Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Daniels may be considered for national run (IN Rep. Governor)
WTHR website ^ | 11/11/08 | Kevin Rader

Posted on 11/11/2008 3:38:42 PM PST by Kimmers

Kevin Rader/Eyewitness News

Indianapolis - Governor Mitch Daniels may be picking up more than he bargained for when he accepts an award in Washington D.C. Wednesday.

The governor will be presented with the 2008 Public Official of the Year Award from Governing Magazine, as the Republican Party works to rebuild itself.

If there was one thing Daniels has been adamant about, other than his campaign theme of change, it was in his determination to make his re-election campaign his last campaign.

The biggest surprise one week after his re-election victory is that some Republicans now want Daniels to consider a national run.

"Will Governor Daniels set sights higher - perhaps the Oval Office? Some want him to run for president," wrote NY Times columnist William Kristol.

Meanwhile, USA Today calls Daniels the "bright spot for the GOP." In a column in the Washington Post entitled "Governors Know Best," David Broder writes the GOP should look to successful chief executives like Daniels.

"Indiana's Daniels, just re-elected to a second term, may offer the best example of the distinctive approach of these politicians," Broder wrote.

"At the top of that list is Mitch Daniels," said State Republican Party Chairman Murray Clark.

He says the governor is more concerned about Indiana, but he understands the attraction.

"He sticks to his guns, is resolute about sticking to fundamental Republican principles - less government, lower taxes - and at the same time, he relates to everyday people," Clark said.

Daniels' name also surfaced during this week's Meet the Press.

"The fact is that there's a lot of bright stars of our party. Mitch Daniels had an excellent day," said Senator Mel Martinez. "On a day when the Republican ticket lost Indiana, he won re-election overwhelmingly. That's because the kind of governor he's been and the kinds of things he has done."

Some say that begs the question if Daniels really is done after this term, even if he doesn't seem like he's going to change his mind.

"There is always a chance," Clark said.

"At the state level, we have statutory term limits and in the broader sense, we have the Cheri Daniels term limits and the penalty for violating the latter is more severe," Daniels said.

As the poster boy for the Republican Governor's Association, he will most likely be asked to consider it.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Indiana
KEYWORDS: 2012gopprimary; govenor; in; in2008; mitchdaniels
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-56 next last
Palin/Daniels ticket or Daniels/Palin
1 posted on 11/11/2008 3:38:42 PM PST by Kimmers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kimmers

at least we could win back Indiana!


2 posted on 11/11/2008 3:40:07 PM PST by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kimmers

We have a great crop of candidates for 2008! Daniels, Palin, Jindal, Pence, Sanford...much better than this years primary


3 posted on 11/11/2008 3:42:49 PM PST by Def Conservative (Palin, Jindal, Pence, Sanford, Steele= the new GOP...out with the old)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kimmers
Daniels ran a good twenty points better than McCain in IN. That's the traditional GOP blowout margin. Apparently a lot of those same GOP voters turned around and voted for Obama.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

4 posted on 11/11/2008 3:43:36 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kimmers

Daniels is a nanny state jerk wad. He is fiscally conservative is his only good value. We need more jerk wads like this like we need more RINO’s

Enough said.


5 posted on 11/11/2008 3:44:02 PM PST by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget (God punishes Conservatives by making them argue with fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kimmers

Is there anyway to compare the states the GOP runs with D runned states? i.e. the GOP has Jindal, Palin, Daniels, Huntsman- and they all seem to be doing decent jobs.
What are the D’s running their states? Granholm, Sebelius, Patterson, Corzine


6 posted on 11/11/2008 3:45:33 PM PST by SMCC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kimmers

Not interested.

Sarah Palin or Jindal are the only two that interest me. And if Sarah isn’t the Presidential nominee, I’m not interested in her being a Veep. Been there, done that.

Either Sarah/Jindal or Sarah/conservative or Jindal/conservative.

Maybe someone else will appear in four years to add to the list, but Daniels’ won’t be that someone.


7 posted on 11/11/2008 3:46:40 PM PST by Soul Seeker (Gov. Sarah Palin '08 -- President Sarah Palin '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker

Hear Hear!!!

Daniels is a formula for another disastrous pseudo-conservative election choice.


8 posted on 11/11/2008 3:52:13 PM PST by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget (God punishes Conservatives by making them argue with fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kimmers
Isn't he the guy that said we had to "get over" Reagan?

Sorry. Not interested.

Palin '12

9 posted on 11/11/2008 3:54:11 PM PST by rhinohunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

Unfortunately, I have to agree with your assessment.


10 posted on 11/11/2008 3:55:38 PM PST by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Def Conservative

Don’t forget Mitt!


11 posted on 11/11/2008 3:59:02 PM PST by GOPsterinMA (The countdown to 01/20/2013 has started......will it matter?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kimmers

Mitch Daniels was a Bush-guy.

Also..anyone who William Kristol is pushing,...I am running the other way.


12 posted on 11/11/2008 3:59:29 PM PST by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kimmers

Hunter/Jindal

The only way to win it back. No more amnesty supporting, global warming believing, reach across the aisle, class warfare republicans.


13 posted on 11/11/2008 4:01:28 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Apparently a lot of those same GOP voters turned around and voted for Obama

You should replace the word "GOP" with the word "idiots." I submitted a comment to the Indy Times that said only idiots and fools voted for Obama. Apparently my account got deleted due to excessive vulgarities in reply to my comment.

14 posted on 11/11/2008 4:04:14 PM PST by pctech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kimmers

That is what the republican need a toll road king. Non starter!!!!


15 posted on 11/11/2008 4:05:54 PM PST by org.whodat ( "the Whipped Dog Party" , what was formally the republicans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Jindal joined the Dems and voted for SCHIP while in Congress.


16 posted on 11/11/2008 4:06:19 PM PST by SMCC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SMCC1

He did? Another compassionate conservartive?

Hunter/Pence


17 posted on 11/11/2008 4:07:19 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper
at least we could win back Indiana!

It was Daniels and his Toll road that cause the lose to begin with.

18 posted on 11/11/2008 4:07:33 PM PST by org.whodat ( "the Whipped Dog Party" , what was formally the republicans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SMCC1
Jindal joined the Dems and voted for SCHIP while in Congress.

Every Repub will be called a RINO on FR with the discovery of the first flaw found in their record.

Count on it.

19 posted on 11/11/2008 4:08:31 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
Also..anyone who William Kristol is pushing,...I am running the other way.

Not to mention open borders Martinez.

20 posted on 11/11/2008 4:09:35 PM PST by org.whodat ( "the Whipped Dog Party" , what was formally the republicans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

Right now in the present give anything to anyone climate I would welcome a fiscal conservative. Anyone who would just say no to the raping of the taxpayer and the future of this country would be welcome.


21 posted on 11/11/2008 4:14:15 PM PST by saganite (I for one welcome our new Socialist masters /s/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: saganite

The first thing Daniels did upon being elected 4 yrs ago was propose an income tax increase on incomes over 100k.
Yes he’s better than most any Democrat, but he’s definitely a Bushie Pub.


22 posted on 11/11/2008 4:17:36 PM PST by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA
Don’t forget Mitt!

LOL

How could we forget him?:


23 posted on 11/11/2008 4:18:03 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation
but he’s definitely a Bushie Pub

Bush CUT taxes.

24 posted on 11/11/2008 4:18:50 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

While INCREASING spending.


25 posted on 11/11/2008 4:20:09 PM PST by Globalist Goon ("Head down over a saddle.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Kimmers

“Will Governor Daniels set sights higher - perhaps the Oval Office? Some want him to run for president,” wrote NY Times columnist William Kristol.

Meanwhile, USA Today calls Daniels the “bright spot for the GOP.” In a column in the Washington Post entitled “Governors Know Best,” David Broder writes the GOP should look to successful chief executives like Daniels.


Given the men and institutions quoted, the question begs to be asked; Just how liberal is this Republican?


26 posted on 11/11/2008 4:22:18 PM PST by Grunthor (Palin/Jindal 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kimmers

I recall a thread Daniels said Reaganism is dead. Sounds like another “compassionate conservative” aka bush liberal.


27 posted on 11/11/2008 4:23:00 PM PST by newfreep ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." - P.J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Def Conservative

“We have a great crop of candidates for 2008! Daniels, Palin, Jindal, Pence, Sanford...much better than this years primary”

If only because there will be no McCain or Ruby.


28 posted on 11/11/2008 4:23:35 PM PST by Grunthor (Palin/Jindal 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kimmers

Sanford is the best, as far as I’m concerned, at least based on his conservative bona fides. That said, I know nothing about his charisma, speaking ability, or television presence. Yes, oratory and telegenics matter.

I would also like to see Rick Santorum make a comeback.


29 posted on 11/11/2008 4:23:48 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Def Conservative
We have a great crop of candidates for 2008! Daniels, Palin, Jindal, Pence, Sanford...much better than this years primary

You mean 2012, right?

30 posted on 11/11/2008 4:25:10 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

yeah. pay me no mind..with the lackluster folks the GOP has been proping up lately, I get kinda ahead of myself.


31 posted on 11/11/2008 4:26:22 PM PST by Def Conservative (Palin, Jindal, Pence, Sanford, Steele= the new GOP...out with the old)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

C’mon- Daniels is not so bad.

He leased the toll road to a private concern at the absolute peak of the infrastructure craze. He got over $2B up front for it, and it could fetch not even half that amount now. It was a smart move for the state.


32 posted on 11/11/2008 4:28:01 PM PST by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: what's up; Txsleuth

“Every Repub will be called a RINO on FR with the discovery of the first flaw found in their record.”

anyone who William Kristol is pushing,...I am running the other way.

-Txsleuth


33 posted on 11/11/2008 4:28:02 PM PST by Grunthor (Palin/Jindal 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Kimmers

No thanks.


34 posted on 11/11/2008 4:28:58 PM PST by B Knotts (ConservatismCentral.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

I repeat;

Given the men and institutions quoted, the question begs to be asked; Just how liberal is this Republican?


35 posted on 11/11/2008 4:31:12 PM PST by Grunthor (Palin/Jindal 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Kimmers

The GOP is full of crap.


36 posted on 11/11/2008 4:32:22 PM PST by Globalist Goon ("Head down over a saddle.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

Yeah...I already got that in your first post.


37 posted on 11/11/2008 4:36:25 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Def Conservative

I agree that we have a better outlook for 2012 now that Bob Dole, I mean John McCain, got “his turn” to run.


38 posted on 11/11/2008 4:38:15 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

“It was Daniels and his Toll road that cause the lose to begin with.”

Ok, Daniels and the toll road caused McCain to lose Indiana while Daniels was re-elected in a landslide. Yeah, that makes sense.


39 posted on 11/11/2008 4:45:17 PM PST by John W (Voters were more afraid of losing their money than losing their souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

I never could understand the problem with the leasing of that toll road....I guess Hoosiers forgot that a British Co. manages the airport and a French company manages the water in Indps....and IN is actually in the black


40 posted on 11/11/2008 4:47:05 PM PST by Kimmers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Kimmers
Shoot. I thought for a second there this was about Charlie Daniels.
41 posted on 11/11/2008 4:59:25 PM PST by Apparatchik ("Hope" is not a course of action. "Change" is a not a policy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kimmers
Il, Oh, Mi are in the tank, In has millions in cash on hand and they are still bashing Mitch. I don't get it.

Mitch said in his acceptance speech he was not running again for any office!

42 posted on 11/11/2008 5:00:08 PM PST by sausageseller (http://coolblue.typepad.com/the_cool_blue_blog/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: sausageseller
I do not think there is a perfect candidate out there and people including FReepers will find fault in everyone....
43 posted on 11/11/2008 5:22:01 PM PST by Kimmers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

Yes he’s better than most any Democrat, but he’s definitely a Bushie Pub.

Which probably explains the “enthusiasm” expressed by the Republican party in keeping him around. The stupid party still wants to ignore it’s base.


44 posted on 11/11/2008 5:27:40 PM PST by saganite (I for one welcome our new Socialist masters /s/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: John W
The state election two year ago. You proved you do not know the history of the man.
45 posted on 11/11/2008 5:32:40 PM PST by org.whodat ( "the Whipped Dog Party" , what was formally the republicans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

Based on my experience with Daniels, he is reliably conservative on business/economic issues, and is quite liberal on some, but not all social issues. The first time he ran, he was opposed in the primary by an unapologetic social conservative, but he had no serious challengers this time.

Daniels is to the right of Dick Lugar, but that’s not saying much.

Could he do well in a national election? Perhaps. He has been a successful administrator in both the private and public sectors, and transformed all of the organizations he worked for.


46 posted on 11/11/2008 5:34:34 PM PST by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Kimmers

No.


47 posted on 11/11/2008 6:10:24 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

And, what you know about Indiana you could put in a thimble.


48 posted on 11/11/2008 7:00:33 PM PST by John W (Voters were more afraid of losing their money than losing their souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: what's up

Republican today doesn’t = conservative.

That needs to change fast if we have a farts chance in a hurricane of weak kneed wimpy woosies with no balls.

F em. If they are fools let them rot.

Our way or the highway.

Dems do it. They won. Reach down and find a pair and tell the bleeding heart to go F themselves. (nicely)


49 posted on 11/11/2008 7:03:46 PM PST by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget (God punishes Conservatives by making them argue with fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Kimmers

Maybe secretary of the treasury but that is it. He does not have what it takes to head a national ticket.


50 posted on 11/11/2008 7:06:22 PM PST by daylilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson