Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ATTORNEY GEN SUES ARBITRON FOR PRACTICES THAT DRIVE MINORITY BROADCASTERS OUT OF BUSINESS
© 2008 NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL. All rights reserved. ^ | 10/10/08 | Andrew Cuomo

Posted on 10/10/2008 8:33:41 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines

NEW YORK, NY (October 10, 2008) - Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo today announced that his office has filed a lawsuit in New York County Supreme Court against Arbitron, the largest media ratings company for the radio market in the United States. The lawsuit accuses Arbitron of deceptively claiming that its Portable People Meter (PPM) system is valid, fair, and representative of diverse radio markets. It also charges Arbitron with failing to disclose important flaws in the PPM methodology to broadcasters, advertisers, shareholders and the public, including serious shortcomings in the accuracy of the new system and its inadequate representation of African-Americans and Latinos.

(Excerpt) Read more at oag.state.ny.us ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; US: New York
KEYWORDS: govwatch; judiciary; talkradio
In other words, the NY Attorney General is forcing a private business to overcount listeners in order to artificially inflate the ratings of "minority" radio stations.

Welcome to Obama's America, folks.

1 posted on 10/10/2008 8:33:42 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

If you can’t impose a Fairness Doctrine with legislation or agency fiat, there’s always the courts ...


2 posted on 10/10/2008 8:37:04 AM PDT by IncPen (Pitchforks and torches.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Wouldn't this be like suing the New York Slimes because it promotes idiot politicians which destroy small businesses? Except that Arbitron publishes actual data rather than propoganda.

Look for more of this s*** under Fuhrer Obama.

3 posted on 10/10/2008 8:37:39 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or, are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Great. Then when advertising rates soar, we can make subsidized loans to buy the air time, driving the rates up more. I see a cottage industry here.


4 posted on 10/10/2008 8:37:53 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Pretty scary stuff.
5 posted on 10/10/2008 8:39:29 AM PDT by Ukiapah Heep (Shoes for Industry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Someone correct me if I am wrong, but isn’t the “Supreme Court” (whether of an individual state or the Federal one) a “court of appeal” and thus lower court actions must be gone thru and exhausted before a case lands in the SC? IOW, an original action cannot (AFAIK) originate in the SC. Now, maybe it is different if the atty gen’ himself (eg; his office) sues the defendant. Beuller? Beuller? Anyone?


6 posted on 10/10/2008 8:42:39 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Tired from wondering whether we wake up in the newest socialist country tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

I will get my own radio show now. Blessed be Obama. The Messiah speaks.

7 posted on 10/10/2008 8:43:15 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ukiapah Heep
...and McCain would appoint Andrew Cuomo as SEC chairman!

(First defeat Obama, then thwart McCain's lunacies.)

HF

8 posted on 10/10/2008 8:48:20 AM PDT by holden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
and McCain says how much he likes A. Cuomo... oh well, like Rush says - let's drag him across the finishline and we'll fix him once we get him there.
9 posted on 10/10/2008 8:48:29 AM PDT by AmericanGirlRising
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
The Portable People Meter

This is a Machine! How in hell can it be biased?

I suspect the real problem is that the minority stations are not doing well and they want yet more special protection.

10 posted on 10/10/2008 8:49:46 AM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Yea because what NY state needs now is

1) To spend money on pointless lawsuits
2) To make business spend money on pointless law suits


11 posted on 10/10/2008 8:58:41 AM PDT by N3WBI3 (Ah, arrogance and stupidity all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

“Someone correct me if I am wrong, but isn’t the “Supreme Court””

It says New York COUNTY Supreme Court. Therefore it is not the State Supreme Court. There are a lot of silly names for courts throughout the country. Here in California we call the major courts in each county Superior Courts. So either New York is free and loose with its terminology or else the reporter got it wrong.


12 posted on 10/10/2008 8:59:14 AM PDT by caseinpoint (Don't get thickly involved in thin things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

When the minority TV stations want to show reruns of “Good Times”, what do they expect?


13 posted on 10/10/2008 9:00:28 AM PDT by TommyDale (I) (Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder
Someone correct me if I am wrong, but isn’t the “Supreme Court” (whether of an individual state or the Federal one) a “court of appeal” and thus lower court actions must be gone thru and exhausted before a case lands in the SC? IOW, an original action cannot (AFAIK) originate in the SC. Now, maybe it is different if the atty gen’ himself (eg; his office) sues the defendant. Beuller? Beuller? Anyone?

In New York, the Supreme Court is the statewide trial court and the Court of Appeals is the highest court.

The weird nomenclature is, I believe, the result of NY's colonial past and the fact that its court system was built bottom up, not top down.

There were "Justice Courts," (town, village and city courts) and "County Courts," where most cases originated. The "Supreme Court" was originally and (to some extent still is) a "circuit court," with statewide trial juridiction (hence being called "Supreme").

14 posted on 10/10/2008 9:01:52 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Not satisfied with the vital role he played in turning our mortgage industry into a welfare program that has caused the greatest financial crisis since the Great Depression, sanctimonious and clueless Andrew Cuomo now sets out to do the same to the radio business.


15 posted on 10/10/2008 9:03:05 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caseinpoint

Forgot to mention that what makes California’s Superior Courts title silly is that there was a reorganization of the courts several years back that wiped out inferior court designations. All courts are now “Superior Courts” (like Keilor’s Lake Wobegon “everyone is above average) but as everyone knows, too many courts in California are anything but “superior”.


16 posted on 10/10/2008 9:04:05 AM PDT by caseinpoint (Don't get thickly involved in thin things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Oh, goody.....give radio licenses to people who don’t know how to market/produce radio content.....because....well...they’re disenfranchised (i.e. part of some minority group that the politicians can extort money from.)


17 posted on 10/10/2008 9:05:55 AM PDT by goodnesswins (Socialism is great until you run out of someone else's money (M. Thatcher))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
This is a Machine! How in hell can it be biased?

I'm sure there is a Diebold connection somewhere :0)

18 posted on 10/10/2008 9:09:40 AM PDT by OCC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
Oh, goody.....give radio licenses to people who don’t know how to market/produce radio content.....because....well...they’re disenfranchised (i.e. part of some minority group that the politicians can extort money from.) didn't you just describe air america?
19 posted on 10/10/2008 9:12:55 AM PDT by AmericanGirlRising
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Geez! Affirmative action radio. Just what we need.


20 posted on 10/10/2008 9:23:34 AM PDT by Islander7 (The only thing Obama has to fear is the truth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Thanks very much, I appreciate your clarification. Other than NY, is my characterization generally true? If you know. TIA!


21 posted on 10/10/2008 9:27:13 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Tired from wondering whether we wake up in the newest socialist country tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Government at all levels in all jurisdictions is out of control.

They have confused the pursuit of political agendas and political correctness with good governance and law enforcement.

This kind of action is related to the massive problems we are now facing:

The destruction of the free market economy

Creeping socialism

Failure to enforce our laws because of social “feelings”

Massive voter fraud

Massive illegal financial contributions to candidates

Massive influence peddling and payoffs by and to elected officials

Raiding the treasury to pay off the lenders who were forced by racist politicians to give loans to unqualified borrowers.

It all stems from the same misguided motivations, abuse of power by arrogant politicians and bureaucrats.

Both parties are culpable.

It is time to clean house from top to bottom and restore government to its intended function of serving the will of the people instead of imposing its will on the people.


22 posted on 10/10/2008 9:39:27 AM PDT by Iron Munro (Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

I believe that most courts call the high court, or appeals court, the Supreme Court, yes. NY is an anomoly.


23 posted on 10/10/2008 9:40:08 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

ORDINANCE OF SECESSION

December 20, 1860
Vote of Convention: Unanimous

At a convention of the people of the State of South Carolina, begun and holden at Columbia on the 17th day of December, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty, and thence continued by adjournment to Charleston, and there, by divers adjournments, to the 20th day of December in the same year:

An Ordinance to dissolve the union between the State of South Carolina and other States united with her under the compact entitled The Constitution of the United States of America.

We, the people of the State of South Carolina, in convention assembled, do declare and ordain, and it is hereby declared and ordained, That the ordinance adopted by us in convention on the twenty-third day of May, in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and eighty-eight, whereby the Constitution of the United States of America was ratified, and also all acts and parts of acts of the General Assembly of this State ratifying amendments of the said Constitution, are hereby repealed; and that the union now subsisting between South Carolina and other States, under the name of the “United States of America,” is hereby dissolved. Done at Charleston the 20th day of December, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty. D.F. Jamison: Delegate from Barnwell and President of the Convention, and others.

Attest: Benjamin F. Arthur, Clerk of the Convention.


24 posted on 10/10/2008 10:04:03 AM PDT by Harrius Magnus (LIBERALS: We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanGirlRising
Oh, goody.....give radio licenses to people who don’t know how to market/produce radio content.....because....well...they’re disenfranchised (i.e. part of some minority group that the politicians can extort money from.)

didn't you just describe air america?


Excellent post! Excellent! Top notch!
25 posted on 10/10/2008 10:29:56 AM PDT by day10 (Rules cannot substitute for character.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson