Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Women at the Top of Business Out Earn Men
Pittsburgh Post Gazette ^ | December 13, 2008 | Torsten Ove

Posted on 12/13/2008 8:40:42 AM PST by PittsburghAfterDark

A Carnegie Mellon University study has concluded that women executives out-earn their male counterparts.

The study, which examined 16,000 executives over 14 years, found that women at the top of the business world bring in a bit more than men and are promoted at the same rate, countering the popular notion that women earn less than men for the same work.

"That common perception is not borne out by this study," said Robert A. Miller, professor of economics and strategy and one of the authors. "If you're looking for evidence of gender discrimination in executive promotion and compensation, it's not happening there."

The study, "Are There Glass Ceilings for Female Executives?," was released last month by Carnegie Mellon's Tepper School of Business but hasn't been published yet.

The largest empirical analysis of the top echelons of publicly traded companies determined that women earned about $100,000 more per year than men of the same age, educational background and experience.

(Excerpt) Read more at postgazette.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: business; executive; pay; women
I'm sick of being a second class citizen. I demand equal pay for equal work. BLAH BLAH BLAH!

Okay Nags, its time to STFU. Put this in your quivers FReepers, the myth has been laid to rest that women are not paid the same as men.

1 posted on 12/13/2008 8:40:42 AM PST by PittsburghAfterDark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PittsburghAfterDark

I think there are two women CEOs in the Fortune 500, and maybe 3 of the companies were started by a woman. This article is complete nonsense.


2 posted on 12/13/2008 8:49:05 AM PST by T. Jefferson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T. Jefferson

How exactly does that prove that this study is nonsense?


3 posted on 12/13/2008 8:51:04 AM PST by Arguendo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: T. Jefferson

Yes, because we know that Carnegie Mellon University is completely incompetent and a well known right leaning bastion of academia.... ROLLS EYES.


4 posted on 12/13/2008 8:57:40 AM PST by PittsburghAfterDark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PittsburghAfterDark

I pray for the day when my son will be able to make as much as his female counterparts in the workplace. I pray for the day when there is equal representation of men in college, graduate school, law school and medical school.

1) Data from the U.S. Department of Education shows women account for 58 percent of enrollment at public two- and four-year colleges and universities.

2) In the year 2000, the number of female applicants to law school has surpassed the number of male applicants, the Law School Admission Council said Wednesday.

3) In 2003, for the first time ever, women outnumbered men among people applying to U.S. medical schools for this fall — a milestone in the slow but steady increase in the number of aspiring female doctors. Now women outnumber men 3 to 2 at med school.


5 posted on 12/13/2008 9:00:59 AM PST by WaterBoard (Somewhere a Village is Missing it's Socialist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PittsburghAfterDark

...oldest profession.


6 posted on 12/13/2008 10:23:53 AM PST by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote, http://falconparty.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T. Jefferson
"I think there are two women CEOs in the Fortune 500, and maybe 3 of the companies were started by a woman. This article is complete nonsense."

Yeah...right. The following is from a few years ago. Our business morts have long been frenchified, IMO.

The following are Fortune 500s that filed briefs in favor of "affirmative action" in the Michigan "Grutter v. Bollinger" (Michigan University) case.

http://www.umich.edu/~urel/admissions/legal/gru_amicus/32_internatl.pdf

3M
Abbott Laboratories
American Airlines
Ashland
Bank One
Boeing
Coca-Cola
Dow Chemical
E.I. Du Pont De Nemours
Eastman Kodak
Eli Lilly
Ernst & Young
Exelon
Fannie Mae
General Dynamics
General Mills
Intel
Johnson & Johnson
Kellogg
KPMG
Lucent Technologies
Microsoft
Mitsubishi
Nationwide Mutual Insurance
Nationwide Financial
Pfizer
PPG
Proctor & Gamble
Sara Lee
Steelcase
Texaco
TRW
United Airlines
General Motors Corporation

http://www.umich.edu/~urel/admissions/legal/gru_amicus/gru_gm.html


7 posted on 12/13/2008 10:29:31 AM PST by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote, http://falconparty.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PittsburghAfterDark

well, golly gee... no kidding...

For YEARS I’ve been READING how men out-earn women at equal positions, but in REAL life have seen the opposite be true. It’s about time we see the truth in print.


8 posted on 12/13/2008 10:41:31 AM PST by J40000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arguendo
How exactly does that prove that this study is nonsense?

Look at the title of the article. "Women at the Top of Business Out Earn Men." Seeing as almost every Fortune 500 company was started by a man, and all but a few CEOs of the Fortune 500 are men (ie the highest paying jobs), women at the top are not in the same league as men, let alone "out earning men."

That doesn't even include Wall St., Hedge Funds, etc., where the same applies with all the CEOs and founders, and the pay is even higher.

9 posted on 12/15/2008 10:59:53 PM PST by T. Jefferson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WaterBoard

Why would requiring equal representation of men be any better than requiring equal representation of women?


10 posted on 12/16/2008 3:52:57 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Apple Blossom

ping


11 posted on 12/16/2008 3:57:08 AM PST by bmwcyle (McCain had no honor when he failed to defend Sarah Palin, Leno was not enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

There is no TRW any more. The company is gone.


12 posted on 12/16/2008 3:59:09 AM PST by bmwcyle (McCain had no honor when he failed to defend Sarah Palin, Leno was not enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

It’s called ‘sarcasm’, duh.


13 posted on 12/16/2008 4:36:26 AM PST by WaterBoard (Somewhere a Village is Missing it's Socialist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: WaterBoard

Ah jeez, sorry, I thought you were part of the angry ‘men’s rights’ gang!


14 posted on 12/16/2008 4:41:17 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

No problem. Merry Christmas.


15 posted on 12/16/2008 6:37:57 AM PST by WaterBoard (Somewhere a Village is Missing it's Socialist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson