Skip to comments.
Trans Texas Corridor is dead, TxDOT saya
DALLAS MORNING NEWS ^
| 06 JAN 09
| MICHAEL A. LINDENBERGER
Posted on 01/06/2009 10:31:39 AM PST by TXnMA
Trans Texas Corridor is dead, TxDOT says
10:50 AM CST on Tuesday, January 6, 2009
By MICHAEL A. LINDENBERGER / The Dallas Morning News
mlindenberger@dallasnews.com
AUSTIN The Texas Department of Transportation announced this morning that it has officially killed the Trans Texas Corridor, saying that despite the project's visionary aspects, "it is clearly not the choice of Texans."
Direct link to article...
(Excerpt) Read more at dallasnews.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: itsdeadjim; nafta; naftasuperhighway; nau; northamericanunion; spp; transtexascorridor; trashtexasconjob; ttc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-80 next last
Sounds good, but I'll trust and believe it when:
- RINO Rick Perry no longer has an office in Texas government
- TxDOT is forced to return to its original status as the Texas Highway Department -- period...
- Texas' highway construction is under an elected Commisioner...
- An alternate highway (only) is under construction.
1
posted on
01/06/2009 10:31:39 AM PST
by
TXnMA
To: TXnMA
2
posted on
01/06/2009 10:32:59 AM PST
by
Uncle Miltie
(Most Animals protect their babies. Palestinians kill their babies.)
To: TXnMA
Don’t be fooled with the name change ~ it’s now I-69 and it’s being built as we speak!
3
posted on
01/06/2009 10:33:09 AM PST
by
muawiyah
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
PING for Good news -- if true.
TSR, I think that this one might be worthy of a ping to your list...
4
posted on
01/06/2009 10:33:43 AM PST
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...!!)
To: TXnMA
Consider yourself lucky. If they only pulled the plug on the Big Dig......(were you here during it?)
5
posted on
01/06/2009 10:37:31 AM PST
by
GQuagmire
To: Admin Moderator
Please correct the (
saya says) typo in the title to make it more searchable...
(The POST form's tiny font size on this hi-res screen is a real challenge for these old eyes...)
Thanks!
TXnMA
6
posted on
01/06/2009 10:38:50 AM PST
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...!!)
To: TXnMA
Separate lanes for large trucks seemed like a good idea, for several reasons.
To: GQuagmire
Yes — for the first twenty years and twenty billion dollars of it... ‘-}
8
posted on
01/06/2009 10:40:39 AM PST
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...!!)
To: TXnMA; All
Having recently moved to Texas, I had to look into this to see why highway improvements are a bad thing.
This was a very ambitious project, but I think I understand why it isn’t so good. It would support traffic from Mexico, take massive areas of land, and privatize the road system.
Something needs done. I am in West Texas, but when I am in Dallas, the traffic is ridiculous. I-35 north to OKC or south toward the Waco area is just flat terrifying. Something needs done, and hopefully it will happen.
But, not this TTC plan.
9
posted on
01/06/2009 10:47:33 AM PST
by
rwfromkansas
("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
Actually, I championed separate
minimum-width cargo-only (trucks + rail) corridors -- one N-S and one E-W -- (without all the utilities ROW, etc).
That would leave the present Interstates for passenger vehicle use only -- which would increase safety, decrease IH traffic volume, and extend the infrastructure's usable lifetimes tremendously.
10
posted on
01/06/2009 10:48:20 AM PST
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...!!)
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA; All
I would say that is one good idea, and parts of this will still be built.
I do believe they need to make separate lanes for trucks.
11
posted on
01/06/2009 10:48:47 AM PST
by
rwfromkansas
("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
To: Uncle Miltie
"Wow! Big win." Thanks! I was right in the middle of the on-the-ground and head-to head battle with TxDOT...
12
posted on
01/06/2009 10:51:08 AM PST
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...!!)
To: TXnMA
So, I guess if they wanted a corridor there, they’d build it themselves.
13
posted on
01/06/2009 10:52:58 AM PST
by
bigbob
To: rwfromkansas
14
posted on
01/06/2009 10:55:06 AM PST
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...!!)
To: rwfromkansas
Yeah, something needs to be done alright. People need to stop moving here. The weather it horrible ya’ll. Scorching hot for 8 months out of the year. mosquitoes that can carry you off, roaches as big as limos, poisonous snakes everywhere. Not to mention floods and droughts, hurricanes and tornadoes. Don't come here it is a nightmare place to live.
That should do it! ;9)
15
posted on
01/06/2009 10:55:37 AM PST
by
Ditter
To: TXnMA
That would leave the present Interstates for passenger vehicle use only -- which would increase safety, decrease IH traffic volume, and extend the infrastructure's usable lifetimes tremendously. That would be fantastic but wouldn't the trucking industry go nuts and moan about road/fuel taxes etc. while ignoring the damage their vehicles cause daily?
To: Ditter
Translate it into Spanish and you’ve got a winner.
17
posted on
01/06/2009 10:59:32 AM PST
by
Rastus
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
“Separate lanes for large trucks seemed like a good idea, for several reasons.”
I agree that trucks, large RV’s, and busses should have their own lanes that’s physically separated from passenger car traffic.
To: bigbob
Not quite sure what your point is, but TxDOT has
zero business grabbing and fencing in ROW for pipelines, power lines, etc.
If Texans want to include rail in their charter, then my solution in # 10 (built along old rail ROWs) would apply...
Of course none of the above would apply unless adjoining States made the same commitment to ensure long-distance freight transport.
19
posted on
01/06/2009 11:04:45 AM PST
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...!!)
To: Ditter
Ya left out the "far aints"... <LOL!!>
20
posted on
01/06/2009 11:07:27 AM PST
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...!!)
To: TXnMA
"Make no mistake: The Trans Texas Corridor as we have known it no longer exists," he said. Each of the dozens of projects that were linked together under the rubric of the TTC including the Loop 9 project in Dallas and the I-69 project in the south will remain as stand-alone projects, he said.
Make no mistake folks, this is merely a name change. Will anyone put money on it not being a foreign-owned toll road?
21
posted on
01/06/2009 11:09:52 AM PST
by
zeugma
(Will it be nukes or aliens? Time will tell.)
To: TXnMA
Oh yeah I forgot the fire ants, they are EVERYWHERE ya’ll! LOL!
22
posted on
01/06/2009 11:12:28 AM PST
by
Ditter
To: relictele
Actually, truckers tell me that they would love to have safe, lighted places built just for them to pull over and sleep -- instead of congregating on the shoulders of all our IH on/off ramps at night... They also say their costs would also benefit greatly from using a ROW that had the easy grades required for cargo rail. And they wouldn't miss "that *^&$$ 4-wheeler traffic" at all!
23
posted on
01/06/2009 11:13:17 AM PST
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...!!)
To: TXnMA
From the article:
Saenz vowed, however, that TxDOT will continue to seek private partnerships for some of the individual toll projects that were once part of the TTC assuming that the Legislature does not outlaw that practice. THAT is what needs to be done. I sometimes wish we had the initiative process here in Texas.
24
posted on
01/06/2009 11:13:44 AM PST
by
zeugma
(Will it be nukes or aliens? Time will tell.)
To: Rastus
Those people don’t care, it is worse where they live.
25
posted on
01/06/2009 11:13:45 AM PST
by
Ditter
To: TXnMA
“extend the infrastructure's usable lifetimes tremendously.”
Well actually if the road beds were constructed the same way the Germans built their Autobahns, the roads would last 50+ years before needing any major repair as opposed to the every 12 to 20 years here in the U.S.
The road beds and the wearing surface of the Autobahn is twice that of whats found on our interstates here in the U.S. and thus are less susceptible to damage due to freeze/thaw cycles, settling, and premature wear.
To: TxDOT; 1066AD; 185JHP; Abcdefg; Adrastus; af_vet_rr; Alamo-Girl; antivenom; AprilfromTexas; ...
It’s dead, Jim.
Trans-Texas Corridor PING!
27
posted on
01/06/2009 11:17:41 AM PST
by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(This election gave the drunks the keys to the liquor cabinet!)
To: 2CAVTrooper; TXnMA
The pavement on the Autobahn is 27” thick. In the U.S., it is typically 11”.
28
posted on
01/06/2009 11:23:15 AM PST
by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(This election gave the drunks the keys to the liquor cabinet!)
To: rwfromkansas
Roadways and utility rows will still be needed. I think they got way to far ahead of themselves with the concept and the people revolted against it.
Now it's back to the old method of building a few miles at a time, separate rows for rail, pipelines, transmission lines, etc and in the meantime the congestion gets worse.
You are correct about the I-35 corridor from San Antonio north to the DFW area. There are some tollroads being constructed paralleling parts of I-35 that hopefully will help some. Hopefully the Sequin to north of Austin 130 will eventually get funded and built.
29
posted on
01/06/2009 11:26:49 AM PST
by
deport
To: 2CAVTrooper
Agreed — but we have thousands of miles of exiting IHs (built to the lower standard) that we must live with, so moving the heavy cargo traffic onto a corridor built to Autobahn specs still makes sense.
30
posted on
01/06/2009 11:28:16 AM PST
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...!!)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
31
posted on
01/06/2009 11:33:15 AM PST
by
E.G.C.
(Click on a freeper's screename and then "In Forum" to read his/her posts)
To: TXnMA
The Texas Department of Transportation announced this morning that it has officially killed the Trans Texas Corridor, saying that despite the project's visionary aspects, "it is clearly not the choice of Texans." I'm more inclined to think the REAL reason this project has been cancelled has to do with economics, not whether Texans agreed or disagreed; TXDOT has known of this opinion for years, yet continued to push.
The main shipping ports of California are no longer terminally gridlocked with shipping containers. The idea was that Mexico would build a port/s capable of handling the bulk of China's goods, thus relieving congestion at The Port of Long Beach.
Enter Trans-Texas Corridor.
The U.S. recession has, for the time being, cured this congestion problem. Hence, no reason for TTC now.
32
posted on
01/06/2009 11:39:02 AM PST
by
adm5
(YOU CANNOT FIX CAPITALISM WITH SOCIALISM! -Glenn Beck)
To: rwfromkansas
Problem is, that it’s not just a new highway. It’s the “NAFTA Superhighway” that will eventually extend from Mexico to Canada, and is intended to be the vanguard for the open-borders of the “North American Community”.
The Pheonix may be dead...for the moment.
33
posted on
01/06/2009 11:39:35 AM PST
by
SandWMan
To: Ditter
I miss my Kansas snow a bit, but I do like Texas. I won’t like the heat in summer, but I suppose I could get some misters for the backyard. Those things really helped at the state fair.
34
posted on
01/06/2009 11:45:20 AM PST
by
rwfromkansas
("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
To: Ditter
As for the other stuff, come on. :) A snake here and there won’t end me.
35
posted on
01/06/2009 11:46:10 AM PST
by
rwfromkansas
("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
To: TXnMA
YEE-Haw! Now if we can rid ourselves of the local toll initiatives.
36
posted on
01/06/2009 11:56:05 AM PST
by
Sarajevo
(You're just jealous because the voices only talk to me.)
To: TXnMA
<LOL!!>
"exiting" s/b
"existing"...
Nowadays, the "exiting" is pretty much clogged with 18-wheelers whose drivers are napping...
37
posted on
01/06/2009 12:04:30 PM PST
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...!!)
To: Ditter
You left out the humidity. The awful, horrifying, debilitating humidity!!! (this is Hell...really...it is!)
38
posted on
01/06/2009 12:05:19 PM PST
by
XenaLee
To: rwfromkansas
"I miss my Kansas snow a bit..." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To paraphrase Lennart, my old Svenska fishing buddy,
"Ya, I sure miss the snow in MA -- I miss it -- but not veddy much!"
But I miss the snow shoveling nary a bit! <LOL!!!>
39
posted on
01/06/2009 12:29:23 PM PST
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...!!)
To: TXnMA
You should see the newly opened ‘Rest Stops’ at marker 282 on the Texas IH-35, about 50 miles north of Austin. Very high dollar and lots of room for trucks... I have been totally confused by these facilities since TxDOT has been crying the blues over lack of money and need for new toll roads.
BTW, I wonder if Goodhair’s son will lose his plush job with the Spanish company now?
40
posted on
01/06/2009 12:29:31 PM PST
by
CenTex
(Texas has a governor for sale... Make an offer...)
To: CenTex
"BTW, I wonder if Goodhairs son will lose his plush job with the Spanish company now?" One can but hope...
41
posted on
01/06/2009 12:32:35 PM PST
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...!!)
To: deport
Still carrying Goodhair’s water huh?
HEHEHEHEHEHE... I think that is the last laugh...
42
posted on
01/06/2009 12:33:26 PM PST
by
CenTex
(Texas has a governor for sale... Make an offer...)
To: XenaLee
What part of Texas are you in? It is so dry down here, I keep looking for camel trains!!!!
43
posted on
01/06/2009 12:39:13 PM PST
by
lolhelp
To: Ditter
“People need to stop moving here.”
I like that one. Stay and screw up your OWN state.
45
posted on
01/06/2009 1:12:20 PM PST
by
wolfcreek
(I see miles and miles of Texas....let's keep it that way.)
To: Ditter
I agree. I have lived my entire life here it's a bad place especially if you are a yankee or liberal. Please, please stay away, you won't like it here. crosses fingers
46
posted on
01/06/2009 1:14:35 PM PST
by
A Texan
(Oderint dum metuant)
To: TXnMA
Thank You for your Service to our state and it's people.
47
posted on
01/06/2009 1:17:33 PM PST
by
wolfcreek
(I see miles and miles of Texas....let's keep it that way.)
To: deport
48
posted on
01/06/2009 1:22:20 PM PST
by
wolfcreek
(I see miles and miles of Texas....let's keep it that way.)
To: deport
49
posted on
01/06/2009 1:22:50 PM PST
by
wolfcreek
(I see miles and miles of Texas....let's keep it that way.)
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA; TXnMA
Separate lanes for large trucks seemed like a good idea, for several reasons. Not if you're an ambulance chasing trial lawyer who makes a living suing trucking companies after 18-wheelers collide with passenger vehicles.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-80 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson