Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Trouble With Leon Panetta [supported anti-CIA, KGB-affiliated, Institute For Policy Studies]
TheNewAmerican.com ^ | January 7, 2009 | Warren Mass

Posted on 01/10/2009 5:55:09 AM PST by ETL

excerpt...

In April 1985 Panetta joined with 13 of his leftist congressional colleagues — including Ron Dellums, Don Edwards, George Miller, Christopher Dodd, and Les Aspin — in sponsoring a 20th anniversary fund-raising gala for the pro-Marxist Institute for Policy Studies (IPS), which had been described by Brian Crozier, director of the London Institute for the Study of Conflict, as the "perfect intellectual front for Soviet activities which would be resisted if they were to originate openly from the KGB." The IPS was originally funded with millions of dollars from the Faberge perfume magnate and Communist Party member Samuel Rubin and his wife.

On April 30, 1987, Rep. Panetta cast a highly suspect vote for one who would direct our nation's top foreign intelligence agency. On that day, he was one of 183 members of the House to vote against the withdrawal of Most Favored Nation (MFN) status for communist Romania. Romania, at the time, was run by Nicolae Ceausescu, one of the most brutal dictators in the entire Soviet bloc.

Anti-communist publisher Phillip Abbott Luce started the hard-hitting newsletter The Pink Sheet on the Left to expose communist and other organizations or individuals working to increase the size and power of government. After the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980, Luce changed the name of the newsletter to The American Sentinel, and changed the publication's emphasis to geo-strategic issues. However, beginning with the February 15, 1993 issue, the biweekly newsletter became The Pink Sheet on the Left again. Editor Lee Bellinger explained his reason for the change, "Consider 10 good reasons why we brought The Pink Sheet on the Left out of retirement: Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Strobe Talbott, Albert Gore, Ronald Dellums, Donna Shalala, Ron Brown, Lawrence Walsh, Leon Panetta, and Warren Christopher."

Readers who recall the movement to impeach Bill Clinton remember that one of the charges raised by Clinton's critics was the conflict of interest created when individuals connected with the Chinese Overseas Shipping Company (COSCO) — such as John Huang, Charles Trie, and James and Mochtar Riady — helped funnel contributions to the Clinton reelection campaign. Afterwards, the Clinton administration lobbied for granting COSCO a 10-year lease on the former Long Beach Naval Shipyard in California. During a March 1997 edition of CNBC's Equal Time program, California Republican State Senator Dick Mountjoy noted that COSCO-linked arms dealer Wang Jun had been granted personal access to President Clinton, and that Wang's business associates had smuggled illegal assault weapons into California for delivery to street gangs by making use of a ship owned and operated by COSCO. Mountjoy then stated:

The next thing you know, (then-Chief of Staff) Leon Panetta is down here negotiating that port for the Chinese.

There is much more to the COSCO-Long Beach connection than we have room for here, but a good summary of the threat the arrangement made to U.S. security may be found in an item inserted into the Congressional Record by Rep. Gerald B.H. Solomon on May 20, 1997.

Even the most unbiased of observers may legitimately ask: Why on Earth is an individual who helped negotiate the turnover of the Long Beach Naval Shipyard to the communist Chinese, thereby creating the threat to U.S. national security described in the Washington Times article by Rowan Scarborough and inserted into the Congressional Record by Rep. Solomon, being considered for a top position at one of our nation's most critical intelligence agencies?

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/election/655


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bhocia; cia; ips; kgb; leonpanetta; panetta; panettarecord; thenewamerican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: SandWMan
I’m shocked, SHOCKED, that Barack Hussein Uhbama would appoint someone to office that had communist ties and socialist leanings.

So we should just sit on our fat apathetic *sses and not attempt to do anything about it? We need to make a big a fuss as possible about these things. Get the word out. Explain it to people in some detail. Write the Republican reps in congress to stop this dupe from being confirmed CIA chief! Senator Shelby is a good guy with influence in this area. Write his office.

http://shelby.senate.gov/public/

21 posted on 01/10/2009 8:14:41 AM PST by ETL (Smoking gun evidence on ALL the ObamaRat-commie connections at my newly revised FR Home/About page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ETL
Give it up folks! Our first Marxist President will want a Marxist Director of the CIA. :-(

Only Earth Changes can save us. Yes, Pheonix and Denver are sea ports. California is a bunch of is a bunch of islands. Blue States hardest hit.
22 posted on 01/10/2009 8:25:40 AM PST by SubMareener (Become a monthly donor! Free FreeRepublic.com from Quarterly FReepathons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL

...My wife and stepson voted for Obama. My wife NNNNever would talk politics with me. “I don’t want to hear it!!!” Now, she won’t shut up and has CNN on all day and night so she doesn’t miss anything! Thhhhere both hopeless lefties. I took one of their votes away. I won’t say who I voted for, but it wasn’t “that other guy”. Here in KY, McCain, “the other guy” got the electorates. Whether they’ll give them back when “they” vote is another story...


23 posted on 01/10/2009 8:52:44 AM PST by gargoyle (..."If this be treason, make the most of it.". Patrick Henry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ETL
Panetta is a political welfare case...

I know where he lives. Used to see him in various places near the former Fort Ord (now CSUMB) at lunch time. He is a stooge, a vacuous skull devoid of thought.

24 posted on 01/10/2009 12:44:00 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gargoyle

It takes a couple of generations, once they have the minds of the youth, a crisis is created and the rest is easy. It’s almost a done deal.


25 posted on 01/10/2009 12:50:26 PM PST by mojitojoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: capydick
John McCain has already spoken in favor of Paneta. 'Nuff said. Except for this:

We need new leadership or a new party - there is no middle ground.

26 posted on 01/10/2009 12:53:02 PM PST by andy58-in-nh (Ronald Reagan had a vision of America. Barack Obama has a vision of Barack Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SandWMan

I’m shocked, SHOCKED, that Barack Hussein Uhbama would appoint someone to office that had communist ties and socialist leanings.

Right! hard to imagine that isn’t it? His choices make it crystal clear that he is everything we thought he was.


27 posted on 01/10/2009 12:53:16 PM PST by mojitojoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ETL

The problem is this: We have no MEDIA!! NONE! This has never happened in the past. We can’t get info out. We need the media. If we can’t get the media to report it, we are doomed. Saudis, Soros and others are determined to buy up and control the media.


28 posted on 01/10/2009 12:55:09 PM PST by mojitojoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh
We need new leadership or a new party - there is no middle ground.

I dont see any leadership skills in the current crop in office. A new party would take years to establish. We're screwed.

29 posted on 01/10/2009 1:12:16 PM PST by capydick ("History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: capydick
The darkest hour is always just before the dawn. I don't know why the hell that's true, but I've been on this planet long enough to know that it just is.

Desperation sometimes breeds determination and determination invites decisiveness and decisive action often brings victory. As a conservative, I feel a bit (and just a tiny bit, out of respect) like the elements of the 506th Parachute Infantry Regiment of the 101st Airborne, cut off and surrounded outside Foy in Belgium in December of 1944. They suffered terrible personal loss, whereas we will likely only suffer politically and economically. But they never gave up and never gave in.

Nuts. I would love to see even 1/10 of the grit and determination of those men in our presumptive leaders. I don't mean to over-dramatize, because our stakes are not yet that high. But I believe the path we are presently on will lead back to such times, and I fear that we are not as equipped to deal with it as those who went before us; for they were better men whose example we can only hope to follow.

30 posted on 01/10/2009 1:46:48 PM PST by andy58-in-nh (Ronald Reagan had a vision of America. Barack Obama has a vision of Barack Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson