Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Battle over military’s gay ban to resume in Congress
Stars and Stripes ^ | 2 March 2009 | Leo Shane III

Posted on 03/02/2009 3:46:23 PM PST by DesertRenegade

WASHINGTON — Congress’ leading opponent of the military’s "don’t ask, don’t tell" policy on Monday reintroduced legislation to allow homosexuals to serve openly in the armed forces.

Rep. Ellen Tauscher, D-Calif., backed a similar measure last year. In a statement Monday, she said the policy has "failed our country and military for 15 years" and hurt readiness by preventing qualified citizens from joining the ranks.

The legislation would remove the current rules preventing homosexuals from serving openly in the military and allow anyone discharged under the policy to apply for reinstatement, though details must be worked out.

More than 12,500 troops have been forced out of the military since the policy was put in place in 1994, according to the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, a lobbying group that opposes the policy.

During his campaign, President Barack Obama pledged to end the ban on homosexuals serving openly, and the White House Web site lists repealing "don’t ask, don’t tell" as a key goal of Obama’s civil rights platform.

"The key test for military service should be patriotism, a sense of duty, and a willingness to serve," the site states. "Discrimination should be prohibited."

But White House officials declined to comment Monday. Tauscher’s office said the president is aware of the legislation but has not yet promised any support.

But Tauscher said she did not feel she should wait for approval from Obama before moving ahead on the issue.

"It’s never too early to right a wrong," she said in a statement.

In July, the House Armed Services Committee held the first congressional hearing on the policy in 15 years.

Democratic and Republican leaders have promised to follow up with more hearings this session, but dates have not been set.

Elaine Donnelly, founder of the conservative Center for Military Readiness, said she believes both lawmakers and Obama will oppose the measure once they begin researching the potential effect on troops’ morale and desire to enlist.

"You’re talking about forced cohabitation with openly sexual homosexuals 24-7, in submarines and close quarters," she said. "This is a volunteer force and you can’t force servicemembers to re-enlist. So it would be a devastating blow when those who disagree decide to leave."

Donnelly also questioned whether the legislation would require chaplains who preach against homosexuality to support a revised policy or leave the service, creating uncomfortable moral mandates.

Nathaniel Frank, author of "Unfriendly Fire: How the Gay Ban Undermines the Military and Weakens America," said his research has found that changing the policy would not undermine unit cohesion, and that conservative members of the military have used their own biases to set anti-homosexual regulations.

"We’ve seen this is such a non-issue when it happens to militaries in foreign countries," he said. "And the climate is so dramatically different now than it was (in the 1990s) that I think you wouldn’t see many issues with a change."

In his book Frank — a researcher at the University of California’s Palm Center, which opposes the policy — argues that the policy will be overturned in the next few years, due to public support for allowing homosexuals to serve.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dadt; homosexualagenda; homosexuality; military; sodomites; sodomy; ucmj
If Obama tries the same little trick as Clinton and try to force social engineering on our men and women in uniform, they are going to reject it big time. When are the liberal elitists going to finally learn that our honorable servicemembers don't want some degenerate lifestyle forced down their throats. No way, no how!
1 posted on 03/02/2009 3:46:24 PM PST by DesertRenegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

How about some common sense?

Clinton tried to force this down everyone’s throat on his 2nd or 3rd day in the White House. There was resistence then and will be again.

I suggest that whatever is done with homosexuals in a military capacity be decided by the military and the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Homosexuality has long been seen as incompatible with the nature of military service.

Bottom line — the military is not like the rest of society, and should not be subjected to the social engineering that takes places in the civilian world.


2 posted on 03/02/2009 4:19:55 PM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Rep. Ellen Tauscher, D-Calif. I dont know much about her, but according to the net she sponsors a lot of gay crap. I guess because her district is so close to San Francisco ,homo capitol of the US.

I can never understand why Homo’s just cant serve and keep their mouths shut,(No pun intended.) Why do they insist on everyone knowing they are queer.


3 posted on 03/02/2009 4:29:50 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

The buffoons in Congress diddle while America rapidly goes into the toilet! Gotta love those Commie DemocRATS! They’ve got their act together. Buffoons!!!


4 posted on 03/02/2009 4:40:32 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Just being a "U.S. citizen" does not make one an American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

Just another way for liberals to attack the military. They hate the military and would love nothing more than destroy it from within.


5 posted on 03/02/2009 9:29:46 PM PST by DirtyHarryY2K (The Tree of Liberty is long overdue for its natural manure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson