Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NY Times Editorial Page: These People Are Palin-Obsessed
The New York Times ^ | 10/3/2008 | Several

Posted on 10/04/2008 7:32:14 AM PDT by publius1

UNSIGNED EDITORIAL: Dick Cheney, Role Model: In all the talk about the vice-presidential debate, there was an issue that did not get much attention but kept nagging at us: Sarah Palin’s description of the role and the responsibilities of the office for which she is running, vice president of the United States.

Bob Herbert: Palin’s Alternate Universe: Sarah Palin is the perfect exclamation point to the Bush years. We’ve lived through nearly two terms of an administration that believed it could create its own reality:

GAIL COLLINS: Talking in Points: The Republicans were euphoric over Sarah Palin’s debate performance, particularly the part in which she stood tall and refrained from falling off the stage... And, indeed, her answers were murky in the extreme.

CHARLES M. BLOW: The Joe Biden Show: Palin launched into her charm offensive — winking, smiling, dodging questions and speaking in her signature Sarah-phonics , a mash up of sentence fragments and colloquialisms glued together with misplaced also’s and there’s — gibberish really. Everyone in the bar lapped it up. It was The Sarah Palin Show... As it became clear that she wasn’t going to implode, I started to see the debate instead as The Joe Biden Show. And, it was good.

STEVEN PINKER: Everything You Heard Is Wrong: Being able to see Russia from Alaska, then, means you have an understanding of foreign policy; living in an Arctic state means that you have an understanding of climate change. In Mr. McCain’s case, it means, as he wrote last month, understanding technology policy because he flew airplanes in Vietnam and being concerned about the oceans’ health because he served in the Navy.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hystericalmedia; mediameltdown; nyt; nytimes; palin; pds; sarahnoia
They should pay royalties to her -- she is almost their entire editorial page, making up today's two minutes of hate!

I had to share this. I actually couldn't believe how obsessed with her they are. Is it possible that they actually love her in some obsessive pathological sick way and are trying hard to deny it?

1 posted on 10/04/2008 7:32:14 AM PDT by publius1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: publius1

I smell liberal fear ...


2 posted on 10/04/2008 7:34:14 AM PDT by catpuppy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1

“She’s not much, but she’s all they can think about.”

ha


3 posted on 10/04/2008 7:34:32 AM PDT by i_dont_chat (The elephant is dancing for the lady from Alaska)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1
Is it possible that they actually love her in some obsessive pathological sick way and are trying hard to deny it?

No, but they are projecting their self loathing obsessive pathological sick love of "The One"

BTW, I loved it when she keep correcting Biden by saying "I need to correct you Senator"

Imagine that blowhard was thinking I had to stand there and take that crap off a mere governor

4 posted on 10/04/2008 7:38:26 AM PDT by Popman (Don’t worry Barney Frank has your ass-ets covered!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1

NySlimes loves Sarah. They can’t get enough of her.

Sales must go up when Sarah’s on the page.

Whoopee—GO SARAH!


5 posted on 10/04/2008 7:39:24 AM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (McCAIN/PALIN...THE CHANGE AMERICANS REALLY WANT—OBAMA..THE CHANGE THE WORLD'S TERRORISTS WANT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1

An “unsigned” editorial is an editorial written by the editors of the publication that publishes it. It may have been assigned to one editor or it may have been a “collective” effort.


6 posted on 10/04/2008 7:39:28 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1

Here is my favorite one:

“STEVEN PINKER: Everything You Heard Is Wrong: Being able to see Russia from Alaska, then, means you have an understanding of foreign policy; living in an Arctic state means that you have an understanding of climate change. In Mr. McCain’s case, it means, as he wrote last month, understanding technology policy because he flew airplanes in Vietnam and being concerned about the oceans’ health because he served in the Navy.”

First of all - you CAN see Russia from Alaska if you are standing in the right spot - on an island by the border.
In fact, during particularly cold seasons, you can walk from one island to the other island - from Alaska to Russia.
Even the libs at GMA proved this to be true when they flew out there (they’ll go all the way to this remote location, but refuse to go to Chicago).

As governor of an arctic state - she just might have spent more time examining the science behind the various theories.
It is always good to read opposing views - sometimes the critics and skeptics turn out to be right (I remember as a child being told we were headed for an ice age).

This idiot shows the typical liberal tendency to assume the worst about people he does not understand - to attribute motivations to them they do not have - but he would LIKE them to have- just so he can demonize them.


7 posted on 10/04/2008 7:40:25 AM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1
They are acting like they are in high school.

Remember that girl who was perfectly nice, gentle, kind and she was beautiful, a straight A student probably on a sports team.

She was always there, always successful never hurt a fly and would help you when ever she could and we all hated her for zero reasons.


I feel like I am reliving those stupid high school antics.

8 posted on 10/04/2008 7:45:42 AM PDT by svcw (Great selection of gift baskets: http://baskettastic.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: svcw


I feel like I am reliving those stupid high school antics.”

You nailed. Every time I see Katie Couric I think of Nellie Olson.

That’s what the media has become.... a bunch of Nellie Olsons.


9 posted on 10/04/2008 7:50:11 AM PDT by AuntB ( "During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: publius1
They should pay royalties to her -- she is almost their entire editorial page, making up today's two minutes of hate!

I had to share this. I actually couldn't believe how obsessed with her they are. Is it possible that they actually love her in some obsessive pathological sick way and are trying hard to deny it?

Yes, they are clearly obsessed with Governor Palin. That's as much as they would have given to a declaration of war by the Congress.

I think it's because they see that Governor Palin is a new Ronald Reagan, a normal American who speaks directly to American sensibilities.

They can see she has a very bright political future, and the inevitability of eight years of a Palin presidency are causing collective apoplexy among the New York Times editors.

10 posted on 10/04/2008 7:52:16 AM PDT by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1

I missed the debates,but i’ve seen snippets and imo she did a good job.I think what really bothers the msm is that she relates and speaks to the middle class.Clearly a problem for the msm.


11 posted on 10/04/2008 7:52:30 AM PDT by Thombo2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: svcw
They are acting like they are in high school.

That describes leftists in general. They live their whole lives that way.

12 posted on 10/04/2008 7:56:13 AM PDT by Reeses (Leftism is powered by the evil force of envy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: publius1
Sarah is exceptional.

She is challenged as much or more than the average middle class American family woman, and she successfully copes while being a patriot, brilliantly successful executive, negotiator, CFO, and public problem solver. All the while remaining charming, witty, engaging, honest, warm and non eleiteist faithful and conservative.

Add in gorgeous and they all hate her because they're NOT her. It's the most enormous case of ENVY that I have ever seen.

Every one of these communist wannabe's are so jealous of Sarah's gifts and accomplishments, that they're dying to use them to further the misery of socialist lies on the world if they had them for themselves.

Just replace conservatism with Marxism and faith with secular humanism and they all want to BE Sarah Palin.

13 posted on 10/04/2008 7:56:15 AM PDT by Navy Patriot (The beauty of conservatism, Sarah Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1

You know damn well that what all of these freaks would really like to do is have sex with her. They, in their darkest souls actually think that is all women are good for. Look how they treat their own, ie. Hillary. She’s just useful up to a point. They don’t want any woman near the whitehouse. Hypocrites.


14 posted on 10/04/2008 7:59:16 AM PDT by SaintDismas (Starting to regret the handle I chose for this forum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1
Good grief, people actually read that drivel?? Shouldn't you be able to string an original thought together, rather than a list of cliches?

Pray for W, McCuda and Our Troops

15 posted on 10/04/2008 8:00:23 AM PDT by bray (It's the Corruption Stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1


16 posted on 10/04/2008 8:00:48 AM PDT by pookie18 (Palin-Jindal '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1

In summary, the left beliueves that the constitution, as written, is dangerous.......


17 posted on 10/04/2008 8:04:57 AM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander

They are obsessed with her because she is rallying those who have not been demoralized. The revolution can only succeed if enough people have been demoralized to the point that they believe government is the only thing that can save them. To them she reeks of personal responsibility and self reliance.


18 posted on 10/04/2008 8:05:54 AM PDT by eggman (Obama is now The Zero. He used to be The One but he added Biden.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: publius1

Palin threatens the success of the Revolution. Can’t have that...


19 posted on 10/04/2008 8:07:43 AM PDT by Interesting Times (Swiftboating, you say? Check out ToSetTheRecordStraight.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pookie18
I bet she knows the name of the Restaurant she really eats at LOL

I bet she knows that the General in Afghanistan understands how to win.

I wonder if her Iraq plan included dividing up the country into 3 separate countries? I wonder is if after 36 YEARS in the Senate she would know anything about Hezbollah?

20 posted on 10/04/2008 8:07:50 AM PDT by scooby321 (Cai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: publius1

I posted this elsewhere:

“Absolutely great moment (her wink at the camera)! All the little down-homeisms that Sarah Palin brings NATURALLY to this election cycle is what reaches out to people. I loved it when she gave “a shout out,” to her brother’s 3rd grade class and told them they get extra credit for stayin’ up to watch the debate. Just a really nice touch.

At the end of the day, what I like most about her (and what has literally dragged me over to casting my vote for McCain) is that she is not like THEM (not like Dems, Repubs, life-long politicians, MSM-types, Hollywood, elitists, etc.) She is like the average American—like me (no boasting in that intended).

The whole notion of changing the way Washington works is exactly what this election needs to be about... So, her wink, her “youbetcha” her “doggoneit” her “Say it ain’t so, Joe” all work for me—She sounds so different from THEM.”

What they hate, I loved! Go figure. And, no, MSM-types, I’m not being deceived by my lying eyes (as you tried to do with edited interview clips). I saw for myself. And what I saw was a genuine-ness about her, a confidence, an awareness that seemed to negate the very Sarah Palin image you have been trying to create for America with your constant barrage of distortions and disingenuous reportage.


21 posted on 10/04/2008 8:16:11 AM PDT by MarDav
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: svcw
Remember that girl who was perfectly nice, gentle, kind and she was beautiful, a straight A student probably on a sports team.

My daughter, you mean.

Cheers!

22 posted on 10/04/2008 8:17:04 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: publius1

Nightline did the same last night...Sarah Palin scares the radical left to death.......


23 posted on 10/04/2008 8:19:05 AM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1
The Karaoke (APoop/NYT/WaPoop/ABCNNBcBS/pBS/FauxNCBC) Journalists are @ it again.....its' just more Liberal Drivel.
24 posted on 10/04/2008 8:21:11 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass ("Annoy the media, elect PALIN and McCAIN....errr....McCAIN / PALIN.....McPALIN" 8^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1

They are just obsessed with her because she reminds them of the beautiful accomplished women who reject them out of hand, both the male and female editors and reporters.


25 posted on 10/04/2008 8:22:40 AM PDT by enat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1

They KNOW that Sarah speaks to us in a way we haven’t heard since Reagan- remember how much they hated him? The more they spew their bile, the more RIGHT she appears. They can’t hurt her, but they hurt themselves.

How much more can they do to destroy their own credibility?


26 posted on 10/04/2008 8:27:44 AM PDT by 13Sisters76 ("It is amazing how many people mistake a certain hip snideness for sophistication. " Thos. Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1
If you get flak, it means you are over the target.

They would not have a single word of disparagement about her if she were not a true threat to their game now at this late stage.

The fact is, their internal polling numbers show them that with her unbridled, day by day, they will lose percentage points and GOP will pick up and the lead will be lost, the trend reversed. One can trajectorize it over four weeks, no sweat.

So they must stop her.

Problem is, SHE IS UNSTOPPABLE, she knows the Japanese proverb: "Get knocked down seven times, get up eight." She showed us and the nation. She is remarkable. And she does it all with a firm, confident smile.

They said the same dismissive, cruel, untrue things of Reagan. They said them in a panic, which they tried to hide, but their words betrayed them. "Stupid". "Unclear". "Foolish". "Bumpkin". "All Show/No Substance".

But Ronald Reagan went right around the mainstream media to the American people and won two terms anyway.

Palin will win if she sticks ABSOLUTELY TO RONALD REAGAN'S PLAYBOOK.


27 posted on 10/04/2008 8:41:33 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1

Interestingly enough, they are no longer accepting comments for this article....guess they got enough negative comments to consider their point of view as valid.....


28 posted on 10/04/2008 8:41:46 AM PDT by illiac (If we don't change directions soon, we'll get where we're going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1

I’m having a friendly e-mail discussion with a liberal relative. I spent about an hour this morning looking up Joe Biden’s tendency to lie. I came to the conclusion he was a pathological liar. What can we say about someone who smears another man’s life by claiming drunk driving caused Biden’s wife’s death?

Biden plagarized in law school, lied about how many degrees he got, lied about where he graduated in law school, plagarized his life from Neil Kinnock, lied blatantly during the Clarence Thomas hearings, and on Thursday night, told big lies about Hezbollah in Lebanon and repeated a lie about how much we were spending in Afghanistan. he also told 20 other assorted lies in the debate, including claiming you could visit a restaurant that has been closed for 15 years.

Why does the New York Times not mention that?


29 posted on 10/04/2008 8:46:53 AM PDT by Our man in washington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

LOLOL. They are really over the top!


30 posted on 10/04/2008 8:56:40 AM PDT by GnuHere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Reeses
The only canyons most Eastern elites have seen are concrete.

They are clueless as to how out of touch they are with Real Americans.

31 posted on 10/04/2008 10:12:34 AM PDT by lonestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson