Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newsweek: Palin Too Common, Too Stupid to be Vice President, She’s ‘Dangerous’
publiusforum.com ^ | 10/09/08 | Warner Todd Huston

Posted on 10/09/2008 7:18:44 AM PDT by Mobile Vulgus

Newsweek's Jon Meacham thinks that Governor Sarah Palin is too much a commoner and too stupid to be allowed to become vice president of the United States of America and apparently his employer agrees with him. The October 13 cover of Newsweek features a close up photo of the Governor with the headline "She's One of the Folks (And that's the problem)," and Meacham writes the accompanying cover story. Be clear about what this means: This is a direct attack on Mr. and Mrs. America. We are all too stupid to be president in the elite opinion of Jon Meacham and Newsweek magazine.

Meacham finds Palin to be incurious, unprepared, and even finds it "dangerous" if she were to become our vice president but he offers us nothing but his opinion to judge by. And it's all because she doesn't measure up to his personal standards. Sadly for Meacham's elitism, however, Palin easily satisfies the standards that the Founding Fathers set as criteria for stepping into the highest office in the land. Curiously, Meacham does not once mention the actual Constitutional requirements to run for office in his entire sarcastic attack on Sarah Palin. Like most of his ilk, the Constitution seems meaningless minutia to him...

Read the rest at Publiusforum.com...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: liberalmedia; mediabias; newsweak; newsweek; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-86 next last
The media... is it helping or hurting Palin? I'm not sure which?
1 posted on 10/09/2008 7:18:45 AM PDT by Mobile Vulgus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

I don’t have a doctor’s appointment for another 6 months, so I guess I will not be reading this article.

Newsweek is a rag doctor’s use in their offices for their sick patients to kill the time.


2 posted on 10/09/2008 7:20:28 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA ("I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction" Obama, from Au)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

If they tried to make her look bad on that cover, they failed. Sarah is beautiful.


3 posted on 10/09/2008 7:20:53 AM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative (GO Sarah Palin !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

The people who “touched up” Sarah Palin’s picture for the cover should be taken out and horse-whipped in public. Do they really think informed people will buy their phony magazine? This contrasts with the phony picture of the “halo” on Obamamama, “the Chosen One”.


4 posted on 10/09/2008 7:21:13 AM PDT by TommyDale (I) (Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

The media is feverishky working 24/7 to slime McCain/Palin and endorse Obama.

I’ve never before seen this much blatant in your face liberal bias.

It’s a call to arms, COnservatives and Republicans may have to take election day off and make sure to get all like minded people to the polls to save our democracy.


5 posted on 10/09/2008 7:21:24 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

The media is just demonstrating “why” they deserve to go out of business. They are less trusted than bottom feeding lawyers and used car salesmen.

I think their attacks are helping Palin like they did with Reagan.


6 posted on 10/09/2008 7:21:24 AM PDT by mgc1122
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

Reagan just had a 4-year degree from a no-name Christian college.


7 posted on 10/09/2008 7:22:05 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (The LA Times, 10/6/08, was told to cut "75 editorial positions." How many are needed for 2 pages?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

I actually think we’re looking at the next (2012) President - after McCain’s first 4 years, he’ll bow out due to age and let Sarah run against Hill - whom Sarah will clobber.

Our first female President, two terms!


8 posted on 10/09/2008 7:22:14 AM PDT by grobdriver (Let the embeds check the bodies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

“Education makes people easy to lead, but difficult to drive; easy to govern, but impossible to enslave.” - Henry Peter Brougham

Liberals do not believe this, or if they do, it is a hindrance to them.......


9 posted on 10/09/2008 7:22:25 AM PDT by Red Badger (My wallet is made out of depleted you-owe-mium........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

Newsweek is too stupid and dangerous to be a news magazine.

No wait, that’s wrong, they aren’t a news magazine.... they are crap.


10 posted on 10/09/2008 7:22:44 AM PDT by Rick.Donaldson (http://www.transasianaxis.com - Please visit for latest on Russia/China/DPRK et al.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

Who th f___ is Jon Meacham and what has he accomplished in his pathetic life besides tearing other people down.

Screw all the dinosaur mediots.


11 posted on 10/09/2008 7:22:55 AM PDT by Yankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

Newsweek’s Jon Meacham, columnist for “Newsweek”, has been assigned an interview with “Roswell Crashdummy” the command pilot of the saucer at Area 51, Nevada. As a Radical Elitist, he only wants to do interviews that are in vogue. Saucers are in vogue, as determined by the Elitist Intelligencia Commission. He joins David Brooks, Kathleen Parker, George Will and others, who have defications that lack odor, and who have attacked Gov Palin.


12 posted on 10/09/2008 7:24:07 AM PDT by BigEdLB (Let's get serious - there is only one choice - McCain/Palin 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

Too common to be VP? That is rather elitist. I guess that, according to Newsweek, I am “too common” for public office. I do not have a trust fund nor did I attend an Ivy League university (I graduated from a state university). Newsweek and their gaggle of toffee-nosed prats (writers) can kiss my “common” bum.


13 posted on 10/09/2008 7:24:45 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yankee

Did Newsweek just have their own “bitter clingy” moment.

Dimwits.


14 posted on 10/09/2008 7:24:55 AM PDT by sunmars
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

The late, great William F. Buckley, Jr. said (to this effect), “I would rather be governed by the first two hundred names in the Boston phonebook than all the folks at Harvard.”


15 posted on 10/09/2008 7:24:58 AM PDT by MarkT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus
This is a direct attack on Mr. and Mrs. America. We are all too stupid to be president in the elite opinion of Jon Meacham and Newsweek magazine.

This is more in a avalanche of liberal arguments that conservatives should be barred from politics, both as voters and candidates, because of their stupidity. The Democrats have become antidemocratic.

16 posted on 10/09/2008 7:25:40 AM PDT by JimSEA (just another liberal-bashing fearmonger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

I saw this rag at my dentist’s office yesterday and turned the cover over and stuck the magazine in the bottom pile of tons of others. I would have ripped the cover off, or put the filth in my purse to throw away, but the receptionist was sitting right there.


17 posted on 10/09/2008 7:25:40 AM PDT by peggybac (Tolerance is the virtue of believing in nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus
1) Is Jon Meacham queer?

2) Newsweek is useless ... the paper is much too glossy and hard surfaced to be properly absorbent.

3) She's one of us? Good. It's about time I had political leadership "of my peers".

18 posted on 10/09/2008 7:25:46 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

Or maybe it’s a rag to make their sick patients even sicker? Maybe Newsweek is good for their business. LOL.


19 posted on 10/09/2008 7:25:50 AM PDT by rom (Cold on McCain '08. Enthusiastic about McCain-Palin '08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rick.Donaldson
Speaking of crap...

This is the only way I'll use Newsweek:


20 posted on 10/09/2008 7:25:53 AM PDT by colorcountry (To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus
“The media... is it helping or hurting Palin? I'm not sure which?”

You would think this would be hurting the media and helping Palin, but from what I see (now this is just my observations at work), that the people here parrot what the “media” says, and think she is stupid.

Out of all the ladies I have spoken to here at work, only two so far have said they like and support her. The young women here at work (at least 10 so far) think she is an idiot ... but can't give any specific reason for their beliefs other than the way she talks ... then again I work on the North shore in Mass.

Back home in NH, most of the people I know think Palin is great ... go figure.

21 posted on 10/09/2008 7:26:40 AM PDT by CapnJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

Lincoln never would have stood a chance with these elitists. Democrats then and Democrats now have a certain preoccupation with “class”.


22 posted on 10/09/2008 7:27:13 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus
Memo to Newsweek: You're irrelevant.
23 posted on 10/09/2008 7:27:14 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rick.Donaldson

Sarah has a net worth 3 times Biden at about half his age. Who’s the idiot here? Do we really want someone to run our country who at retirement age can’t afford retirement?


24 posted on 10/09/2008 7:27:35 AM PDT by Reeses (Leftism is powered by the evil force of envy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

I’ll take one “common” person against a commie any day.


25 posted on 10/09/2008 7:27:47 AM PDT by MES401067
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA
Newsweek is a rag doctor’s use in their offices for their sick patients to kill the time.

Oh. I always thought it was to make them sicker.

26 posted on 10/09/2008 7:27:58 AM PDT by Humbug (I had a spiffy quote i was going to put here but unfortunately it was too long....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

“Newsweek is a rag doctor’s use in their offices for their sick patients to kill the time.”

I don’t read mags in doctor’s offices because I think they are infected by all the sick people who hold them. I especially wouldn’t read Newsweak because it is also infected inside because of all the sick people who write it.


27 posted on 10/09/2008 7:27:58 AM PDT by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

Ah! Humanistic intellectual elitism rears its ugly head once again. This time at Newsweak.


28 posted on 10/09/2008 7:28:32 AM PDT by OB1kNOb (Where are we going and what are we doing in this economic handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative

I think she is very pretty too, but this is what the closeup does(which is what they want): shows visible dark hairs above her lip. I’m glad she’s got other stuff to worry about than that....

I also didn’t think the article was that bad.


29 posted on 10/09/2008 7:28:49 AM PDT by merry10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Reeses

Nope, *I* don’t.

I never really liked McCain much.

But I sure like Sarah Palin. I can see her being President in 2012. I can see her running against Hillary (because I can see Obama being impeached, or removed from office by the People!)


30 posted on 10/09/2008 7:31:04 AM PDT by Rick.Donaldson (http://www.transasianaxis.com - Please visit for latest on Russia/China/DPRK et al.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

This is why I never buy the mainstream “news” mags. I read them in Dr’s and dentist’s offices, or libraries.


31 posted on 10/09/2008 7:31:12 AM PDT by BooksForTheRight.com (The left is despicable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: merry10

They lost 37% of their readership tis year alone.


32 posted on 10/09/2008 7:31:16 AM PDT by scooby321 (Cai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus
Huston's money line:

The main problem with Meacham’s position is that it would tend to create a permanent political class from which we would draw our leaders. This is a concept quite outside of what the Founders wanted.

33 posted on 10/09/2008 7:31:38 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

Newsweek sounds like Mrs. Slocum: “She’s dead common!”


34 posted on 10/09/2008 7:32:32 AM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA
Newsweek is a rag doctor’s(sic) use in their offices for their sick patients to kill the time.

'Doctors', 'patients', and 'kill' should never be used in the same sentence.

;-)

35 posted on 10/09/2008 7:32:43 AM PDT by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

Havent read this rag in years. If it were fifty cents for 52 weeks, it would still be too much.


36 posted on 10/09/2008 7:32:45 AM PDT by owlbird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

a liberal education can ruin lives and enslave people.


37 posted on 10/09/2008 7:32:52 AM PDT by DeLaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus
Meacham finds Palin to be incurious, unprepared,...

The standard Dem play book. Ronald Reagan was too stupid and had a cowboy mentality. Dan Quayle was too stupid, George Bush was/is incurious and too stupid.

Tell me, what Vice Presidential nominee declared that Roosevelt was President during the 1930s Depression and went on TV to comfort people? What presidential candidate visited nearly all 57 states? Funny how that stuff is left out of the the MSM template.

38 posted on 10/09/2008 7:34:56 AM PDT by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeLaine

a liberal education is an oxymoron............


39 posted on 10/09/2008 7:35:04 AM PDT by Red Badger (My wallet is made out of depleted you-owe-mium........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

Newsweek: To biased and corrupt to be capable of any real journalism—only capable of liberal anti-American editorials.


40 posted on 10/09/2008 7:35:04 AM PDT by FreedomProtector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus
The "fellow travelers" at Newsweek know that the market is vanishing for their alleged "news" product.

So, rather than adapting, they are going for one, last...

Crazy Ivan to the left!.

41 posted on 10/09/2008 7:35:34 AM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

Definately helping with stupid articles like this.


42 posted on 10/09/2008 7:36:07 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus
Palin easily satisfies the standards that the Founding Fathers set as criteria for stepping into the highest office in the land.

So does Obama. Scary, ain't it?

43 posted on 10/09/2008 7:37:13 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yankee

Actually, Meacham is an excellent writer and journalist. Certainly not a “dinosaur mediot.” However, I really like Sarah Palin and won’t be swayed by anyone’s attacks on her, otherwise credible or not.


44 posted on 10/09/2008 7:37:51 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

These people wouldn’t have liked the pioneers who came to settle our country, either. They get their ideas from the oh-so-cultivated Europeans who made fun of us ever since this country was created.

What they need is some hard work on a farm or in a factory - actually producing something that has some value.


45 posted on 10/09/2008 7:38:14 AM PDT by BusterBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Neoliberals say the darndest things! Especially when they’re irrelevant or losing.


46 posted on 10/09/2008 7:38:58 AM PDT by polymuser (Taxpayers voting for Obama are like chickens voting for Colonel Sanders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus
From the Newsweek article: "John McCain is a man of accomplishment and curiosity, of wide and deep reading, travel and experience. He is smart without being a snob."

Too bad the same can't be said of the author and a large number of his colleagues.

47 posted on 10/09/2008 7:39:52 AM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sunmars

The moniker of the Democrat party being for the ‘working guy’ is over!
The ‘elitist’ have been talking down to the folks!
Obama’s ‘clinger’ remarks, Biden’s Obama too intelligent for my neighborhood, on and on....

Conservative Republicans believe in ordinary people doing extraordinary feats.
Go Sarah Go!


48 posted on 10/09/2008 7:40:05 AM PDT by griswold3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
"Reagan just had a 4-year degree from a no-name Christian college."

Excellent point. This needs to be repeated. Noonan, Brooks, National Review, and all the other northeast country club Bush/Nixon "Rebuplicans" only share a common interest with us when we are winning.

Reagan didn't have the means to attend an "elite" school and would have been pushed aside by today's "Republican elite." He educated himself by traveling this country and interacting with the electorate during his GE show days.
49 posted on 10/09/2008 7:41:02 AM PDT by Minus_The_Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus
The article opens with this little gem:

Yes, she won the debate by not imploding. But governing requires knowledge, and mindless populism is just that—mindless.

Many in middle America identify with Sarah Palin and her family. They're not going to take kindly to being called "mindless" and "problems" by elitist journalists. This is the kind of snobbery that causes a HUGE backlash, much like it did with US magazine. There is an old adage that says: Never pick a fight with someone who buys ink by the barrel. In this case, it would seem the people at News-weak have been swilling the said ink.

50 posted on 10/09/2008 7:41:31 AM PDT by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson