Skip to comments.
Obama expected to press repeal of military ban on 'gays'
OneNewsNow ^
| 12/5/2008
| Chad Groening
Posted on 12/06/2008 3:22:53 AM PST by IbJensen
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-163 next last
To: RU88
...a down payment on what he owes to all of his homosexual allies. It's a shame that this speaks volumes about the character of Obomba. (America's first African-African president.)
To be beholden to a gaggle of perverts is an utter disgrace.
21
posted on
12/06/2008 5:12:53 AM PST
by
IbJensen
(The fat lady has sung and it was awful. Coming up: Maya Angelou!)
To: IbJensen
Buy Stock in the company that makes Soap on a Rope.
To: SolidWood
could those helmets possibly look more GAY?
Only if they were pink!
23
posted on
12/06/2008 5:43:22 AM PST
by
a real Sheila
(Going into my cave Jan 20. Come get me in 4 years.)
To: IbJensen
For some reason Obama is determined to suck up to the gays. I wish I knew why a supposed Christian would bend over for such abominations.
24
posted on
12/06/2008 5:47:53 AM PST
by
raybbr
To: IbJensen
25
posted on
12/06/2008 5:49:06 AM PST
by
ladyvet
(WOLVERINES!!!!!)
To: IbJensen
This was also one of Mitt Romney’s goals, full integration of homosexuals into the military, it looks like Obama will beat him to it.
26
posted on
12/06/2008 5:59:29 AM PST
by
ansel12
( When a conservative pundit mocks Wasilla, he's mocking conservatism as it's actually lived.)
To: a real Sheila
27
posted on
12/06/2008 6:00:01 AM PST
by
SolidWood
(Sarah Palin - Everything that is Sweetness and Light! WE STAND WITH HER!)
To: IbJensen
If this happens, I will guarantee you that Navy members will vote with their feet, and accept a discharge as soon as they can. I don’t think many civilians who have never served truly understand just how big of a threat this poses to our Armed Forces.
Unfortunately, those people who don’t understand (and who don’t really care) are the Congress Critters who are going to attempt to make this happen.
28
posted on
12/06/2008 6:18:22 AM PST
by
Bean Counter
(Stout Hearts.....)
To: IbJensen
And never mind that he is not a “natural born” citizen and does not Constitutionally qualify to hold the Office of President. But then, McCain doesn't either. Who cares about our Constitution anyway! Just a few of us “tinfoil hat” wearers. We are the ones watching what is going on in the Courts across the country and the cases before the SCOTUS with a decision coming Monday on the Donofrio case!
Just had to pause a moment to adjust my tinfoil hat. One of the American flags started to fall off, but I fixed it. :)
To: IbJensen
the law that forbids homosexuals from serving in the military.
There is NO such law.
Homos CAN serve. They just can't prance around the latrine in heat.
30
posted on
12/06/2008 7:17:16 AM PST
by
Beckwith
(Typical white person)
To: Beckwith
Homos CAN serve. They just can't prance around the latrine in heat. As it should be. Why should the military care what they do in private, off-duty? Existing fraternization and sexual harassment regulations should be adaptable to take care of any issues this presents.
The simple fact of the matter is that there are gay and lesbians serving in uniform now. No one of my generation cares very much.
31
posted on
12/06/2008 7:22:17 AM PST
by
jude24
To: a real Sheila
MOST gays are militant liberal democrats. Militant liberal dems HATE the military! They infiltrate to destroy the organization. Just like they have damaged the leadership of all the mainline churches.
32
posted on
12/06/2008 8:23:53 AM PST
by
Mogollon
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. -- Thomas Jefferson)
To: IbJensen
Obama vows to "kill or capture Osama bin Laden."
Will he use his hand-picked Obama-Corps to get the job done?
33
posted on
12/06/2008 8:30:05 AM PST
by
Iron Munro
(Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself)
To: jude24
As it should be. I agree. When I was in the Army, there was no doubt that there were some guys that were "smoking rope". However, having it in the open would definitely not be conducive to good order and discipline. Same thing with women in combat arms units.
34
posted on
12/06/2008 8:51:19 AM PST
by
glorgau
To: IbJensen
Homosexuals can and do serve in the military. They just can’t tell anyone they are homosexual, and no one can ask them if they are. They have to be “stealth homosexuals.”
35
posted on
12/06/2008 11:01:28 AM PST
by
ViLaLuz
(2 Chronicles 7:14)
To: IbJensen
There goes out military; how many lifetime officers (and PVCs do you think will retire or opt to not re-enlist) when this goes into effect?
36
posted on
12/06/2008 11:14:18 AM PST
by
JSDude1
(Like the failed promise of Fascism masquerading as Capitalism? You're gonna love Marxism- Nephi)
To: ViLaLuz
They just cant tell anyone they are homosexual/They wouldn’t have to it shows ban them.
37
posted on
12/06/2008 11:45:17 AM PST
by
Vaduz
To: Army MP Retired
That is most reassuring - sounds like the Armed Forces at the last hold-out. God bless them all.
To: FES0844
I agree - I had no problem with them if they stayed in the closet. Whenever I get treated to pics (compliments of the tv) of two men or two women showing “affection” to each other, it honestly makes me rather sick. I find it revolting.
To: IbJensen
I hope all the black members of the military who voted for Zero enjoy their new bunk mates!
40
posted on
12/06/2008 1:11:05 PM PST
by
edge10
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-163 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson