Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boycott NYT: Media Bias Reached New Lows in 2008 Campaign
Accuracy in Media ^ | October 28, 2008 | Boycott The New York Times

Posted on 10/28/2008 1:39:33 PM PDT by AIM Freeper

On the release of an October 22 Pew Research Center survey that found 70% of Americans think the media favors Senator Obama over Senator McCain, Boycott The New York Times editor Don Feder noted that media bias reached new lows in this election.

“As bad as The New York Times has been before, it’s nothing compared to the way the paper has managed, manipulated and mangled coverage of the 2008 campaign,” Feder observed. “Not a day goes by that The Times doesn’t misrepresent John McCain, ridicule Sarah Palin, refuse to report a revelation that reflects badly on the Obama-Biden campaign, or rationalize Obama’s radical past.”

The Pew study found that only 9% of voters think the media favors John McCain, in contrast to 70% who believe journalists favor Barack Obama. At this point in the 2004 campaign, a Pew survey found that 50% of Americans thought the press favored John Kerry, compared with 22% who thought it preferred George W. Bush.

A study of media coverage of the candidates in the six weeks following the nominating conventions, by the Project for Excellence in Journalism, showed four times as many negative stories about McCain as about Obama.

Feder further notes that according to a Rasmussen report earlier this year, only 24% of Americans have a favorable opinion of The New York Times, “making the paper almost as popular as trial lawyers.”

Feder calls Times editorial page editor Andrew Rosenthal’s recent claim – in a speech to the Association of National Advertisers – that the paper aims to ensure opinion and news are kept separate – “stand-up comedy at its most hilarious.”

(Excerpt) Read more at aim.org ...


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: barackobama; johnmccain; mediabias; thenewyorktimes
Freepers: if you're fed up with The New York Times' biased election coverage, head to www.boycottnyt.com and sign the pledge to boycott The Times. Even if you've already canceled your subscription or have never subscribed, you can still sign our online petition to tell The Times how you feel about their reporting. Thanks for all you do!
1 posted on 10/28/2008 1:39:33 PM PDT by AIM Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AIM Freeper

Boycott?!? But what will I do for house-training our puppy?


2 posted on 10/28/2008 1:41:44 PM PDT by mkcc30 (One word three letters R-E-V-O-L-U-T-I-O-N ! Thanks Joe the Senator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AIM Freeper

Just heard on the radio that the Christian Science Monitor would stop publishing a paper next spring and go all electronic.


3 posted on 10/28/2008 1:42:19 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AIM Freeper
Does anyone know if WFTV-TV anchor Barbara West, who asked "forbidden" question of Joe Biden, has been fired yet? I am convinced that only NYT style journalism will be permitted should Obama be elected. The Obama Nation is not the least bit hesitant about about their requirements of the media.

Sure, personally, I chose not to read the Times. I don't like the regimentation of a boycott. It is too reminiscent of radical leftist and labor tactics. However each of us chooses what media we can support by buying or watching.

4 posted on 10/28/2008 1:47:23 PM PDT by JimSEA (just another liberal-bashing fearmonger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkcc30
beating a dead horse


5 posted on 10/28/2008 1:48:16 PM PDT by edzo4 (Vote McCain, Keep Your Change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mkcc30

No federal bailout of the ole grey mare.


6 posted on 10/28/2008 1:58:48 PM PDT by mathurine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AIM Freeper

What? I’ve been boycotting the NYT since 1963!


7 posted on 10/28/2008 1:59:04 PM PDT by calenel (The Democratic Party is a Criminal Enterprise. It is the Socialist Mafia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AIM Freeper

My father died in 1967 and I was 20. I bought a subscription to the NYT shortly thereafter. After 5 years, including a stint in the USMC, I moved to NYC where I attended Columbia. After graduation, I attended and graduated from Harvard Business School. I maintained my subscription with the NYT until late last year. They were bad even in the late 60’s but have deteriorated to such a low class that I cannot understand why anyone reads it. Actually, I am disappointed that the MSM has abandoned any scence of independence but phuk them and I hope they all go broke. Semper Fi.


8 posted on 10/28/2008 1:59:39 PM PDT by MarkT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkcc30

“Boycott” in the original sense meant to shun someone. Suggest we shun the Times’ reporters, editors, and publishers.


9 posted on 10/28/2008 2:05:58 PM PDT by popdonnelly (Obama is a neo-Marxist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MarkT

“I am disappointed that the MSM has abandoned any scence of independence but phuk them and I hope they all go broke. “

The NYTimes is being very obliging. Their circulation is way way down, and their stock has been downgraded to “junk” status last week.

The NYT is my hometown paper, and I have been reading it since HS. I refuse to buy it now, but read the local articales, cultural coverage and food pages online or for free at Starbucks. Even my Grandmother, aged 101 has cancelled her subscription.


10 posted on 10/28/2008 2:07:30 PM PDT by Cincinna (THERE IS STILL TIME!. CHANGE IS COMING! MCCAIN * PALIN '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AIM Freeper

I haven’t read the NYT in years. I even cancelled my free e-mail news alerts thingie from them.


11 posted on 10/28/2008 2:10:21 PM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall cause you to vote against the Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AIM Freeper

It amazes me that 30% don’t realize the MSM is RAT-biased. Talk about real idiots.


12 posted on 10/28/2008 2:11:51 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus; All

I see about 10 O commercials for one M commercial, locally. I mentioned it to a friend and he said that the more money you have, the more commercials you can air. Did I miss something? I thought they were to be given “equal time.”


13 posted on 10/28/2008 4:32:06 PM PDT by Monkey Face (I just let my mind wander and it didn't come back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: edzo4
The NYT stock price is going down faster than Maureen Dowd after a couple of drinks.
The NYT stock price is going down faster than Frank Rich in a public restroom.
14 posted on 10/28/2008 8:05:30 PM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Monkey Face

“Equal time”?? No, they pay for commercials. Obama broke his promise to only accept government campaign money to take advantage of the millions of idiots giving him money.


15 posted on 10/29/2008 10:11:16 AM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus

Ah. Thanks for clarifying.

He who has the money makes the rules. I hope his money can’t buy him the love of the US of A.


16 posted on 10/29/2008 10:15:39 AM PDT by Monkey Face (I just let my mind wander and it didn't come back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson