Wingers and the Born Conspriacy (or "Dr." Polarik is a Fraud)

unattributable.com ^ | Dec. 2, 2008 | Prudence

[Nipfan]

If you had bothered to look, you would have seen that I was responding to a post which said that there already were other experts who believed it to be fraudulent. I was just asking for details.

[Kevmo]

Mrs. Cheese is not at ease so pleased
A revolting cat her gender sleazed
and Calpernia is not her name
but we love her just the same
I tell y’all I’m really shocked
but our Polarik will not be knocked

I’ve been watching too many of my kids’ videos lately

;-)

[Kevmo]

I did bother to check and I’m telling you to go and get your details. Anyone, even you, can act like a keyboard commando sniping from standoff range and demand details that are hard to produce or don’t exist. Do it for yourself once in a while to see how difficult it is, and you won’t be so dismissive about the level of detail that is provided here. You want a detailed analysis from an expert, go and get one. Thanks for volunteering. Let us know how that project goes.

[Windflier]

Do we really not know for sure if this expert is who he says he is?

Honestly.... I really don't believe that anyone would raise this question if they'd actually read Ron Polarik's full report.

Res ipsa loquitur.

[Fred Nerks]

Google

Results 1 - 10 of about 38,500,000 for CONSPRIACY

[Fred Nerks]

CONSPRIACY=A WHOLE LOT OF PEOPLE WHO CAN’T SPELL CONSPIRACY!

[HawaiianGecko]

I don't know what this all means but there have been 1,354,873 PhD's conferred between 1920-1999.  Only 8,751 of those are in experimental and/or comparative psychology and 2,981 in instructional media. Approximately 8% have dual doctorates. These numbers lead to statistical odds of having dual doctorates in these two specific fields of study at 1 chance in 879,605.  http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf06319/tables/taba1.xls

Anyone that signs a post... http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2143233/posts?page=195#195  ... "Have a good weekend, Chow for now."  Doesn't strike me as someone that spent his first 34.7 years in academia.

Ciao, Y'all.

[Sharrukin]

Those who attack the messenger because the message is uncomfortable are in fact making an understandable, though primitive, response. Instead of addressing the argument that has been made, people using this method attack the person making it instead.

[Joe Marine 76]

I’m not familiar with “Krawetz?”

[Grampa Dave]

There is/was no date on the jpg.

[Revolting cat!]

You just wait till Dr. (Polarik) Sues!

[PhilDragoo]

[Kevmo]

Mrs. Cheese is not so pleased
A revolting cat her gender sleazed
and Calpernia is not her name
but we love her just the same
I tell y’all I’m really shocked
but our Polarik will not be knocked
You just wait till the Doctor Sues!
Is that Doctor Suess? Who Knews?

[LucyT]

Stupid EEdEEot

Heh, good guess.

[Kevmo]

You need to read the article.

[Revolting cat!]

A poet of one name Kevmo
Scratched rhymes and them some mo
Not read by O H Barack
Appreciated by Polarik
Like Blago he wanted dough

[Joe Marine 76]

Thanks, I will do so immediately!

[Kevmo]

And then Kevmo went to Bevmo so he could Have mo’.

[Fred Nerks]

A Message to our Electors:

http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=sX7uuhHXs-0

[rosettasister]

Hi, Lucy!

You don’t know me, but I’ve been putting up posts about Polarik’s findings at RosettaSister, well, for awhile now.

I was wondering if you could shed some light on the following question I received:

Foxtrot Says:
December 11, 2008 at 10:23 pm
Rosetta — -have you checked into this clandestine filing in the D.C. court from Berg et al? I would be very curious to see if you can find out any more on this subject.
————————
I’ll try, Foxy.
This is the first I’ve heard of it.
Polarik did post something about “a Factcheck lawsuit” at Free Republic but didn’t elaborate.
I don’t know if they’re related.

---

Anyhow, glad to make your acquaintance.

Would appreciate a reply.