Posted on 02/03/2009 5:50:47 PM PST by Diana in Wisconsin
When Michael Steele ran for Maryland's open U.S. Senate in 2006, his backers hired 300 mostly poor African-Americans from Philadelphia -- most if not all of them unemployed, many of them homeless -- fed them doughnuts and then packed the crew onto Trailways buses for an Election Day trip that would make a bit of political history.
The buses, which were draped in banners for Steele and Maryland Gov. Robert Ehrlich, headed across the state line into Maryland, where the day laborers were dispatched to predominantly African-American neighborhoods of the city of Baltimore and populous Prince George's County.
They spent Election Day handing out glossy fliers headlined "Democratic Sample Ballot" or "Official Voter Guide." The fliers employed the phrase "Ehrlich-Steele Democrats." And they featured images of prominent African-Americans, such as former Democratic congressman and NAACP leader Kweisi Mfume, above the words: "These are our choices."
The implication that Mfume and other popular Democrats in the state were backing Steele and Ehrlich was hard to miss.
But Mfume wasn't backing the "Ehrlich-Steele Democrats" ticket.
Steele and Ehrlich weren't running as Democrats.
Both men were Republicans. And, despite what the group Progressive Maryland described as a campaign of "Lies, Dirty Tricks, and Fraudulent Fliers Designed to Deceive African-American Voters," they both lost.
Now, however, one of them, Steele, is the new chairman of the Republican National Committee.
The former lieutenant governor of Maryland, who has long been a favorite Republican commentator on Fox News and other conservative programs, won the backing of committee members who gathered in Washington Friday after promising to renew the sagging Grand Old Party.
Steele, an arguably able political player who has for many years been one of the GOP's highest-profile African-American leaders, pitched himself for the chairmanship by suggesting that he could put a positive face on a party that has seemed in recent years to be more interested in circling the conservative wagons than in attracting new voters.
Steele promises to engage in "outreach."
But what will the outreach look like?
What sort of politics will Steele practice as RNC chair?
If past is prologue, this 2006 article from the Washington Post may prove instructive.
As Post writers Matthew Mosk and Avis Thomas-Lester noted: "Republican leaders have defended the Election Day episode as an accepted element of bare-knuckle politics. But for many voters, it shattered in one day the nice-guy images Ehrlich and Steele had cultivated for years."
Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley was blunter: "I think it's pretty low that Ehrlich and Steele would print up a fake ballot and bus in unemployed people and exploit them. It doesn't get much lower than that."
Hey! That's the way we Liberals do it! Cheater! Cheater!
*SMIRK*
But it’s perfectly fine if Democrats do that and worse, I mean digging up dead people to vote! Al Frankin.... need I say more.
If true, this story is hilarious.
From the land of LBJ and GWB, the irony is GREAT!
They are pissed because ACORN did not get the gig.
If I didn't say that well, please forgive. My blood still boils when I think about it.
I hope Steele understands the uses and practicality of everything from a pocket knife to a cavalry sword, when it comes to dispatching his adversaries ... politically speaking, of course.
Actually, Maryland has a lot of black Republicans, but even more black Democrats.
Doggone it, Maryland has one of the highest percentages of black residents in the United States (30%). Everywhere you go you turn around and there goes some of 'em. Darndest phenomenon you ever did see.
So, is the article fake? Probably, but is it true? Not a bit.
In fact, this story is a compound of several stories. The group traveling around in a bus is actually about a NAACP/DNC campaign team who would go to every Steele gathering and toss Oreo Cookies at him.
That's what Democrats do ~ RACISM!
The folks in Madistan play ignorant lackeys to Maryland's Democrats.
This whole article is a crock of meadow muffuns. He “exploited” unemployed homeless people by “hiring” them. The flyer said the people handing them out were “Democrats for Steele/Erlich”. They WERE! There were pictures of Dims and Pubs on it. No big suprise there!
Michael Steele on Civil Rights ![]() |
Click here for OR .
|
This is either satire or just absurd. Liberals live in some odd alternative universe.
I see that site has ad for Alan Keyes, they guy who had a chance to take out Obama when he ran for Sen. and didn’t, couldn’t and never could win office. The ever famous gadfly.
Steele is conservative, a sharp mind, and the type of person that can take on the Liberals.
A person who actually won office, Lt. Gov.
“The folks in Madistan play ignorant lackeys to Maryland’s Democrats.”
And they take great, ignorant pride in it too, LOL!
Now, why didn’t I think to throw Oreos at 0bama when he was in town? *SMIRK*
(I never would, no matter how Empty I find that Suit.)
I’ve been blessed to have parents that took in Exchange Students from all over the world from the time I was a toddler on. Mombay? He was funny and very, very smart with a smile like the Cheshire Cat. Oh. He was BLACK?
Usha? She was BEAUTIFUL beyond description and smelled like lavender and honey and gave us girls beautiful glass bangles to wear on our wrists that sounded like music when we shook them. She was BROWN? Who knew?
Sayko? She was tall and slender with gorgeous, shiny black hair that we would brush for hours on end. She was YELLOW? Who knew? LOL!
Not to mention people from every race and ethnicity that served with me and under me in the Army for 20 years. (Best Man at my wedding? From Sri Lanka. *SHRUG*)
Skin color means nothing to me. Character & kindness & intelligence means everything to me. And I am the most boring white woman you’ll ever meet! :)
But, I guess I am a Bad Person because I Hate Liberals; of any color, LOL!
Anybody who thinks the 2nd Amendment is about hunting or self-defense has his head where the sun don’t shine. It is strictly about being able to enforce “When in the course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands that have connected them with another, ...”
Hunting, skeet, trap, self-defense, etc are fringe benefits.
“This is either satire or just absurd. Liberals live in some odd alternative universe.”
No, it’s just the mentally ill John Nichols. Really. The guy is whack. Google his name if you have the stomach to do so.
“...except maybe what the ‘Rats did in IL, unsealing court records in a divorce case to use to smear the ‘Pub opponent.”
Yep. Ryan. And look who’s President now! *SHUDDER*
What do you make of this and the Steele chairmanship for the GOP?
What do you make of this and the Steele chairmanship of the GOP?
That's Madistan...to a tee.
Society should draw lines. What do you need an assault weapon for, if you're going hunting? That's overkill. But I don't think that means you go to a total ban for those who want to use gun for skeet shooting or hunting or things like that. But what's the point of passing gun laws if we're not going to enforce them? If you want to talk about gun control, that's where you need to start. We've got 300 gun laws on the books right now. At the end of the day, it's about how we enforce the law.
Source: Washington Post interview Oct 16, 2006
Nothing, typical media ‘dirtying up’.
Steele was hired for the media. He’s a smooth talker.
I hope he’s a hard worker too.
But it was okay for Liberals to call Steele an Oreo?
Remember, the Post campaigned against Senator Allen's mother that same year because she was Jewish during WWII.
Unless you heard Steele say it himself, and he was engaged in a discussion with you ~ not giving a canned speech before a Demo-fascist audience (Maryland has a lot of that kind) ~ then you don't know.
It struck a memory chord to see Matthew Mosk named in the piece. IIRC, he was the only person who admitted logging into Free Republic under the screen name Md4Bush - a user who caused a little trouble for Ehrlich. One still wonders if he was the only person logging in as such.
This may be a unique opportunity to build a relationship or a bridge between the conservatives and the moderates in our party and so she asked me to serve on her board and I said well this will be good. Itll be a pro-life conservative voice on a board with a pro-choice leadership that is looking to elect moderates. We have to elect moderates in the party.From "Michael Steele to his Conservative Critics: Wake Up People!" (David Brody interview, CBN News). So obviously, he would talk one thing and do the other, as mentioned about the "board" in the quote above--the kind of tactic that I've not been surprised about since the Giuliani Putsch.
Again, the problem is it's the Washington Post claiming that Steele said something in an interview. As a general rule anything the Post says someone said should be discounted unless you get two other independent sources.
And then there is Eric Holder...As a top Obama adviser, Holder...In a radio appearance last week, Michael Steele, a Holder supporter who is a candidate to become head of the Republican National Committee, explained this, er, strategy. We have to be smart about picking our battles, he told a disgruntled conservative caller. Steele asked, is there any real chance of beating Holder? When she conceded there was not, he replied, with evident self-satisfaction: Why would I want to get into a fight we cant win? He then spoke vapidly about how it was more important to get Holder in power: that, you see, is when we really get to confront him on issues. Somewhere, President Obama was smiling.
He's the kind of lawyer who always assumes his client is guilty ~ so if something bad happens, e.g. a murder, and there could possibly be any involvement in it by someone in the White House, or on the Cabinet, he will move to protect whoever he thinks is the bad guy.
You think we can't use that against the Democrats?!
Our best bet is to make sure Holder keeps that job for a good long time. Sure, we'll eventually be able to have him sent to jail, but as long as the day to day business in DOJ is run by the permanent bureaucracy, there's no real problem in this for us.
Let Holder do his stupidest and we'll reap great political rewards.
Steele is good. Steele is strong. Just what we need right now. Believe in him but let us not let him go without plenty of uproar and guidance from us, the Republic of America...Michael will guide those who tell him where we need to go.
"I can chart and captain ye this vessel, for I fear the seas naught...but I need thee to tell me thine intended port of debarkation!"
I know you're probably right, but somehow I wonder if those DOJ folks might not be better-suited to being Wal-Mart greeters or some such thing.
You mean he GAVE THEM MONEY to actually DO SOMETHING?!
Something the 'Rats DIDN'T WANT THEM TO DO?! OMG!!!
What is the world coming to?
How LOW can one man GO? He GAVE them MONEY!!!! OMG OMG OMG!!
lolol
"What do you need an assault weapon for, if you're going hunting? That's overkill."
Actually, an "assault weapon" is "underkill" for some game. Elk, moose, bear. You need a lot more gun, if you're trying to defend yourself against a top predator.
People, especially Democrat polemicists, tend to equate these Militia weapons (esp. when fully automatic) with recoilless rifles or something.
Much hotter cartridges are used by big-game and "tropical" rifles. Tons more energy. Except for rifles in .50 BMG, even snipers using military sniper rifles are using .30-cal. rifles of some description -- .308 or .30-06 as a rule.
Even the scary-looking Russian Dragunov SVD sniper rifle, permanent resident of the 'Rats hate-list, is just another semiautomatic .30-cal. rifle, like the venerable Browning Automatic Rifle that someone's grandfather took on deer hunts in the 1940's. The fact is, neither rifle is quite enough gun to go after big elk, and "assault-rifle" ammo is a step down from most of the .30-cal. rounds.
Russert invites Steele to dis-elect himself, to bump himself off, in a race in a very liberal State by posing Roe vs. Wade as a litmus test. Russert is trying to help the 'Rats beat Steele, is why he put that question to him.
Chris Wallace just wants Republicans to fight amongst themselves, so that's why he brought up that quote about knocking people down.
Yep. I live on a high and windy mountain basin, so .338 Win Mag is nice.
Also M-1A's I think. Guy just loves those .338 Mags. More bang for the buck.
And I guess you're equipped to defend yourself against an ornery grizz, too.
I didn’t know about the M-1s. Savage is relatively low-priced, good and very accurate for the money. I like the .338 because of the long distances with little or no concealment (trees) and performance in wind. ...less windage guessing. .300 Win Mag’s good, too, for those who miss because of .338 recoil and noise—versatile enough to make the girls happy and accurate enough with the right loads.
Maryland “Freak State” PING!
You owe me a new pair of sweatpants!
What the Democrats needed was cooboration ~ not the initial story.
WHat I find interesting is the knee-jerk reaction to the idea that anyone needed to "smear" a guy who visits S&M clubs ~ seems to me that sort of behavior "smears" all by itself.
Best to not do that anymore.
Well, I’m not saying I would’ve voted for Ryan either, LOL!
If you can get yourself close to a herd ~ (there are numerous techniques for this) ~ you just walk up and grab a cow by the antlers and she will stand there and let you do anything you want.
Because it would have been prosecuted as a "hate crime?"
Selective prosecution is the other side's stock in trade. Just ask Henry Waxman.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.