Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FOX News/Rasmussen Reports Poll: Obama Leads in Ohio, 49% to 47%
elections.foxnews.com ^ | October 13, 2008 | FOXNews.com

Posted on 10/13/2008 3:36:27 PM PDT by Publius804

FOX News/Rasmussen Reports Poll: Obama Leads in Ohio, 49% to 47%

Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama has gained a lead over his opponent in the swing state of Ohio, according to a recent poll.

Barack Obama has pulled ahead of John McCain in Ohio, the weekly FOX News/Rasmussen Reports Battleground Poll shows.

This week's poll shows a very stable race whose underlying dynamic strongly favors the Democratic presidential candidate. Obama holds a narrow advantage ranging from two to five percentage points in Ohio, Florida, Virginia and Missouri, and he is tied with McCain in North Carolina. Keep in mind that George W. Bush won all five of these states in 2004.

The only notable change this week was in Ohio, where Obama is now on top, 49 percent to 47 percent, overcoming a one-point deficit in each of the previous two weeks and an even larger lead for McCain in the Buckeye State in the weeks prior to that. The race for Ohio's 20 Electoral College votes is now well within the margin of sampling error, but trending toward the Democrat.

In Virginia, a state that no Democrat has won since 1964, Obama earns 50 percent support for the third straight week while McCain is at 47 percent. Those results are essentially unchanged from each of the past two weeks.

(Excerpt) Read more at elections.foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: electionpresident; ohio; rasmussen; virgina
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-84 next last

1 posted on 10/13/2008 3:36:28 PM PDT by Publius804
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Publius804

The steel workers are for Hussein.


2 posted on 10/13/2008 3:37:18 PM PDT by itsthejourney (1 of every 10 people you pass in the mall is here illegally)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

“I’m Baracko Buma and I approved these poll numbers.”


3 posted on 10/13/2008 3:37:39 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (I'm voting for McCain/Palin so I can look my grandkids in the eye when I tell them I'm sorry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

McCain’s campaign has sent an incoherent message about 0bama.
It has failed to define him.
What good is talking about William Ayers or ACORN if the campaign doesn’t use these associations to draw a conclusion about 0bama?

McCain needs to use not one, but rather the aggregate of 0bama’s influences in life to bring him into focus. Frank Marshall Davis, Jeremiah Wright, William Ayers, Saul Alinsky, ACORN, The Democratic Socialists of America, The New Party. What do they all have in common?

The answer: a dangerous, radical, far left ideology.

McCain must make this about ideology, and take 0bama’s associations as instructive. He should highlight that Saul Alinsky taught radicals to cut their hair, put on a suit, and take down the government from the inside, and 0bama was so versed in Alinsky’s tactics that he taught them to ACORN activists.

McCain’s ACORN ad reveals that 0bama taught for ACORN, but it never reveals the substance of what he taught.
The substance is what we need to understand 0bama. The substance is what makes it tangible.

McCain needs to call 0bama a wolf in sheep’s clothing. A clean-cut radical with very little papertrail infiltrating the system in order to destroy it.
Exposing 0bama’s radical agenda and properly identifying it as Socialism would be enough to ensure his defeat. It is what McCain must do.


4 posted on 10/13/2008 3:37:47 PM PDT by counterpunch (It's the SOCIALSM, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

In was held today, McCAIN WINS!!!

This will swing handily in McCain’s favor the next three weeks.


5 posted on 10/13/2008 3:38:23 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

There’s a Fox News poll? I thought Fox News simply regurgitated the BS that is the Gallup tracking poll. [/sarc]


6 posted on 10/13/2008 3:39:06 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

That’s not enough for Obama to win on election day. The “election correction” for Ohio polls (see 2000 & 2004 for this day in history) is 8-10 points in favor of the GOP. Obama loses with these numbers.


7 posted on 10/13/2008 3:40:11 PM PDT by PeterFinn (Buraq HUSSEIN Obama. If the libs don't like his name then why support him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

Dems oversampled by 10%


8 posted on 10/13/2008 3:40:25 PM PDT by xcamel (Conservatives start smart, and get rich, liberals start rich, and get stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

Is anyone else tired of hearing how far behind we aren’t?


9 posted on 10/13/2008 3:40:29 PM PDT by teletech (Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: itsthejourney
"The steel workers are for Hussein."

The STEAL workers are for Hussein

10 posted on 10/13/2008 3:40:53 PM PDT by litehaus (A memory tooooo long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

The problem is is that it appears that McCain is still obsessed with “bipartisan unity,” and it has blinded him. He needs to stop being so “nice” and stand up and fight for what is right! For the sake of our country, he needs to do it!


11 posted on 10/13/2008 3:41:00 PM PDT by wk4bush2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

When McCain ties Obama to teaching ACORN without telling what he taught, I can see where that could be construed as racist. And that’s exactly what the media want.


12 posted on 10/13/2008 3:42:08 PM PDT by Terry Mross (O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

How is points within the margin of error “pulling ahead”?


13 posted on 10/13/2008 3:42:23 PM PDT by Palin4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

“very stable race”???

Shows a very stable poll, maybe. But stable and wrong is still wrong.


14 posted on 10/13/2008 3:42:31 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Don’t trust any polls, they only make you feel ugly...


15 posted on 10/13/2008 3:42:45 PM PDT by sciencefreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

I get that any race could be close, but I can’t see it here....Obama is such a lightweight and everyone is just giving him a pass.


16 posted on 10/13/2008 3:42:46 PM PDT by Heff (Half this country is that stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

No wonder Obama is buying air time. He’s going down.....one way or another. I just can’t see the American people electing this socialist.


17 posted on 10/13/2008 3:43:02 PM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Palin4ever

Meant to say: 2 points within the margin of error...


18 posted on 10/13/2008 3:43:03 PM PDT by Palin4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

Pure bull.

Except of course for adding in 3% for an ACORN vote.


19 posted on 10/13/2008 3:44:00 PM PDT by combat_boots (God, gun and babies. Justices, taxes and sovereignty. Otherwise known as White Trash. Count me in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

Closer than where they were in 04 when we were all sooooo certian it was a Kerry lock.


20 posted on 10/13/2008 3:44:32 PM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

Just for fun, does anyone know what Rasmussen thinks the breakdown by party ID is going to be for Ohio? In 2004, it was D35, R40, and I25 (with the Is voting for Kerry 59-40 — perhaps explaining why Bush won the state by only 2 points).


21 posted on 10/13/2008 3:46:10 PM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
Dems oversampled by 10%

How do you know this, or are you just guessing? Thanks.

22 posted on 10/13/2008 3:47:06 PM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Publius804
The Ohio Newspaper Poll is the gold standard for Ohio state level polling, and their poll from several days ago had McCain up 2. If this poll ever shows Obama ahead in Ohio then I will get much more nervous, even though it is clearly a major battle.

And might I add since everyone loves to focus on public polls so much, why in the heck do you think both the McCain and Obama campaigns are still showing up multiple days in PA if Obama has a solid double digit lead like most of the pubic polls have shown.

23 posted on 10/13/2008 3:47:49 PM PDT by bcatwilly (West Virginia is McCain-Palin Country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

State polls lags the national. These are actually pretty good news considering.

The national polls (with Gallup as the outlier) are tightening. If the states trend back a smidgen McCain regains his lead. And we know state polls almost always show Dems up.

I expected wider leads for the little messiah this week. The bleeding has stopped, the market is up...

Hang in there.


24 posted on 10/13/2008 3:49:38 PM PDT by DHarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

This is a statistical tie.


25 posted on 10/13/2008 3:50:54 PM PDT by svcw (Great selection of gift baskets: http://baskettastic.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: svcw

barf


26 posted on 10/13/2008 3:55:05 PM PDT by DrHannibalLecter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: DrHannibalLecter

I believe this is an accurate poll for Obama...49% I believe McCann will get 51%

Obama throughout the primary polled where he finished....it was Hillary who gained actual votes....


27 posted on 10/13/2008 3:57:04 PM PDT by Illinois Rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

The RCP final polling average for Ohio in 2004 was 2.1%. Bush won Ohio by 2.1%.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/bush_vs_kerry_sbys.html


28 posted on 10/13/2008 3:57:19 PM PDT by LadyNavyVet (Be a monthly donor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LadyNavyVet

2004 polls don’t tell us much about 2008 polls. The pollsters have changed their weighting to reflect a big democrat advantage. That may not hold for true for the Presidential election and in fact, I don’t think it will. We’ll find out soon enough.


29 posted on 10/13/2008 4:00:07 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (MSM Lied, Journalism Died. RIP 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn
I have lived in Ohio for 24 years and studied the political scene fairly closely.

Except amongst blacks and college students, there is little enthusiasm for Obama here.

Ohio will go to McCain. I guarantee it.

30 posted on 10/13/2008 4:00:39 PM PDT by PackerBoy (Just my opinion ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

Translation: McCain now ahead, comfortably, in OH.


31 posted on 10/13/2008 4:00:44 PM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

...please Ohio, help save us all.


32 posted on 10/13/2008 4:03:12 PM PDT by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

My post was in response to a poster trying to assert that the 2004 Ohio polls were way off. They were not.


33 posted on 10/13/2008 4:05:22 PM PDT by LadyNavyVet (Be a monthly donor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Publius804; All

FYI, Mccain is within 5% in ras national poll. and that is inspite of ras moving the dem oversample to +6.3% this week. All we have to do is show up and we win.


34 posted on 10/13/2008 4:05:46 PM PDT by johncocktoasten (Obama/Biden '08, in and of itself, A Bridge To Nowhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

“The pollsters have changed their weighting to reflect a big democrat advantage.”

Most pollsters do not weight for party ID. Ras does, but he is one of the few.


35 posted on 10/13/2008 4:06:51 PM PDT by LadyNavyVet (Be a monthly donor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

Let’s turn Acorns into roasted nuts.


36 posted on 10/13/2008 4:07:12 PM PDT by A Strict Constructionist (Can we avoid"Tobacco Road" on the "Road to Surfdom"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johncocktoasten

After reading the WND story on Jessica Hughes we have to beat this MARXIST P.O.S.. Conservatives need to hang together, the fate of liberty rests on our shoulders.


37 posted on 10/13/2008 4:08:04 PM PDT by Publius804 (McCain-Palin '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: LadyNavyVet

That would be incorrect, they all weight to one extent or the other.


38 posted on 10/13/2008 4:09:48 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (MSM Lied, Journalism Died. RIP 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

According to the way FoxNews is making it sound, McCane should probably just throw in the towel.

I cannot believe that a Commie is going to be elected President of this great nation. Let’s not forget, he will not wear the American flag on his lapel. This is a bad dream.


39 posted on 10/13/2008 4:10:15 PM PDT by rambo316 (God help America....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

They all norm to census demographics; that is not the same as weighting for party ID.


40 posted on 10/13/2008 4:11:55 PM PDT by LadyNavyVet (Be a monthly donor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

Is this ‘with’ or ‘without’ the acorn toppings?


41 posted on 10/13/2008 4:13:53 PM PDT by Gaffer ("Arguing with a Liberal is like not wiping yourself after taking a dump" Scatological, but true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Palin4ever
This is the first Rasmussen poll to show Obama ahead in Ohio.
42 posted on 10/13/2008 4:14:09 PM PDT by Mr. Know It All (Quicumque vult salvus esse, ante omnia opus est, ut teneat catholicam fidem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

Dems 48%; Repubs 38%; blacks 18%. Some “poll.”


43 posted on 10/13/2008 4:15:58 PM PDT by pabianice (Inexplicable and infuriating.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

Unfortunately, well outside the margin of fraud.


44 posted on 10/13/2008 4:17:03 PM PDT by clintonh8r ("My friends, we've got them just where we want them." McCain. Or Custer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rambo316

Fox News last poll in 2004 had Kerry winning...so.


45 posted on 10/13/2008 4:18:26 PM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Heff

Are you in Ohio? What’s your gut tell you?


46 posted on 10/13/2008 4:20:21 PM PDT by SaintDismas (Starting to regret the handle I chose for this forum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: snarkytart

That was done by Opinion Dynamics, not Rasmussen.


47 posted on 10/13/2008 4:22:27 PM PDT by LadyNavyVet (Be a monthly donor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Told ya...


48 posted on 10/13/2008 4:22:48 PM PDT by xcamel (Conservatives start smart, and get rich, liberals start rich, and get stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: LadyNavyVet
Norming by census demographics is the same as weighting for party ID because Party ID is representative of different demographics. Like I said, they all weight one way or another and if they don't the data is useless. American National Elections are relatively consistent over time relative to Party ID. Sometimes the dems are up a coupe of points sometimes it's even. In 2006 a big year for the dems they had a three point advantage in the exit polls.

A poll that has a sample size of 500 with 300 self identifying dems and 200 republicans is useless without weighting.

49 posted on 10/13/2008 4:24:23 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (MSM Lied, Journalism Died. RIP 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

A blanket “all the polls are crap” statement is probably too much, BUT one glaring example that should provide us some hope is that the current RealClearPolitics average for PA is Obama +13. However, Obama had several stops in Philly just the other day, Biden and the Clintons were in PA today, and McCain and Palin continue to have multiple rallies there (including tomorrow and later this week). Does anyone believe for a second that BOTH campaigns would be spending that much time in PA if those public polls are accurate?


50 posted on 10/13/2008 4:24:42 PM PDT by bcatwilly (West Virginia is McCain-Palin Country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson