Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'I won': GOP words to live by
Politico ^ | 1/29/09 4:41 AM EST | HUGH HEWITT

Posted on 01/29/2009 7:20:43 AM PST by pillut48

"I won."

When President Barack Obama used those words to reply to Republican objections to the massive spending bill working its way through Congress, he did much more than deliver a good laugh line and declare the GOP proposals irrelevant.

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 111th; bho2009; bho44; bhostimulus; economy; hewitt; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-75 next last
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
Photo: AP
"Obama also signaled to us all that the campaign talk about bipartisanship and 'a new way' was just the clever rhetoric of a highly choreographed campaign." (Photo caption)

Hugh Hewitt nails this phony 'unifier' to the wall! What was the phrase they used to insult President Bush with? "All hat, no cattle"--perfect description of HolyO!!
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

1 posted on 01/29/2009 7:20:43 AM PST by pillut48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pillut48

Elections have consequences, and the GOP threw the last two away due to stupidity.

We now get to live with the results for at least four years.


2 posted on 01/29/2009 7:22:32 AM PST by Badeye (There are no 'great moments' in Moderate Political History. Only losses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Badeye

I am really amused by the whining taking place on the Republican side. When the Repubs held the high ground they felt rather full of themselves. Now they are shut out and want to complain about the victors talking some trash.


3 posted on 01/29/2009 7:24:28 AM PST by misterrob (Smooth talkers win at singles bars and in politics .. often with similar outcomes for the listener)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Badeye
Elections have consequences, and the GOP threw the last two away due to stupidity. We now get to live with the results for at least four years.

Not necessarily, some people fight better when their backs are against the wall.

4 posted on 01/29/2009 7:25:52 AM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: misterrob

Hmmmmm. I’d say those most given to what you are saying have either retired, or got fired, the past two election cycles.


5 posted on 01/29/2009 7:26:06 AM PST by Badeye (There are no 'great moments' in Moderate Political History. Only losses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: madison10

If you are a House Rep, your back is always against the wall due to the election cycle being every two years.

But I see your point, to a certain extent.


6 posted on 01/29/2009 7:26:58 AM PST by Badeye (There are no 'great moments' in Moderate Political History. Only losses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pillut48

America lost.


7 posted on 01/29/2009 7:27:26 AM PST by Senator Goldwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pillut48
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
[apologies to LOLcats] :-)
8 posted on 01/29/2009 7:28:46 AM PST by pillut48 (CJ in TX --"God help us all, and God help America!!" --my new mantra for the next 4 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Badeye

I think a lot of the House repubs are actually pretty good. The problem is ACORN will now have unlimited funds and libs keep the same garbage like Pelosi, Waxman and Frank in forever.


9 posted on 01/29/2009 7:30:16 AM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Senator Goldwater

Big time!


10 posted on 01/29/2009 7:30:32 AM PST by Obadiah (The orgasm has replaced the cross as the focus of longing and fulfillment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Badeye

imho, it was not stupidity. Instead it was deliberate. There was no way John Sidney McCain could win.


11 posted on 01/29/2009 7:30:34 AM PST by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pillut48
Many voters didn’t think they were voting for an “I won” kind of guy,

They also didn't know they were voting for a "Hussein" kind of guy. ....or a guy who has close associations with terrorists and black nationalists. They were so enamored by his "style" and skin color they didn't want to know anything else.

12 posted on 01/29/2009 7:33:07 AM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pillut48

“We won” Those two words represent an arrogance in the political world, or the White House, I have never before seen.

Those two words will be the rally point of the new conservative. They may have won. But being on the top only leaves them one way to fall. And they are going to be the ultimate losers. Unfortunately a lot of American people are going to lose because of that arrogance.

Obama never had any intention of working across the aisle. He wants the Republicans to capitulate to his whim so he will not be solely responsible when he fails.

Way to Go Republicans!! Gon’t give them effers an inch more.


13 posted on 01/29/2009 7:33:14 AM PST by o_zarkman44 (Since when is paying more, but getting less, considered Patriotic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: misterrob

When Nancy Pelosi and Dems. took over in 2006, the unemployment rate was low, and the only talk of bad economic things on the horizon was from the Republicans trying to get Barney Frank and Chris Dodd, Nancy and crew to look and see that Fannie & Freddie were disasters waiting to happen. To no avail. The truth was that the Democrats were pitching a hissy fit to get rid of “Bush”, and they were willing to crash this economy and ruin this country to do it. - Now that the Obamassiah is calling the shots along with Nancy, Frank and Dodd, oh, things ARE going to get worse before they get better, and IF they get better, it will be in spite of the Democrat’s outrageous spending debacles - not because of them. Of course, they mean well, because it’s their BIRTHRIGHT to rule and tax us to death.


14 posted on 01/29/2009 7:33:35 AM PST by Twinkie (TWO WRONGS DON'T MAKE A RIGHT!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: apocalypto

Of course there wasn’t any way McCain could win a national election cycle.

He proved that in the 2000 primaries, and in the 2008 primaries, where he only garnered 37% of Republican votes.


15 posted on 01/29/2009 7:33:55 AM PST by Badeye (There are no 'great moments' in Moderate Political History. Only losses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pillut48
"I won." - Barack Obama

"What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul?" - Jesus Christ

16 posted on 01/29/2009 7:36:46 AM PST by EternalVigilance (God is watching and listening.)(The Personhood Imperative: www.BanAbortionNOW.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: misterrob
You should be much better informed about rule changes made by Repubs when they were in power regarding the minority and what changes the San Francisco socialist made. I think your comment is ill thought out.

Nam Vet

17 posted on 01/29/2009 7:37:38 AM PST by Nam Vet (This space for rent............Hard currency only)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pillut48

It is too bad Bush and the GOP did not live by this rule when they had the chance.


18 posted on 01/29/2009 7:38:47 AM PST by pnh102 (Save America - Ban Ethanol Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: misterrob
I am really amused by the whining taking place on the Republican side. When the Repubs held the high ground they felt rather full of themselves. Now they are shut out and want to complain about the victors talking some trash.

What exactly is an appropriate response? "Oh, how wonderful"?

I don't see it as whining. The Republicans have shocked me by taking that silly line personally, and are actually behaving as they should.

As opposed to the dems you seem to think acted appropriately, who, when they were the underdogs, called Republicans Fascists, divisive, war mongers, stupid, etc. So I don't see their behavior as somehow more honorable than the Republicans', which is to respond to trash talk by finding their principles.

I don't see that as whining but as an appropriate response to the president's childishness.

19 posted on 01/29/2009 7:39:17 AM PST by Darkwolf377 (Pro-Life American Atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Badeye; SierraWasp; BOBTHENAILER; Ernest_at_the_Beach; BIGLOOK; Miss Marple; Liz

“Elections have consequences, and the GOP threw the last two away due to stupidity. We now get to live with the results for at least four years.”

‘When President Barack Obama used those words to reply to Republican objections to the massive spending bill working its way through Congress, he did much more than deliver a good laugh line and declare the GOP proposals irrelevant.’

Yep, the insane ones, who post here and claim to be conservatives, but want to lose elections to the rats to teach us a lesson have a lot to be happy about as our nation teters on the edge of the abyss. The downfall started with the first “lesson” giving control of congress to Pelosi Galore and Reid the Red in the 2006 election.

The grim reality is simple. When you lose elections, you have no power and become “Irrelevant! “


20 posted on 01/29/2009 7:39:21 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Does Zer0 have any friends, who are not criminals or foriegn or domestic terrorists or both?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pillut48
Keep asking Mitt Romney, Mike Huckabee, Sarah Palin, Tim Pawlenty, Bobby Jindal and other senior GOP figures to appear alongside you in D.C to make points and guide press coverage.

Fixed.

21 posted on 01/29/2009 7:39:27 AM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

AMEN!!


22 posted on 01/29/2009 7:42:15 AM PST by pillut48 (CJ in TX --"God help us all, and God help America!!" --my new mantra for the next 4 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: madison10

I wonder...

Remember Monty Python’s knight whose arms, etc, were cut off? How can the Republicans fight when the Democraps don’t need their votes at all?


23 posted on 01/29/2009 7:42:36 AM PST by Ex-Democrat Dean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pillut48

“Elections have consequences.” So true, this one more so than any in history, and all of them will be bad unless Republicans figure out how to get their act together and win the next two.


24 posted on 01/29/2009 7:43:21 AM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

Until the Republicans voted in unison against the faux stimulus package, I would agree completely.

Now...I’m going to take a ‘watch and see’ attitude.


25 posted on 01/29/2009 7:44:25 AM PST by Badeye (There are no 'great moments' in Moderate Political History. Only losses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: misterrob

I think it behooves us to pay attention and point out that Obama says one thing (bipartisanship—a new sort of politics) and does something entirely different (I won). Your mileage may vary but the word needs to be out there. You don’t expect the MSM to say anything do you?


26 posted on 01/29/2009 7:46:06 AM PST by brytlea (You can fool enough of the people enough of the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Badeye

Agreed. Total stupidity in the last 4 years.


27 posted on 01/29/2009 7:49:59 AM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: misterrob
I am really amused by the whining taking place on the Republican side. When the Repubs held the high ground they felt rather full of themselves. Now they are shut out and want to complain about the victors talking some trash.

Indeed - they spent like sailors on leave during the Bush tenure and now whine about the fiscal irresponsibility of the bailout(s). They used the whole Bush presidency to lob money at well-lobbied companies. And we still have this recession. Does anyone finally get that federal spending of money it does not have is counter-productive???

I would hope the lesson has been learned but am afriad it has not been. I base this on the silence here on FR about creative ways to revive industry in the USA. You can't have money unless you create goods or services of real value. And yet, where is the Pubbie that has proposed getting government off the backs of people who want to create jobs, refine oil, refine coal, etc?

28 posted on 01/29/2009 7:50:55 AM PST by Puddleglum (this space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ex-Democrat Dean

If they use it properly, they still have the ability to reach voters. They need to POUND on every mistake that makes things worse. I hardly expect them to do this, but they should. And they should never let the Dems and Obama use them for cover, as he’s trying to do on this stimulus bill. Of course, it’s an uphill battle, but they need to fight it.


29 posted on 01/29/2009 7:53:05 AM PST by brytlea (You can fool enough of the people enough of the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Right again. They will control the votes through funded fraud and we will be paying endlessly for their stimulation.


30 posted on 01/29/2009 7:54:28 AM PST by mcshot ("prepare to ditch" Sully 01/09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: brytlea
This concrete plan layed out by Hewitt is a must-read and must-follow. PASS THIS ON! Email it to your Congressmen!
31 posted on 01/29/2009 7:54:52 AM PST by ensignbay (*** http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/we-demand-true-conservative-leadership.html ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44
Those two words will be the rally point of the new conservative. They may have won. But being on the top only leaves them one way to fall. And they are going to be the ultimate losers. Unfortunately a lot of American people are going to lose because of that arrogance.

It's our duty to conduct a scorched earth policy against these liberal Fascists, similar to that conducted by the Soviets in their retreat before the invading German armies in 1941.

The Leftists have swiftly become as arrogant as those Germans were all those years ago, and seem to be comporting themselves in much the same manner.

We don't have to cooperate.

Cut your spending to the bone. Every nickel you deny to their "stimulus" is a victory.

If you try to make any money right now, they're just going to steal it to spread around to their non-taxpaying voting base.

32 posted on 01/29/2009 7:55:15 AM PST by an amused spectator (Citizen Kenyan: Commander in The Effort Against Culturally-Influenced Misbehavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pillut48

This shows that the GOP needs a set. Every one of the people in that room won. Otherwise they wouldn’t be there. Duh!


33 posted on 01/29/2009 7:56:56 AM PST by HungarianGypsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator

Extra money= ammo and survival food.

Nothing else for the socialist economy in this house.


34 posted on 01/29/2009 7:57:39 AM PST by o_zarkman44 (Since when is paying more, but getting less, considered Patriotic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Ex-Democrat Dean

The Dems don’t need their votes, but we need to see that they are at least on OUR side. There is a record of those votes and someday it may matter when they come up for reelection.


35 posted on 01/29/2009 7:58:13 AM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: pillut48

I really would like to slap that chit eating grin off his face that he always seems to give.


36 posted on 01/29/2009 8:00:12 AM PST by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Badeye
Elections have consequences, and the GOP threw the last two away due to stupidity.

Indeed!
GWB: "I'm a uniter, not a divider!"

BO: "I won!"

37 posted on 01/29/2009 8:07:16 AM PST by meandog (The two named Bush get the bird from this hand!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mcshot

ACORN will insure that reparations will be in every stimulus bill they pass every 6 months or so. They just don’t call it that. ACORN is filled with illegal aliens too like their sister griup the SEIU union.


38 posted on 01/29/2009 8:08:23 AM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: pillut48

Any house member won their seat as well and is there to represent his district. This pompous ass believes that because he won the presidency that no one has a say in the process. This just goes to show you his arrogance or his ignorance. (I believe the former attribute is a product of the later.)


39 posted on 01/29/2009 8:09:08 AM PST by UpInArms (no failure, no success, only slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10

Also important is to remind the Blue Dogs that they hail from conservative districts (indeed, Queen Nancy had them run as conservatives to get them elected). These districts need to hold the Blue Dogs feet to the fire.


40 posted on 01/29/2009 8:10:59 AM PST by Right Cal Gal (Abraham Lincoln would have let Berkeley leave the Union without a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Twinkie

Look at a chart of the S&P 500.

June 2008 - Obama gets the nomination and we start down.
October 2008 - when McCain’s polls numbers are awful BIG down.
Nov 2-4 2008 - a little rally because McCain closed in the polls.
Nov 6 after the election down more.

The market collapsed because the fear Obama is a marxist. People with any money or businesses have ZERO confidence in Obama.


41 posted on 01/29/2009 8:12:08 AM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Yep, the insane ones, who post here and claim to be conservatives, but want to lose elections to the rats to teach us a lesson have a lot to be happy about as our nation teters on the edge of the abyss. The downfall started with the first “lesson” giving control of congress to Pelosi Galore and Reid the Red in the 2006 election.

There was a large measure of that, yes.

But examining the history of these things over the last many years on Free Republic, I'm beginning to believe that an Obama or his like was inevitable.

The combination of the illegal donations flowing in the back door to the Obama campaign, and the BILLIONS of dollars in free advertising from the Obama-worshipping media was unstoppable. I know that you're a media watcher also, and I know that I've NEVER seen anything like what went down in the last two months of the election.

On the bright? side, I also think that the September meltdown "got some help", and the "helpers" didn't really understand the full consequences of what they were doing.

The only way we're going to be able to take back the Republic is by denying the liberal Fascists any sort of aid and comfort in their attempts to get the "easy-money consumer economy" back on track.

They thought they could have this little hiccup, scare everybody, and then go back to the good ol' housing bubble, the good ol' credit card bubble, and all the other bubbles.

Us old-fashioned idiots knew all along that they were spending beyond their means, and wondered what wrong with OURSELVES that we couldn't get with the easy-money program.

Well, right now, this is the ONLY time they're going to be vulnerable. If they get their program back on track, you might as well sign your property, paycheck, children and grandchildren over to them. So, it's time to fight.

42 posted on 01/29/2009 8:12:25 AM PST by an amused spectator (Citizen Kenyan: Commander in The Effort Against Culturally-Influenced Misbehavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: pillut48
As far as I am concerned...he's right. He won. That's true. He won because we 1) ran a disaster of a candidate; 2) Mucked up the whole works by abandoning our principles as a party via Bush and his compassionate big government and 3) have allowed the dems and their media accomplices to paint us as people we are not.

He won...let them (the dems) run this country into the ground ALONE and BY THEMSELVES and we will be the voice of opposition. What will happen is they will be like Carter all over again. What goes around comes around. Hopefully in four years...we can sweep the whole bunch out and then govern from our principles and NOT ABANDON THEM under scrutiny or fear of being called names.

THEN...hopefully...someone with some stones...will stand up as POTUS and say to the minority leader Nancy P...Hey Nancy...remember what you and BHO said 4 years ago? Well guess what...I won...sit down and shut up.

I doubt it seriously though...'cause we are the stupid party and we...for some reason...remind me of the picked on little kid who wants to be friends with the class bully.

43 posted on 01/29/2009 8:13:58 AM PST by NELSON111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44
Extra money= ammo and survival food. Nothing else for the socialist economy in this house.

Exactly.

44 posted on 01/29/2009 8:14:11 AM PST by an amused spectator (Citizen Kenyan: Commander in The Effort Against Culturally-Influenced Misbehavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: UpInArms

It’ll be interesting to see if the media totally ignores his falling approval ratings. And when people continue to be laid off in the coming months and prices/taxes continue to go up, it will. There is no Hopenchange, America, and 52% of you proved once again that the snake oil salesman is alive and well.

My guess is Obamaphoria will have worn off by June among 60% of the twits that voted for him, when they can no longer ignore the fact that the Emperor has no clothes.


45 posted on 01/29/2009 8:15:35 AM PST by Right Cal Gal (Abraham Lincoln would have let Berkeley leave the Union without a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
"Yep, the insane ones, who post here and claim to be conservatives, but want to lose elections to the rats to teach us a lesson have a lot to be happy about as our nation teters (sic) on the edge of the abyss."
"The grim reality is simple. When you lose elections, you have no power and become “Irrelevant!“

I think you actually do a good job highlighting the essential difference between conservatives on one hand and many contemporary republicans, including RINO's, Compassionate Conservatives, NeoCons, and the reach-across-the-asile kind of pretend republicans on the other hand.

Conservatives generally place principle over winning at any cost, whereas many of today's republicans place winning at any cost before principle.

If your goal is to implement policies consistent with conservative principles nothing is gained if you have to run a liberal as a republican to win.
Yes, we all know the argument that you must be in the game, you must win no matter the cost, or you cannot hope to see your principles transformed into policy.

Te sad truth is that when you win with a liberal gussied up as a RINO or other non-conservative they ignore conservatives until they need their votes again. We just had an eight year lesson in that as we watched a republican president reach across the island to Ted Kennedy more than he did to conservatives.

All conservatives are not at heart rabid republican party loyalists, but most do generally vote republican as the lesser of two evils. But, if there is a viable, more conservative alternative candidate that is where the conservative vote would go.
But republican party loyalists vote for the party's candidates - even the really horrible ones, because they want their party in power.

That is a significant difference and explains why republican party loyalists get so upset with conservatives who do not always blindly support republicans.

Look at the last election - the party faithful would have voted for McCain no matter what, but he would probably received 10 million fewer votes if he had not brought Sarah Palin on board to attract conservatives disgusted with the republican party.

46 posted on 01/29/2009 8:23:13 AM PST by Iron Munro (Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: pillut48

47 posted on 01/29/2009 8:29:22 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pillut48
At least he is honest enough to wear a black hat.
48 posted on 01/29/2009 8:31:43 AM PST by MIchaelTArchangel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

“Look at the last election - the party faithful would have voted for McCain no matter what, but he would probably received 10 million fewer votes if he had not brought Sarah Palin on board to attract conservatives disgusted with the republican party”

EXACTLY!

Count me as one of those who only came on for McCain after he picked Palin. Otherwise I was voting for Bob Barr and the libertarians.

If we want a candidate like a Fred Thompson, or a Duncan Hunter conservative, we have to start getting the money together now for that inevitable battle over who the GOP National committee selects, and who the people want.

And we need to get movements going to change the primary rules in the early states requiring party registration. We have to eliminate the cross over pollution that obviously targets the real conservatives.

We don’t have to work for the GOP National committee, nor send them money. But we sure can send them a lot of free advice.


49 posted on 01/29/2009 8:33:17 AM PST by o_zarkman44 (Since when is paying more, but getting less, considered Patriotic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
I understand your point, but while I assume that some of the more moderate Republicans have been taught a lesson, our nation is going to have Obama in the Oval Office for at least 4 years. As we saw with the Georgia Peanut, a lot of damage can be done in four years.

McCain was my absolute last choice as a nominee. But I donated to his campaign and dragged myself to the polls to vote for him. Why? Because I could see what this Marzist charlatan would do. MY principles tell me to protect the country first of all, and I do not see that having a President Obama is going to do that.

50 posted on 01/29/2009 8:36:38 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson