Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AP Interview: Transportation secretary says taxing how much we drive may replace gasoline tax
Newsday.com ^ | 7:17 AM EST, February 20, 2009 | JOAN LOWY

Posted on 02/20/2009 7:45:39 AM PST by mmanager

WASHINGTON (AP) — Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood says he wants to consider taxing motorists based on how many miles they drive rather than how much gasoline they burn — an idea that has angered drivers in some states where it has been proposed.

Gasoline taxes that for nearly half a century have paid for the federal share of highway and bridge construction can no longer be counted on to raise enough money to keep the nation's transportation system moving, LaHood said in an interview with The Associated Press.

"We should look at the vehicular miles program where people are actually clocked on the number of miles that they traveled," the former Illinois Republican lawmaker said.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: agenda; bho44; bhodot; gastax; lahood; taxes; taxincrease; teatax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-93 next last
Gosh, when is this all going end?
1 posted on 02/20/2009 7:45:39 AM PST by mmanager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mmanager

Ha! This is GREAT!

Does this mean that little rice burners will now pay the same tax as a gas guzzling suburban for the same miles driven!?

Sweet!


2 posted on 02/20/2009 7:47:16 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mmanager

Doesn’t it result in the same thing? If you drive more miles, you buy more gas.


3 posted on 02/20/2009 7:47:51 AM PST by randita (Starve the beast - earn as little as you can get by on and spend even less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

This means that the Hybrid drivers also get hosed.


4 posted on 02/20/2009 7:47:53 AM PST by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
Does this mean that little rice burners will now pay the same tax as a gas guzzling suburban for the same miles driven!?

Only if you believe that they will rescind the gasoline tax.

Good luck with that...

5 posted on 02/20/2009 7:48:30 AM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mmanager

I think the transportation secretary may have “mis-spoken” on this subject. I am sure what he MEANT to say was “...taxing how much we drive may AUGMENT gasoline tax...”

pres. Obeyme will be speaking with him about his little “mistake” in the near future...


6 posted on 02/20/2009 7:48:40 AM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mmanager

GPS Chip. Go ahead and try.


7 posted on 02/20/2009 7:49:02 AM PST by arealconservativeforachange (Tell JD Hayworth to run for McCain's seat! http://www.jdhayworth.com/contact.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mmanager

Mr. LaHood you are a fool.

We are already taxed on the miles we drive. The more miles we drive the more gas we must buy and the more taxes that are paid.

You are a fool.


8 posted on 02/20/2009 7:49:30 AM PST by MikeWUSAF (Extreme vitriol and rancorous replies served daily. - Mike W USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mmanager

I love the idea of a prius driver paying more for his 100 mile commute than I pay for my gashog SUV 15 mile trip to the supermarket

But it aint gonna happen- Taxpayers will end up with the elevator AND the shaft on this one


9 posted on 02/20/2009 7:49:59 AM PST by silverleaf (Freedom's just another word for "nothing left to lose")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita
Doesn’t it result in the same thing? If you drive more miles, you buy more gas.

Almost. Actually, however, it reduces incentives for fuel-efficiency, in that you get taxed the same regardless of your MPG, which decreases the cost difference between efficient and non-efficient vehicles.

10 posted on 02/20/2009 7:50:28 AM PST by kevkrom ("The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Exactly! That why the robber barons (Socialist Politicians) are changing their MO!


11 posted on 02/20/2009 7:50:32 AM PST by alice_in_bubbaland (Markets and Marxists Don't Mix! Let the Revolution Commence!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mmanager

They are just getting started.

Gas tax, mileage tax, road tax, dog tax, television tax, sewer tax, environmental tax, packaging tax, flying tax, an ever increasing sales tax and .....

all on top of Pork Plan I. (Pork Plan II soon to follow).

Slap your democrap friends around with this (if you still have any).


12 posted on 02/20/2009 7:51:50 AM PST by bergmeid (It's a secret.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mmanager
"Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood says he wants to consider taxing motorists based on how many miles they drive rather than IN ADDITION TO how much gasoline they burn."

fixed.

13 posted on 02/20/2009 7:52:24 AM PST by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mmanager

Stealth tracking ... Orwell at his best


14 posted on 02/20/2009 7:52:47 AM PST by clamper1797 (FUBO ... The Kenyan Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mmanager

Carpooling, but then it will be a tax on the number of people in our cars.


15 posted on 02/20/2009 7:52:50 AM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mmanager

No problem, that GPS chip will have a lovely storage spot on a shelf in my garage. I’ll take it out for the occasional Sunday drive... but that’s that.

Little by little these Obamaphiles will realize what they got themselves into. Voter remorse is on the way.


16 posted on 02/20/2009 7:53:59 AM PST by AbeKrieger (If global warming didn't exist, Al Gore would have had to invent it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
this will be ADDED to the gas tax, and the toll roads....AND the stimulus that is supposed to fix our crumbling roads...
17 posted on 02/20/2009 7:54:41 AM PST by TornadoAlley3 (Obama is everything Oklahoma is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mmanager

1. Stop using gas tax money to pay for “mass transit”
2. Make the people that ride the bus or train pay for it.


18 posted on 02/20/2009 7:54:48 AM PST by sticker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

The real reason the Rats love this(RINOs also), is that it adds to govt bureaucracy. Somebody has to administer and inspect to do this. That will add hundreds of new state jobs with all the big bene’s. Plus hundreds of new inspection stations. Millions in computers and fines etc.
The gas tax is just too easy. Basically, mileage comes down to the weight of the vehicle..heavier worse mileage..and wear and tear on the roads is based on weight and speed..so all an all the “fairest” way to tax is by fuel taxes.


19 posted on 02/20/2009 7:55:15 AM PST by Oldexpat (Drill Here, Drill There..we must drill everywhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Then they will tax walking.


20 posted on 02/20/2009 7:55:23 AM PST by PrincessB (The change he's peddling isn't something I believe in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
Only if you believe that they will rescind the gasoline tax.

Bingo. It's a sucker bet. We'd wind up with both.

21 posted on 02/20/2009 7:55:47 AM PST by Poison Pill (Help, I've voted Republican and I can't get up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

So they will tax electric cars the same as gas-hogs?


22 posted on 02/20/2009 7:55:52 AM PST by ol painless (ol' painless is out of the bag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mmanager
I don't think my 1998 Harley will support a GPS chip.

Something about not enough extra electrical power. ;^)

23 posted on 02/20/2009 7:55:52 AM PST by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mmanager
Gasoline taxes that for nearly half a century have paid for the federal share of highway and bridge construction can no longer be counted on to raise enough money to keep the nation's transportation system moving

Okay, so we'll just cut some welfare spending, right?

RIGHT?

Oh, okay.

24 posted on 02/20/2009 7:56:13 AM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Nihil utile nisi quod honestum - Marcus Tullius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mmanager

Bullcrap!...once they institute this what makes anyone think they will never raise gas taxes again?....it’s the slow stranglehold of socialism to control you!


25 posted on 02/20/2009 7:56:35 AM PST by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mmanager

Park the trucks and make an efficient railroad system happen. Road damage is disproportionate to vehicle weight. If they built the roads correctly and didn’t use salt and didn’t have trucks, the roads would last almost forever. No need to rebuild them every 4 to 5 years.


26 posted on 02/20/2009 7:56:42 AM PST by Paladin2 (No, pundits strongly believe that the proper solution is more dilution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mmanager
replace the golden cow?....with a usage tax?

ya know the old adage..if it sounds too good

yeah until they find out like Bloomberg announced yesterday,
..44,000 NY’ers are paying 50% of the city's taxes..a third of NY’ers don't pay taxes......and what happens when the 44,000 move out because of high taxes?.....oh sh*t, the jig is up....sound familiar?

27 posted on 02/20/2009 7:56:49 AM PST by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mmanager

If they used the portion of the gas and property tax that is supposed to go to roads, instead of putting it all in a general fund, they would have plenty of money to repair the roads. When it goes into a general fund, who knows where the money goes. A general fund is a perfect way to hide money and graft.


28 posted on 02/20/2009 7:56:57 AM PST by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3; Izzy Dunne
taxing how much we drive may replace gasoline tax

My apologies. I thought it was appropriate to respond based on what the article says!

29 posted on 02/20/2009 7:56:58 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mmanager
O'dumbo ain't so dumb. Since turncoat Transportation Secretary La Hood is a (phony) Republican slavishly following the dictates of his master, the Republicans will get blamed as being bipartisan participants in any mileage tax hike punishment mandate.

If this isn't going to be an illegal restriction on interstate commerce (travel) than I'm a monkey's uncle (oops, un-PC choice of words, change immediately to "I'm a monkey's aunt").

Leni

30 posted on 02/20/2009 7:57:23 AM PST by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

Seriously. “Replace”. Hah. When Hell freezes over.


31 posted on 02/20/2009 7:57:54 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

I know what the article said; the question is whether you believe they will do it or not.


32 posted on 02/20/2009 7:58:05 AM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: mmanager
They tried to screw you with toll roads and the public would not buy it, so now this. The goal is a new tax that is easy to raise and hide.
33 posted on 02/20/2009 7:58:32 AM PST by org.whodat (Auto unions bad: Machinists union good=Hypocrisy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arealconservativeforachange

The most likely solution would be to accept the chip or pay quadruple. They will look at the distance you travel daily to and from work and find some formula that punishes you for being productive.

Remember those who live in “government” housing and take “public” transportation that travel on “public” roads would not be subject to the tax.

You must be punished for not feeling guilty about your wealth, sir. Deal with it.


34 posted on 02/20/2009 7:58:48 AM PST by PJammers (I can't help it... It's my idiom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mmanager
Gasoline taxes that for nearly half a century have paid for the federal share of highway and bridge construction can no longer be counted on to raise enough money to keep the nation's transportation system moving, LaHood said in an interview with The Associated Press.

Really?

What was all that "Bust the Highway Trust" stuff about years back? (My recollection is that the gas tax was bringing in a lot more money than they were spending on roads so they wanted to use what was left over for other stuff, i.e. for something other than highways.)

ML/NJ

35 posted on 02/20/2009 7:59:04 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

oops..left out there are 8 million NY’ers


36 posted on 02/20/2009 7:59:14 AM PST by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: PrincessB
"Then they will tax walking."

Then they will tax how much oxygen we inhale and exhale.

Leni

37 posted on 02/20/2009 7:59:38 AM PST by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
Hate is a terrible thing, this tax would be in addition to.
38 posted on 02/20/2009 7:59:38 AM PST by org.whodat (Auto unions bad: Machinists union good=Hypocrisy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mmanager

It won’t replace the gasoline tax,
it will be in addition to the gasoline tax.


39 posted on 02/20/2009 8:00:39 AM PST by MrB (The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mmanager
Regressive tax that will hurt those at the lower end of the scale more. For eample, in major urban areas, many people cannot afford to live in the city or close in suburbs. Hence, they must have long commutes. They will feel the brunt of such taxes. And then there are the privacy issues.

And everyone knows that you create a new tax, but the old one never goes away entirely. There will still be state and local taxes on gasoline and they may increase them once the federal tax is removed.

40 posted on 02/20/2009 8:01:13 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mmanager

Lovely. The socialist 0bama administration is really knocking all of those looney-lefty big government ideas out of the park.

Americans aren’t going to go for this. The idea that these nimrods will be able to track where we are at all times is just plain scary.

I bet they’ll have a chip scanning program and ticket you if you do not have the unit installed... Yet another money grab by the government. Enhanced revenue for all.

Gotta love it though — these dirty hippies yell about fuel efficiency and mandate it. We achieve the goals, and the realize — whoops — less tax revenue.

They raid the ISTEA money for ridiculous pork projects, but don’t have the political will to raise the gas tax because we’d revolt. So they think up a new hair brained scheme to get the revenue instead.

Idiots.


41 posted on 02/20/2009 8:01:52 AM PST by NYRepublican72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797
Stealth tracking ... Orwell at his best

Heck, we're already there. If you carry a cell phone, you're already carrying a personal bugging device and a tracking device. The Feds can turn on the microphone and listen in on you even if you're not making a call.

The FBI appears to have begun using a novel form of electronic surveillance in criminal investigations: remotely activating a mobile phone's microphone and using it to eavesdrop on nearby conversations. The technique is called a "roving bug," and was approved by top U.S. Department of Justice officials for use against members of a New York organized crime family who were wary of conventional surveillance techniques such as tailing a suspect or wiretapping him.

http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1035_22-150467.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cell_phone_tracking

42 posted on 02/20/2009 8:02:33 AM PST by Sax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Don’t forget, as we lose jobs and cannot sell our homes, we will have to drive further to get to the job that pays us less.

And chips are wonderful things. Once a chip is installed, you can adopt the readers for so many things—regulating travel, tolls on what used to be non toll roads, tracking criminals, tracking gun owners, tracking gas guzzlers, tracking just about anything.

And, if the chip is installed at the manufacturing point imagine the bookkeeping nightmares when you sell your car. Change the chip—only at federally regulated places and for $50.

This is the sign of the freaking beast.


43 posted on 02/20/2009 8:02:45 AM PST by Vermont Lt (Ein Volk, Ein Riech, Ein Ein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

last sentence of article....

The devices also could be programmed to charge higher rates to vehicles that are heavier, like trucks that put more stress on roadways, Atkinson said.


44 posted on 02/20/2009 8:02:56 AM PST by TornadoAlley3 (Obama is everything Oklahoma is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: MikeWUSAF

People started buying more fuel efficient vehicles, and lowered the amount of taxes they paid.

Now, you’d think, according to their rhetoric, that they would think this was a good thing - more fuel efficient vehicles on the road.

But, no, instead, they reveal themselves - they want to control and punish your MOVEMENT. This will result, as some have already stated, in people buying

LESS EFFICIENT

vehicles, because they won’t be taxed on the gas they use.

Leftists reveal their intentions sometimes in the policies that they propose. Their intention here is to limit your travel.


45 posted on 02/20/2009 8:03:19 AM PST by MrB (The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: arealconservativeforachange

I see the gps signal blocker market as an investment opportunity. We will jam em.


46 posted on 02/20/2009 8:03:23 AM PST by screaminsunshine (f)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mmanager

The government is trying to become our master. The time is coming to put it back in its place.


47 posted on 02/20/2009 8:04:16 AM PST by Trod Upon (The Left killed my country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

“Then they will tax walking”.....

The Seattle City Council was considering a few creative new taxes awhile back....Taxing shoes and toilet paper!...How much socialism can we stand?....


48 posted on 02/20/2009 8:04:44 AM PST by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: randita

“...Doesn’t it result in the same thing? If you drive more miles, you buy more gas....”

We’re talking politicians here. They are not only not the sharpest knife in the drawer, they are tubules of excrement.


49 posted on 02/20/2009 8:05:01 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mmanager

Yes. Three obvious conclusions.

1. This will be an additional tax, not a replacement for tax per gallon.

2. This will require a new bureaucracy, belonging to the gov employees union, for which they can hire their family and friends for secure jobs at a time when everyone is being thrown out of work.

3. This will be a wonderful way to spy on people by keeping records of when and where they drive, in exact detail. Not quite as good as an embedded chip, but that’s coming later as part of the medical tracking plan that was included in the Porkulus bill.


50 posted on 02/20/2009 8:05:09 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson