Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FDR knocks out Reagan as best 20th century president
The Colorado Independent ^ | 12/29/08 | Wendy Norris

Posted on 12/31/2008 7:38:11 AM PST by presidio9

Deal triumphs over the patriarch of the 1980s “government is the problem,” according to a new Rasmussen poll.

By a margin of 45-40 with 15 percent undecided, poll respondents selected Franklin Delano Roosevelt as better than Ronald Reagan. Predictably, the two commanders-in-chief won high marks from those on their ideological spectrum, with 76 percent of liberals favoring Roosevelt and 68 percent of conservatives preferring Reagan.

But it’s with moderate, women and African-American voters where the poll gets interesting. Centrists back FDR over Reagan 56 percent to 26 percent, while black voters overwhelmingly support him by a 2-to-1 margin. Women favored Roosevelt by 15 percentage points.

As fewer voters align with a specific political school of thought and women and minorities become more politically engaged, future candidates could do well to emulate the big thinking of the New Deal, focusing on a collapsing economy and multiple foreign wars rather than political pandering and ideology.

It probably also doesn’t hurt that the poll was conducted as Americans watched foreclosures loom, unemployment soar and Wall Street melt down. Maybe in the midst of an economic crisis, free markets without regulatory watch-dogging doesn’t seem like such a great idea after all.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Miscellaneous; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008polls; bravosierra; coldwar; fdr; hadacommievp; presidents; reagan; reddupe; starkravingsocialism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-53 next last

1 posted on 12/31/2008 7:38:12 AM PST by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Corresponds with the Demobama victory... they can’t get enough of socialist busybodies who sell out to communists.


2 posted on 12/31/2008 7:40:26 AM PST by SolidWood (Sarah Palin - Everything that is Sweetness and Light!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

This is because conservatives fail to teach.
Socialists have no such problem.

When conservatives bother to try and evangelize their message this will change. Until then, what did you expect?


3 posted on 12/31/2008 7:40:38 AM PST by IrishCatholic (No local communist or socialist party chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

(I guess Wendy polled the same people who voted for ZerO)


4 posted on 12/31/2008 7:40:49 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Sadly, this is a sign of the times. Americans want Uncle Sam to give them what they want and make “the rich” pay for it. We want to be children and have our parent, the government, take care of us, rather than Reagan-style individuals.


5 posted on 12/31/2008 7:41:03 AM PST by Opinionated Blowhard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

The pendulum swings back and forth, once people see under Obama, that Government isn’t the solution, it will swing back.


6 posted on 12/31/2008 7:42:11 AM PST by dfwgator (I hate Illinois Marxists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishCatholic
Socialists don't teach, they indoctrinate. Teaching means allowing the student to follow the logical progression to conclusion and make their own decisions based on that process.

IOW, conservatism means utilizing critical thinking. Why do that when you can just roll over and let the nanny state provide for you without any risk or hope of advancement?
7 posted on 12/31/2008 7:42:56 AM PST by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

one explanation, out country has turned to Socialism


8 posted on 12/31/2008 7:43:20 AM PST by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
The pendulum swings back and forth, once people see under Obama, that Government isn’t the solution, it will swing back.

One would have thought that after FDR, LBJ, and Carter. Sadly, they have not.
9 posted on 12/31/2008 7:43:45 AM PST by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard
As fewer voters align with a specific political school of thought and women and minorities become more politically engaged, future candidates could do well to emulate the big thinking of the New Deal, focusing on a collapsing economy and multiple foreign wars rather than political pandering and ideology.

How sad and ironic that the unintended consequences of the 15th and 19th amendments might end up being our nation's ultimate destruction.

10 posted on 12/31/2008 7:45:04 AM PST by presidio9 (Islam Is As Islam Does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
68 percent of conservatives preferring Reagan.

Are you kidding me? So 32 percent of conservatives prefer FDR?

Something stinks here.

11 posted on 12/31/2008 7:45:04 AM PST by Flycatcher (Strong copy for a strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky

Unfortunately, under President Bush, even though he spent like a Keynsian, with predictable results, people perceive he was conservative, and that we are in dire straits because of Reagan-like conservative policies.


12 posted on 12/31/2008 7:46:23 AM PST by dfwgator (I hate Illinois Marxists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Flycatcher

Makes no sense...


13 posted on 12/31/2008 7:47:45 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
No it doesn't—its been moving in one direction since the 1930s—over 70 years. Reagan was as close as we've had to a small government president in the past 70 years and he could only slow the growth of government. A GOP President with a GOP Congress spent like drunken sailors. I hate to be pessimistic but it is a sign of national decline, like Britain experienced, when the government does more and more.
14 posted on 12/31/2008 7:49:04 AM PST by Opinionated Blowhard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Flycatcher
Are you kidding me? So 32 percent of conservatives prefer FDR?

Something stinks here.

I agree with you. Sounds a bit like "32% of Muslims prefer Jesus." Unfortunately, what it makes me think is that at least half of the people who vote in this country are so stupid, that are unable to make any concrete distinction between liberalism and conservatism. We need a poll quiz.

15 posted on 12/31/2008 7:49:07 AM PST by presidio9 (Islam Is As Islam Does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Poll it must be true NOT


16 posted on 12/31/2008 7:51:02 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz

I think you can get a poll to say just about anything, dependent on who you ask and how you phrase the questions.

Reagan was without doubt the greatst President of the 20th century.


17 posted on 12/31/2008 7:53:14 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

This cycle the voters voted for “Uncle Sugar”. You have an entire generation of voters who have no memory of the 70’s that swept Reagan in.

Also an entire class of voters now that believe government is there to wipe their behinds and see to their needs. In other words a new class of voters that has basically given up on taking care of themselves.


18 posted on 12/31/2008 7:54:50 AM PST by headstamp 2 (Been here before)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I would give Warren Harding a high ranking. He was the only president of the century to substantially reduce the size of the federal government, and he successfully fought a depression and turned the economy around.

Harding and his successor Coolidge were also the last presidents to view themselves as chief magistrates, in the Jeffersonian tradition, with limited, enumerated powers. After 1928, the president essentially became an elected king.


19 posted on 12/31/2008 7:55:56 AM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Unfortunately, as both Presidents were of the 20th century, and most Americans alive today were not here for either presidency, all we really know about them is filtered through a liberal media and their promoted biographies.
Which one do you think gets more favorable treatment, in the media and the history books used in public education?
20 posted on 12/31/2008 7:56:14 AM PST by jeffc (They're coming to take me away! Ha-ha, he-he, ho-ho!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Let's see:

FDR: Decade long depression, world war, millions of people killed by facism and millions more killed or enslaved by Communism, rampant lynchings of blacks in the south.

Reagan: End of double digit inflation and unemployment rates, prosperity and growth, mostly peaceful except for an arms race which led to the collapse of the Soviet Union, national holiday for Martin Luther King, Jr.

Good grief! How stupid can people be?

21 posted on 12/31/2008 7:57:35 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or, are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
focusing on a collapsing economy and multiple foreign wars...

Right, because Reagan had no collapsed economy to focus on, plus he had all those foreign wars going on. Instead we should pattern ourselves on Roosevelt, who had no foreign wars.

/unneccessary sarcasm tag

...rather than political pandering and ideology.

Also, per Liberal Fascism, fascism typically presents itself as non-ideological or post-ideological.

22 posted on 12/31/2008 7:57:35 AM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Bush gave conservatism a bad name. I can’t wait for 2010.


23 posted on 12/31/2008 7:58:43 AM PST by SolidWood (Sarah Palin - Everything that is Sweetness and Light!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Flycatcher
68 percent of conservatives preferring Reagan.

Are you kidding me? So 32 percent of conservatives prefer FDR?

Something stinks here.

They're painting with a broad brush. I'm sure they call McCain and GW conservatives (and both would probably raise their hands for FDR).

24 posted on 12/31/2008 7:59:00 AM PST by randog (Hope is a bad business plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jeffc

I agree with you. FDR presided over the most cataclysmic war of the last century. He is mentioned FAR more than Reagan and hence the familiarity. Throw in a flaming liberal media and there you have it.


25 posted on 12/31/2008 7:59:05 AM PST by headstamp 2 (Been here before)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
FDR: Decade long depression, world war, millions of people killed by facism and millions more killed or enslaved by Communism, rampant lynchings of blacks in the south.

And don't forget, forced imprisonment of innocent Japanese citizens.

26 posted on 12/31/2008 8:00:27 AM PST by dfwgator (I hate Illinois Marxists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

FDR had a pro-Communist VP who saw Stalin’s gulags firsthand and said nothing.

Ronald Reagan helped bring about the collapse of the Soviet Union.

No comparison.


27 posted on 12/31/2008 8:02:36 AM PST by weegee ("Let Me Just Cut You Off, Because I Don't Want You To Waste Your Question" - B.Obama Dec 16, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

How utterly stupid this story is - the title makes it sound as though FDR has recently done something great to change Americans’ minds.


28 posted on 12/31/2008 8:18:10 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill
Harding and his successor Coolidge were also the last presidents to view themselves as chief magistrates, in the Jeffersonian tradition, with limited, enumerated powers. After 1928, the president essentially became an elected king.

Whenever I find myself engaged in this sort of discussion, I am always suprised how quick Conservatives are to bring up Jefferson. His status as a president is mostly bolstered by his earlier work as a patriot, and writer of the DOI. His major accomplishment as president was the Louisiana Purchase. Monroe had to basically pin Jefferson to the floor for permission to speak to Napolean about the deal. Then, when the deal was completed, Jefferson immediately levied taxes against his new citizens who had never voted (ie: taxation without representation). This is not to say that Jefferson was a bad president (or even that you suggested he was a good one). Just that it ticks me off that he is always overrated on these lists. I'd rank Reagan above Jefferson.

29 posted on 12/31/2008 8:20:25 AM PST by presidio9 (Islam Is As Islam Does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

FDR was a socialist who extended the Great Depression. He was a horrible President.


30 posted on 12/31/2008 8:24:36 AM PST by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
I'm surprised it wasn't Obama...I guess that will happen a couple of days after he's inaugurated.
31 posted on 12/31/2008 8:25:00 AM PST by HardStarboard ("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule - Mencken knew Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

naaah

another poll skewed- so what else is new


32 posted on 12/31/2008 8:25:28 AM PST by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

For those of us in our 70’s, the pendulum swings far to slowly. We were counting on Bush to push the pendulum right a whole bunch more than he did.


33 posted on 12/31/2008 8:27:21 AM PST by HardStarboard ("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule - Mencken knew Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky

Socialists do teach. They lay the groundwork in their worldview and restrict critical thinking. This way they induce people to accept their ideology

They also indoctrinate when those people are ready.

If conservatives taught history and logic, socialism would gain no traction. Now socialism, once a fringe, is almost the majority.


34 posted on 12/31/2008 8:28:56 AM PST by IrishCatholic (No local communist or socialist party chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

And what makes idiots that answer the phone capable of such a decision.

Undecided? BS. They didn’t know who Roosevelt was.

And on what grounds do they base their claim. How ‘bout you phrase the question: During their presidency who was better at the 50 yard dash?

You see...its all in the way the question is posed.


35 posted on 12/31/2008 9:19:56 AM PST by Vermont Lt (I am not from Vermont. I lived there for four years and that was enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

The world war was not FDR’s fault.


36 posted on 12/31/2008 9:23:32 AM PST by dbz77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

And in a related “poll”, respondents by a wide margin named Obama as the greatest President of the third Millennium....


37 posted on 12/31/2008 9:24:33 AM PST by mikrofon (Happy New Year 2009!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
Good grief! How stupid can people be?

You saw that November 4th,2008.

38 posted on 12/31/2008 9:29:22 AM PST by Centurion2000 (To protect and defend ... against all enemies, foreign and domestic .... by any means necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
This is not to say that Jefferson was a bad president (or even that you suggested he was a good one). Just that it ticks me off that he is always overrated on these lists. I'd rank Reagan above Jefferson.

It's difficult to know which of these men was truly a greater president (however you choose to define "greatness") when the institution of the Presidency was so drastically different in Jefferson's day than in Reagan's. I think that most conservatives would prefer the Jeffersonian institution to the imperial Presidency that Reagan inherited (and failed to inhibit).
39 posted on 12/31/2008 9:32:21 AM PST by UncleDick (Sola fide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: IrishCatholic

“This is because conservatives fail to teach.
Socialists have no such problem.”

I would use the word “indoctrinate” rather than “teach”.

I saw some Civil War movie off and on awhile back- “Riding with the Devil” or something, just saw bits and pieces. I think it was about Cantrell’s (sp?) Raiders which I think was after the war had ended??

ANYWAY - in one scene the younger guys with the Raiders are eating dinner with an older Southern Gentleman that is leaving the fight and moving to Texas. He tells the young raiders something like:

“The Northerners built a school, and they teach the children what to think, and to think like them. We’ve lost because we don’t try to tell others how to think.”

One young raider ready to lash out scowls “You tryin’ to say what we’re fightin’ for ain’t worth it?”

“No - we’ve already lost what we are fighting for.”

It went something like that anyway. A defeatist attitude I guess from the older gentleman, but accurate for the Civil War era. I hope it is not accurate for our times, but I fear it is.


40 posted on 12/31/2008 9:35:18 AM PST by 21twelve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dbz77
I'll grant you that. But the way he handled it (siding with Stalin againt Churchill at Yalta, giving Stalin pledges of territory for entering the war against Japan, etc.) are still haunting us today.

The longer I live, the more I understand my Dad was right about FDR being a sleezebag. He used to recite a poem to me about FDR called "Rejected". I'll see if I can find it and post it.

41 posted on 12/31/2008 9:41:11 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or, are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: dbz77
For a real good perspective on FDR's accomplishments, click on the title of the poem I promised and see Post #28 at the link.

Rejected
FDR at the gates of Hell

A stranger stood at the Gates of hell
And the Devil himself answered the bell.
He looked him over from head to toe
And said: My friend, I'd like to know
What you have done in the line of sin
To entitle you to come within?

Then Franklin D, with his usual guile
Stepped forth with his toothy smile and said:

"When I took charge in '33
A nations faith was mine," said he
"I promised them this and I promised them that
And I calmed them down with a fireside chat.
I spent their money in fishing trips
And fished from the decks of their battleships.

I gave them jobs in the WPA
Then raised their taxes and took it away.
I raised their wages and closed their shops
I killed their pigs and buried their crops
I double-crossed both old and young
And still the folks my praises sung. I taxed it so high they couldn't drink.
I furnished 'em money with Government loans
When they missed a payment I took their homes.
When I wanted to punish the folks, you know
I'd put my wife on the radio.

I paid them to let their farms lie still
And imported foodstuffs from Brazil.
I curtailed crops when I felt real mean
And shipped in crops from the Argentine.

When they started to worry, stew and fret
I got them to chant the alphabet
With the AAA and the NLB
The WPA and the CCC.

With these many units I got their goats
And still I crammed it down their throats.
My workers worked with the speed of snails
While the taxpayers chewed their fingernails.

When the organization needed dough
I closed their plants with the CIO.
I ruined jobs, I ruined health
And I put the screws on the rich man's wealth.
And some who couldn't stand the gaff
Would call on me and how I'd laugh.
When they got too strong on certain things
I'd pack and head for "Ole Warm Springs."
I ruined their country, their homes and then
I placed the blame on "Nine Old Men."

Now Franklin talked both long and loud
And the devil stood and his head he bowed.
At last he said: "Lets make it clear
You'll have to move, you can't stay here
For once you mingle with this mob,
I'll have to find another job."

42 posted on 12/31/2008 9:51:16 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or, are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

Its all in how you package it and sadly the packaging and sales department belongs to the Liberal Media.


43 posted on 12/31/2008 10:26:21 AM PST by tomnbeverly ("In the hour of darkness and peril and need, the people will waken to listen and hear.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Maybe in the midst of an economic crisis, free markets without regulatory watch-dogging doesn’t seem like such a great idea after all.

Wendy, you ignorant, misguided journalist. Read a book.

If you think there has been no regulatory watch-dogging lately, ask yourself how and why it is that outfits like Enron, WorldComm, Arthur Andersen, Tyco, et al, no longer exist?

And while you're at it, ask yourself why it is that people like Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Maxine Waters, et al, are viewed as the arbiters of fiscal responsibility when it is they who ignored the warnings of the looming mortgage crisis when they were in position to do something about it?

Begone, loser. I can't take it no more.

44 posted on 12/31/2008 10:35:16 AM PST by Texas Eagle (Who'll save the world from those who think only they can save it?. -- Ashleigh Brilliant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Don’t get me wrong—My post was about Harding, and I never said that Jefferson is my favorite president. However, I, like many conservatives would prefer a presidency with limited powers based on the principles that Jefferson articulated and personified as opposed to the elected kings that we have today.


45 posted on 12/31/2008 10:36:38 AM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Flycatcher
Are you kidding me? So 32 percent of conservatives prefer FDR?

Not long ago, Laura Ingraham interviewed Conrad Black, who wrote a hagiography of FDR, and she was positively gushing in her admiration for Dr. New Deal.

However, I do admire FDR for one accomplishment--the Manhattan Project.

46 posted on 12/31/2008 10:41:10 AM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Poll taker: Who do you think is the greatest president - Roosevelt or Reagan?

Uninformed/govt educated Pollee: What parties are they affiliated with?

Poll Taker: Roosevelt - Democrat; Reagan - Republican.

Uninformed/govt educated pollee: I pick Roosevelt.

47 posted on 12/31/2008 10:56:39 AM PST by 3catsanadog (I plan to give the new President the same respect and dignity the other side gave Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

It’s important to note this Norris lady doesn’t bother to mention how many people were actually polled. Most Americans can’t even name the 9 Supreme Court Justices today, and I’m supposed to believe that a majority of living Americans have even the remotest clue as to what FDR accomplished and thrust upon America during his Presidency, nearly 75 Years Ago? Yeah, Right. Mmm Hmmm.


48 posted on 12/31/2008 11:46:23 AM PST by Pagey (B. Hussein Obama has no experience running anything, except his pedestrian mouth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
FDR knocks out Reagan as best 20th century president

No he doesn't.

49 posted on 12/31/2008 5:19:23 PM PST by gitmo (I am the latte-sipping, NYT-reading, Volvo-driving, no-gun-owning, effete, PC, arrogant liberal. -BO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Let’s see: A president who presided over and prolonged twelve years of depression, the last four of which were spent in a world war, vs. a president who caused a 25-year economic boom and won the Cold War. Such an easy choice! Depression and war beats prosperity and peace hands down!


50 posted on 12/31/2008 6:20:40 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson