Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California's 'Green Jobs' Experiment Isn't Going Well
Wall St. Journal ^ | January 31, 2009

Posted on 01/30/2009 9:16:44 PM PST by Steelfish

JANUARY 31, 2009

California's 'Green Jobs' Experiment Isn't Going Well

By STEPHEN MOORE

Los Angeles

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger was all smiles in 2006 when he signed into law the toughest anti-global-warming regulations of any state.

Mr. Schwarzenegger and his green supporters boasted that the regulations would steer California into a prosperous era of green jobs, renewable energy, and technological leadership. Instead, since 2007 -- in anticipation of the new mandates --

California has led the nation in job losses.

The regulations created a cap-and-trade system, similar to proposed federal global-warming measures, by limiting the CO2 that utilities, trucking companies and other businesses can emit, and imposed steep new taxes on companies that exceed the caps.

Since energy is an input in everything that's produced, this will raise the cost of production inside California's borders.

Now, as the Golden State prepares to implement this regulatory scheme, employers are howling. It's become clear to nearly everyone that the plan's backers have underestimated its negative impact and exaggerated the benefits. "We've been sold a false bill of goods," is how Republican Assemblyman Roger Niello, who has been the GOP's point man on environmental issues in the legislature, put it to me.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: ab32; arnoldlegacy; california; climatechange; economy; globalwarming; greengovernor; greenjobs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

1 posted on 01/30/2009 9:16:44 PM PST by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Mr. Schwarzenegger and his green supporters boasted that the regulations would steer California into a prosperous era of green jobs, renewable energy, and technological leadership.

Instead, since 2007 -- in anticipation of the new mandates -- California has led the nation in job losses.

What are the odds.

2 posted on 01/30/2009 9:18:50 PM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
CAUSE:

The environmental plan was built on the notion that imposing some $23 billion of new taxes and fees on households (through higher electricity bills) and employers will cost the economy nothing, while also reducing greenhouse gases.

Meet EFFECT:

Meanwhile, the state is losing jobs, a lot of them. California's unemployment rate hit 9.3% in December, up from 4.9% in December 2006. There are now 1.5 million Californians out of work. The state has the fourth-highest housing foreclosure rate in the nation, has lost more businesses than any state in recent years, and is facing a $40 billion deficit. With cap and trade firmly in place, the economic situation is only likely to get worse.

3 posted on 01/30/2009 9:20:17 PM PST by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
The study concludes that the plan "will not only significantly reduce California's greenhouse gas emissions, but will also have a net positive effect on California's economic growth through 2020."

You would have to have been truly psychotic to believe this.

4 posted on 01/30/2009 9:21:02 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

A Santa Monica customer I met with today is starting a new business and is incorporating in Nevada because California business laws absolutely stifle and discourage starting businesses in California.


5 posted on 01/30/2009 9:22:11 PM PST by A message
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
"We've been sold a false bill of goods" -- Republican Assemblyman Roger Niello.

For crying out loud, anybody with a basic understanding of science and economics and a good dollop of common sense knew exactly how this would turn out. If Nielio is really this stupid, he should be a Demoncrat.

6 posted on 01/30/2009 9:24:53 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Mega-Rino idiot Schwarzenegger and the utterly corrupt, incompetent democrat oligarchy are systematically destroying California.


7 posted on 01/30/2009 9:27:15 PM PST by FormerACLUmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish; Jim Robinson; ElkGroveDan; calcowgirl; tubebender; hedgetrimmer; forester; marsh2; ...
""We've been sold a false bill of goods," is how Republican Assemblyman Roger Niello, who has been the GOP's point man on environmental issues in the legislature, put it to me." (emphasis added by SierraWasp)

Praise God from whom all blessings flow!!!

There is STILL a microscopic bit of sanity left in the once blessed state of California!!! Haleluyah!!! (did I spell that right? I ain't that much of a Holyroller, ya know)

8 posted on 01/30/2009 9:28:06 PM PST by SierraWasp (The Jim Jones of the 21st Century is now POTUS!!! Premier 0bama the illegitimate!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

It doesn’t matter what any Republican says. After any truthful information is processed by the liberal lobbying groups, liberal press in San Francisco and LA, and digested by citizens that are educated by one of the worst secondary school systems in the US; this is will all be George Bush’s fault, even if he is no longer the president.


9 posted on 01/30/2009 9:28:23 PM PST by DiogenesLaertius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish; All
Here's what I would do to fix California's economy.

1. Completely eliminate the California Air Resources Board. These people are the most useless group imaginable. They are a total duplication of the EPA and they cost the state of California Billions both directly and indirectly every year.
2. Build 6 (at least) new Nuclear Power Plants (units). But 2 units at Diablo Canynon. 2 at the Rancho Seca site and 2 new units in the So. CA area. This would create thousands of new jobs-good jobs that would be productive.

Just these two things along would be a good start.
10 posted on 01/30/2009 9:29:49 PM PST by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
If Nielio is really this stupid, he should be a Demoncrat.

Nielio I believe was the lone Republican that did not sign the no tax pledge other state Republicans recently signed. He is that stupid and is pretty likely to sign on to the 14 billion in new state taxes.

11 posted on 01/30/2009 9:30:48 PM PST by A message
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Arnold Schwarzenegger-Kennedy is a joke, too bad it is on
the few fine people still left in this once great state.
12 posted on 01/30/2009 9:32:15 PM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (!yaw gnorw eht su gnikat si noitartsinimdA amabO ehT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthguy

Keep Dreamin’ Won’t happen so long as CA consists of little socialist republics like Santa Monica, Santa Cruz, San Francisco, Santa Barbara


13 posted on 01/30/2009 9:34:16 PM PST by Steelfish (Our Winning Video)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Hey new england asshats that voted for Obama,dems and rinos!

Please don’t come to my state looking for jobs just because your madhatter liberal bi-partisan crap has utterly failed in your state.
I know it is tempting, because we actually have a good economy in these tough times and our state is run by fiscal conservatives. Make no mistake..we don’t want your kind.

Got It?


14 posted on 01/30/2009 9:38:47 PM PST by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Here's the rub:

Due to their vast wealth, the Hollywood elites who are on board with this erroneous thinking will be the last to feel the pinch from this. Since their representative at the federal level, Henry Waxman, is Chairman of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and since President Obama shares his views, and since these Hollywood elites aren't going to turn on Waxman anytime soon, if ever......

Soon we will be seeing similar measures enacted at the federal level. Never mind that even without this preposterous nonsense, our economic situation is only worsening to the point where it could be catastrophic.

I am comforted by the fact that both sides of my family own farmland on which crops and livestock are raised, so that we may have the opportunity to continue to eat.

15 posted on 01/30/2009 9:39:08 PM PST by squidly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthguy
Build 6 (at least) new Nuclear Power Plants (units)...

Government's role is not as an employer.

If government wants to relax environmental standards and allow the private sector to build these facilities, fine. But, government shouldn't impose utility rates that artificially enrich utility investors.

I think you'll find, even with relaxed standards, nuclear power still isn't competitive in a free market.

16 posted on 01/30/2009 9:40:24 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
“We've been sold a false bill of goods,” is how Republican Assemblyman Roger Niello, who has been the GOP’s point man on environmental issues in the legislature”

Sounds like a RINO (Assemblyman Roger Niello) has finally awoken to the friggin this pig in a poke scam Arnold and the other RINOs have bought into .

And they signed their party's name to the bill. See what putting bipartisanship above principles means...guilt by association.

GOP... the Stupid party.

17 posted on 01/30/2009 9:41:46 PM PST by RedMonqey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

Yeah...and now Bambi wants to basically implement this across the country.....swell.


18 posted on 01/30/2009 9:43:04 PM PST by goodnesswins (Tell the truth - GOEBBELIZATION (propaganda) is what many voters suffer from.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: squidly
I am comforted by the fact that both sides of my family own farmland on which crops and livestock are raised, so that we may have the opportunity to continue to eat.

Hopefully you have many strong draft animals, because you won't be able to find diesel at any price for your tractors, harvesters and crop driers. Maybe you can use your manual labor on a 1-acre plot to feed your family.

19 posted on 01/30/2009 9:43:34 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Who would have guessed . A big NO DUH !!!


20 posted on 01/30/2009 9:44:06 PM PST by Deetes (God Bless the Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson