Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Confirmed – Roy Blunt Considering Running for Bond’s Seat in 2010

Posted on 01/09/2009 12:23:17 PM PST by Bodhi1

roy blunt With the upcoming retirement of Sen. Kit Bond, Republicans across the state are wondering who will run to replace the Godfather of the Missouri GOP.

My sources confirm that Congressman Roy Blunt is seriously considering a run for Bond’s seat. 

In a press release on his website, Blunt says, “There is no doubt that if Senator Bond’s name was on the ballot in November of 2010 he would have won handily.”

The question is, can Roy Blunt win?  The likely opponent for Blunt would be current Secretary of State Robin Carnahan.  For those outside of Missouri, the Carnahan family has a long political history in the state and Robin would be a powerful candidate.

The Democrat strongholds in Missouri are Kansas City and St. Louis.  Blunt, however, is a strong candidate in Springfield, and is the most likely Republican to beat Carnahan in 2010.

If Blunt finds he can carry Springfield, expect him to face off against the Democrats in 2010.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: 111th; kitbond; mo2010; royblunt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 01/09/2009 12:23:18 PM PST by Bodhi1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bodhi1
I would think his son Matt, who is just finishing up his term as Missouri governor, would be a better choice.

He didn't run for a second term because he could not have won the Republican Primary.

Thousands of Republican Missourians crossed over to vote in the Democrat primaries against then-governor Bob Holden in 2004.

It is an absolute certainty that thousands of Democrats would have acted in-kind in 2008.

2 posted on 01/09/2009 12:27:22 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are the opium of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Political PING?


3 posted on 01/09/2009 12:31:57 PM PST by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Matt didn’t have the belly for another four years of living in a fishbowl and there was a good likelihood that Nixon would have clobbered him anyway. It wouldn’t hurt my feelings if both Blunts moved aside. Neither have been extraordinary leaders.


4 posted on 01/09/2009 12:34:11 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bodhi1

Is he a RINO?


5 posted on 01/09/2009 12:34:20 PM PST by Jeb21 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaE98w1KZ-c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bodhi1; 1stMarylandRegiment; 47carollann; A Citizen Reporter; A Cyrenian; adrian; AFLoggie; ...
Missouri ping

Low volume ping list

FReepmail me to be on, or off, this list.

Again, I'd run if I could find the money.
Anyone got a couple of hundred thousand they don't need to get me started? ;^)

6 posted on 01/09/2009 12:34:54 PM PST by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeb21
Is he a RINO

I don't know. He lost the Majority Leader race in 2006... I do not know if that is because he was trying to hold up the conservative brand or not...

7 posted on 01/09/2009 12:52:02 PM PST by 11th Commandment (2008 was an historical election - the first time a socialist was elected President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jeb21

Epic fail incompetent.


8 posted on 01/09/2009 1:02:43 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
He didn't run for a second term because he could not have won the Republican Primary.

If he couldn't win the the gubernatorial primary in 2008 what makes you think he could win a senate primary in 2010.

9 posted on 01/09/2009 1:05:30 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
If he couldn't win the the gubernatorial primary in 2008 what makes you think he could win a senate primary in 2010.

No incumbent Missouri governor will ever win a second term ever again.

The precedent has been set.

Voters from the opposing party will cross over to vote against him in the primary.

How many Democrats do you suppose would be willing to cross over to vote against Palin in the 2012 presidential primary?

10 posted on 01/09/2009 1:18:50 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are the opium of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bodhi1
The best news for me is that Robin Carnahan is considering a run for this. She is either completely incompetent or corrupt as Secretary of State; she just can't write fair ballot language. Anything that gets her out of that spot is good news to me.
11 posted on 01/09/2009 2:45:35 PM PST by In veno, veritas (Please identify my Ad Hominem attacks. I should be debating ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: Chris DeWeese
Barf. No establishment pubs need apply.

In that case, I should have it made. I haven't ever been a member of ANY party. ;^)

13 posted on 01/09/2009 2:52:18 PM PST by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Bodhi1

How about we get someone without a family political name in office? I am sick and tired of the successions of the heirarchy and political nepotism.
A new name would be fresh.

I had decided I wasn’t going to vote for Bond next election anyhow. Time for some new blood. He had his chance and wasn’t up to our expectations.

Go ahead and run. Plenty of time to raise money.


14 posted on 01/09/2009 2:58:40 PM PST by o_zarkman44 (Since when is paying more, but getting less, considered Patriotic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Then we need to lobby our legislature to close our primaries to registered party members only. That will cut out the cross over crap that hurt our people last election.


15 posted on 01/09/2009 3:00:55 PM PST by o_zarkman44 (Since when is paying more, but getting less, considered Patriotic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve; Impy; St. Louis Conservative; Norman Bates; ExTexasRedhead; fieldmarshaldj; ...

OH, ****!!!

Roy Blunt was a lousy whip in the House. There’s no reason to believe that he’d made a good Senator, regardless of his ACU ratings.


16 posted on 01/09/2009 3:06:58 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (If greed is a virtue, than corporate socialism is conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I can’t imagine Roy winning a primary if Steelman and/or Kinder runs. Blunt has virtually zero grassroots support.


17 posted on 01/09/2009 3:49:47 PM PST by St. Louis Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Bodhi1

I could imagine the campaign slogans right now.

Steelman: Vote for me cos I’m a hot babe like Sarah Palin.

Blunt: Steelman is a selfish maverick like McCain. Just like McCain, Steelman takes pleasure in bashing other Republicans for personal gain. Plus Steelman takes money from trial lawyers.

Robin Carnahan: God saved me from breast cancer so I can fight for the middle class. Remember the glory days of the 90s when we had world peace and record economic growth under my dad, Mel. Happy days will be here again if I am allowed to help Obama change America. Never again shall America be bushwhacked and suffer from Blunt trauma.


18 posted on 01/09/2009 6:43:45 PM PST by yongin (Converting people to Mormonism makes the world more conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

“Blunt has virtually zero grassroots support.”

And you know this how?

As it is I don’t care for Blunt because of his “dalliance” with a lobbyist. However if it was a choice of him or a Democrat, I’ll vote for Blunt.


19 posted on 01/09/2009 6:50:04 PM PST by swmobuffalo ("We didn't seek the approval of Code Pink and MoveOn.org before deciding what to do")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: swmobuffalo

I know this because I grew up in Springfield and I know the general sentiments. SW Mo is heavily Republican and people will vote for Blunt because he is a Republican and has been in office forever. That’s about it. He’s not an inspiring guy.

And yes, obviously I’ll vote for Blunt over ANY Dem, especially a Carnahan, but Blunt is weak. He divorced his wife and married a lobbyist, and the Blunt name isn’t too good in Missouri right now. We need new blood. Sarah Steelman would be a better candidate, mark my words.


20 posted on 01/09/2009 11:33:31 PM PST by St. Louis Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson