Skip to comments.
Obama adviser: Nation can afford big stimulus plan
Yahoo ^
| 1-25-09
| staff
Posted on 01/25/2009 11:17:15 AM PST by Nachum
WASHINGTON One of President Barack Obama's top economic advisers says the nation can afford to spend hundreds of billions of dollars in an attempt to jump-start a weak economy. But Larry Summers warns that fiscal discipline will be necessary once the economy recovers. He says the government must spend money now to revive an economy that shed more than 2 million jobs last year.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; adviser; afford; agenda; bho44; bhostimulus; idiot; kneelingforzero; larrysummers; nation; obama; socialist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-54 next last
1
posted on
01/25/2009 11:17:15 AM PST
by
Nachum
To: Nachum
just the Batboy putting up the clinton like shield..”don't blame meeeeee”
2
posted on
01/25/2009 11:20:32 AM PST
by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: Nachum; sickoflibs; Gondring
Obama adviser: Nation can afford big stimulus planOf course you can afford anything when you're printing money.
3
posted on
01/25/2009 11:21:59 AM PST
by
rabscuttle385
("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
To: Nachum
That may have been true a while ago, but at this point we’ve about maxed out our ability to service our debt. Add this 1T to the 1T of the deficit this year, and the 2T of deficit next year, and then another T for Stimulus 2 (when Stimulus 1 fails) and the 4T that the bailouts will finally total, and you have an added debt of around $9T, for a total debt of about $20T.
Game over...inflation takes the field.
4
posted on
01/25/2009 11:22:10 AM PST
by
BobL
To: Nachum
One of President Barack Obama's top economic advisers says the nation can afford to spend hundreds of billions of dollars in an attempt to jump-start a weak economy. GREAT!
When do we pay off our nation debt then?
Or has it been do already?
5
posted on
01/25/2009 11:23:09 AM PST
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, Question everyone else)
To: Nachum
To: Nachum
We're all Keynesians now!
To: Nachum
Here's and idea
CUT TAXES
Not that it isn't obvious, but give businesses the ability to afford more employees and they will hire, those people will then spend money. Cut income taxes across the board, and blamo, people start spending money again. Anyone who derides this simple economic reality has no brain.
Better yet, make it fair across the board, Flat tax, No loopholes. Golly what a simple idea, Fair for everyone, but heaven forbid the Democrats do ANYTHING that would actually put MORE money into the pockets of average people, that would defeat their purpose of making everyone poor and dependent on government handouts!
8
posted on
01/25/2009 11:24:05 AM PST
by
Danae
(Amerikan Unity My Ass)
To: BobL
You beat me by a post FRiend....
9
posted on
01/25/2009 11:25:11 AM PST
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, Question everyone else)
To: Nachum
“...the nation can afford to spend hundreds of billions of dollars...”
Ya’ know, LBJ said exactly the same thing when he kicked off, “The Great Society”. Stays the same.
10
posted on
01/25/2009 11:25:12 AM PST
by
Habibi
To: Danae
I'm an advocate of free enterprize zones. Complete federal tax free zones on businesses in parts of the nation that are hardest hit. Detroit, the Gulf Region immediately come to mind.
To: Nachum
Then why doesn’t the O pay for it out of his own pocket if it’s such a great deal. ROFL. Total morons.
12
posted on
01/25/2009 11:26:40 AM PST
by
VRWC For Truth
(Throw the bums out who vote yes on the bail out)
To: Nachum
Owners of capital will stimulate working class to buy more and more of expensive goods, houses and technology, pushing them to take more and more expensive credits, until their debt becomes unbearable. The unpaid debt will lead to bankruptcy of banks, which will have to be nationalized, and State will have to take the road which will eventually lead to communism.
-—Karl Marx
_____________________________________________________
I had to re-post this.
13
posted on
01/25/2009 11:27:13 AM PST
by
CommieCutter
(http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/programs/ht/qt/3013_08.html)
To: BobL
...inflation takes the field.<<<
but not until u have a long enough depression whereby the sheeple BEG for more government intervention of the socialist kind....Then u can have your hyper inflation
14
posted on
01/25/2009 11:29:00 AM PST
by
M-cubed
(Why is "Greshams Law" a law?)
To: Nachum
“fiscal discipline will be necessary once the economy recovers.”
That shouldn't be too difficult.
By the time the economy recovers, many years from now, the Republicans will be back in power, and will have to do their usual act of “cleaning up the economic mess caused by the Democrats”.
Note: FDR's economic policies turned a severe recession into a depression that lasted more than a decade. The depression ended when FDR's wage and price scams were repealed.
Obama’s economic policies are going to make FDR's policies look downright moderate, in comparison.
15
posted on
01/25/2009 11:29:23 AM PST
by
ChicagahAl
(It's mourning in America. Mourning our dearly departed freedom, liberty, security and wealth.)
To: Nachum
Nation can afford big stimulus planThere's over $3 trillion sitting in money funds (at the end of Dec) that would make any robin hood's chops salivate.
To: Danae
CUT TAXES That would work wonders for the ills that we face financially in our country however, the big drawback would be personal freedom to keep ones money to spend as deemed necessary without government intervention as how to spend it, if one would consider that to be a drawback....
17
posted on
01/25/2009 11:30:14 AM PST
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, Question everyone else)
To: Nachum
Washington just might as well switch the word “stimulus” to “taxpayer”.
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
We're all Keynesians now! It's obviously the politically popular mindset to take these days.
19
posted on
01/25/2009 11:32:35 AM PST
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, Question everyone else)
To: Nachum
This is the first really big lie from the nascent regime. This stimulus is going to bankrupt the nation. Everything else will be minor in comparison.
20
posted on
01/25/2009 11:33:19 AM PST
by
xp38
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
We're all Keynesians now! We all have been Keynesians since January 20, 1989.
21
posted on
01/25/2009 11:33:41 AM PST
by
dfwgator
(1996 2006 2008 - Good Things Come in Threes)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
22
posted on
01/25/2009 11:34:33 AM PST
by
M-cubed
(Why is "Greshams Law" a law?)
To: Nachum
STIMULUS = PORKULUS Yeah...I stole it from RUSH.....
23
posted on
01/25/2009 11:36:05 AM PST
by
goodnesswins
(Tell the truth - GOEBBELIZATION (propaganda) is what many voters suffer from.....)
To: BobL
“Game over. Inflation takes the field.”
You are correct ... any ideas on how one best invests for an highly inflationary future???
24
posted on
01/25/2009 11:38:33 AM PST
by
dodger
To: Nachum
spend hundreds of billions of dollars in an attempt to jump-start a weak economy. I wonder what the backup plan calls for. They do have one, don't they?
25
posted on
01/25/2009 11:38:40 AM PST
by
An Old Man
(Use it up, Wear it out, Make it do, or Do without.)
To: Nachum
Stop deficit spending now.
Pay down the debt.
Enough of this madness. Clark Howard for Fed chief.
26
posted on
01/25/2009 11:39:32 AM PST
by
mysterio
To: dfwgator
We all have been Keynesians since January 20, 1989. Government as the instigator long before.
FDR 1932
LBJ 1963
BJ 1992
27
posted on
01/25/2009 11:42:13 AM PST
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, Question everyone else)
To: dodger
“You are correct ... any ideas on how one best invests for an highly inflationary future???”
I’m going for gold and oil. You can use ETFs if you don’t want to hold the actual commodity (i.e., gold), you better use an ETF for oil. It may be a while for oil to recover, but it will recover with a VENGEANCE, since today’s prices and economic slump will effectively stop new drilling...and because there’s bound to be some blow-up in the Middle East. Most other commodities are probably good to (like copper).
The bottom line is that there will a lot more dollars chasing the same goods, so commodities will have to increase in price (once demand picks up a bit).
28
posted on
01/25/2009 11:44:19 AM PST
by
BobL
To: Danae
Exactly. Also, How about suspending Employer Payroll Taxes for say 2 years. That would reduce the cost of an employer's payroll by 7.65% which would help save jobs in the short run and in a year or so make it easier for employers to create jobs.
29
posted on
01/25/2009 11:48:44 AM PST
by
spikeytx86
(Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by their fruity little club.)
To: Danae
“Here’s and idea CUT TAXES”
I know that Rush and the Republicans like the idea, but the damage done to the debt will be huge.
A better idea is to, as RR said, “get government off the backs of the people” or really to get them off the backs of business.
What should be done. An end-to-end review of all laws and regulations that affect business and getting rid of everything that is stupid (like Endangered Species, Wildlife Preserves, Air Bags, etc.). Maybe just go back to 1990 and remove EVERY mandate since...we were doing quite well back then.
30
posted on
01/25/2009 11:50:41 AM PST
by
BobL
To: Nachum
This media likes a big stimulus plan, as their print brothers just found out how France subsidizes the print media.
There's no doubt that the NYT strongly calculates on Fed subsidies.
Just think of this 250 million loan at 14% from a Mexican very rich man.
That's 35 mill/year from a bankrupt enterprise.
Taxpayers to the rescue of the New York Times, news will be favorable for Obama and Democrats.
31
posted on
01/25/2009 11:52:46 AM PST
by
hermgem
(Will Olmr)
To: Doogle
Here is the conundrum:
1. If the Dems pass the stimulus bill with any Republicans joining them, then when it fails to stimulate the economy, the Dems will blame the Republicans.
2. If the Dems pass the stimulus bill without any Republicans, then when it fails to stimulate the economy, the Dems will blame the Republicans.
The difference between 1 & 2 is that the GOP has the higher chance to win back Congress with option 2 if they are EXTREMELY vocal about it for the next two years.
32
posted on
01/25/2009 11:56:03 AM PST
by
sf4dubya
(I rebelled against my parents by becoming a conservative)
To: Danae
Stop being so logical...it’s clear you don’t understand the complexities of the federal macro economy... /sarc
33
posted on
01/25/2009 11:59:16 AM PST
by
phatus maximus
( John 6:29. Learn it, love it, live it.)
To: sf4dubya
they are EXTREMELY vocal about it for the next two years. ...yeah, I hear ya there, but their recent attitude don't fair well with anything extreme, if anything they have gone........limp
34
posted on
01/25/2009 11:59:48 AM PST
by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: screaminsunshine
Quick. Invest in ink!!! Ink hell, I want the paper concession,but please pay me in gold, OK?
35
posted on
01/25/2009 12:02:00 PM PST
by
calex59
To: Danae
Golly what a simple idea, Fair for everyone, but heaven forbid the Democrats do ANYTHING that would actually put MORE money into the pockets of average people, that would defeat their purpose of making everyone poor and dependent on government handouts! Yes, you hit the nail. The libards only want to destroy us to the point we will accept any and all laws that bind us to the government and makes us slaves, as they have made the blacks slaves for the last 50 years with their so called "civil rights" movement.
36
posted on
01/25/2009 12:03:57 PM PST
by
calex59
To: Nachum
I have a young co-worker who expressed concern about what this would do to inflation and/or the nation debt. He voted for Obama. I reminded him that this was what he asked for, when he voted.
37
posted on
01/25/2009 12:06:03 PM PST
by
3niner
To: Nachum; All
38
posted on
01/25/2009 12:06:16 PM PST
by
Larousse2
(Like June Carter Cash, "I'm just tryin' to matter.")
To: Nachum
The dOpey-One has already set stage for failure. He says that if we do not do enough soon enough we will fail. Failure is assured since we already have blame.
39
posted on
01/25/2009 12:12:50 PM PST
by
depressed in 06
(Dope in chains, the Chicago way.)
To: Danae
CUT TAXES Nancy and Harry said no to that but bthey are willing to spend more same old democrat line of thinkig.
40
posted on
01/25/2009 12:20:21 PM PST
by
Vaduz
To: CommieCutter
Owners of capital will stimulate working class to buy more and more of expensive goods, houses and technology, pushing them to take more and more expensive credits, until their debt becomes unbearable. The unpaid debt will lead to bankruptcy of banks, which will have to be nationalized, and State will have to take the road which will eventually lead to communism. -Karl Marx I would say that you have summed up the state of the next generation of useful comrades.
41
posted on
01/25/2009 12:30:22 PM PST
by
Digger
(If RINO is your selection, then failure is your election)
To: calex59
This is insane. That is all there is to be said. Why babble. It is insanity.
To: Nachum
One of President Barack Obama's top economic advisers says the nation can afford to spend hundreds of billions of dollars in an attempt to jump-start a weak economy. But Larry Summers warns that fiscal discipline will be necessary once the economy recovers.
All right, just a couple more drinks, since they're "free" and it makes us real happy. But let's all promise that when Monday comes, we're gonna sober up, get on the wagon and join AA. Hey, bartender, make mine a double!
43
posted on
01/25/2009 12:38:28 PM PST
by
LostInBayport
(The press and the Barackolytes view you as a miracle worker...so turn the economy into wine, Barry.)
To: spikeytx86
How about suspending Employer Payroll Taxes for say 2 years. That would reduce the cost of an employer's payroll by 7.65% which would help save jobs in the short run and in a year or so make it easier for employers to create jobs. Never ever will happen because it would work & the Gestapo would lose their power in D.C.
44
posted on
01/25/2009 12:42:46 PM PST
by
Digger
(If RINO is your selection, then failure is your election)
To: Nachum
Obama adviser: Nation can afford big stimulus planArrowhead1952: Taxpayers CANNOT afford big stimulus plan
45
posted on
01/25/2009 12:44:15 PM PST
by
Arrowhead1952
(Dissent is patriotic - Hussein is not and will never be my president.)
To: Nachum
But Larry Summers warns that fiscal discipline will be necessary once the economy recovers. Methinks that Larry Summers is assuming facts not in evidence.
Did he mean to say "if" instead of "once"?
46
posted on
01/25/2009 1:00:04 PM PST
by
The Electrician
("Government is the only enterprise in the world which expands in size when its failures increase.")
To: Nachum
To: phatus maximus
HEHE I can’t be illogical any more than Spock can LOL
48
posted on
01/25/2009 1:29:34 PM PST
by
Danae
(Amerikan Unity My Ass)
To: Nachum
This massive spending is going to suck the wind out of the private sector. It’s also going to suck the wind out of local and state public sectors.
I’m starting to believe that the only way we can stop this madness is to starve the beast. Do not do business with any financial institutions that are taking TARP money. Don’t spend any money unnecessarily. Pay off debt and save all the money you can - you might need it down the road. Don’t help Obama and the Democrats make the crap sandwich they are intent on shoving down our throats.
Maybe huge protests on the Mall would do the trick, but that’s just not going to happen when so many people are enthralled with The One.
49
posted on
01/25/2009 2:41:56 PM PST
by
randita
(If the government could "fix" the economy, we'd never have a recession.)
To: screaminsunshine
This is insane. That is all there is to be said. Why babble. It is insanity.,/I> What is insane? The idea that the libtards want to bind us to government servitude(glom the Bozo's "Join the service website" ads on TV)and that people like me can see through their plots,or the idea that they are actually doing it and plan on carrying out their communistic ideas?
50
posted on
01/25/2009 3:39:30 PM PST
by
calex59
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson