Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

And this is just the beginning...
1 posted on 01/15/2009 8:44:34 PM PST by FocusNexus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: FocusNexus

Under bill, giant chunks of California stay wild

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/01/15/MNO215B3BA.DTL

The Senate approved a major expansion of wilderness areas nationwide Thursday, protecting more than 2 million acres of public land from drilling, logging and mining, including 735,000 acres across California.

The 73-to-21 vote was a huge victory for conservationists, who convinced Senate leaders to roll 160 wilderness bills into one giant package. The bill would permanently protect lands in nine states, from the Eastern Sierra Nevada in California to Oregon’s Mount Hood and from Utah’s Zion National Park to the Jefferson National Forest in Virginia.


2 posted on 01/15/2009 8:47:18 PM PST by FocusNexus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FocusNexus

A nation rich in resources refuses to use them....

In the coming century, Chinese historians writing about the fall of America will all ask: “What were they thinking? Were they even thinking at all?”

Then they will laugh. Around the world, we will no longer be despised as “ugly Americans.” We will be ridiculed as “stupid Americans.”


3 posted on 01/15/2009 8:48:27 PM PST by henkster (When I was young I was told anyone could be President. Now I believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FocusNexus

It is a pro terrorism bill because it insures that domestic drilling and mining is limited and more oil is imported from radical middle east states.


4 posted on 01/15/2009 8:49:01 PM PST by lonestar67 (Its time to withdraw from the War on Bush-- your side is hopelessly lost in a quagmire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FocusNexus

Who were the republican Quislings who voted for this monstrozity?


6 posted on 01/15/2009 8:53:22 PM PST by Postman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FocusNexus; All

Hopefully the folks in the North(NE) enjoy the cost of their

Home Heating Oil!!!

NEXT winter is gunna be tuff on them...


8 posted on 01/15/2009 8:57:20 PM PST by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FocusNexus
The Senate on Thursday approved a sweeping conservation measure as it tries to reverse years of rollbacks in environmental protection by the administration of outgoing President George W. Bush.

What rollbacks? There weren't any.

9 posted on 01/15/2009 9:04:50 PM PST by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FocusNexus
Barack Obama is set to sign it into law after he is sworn in as president on Tuesday, one of the first moves in what is likely to be a more aggressive approach toward the environment.

It will not be legal...any law the man signs is not legal.

13 posted on 01/15/2009 9:36:52 PM PST by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FocusNexus
And this is just the beginning...

Yes it is, and I've already got near permanent knot in my gut, and a splitting headache.

A little range time would probably help me relax a bit.

15 posted on 01/15/2009 10:09:35 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FocusNexus
Wilderness means the federal government is seizing the land and placing off limits to all human access. In states like Idaho, the federal government controls most of the land. That land is unavailable for economic development or generation of a tax base. A nominal "Payment In Lieu of Taxes" is paid on some of the land to offset the tax revenue damage to the states.
16 posted on 01/15/2009 10:20:12 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: berdie

later


18 posted on 01/15/2009 10:47:20 PM PST by berdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FocusNexus
Any time that the congress critters roll more than one bill together and do so speedily it is not just bad law it is horrible law. We won't find out what is buried in this hobgoblin of a law until long after it is to late to repair the harm it will cause.
21 posted on 01/15/2009 11:34:00 PM PST by fella (.He that followeth after vain persons shall have poverty enough." Pv.28:19')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FocusNexus

Just call it the “let it all burn” bill. They try not to do anything un-natural in Wilderness, like fight fires. One of the reasons more than 200,000 acres of forest burned in my County last summer.


28 posted on 01/16/2009 2:11:36 AM PST by marsh2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FocusNexus

Judging by the vote count, it was a bi-partisan butt-f***ing.


30 posted on 01/16/2009 2:38:10 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (This election gave the drunks the keys to the liquor cabinet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FocusNexus

Can’t you just hear the gears of enterprise grinding to a halt?


32 posted on 01/16/2009 4:52:31 AM PST by big'ol_freeper (Sexual Chocolate Almond Chip with extra Hot Fudge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FocusNexus
"The Senate on Thursday approved a sweeping conservation measure as it tries to reverse years of rollbacks in environmental protection by the administration of outgoing President George W. Bush."

"Years of rollbacks?" What rollbacks? If anything, the Republicans continued the growth of the environazi movement. They SHOULD have defunded the EPA and spoke out against the myth of global warming but most remained silent or actually embraced the continuing BS (Newt and Pelosi, e.g.).

Oh well, it's irrelevant now - this country's finished. Game over!

33 posted on 01/16/2009 5:09:04 AM PST by meyer (We are all John Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FocusNexus
Supply and demand.

Sharply reduced supply of available land with continued growing demand --> Sharply increasing land prices.

Of course, when the price of land skyrockets, landowners will be immediately hated by the Left for their unconscionable greed.

To the ignorant, basic economic laws are scary voodoo.

40 posted on 01/16/2009 1:52:42 PM PST by TChris (So many useful idiots...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson