Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Monetary Base jumps 500%
St. Louis Fed | Economic Research ^ | 2008-09-24 | St. Louis Fed

Posted on 10/03/2008 8:20:31 AM PDT by Santiago de la Vega

Monetary base jumps to 939.472 from 874.750 for two week period.

From September 10 till the 24th the Fed added nearly $65 billion dollars in High Powered money.

At an annual rate, this is a jump of more than 500%.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: fed; inflation; monetarybase; moneysupply
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-118 next last
The Fed is trying to alleviate the problems faced by the banking system.
1 posted on 10/03/2008 8:20:32 AM PDT by Santiago de la Vega
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Santiago de la Vega

Gold


2 posted on 10/03/2008 8:22:29 AM PDT by sickoflibs (What's Next ?? the feds buy up GM stock to save the economy??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Santiago de la Vega
jumps to 939.472 from 874.750 for two week period

Must be new math. That's not a 500% increase.

Oh! I see! If this rate of increase continued, it would be an annual rate of 500%! Oh! That's different!

Saaaaaaaaaay ... what would the rate be if this continued for the next 10 years?

3 posted on 10/03/2008 8:23:52 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (I ain't gonna quit until I'm laid in my tomb and even then they better shut it tight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Santiago de la Vega

Inflation.


4 posted on 10/03/2008 8:23:54 AM PDT by Paladin2 (Palin for President! (PUMA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

No, the Feds should just buy up all the “surplus cars” that GM and Ford can manage to produce.


5 posted on 10/03/2008 8:24:29 AM PDT by Boiling Pots (Hey B. Hussein, are you going to prosecute me now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Santiago de la Vega

Theft by government.


6 posted on 10/03/2008 8:27:16 AM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Santiago de la Vega

I don’t think people realize just how much the Fed needs to pump liquidity in the short run. There are hundreds of businesses and corporations that depend on short term debt and commercial paper for their working capital. Whole solid businesses are close to bankruptcy solely because of the lack of liquidity.


7 posted on 10/03/2008 8:27:24 AM PDT by winner3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Santiago de la Vega

Those who know not history, are doomed to repeat it.

8 posted on 10/03/2008 8:27:45 AM PDT by OB1kNOb (The Late Great Nation USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Santiago de la Vega
"The Fed is trying to alleviate the problems created by the banking system. By creating hyper inflation, look forward to $8 a gallon gas and exhorbarant prices at the supermarket.

I fixed your errors for you.

9 posted on 10/03/2008 8:31:24 AM PDT by Tempest (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNlXgzzdJQA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Santiago de la Vega

Maybe we should invest in Zimbabwe dollars.


10 posted on 10/03/2008 8:32:09 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (We're not supporting clean coal --- Joe Biden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boiling Pots

Hey! Mayeb thats the way to look at this mess! The Fed is going to buy up houses the way the government buys up corn and wheat farmers DO NOT produce


11 posted on 10/03/2008 8:32:21 AM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Boiling Pots
"No, the Feds should just buy up all the “surplus cars” that GM and Ford can manage to produce."

Why not. They are doing it with cheese. There are factories that make cheese that sell everything they make to the government. The government puts it in storage and pays hundreds of million annually in storage costs. When the cheese is close to being bad, they give it away.

12 posted on 10/03/2008 8:33:18 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Santiago de la Vega

Talk about a misleading title.


13 posted on 10/03/2008 8:37:01 AM PDT by DaisyCutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

The is no reason for the bailout.

This bailout among other actions will put us in to hyper-inflation combined with soon to be double diget interest rates and double diget unemployment rates.

Worse part is the laws that brought this problem about are not only still on the books but have been reinforced in the bailout bill.

No consernative would support this bill.

The passage of this bill is a mortal wound to the free markets here in the US.


14 posted on 10/03/2008 8:37:50 AM PDT by stockpirate (October 1, 2008-the day McCain lost my vote, I'm now voting Sarah Barracuda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

This is simply a game of chicken between the banks and Gub’ment. Backdoor Barney told them to make the loans and the socialists in our Gub’ment would force the lunkheaded masses to pay for it. BROKE AND FREE... BROKE AND FREE!!


15 posted on 10/03/2008 8:38:30 AM PDT by Camel Joe (liberal=socialist=royalist/imperialist pawn=enemy of Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Santiago de la Vega

16 posted on 10/03/2008 8:40:28 AM PDT by ari-freedom (Betcha they're good. Why shouldn't they be? Their one mistake was giving up me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OB1kNOb

The current crisis is wildly DEflationary. The economy is facing violent contractions and can absorb all this money and more.


17 posted on 10/03/2008 8:40:48 AM PDT by Petronski (Please pray for the success of McCain and Palin. Every day, whenever you pray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot; Mase; expat_panama

You notice anything funny about the headline versus the body?


18 posted on 10/03/2008 8:41:03 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

not when gold is $847 an ounce


19 posted on 10/03/2008 8:44:55 AM PDT by ari-freedom (Betcha they're good. Why shouldn't they be? Their one mistake was giving up me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
You notice anything funny about the headline versus the body?

You mean that it's an actual increase of 7.4% but that the author annualized it and still missed the math?

20 posted on 10/03/2008 8:55:04 AM PDT by groanup (Does all of Wall Street get on the gov't pension plan now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
Gold

I agree... but MAN did my gold stocks get hammered yesterday. Ouch!!

21 posted on 10/03/2008 8:55:43 AM PDT by mn-bush-man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
The economy is going to contract regardless because of the additional burden on the tax payer and the global economic slowdown. Today's passage of H.R. 1424 will allow the Feds to seize more control of the economy (banking industry) and hand us the bill.

The first $150 billion will go directly overseas to Japan, China and 2 Brit banks.

W and Paulsen are being blackmailed (by Asian banks) to pay up the worthless paper FM sold to those banks, or they are going to dump US Treasury bonds/notes.

Not to mention the hedge fund guru's are gobbling each other up with many of those funds frozen and the rich elite are screaming they can't get their money now, even with penalties. That's the crisis.

Businesses and individuals can still get loans for what they want provided they have a good credit history, aren't overextended with debt at this time and go to a sound institution.

It's the 'venture' capital (i.e. credit) that has dried up as the domino effect has started on the global unregulated credit derivative market (economy).

22 posted on 10/03/2008 9:01:23 AM PDT by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RSmithOpt
The economy is going to contract regardless because of the additional burden on the tax payer and the global economic slowdown.

Yes. It is a question of moderate recession or deep recession or depression. This is not a binary situation.

W and Paulsen are being blackmailed (by Asian banks) to pay up the worthless paper FM sold to those banks, or they are going to dump US Treasury bonds/notes.

Sorry, I don't do paranoid fantasies.

23 posted on 10/03/2008 9:04:41 AM PDT by Petronski (Please pray for the success of McCain and Palin. Every day, whenever you pray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

The gold top in real dollars is something like $2200.

Eight-fifty gold does not impress me.


24 posted on 10/03/2008 9:05:36 AM PDT by Petronski (Please pray for the success of McCain and Palin. Every day, whenever you pray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Santiago de la Vega
The Fed is trying to alleviate the problems faced by the banking system.

Amendment: The inflationary policies of the Fed helped to CREATE the problems faced by the banking system. The ooly guy warning about this last year was Ron Paul.

25 posted on 10/03/2008 9:07:27 AM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
The current crisis is wildly DEflationary.

Perhaps deflationary initially, as the housing and real estate market crashes back to real value levels from the over-inflated values they soared to, but if the fed reserve and government continues injecting huge volumes of our currency into the global market, then sooner or later the money supply glut will force a devaluation of the dollar which will cause inflation. If not abated, hyperinflation isn't out of the picture ala 1920's Germany. I hope you are right. I pray that I am not.

26 posted on 10/03/2008 9:07:30 AM PDT by OB1kNOb (The Late Great Nation USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

It’s gonna be deep....not enough money the US has to stop the global reaction. We’re just (the taxpayer) buying up the $1.3 trillion immediately of toxic ACORN (CRA) loans trying to soften the global crash. The money is there and the Wall St. banks (what’s left) demands to taxpayer to give them money. Stocks are up because of it. Sound banks are sitting on their cash. The big boy hedge funds will drive the crash as they are way over leveraged.


27 posted on 10/03/2008 9:09:54 AM PDT by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: OB1kNOb
If not abated, hyperinflation isn't out of the picture ala 1920's Germany. I hope you are right. I pray that I am not.

If the credit markets are melted, there could be an inflation risk down the road. It's up to the Fed to draw back on the spigot with the right timing.

But inflation has known therapies, treatments and cures, in contrast, DEflation is a tough nut to crack. Last time we faced it in significant magnitude, the New Deal prolonged and deepened the symptoms and only World War cured it.

28 posted on 10/03/2008 9:14:59 AM PDT by Petronski (Please pray for the success of McCain and Palin. Every day, whenever you pray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RSmithOpt
It’s gonna be deep....not enough money the US has to stop the global reaction.

Agreed.

But the rescue plan is more than palliative. Melting commercial credit markets--soonest possible--works to prevent depression and mitigate the severity of recession.

29 posted on 10/03/2008 9:17:47 AM PDT by Petronski (Please pray for the success of McCain and Palin. Every day, whenever you pray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Under either scenario, yours or mine, it sounds like we’re screwed and gonna suffer for some time. :-(


30 posted on 10/03/2008 9:18:35 AM PDT by OB1kNOb (The Late Great Nation USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

it should ideally be in the $400-$500 range.


31 posted on 10/03/2008 9:18:47 AM PDT by ari-freedom (Betcha they're good. Why shouldn't they be? Their one mistake was giving up me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: All
Math and tactics aside isn't this what the Fed usually does when there is a shortage of liquidity?

I guess that's a rhetorical question because the answer is, yes, of course it is. Thus my real question, why the need for whatever that thing they're getting ready to pass other than buying up some funky "assets"? Is the total amount outside the scope of the Fed or is the bailout just a naked payoff?

32 posted on 10/03/2008 9:21:18 AM PDT by Proud_texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OB1kNOb

Yes. It is a question of suffering for months or for years. Does one prefer a stress fracture of the femur, or a compound fracture? A toothache or an abscess? A 2% contraction in GDP or a 12% contraction?

And so forth.


33 posted on 10/03/2008 9:22:03 AM PDT by Petronski (Please pray for the success of McCain and Palin. Every day, whenever you pray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

These graphs indicate that there is plenty of extra cash in the market? If so, where or why is there a claim of lack of liquidity?


34 posted on 10/03/2008 9:23:24 AM PDT by TomasUSMC ( FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Steve Forbes wrote: “The first prescription for a cure is to formally strengthen the dollar and announce it publicly. A year ago August the price of gold was more than $650 per ounce. In late 2003 it had breached $400. The Fed should declare that its goal for gold is around $500 to $550. That would stabilize the buck—and stability is essential if animal spirits and risk taking are to revive.”

ok that’s a different range than the one I gave but it’s better to pick a price that’s too high than too low otherwise borrowers will get spanked.


35 posted on 10/03/2008 9:26:05 AM PDT by ari-freedom (Betcha they're good. Why shouldn't they be? Their one mistake was giving up me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC

The claim is that the extra cash in the market is not being used to issue loans, it’s just sitting there.


36 posted on 10/03/2008 9:29:26 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

But don’t you think that if the fed keeps pumping new billions of dollars into the global money supply, that at some point it becomes awash in dollars backed by nothing but the good(?) faith and credit of the U.S. government and at some point that will not suffice for foreign interests that own so many of our dollars and they will demand that the dollar be devalued thus setting off a potential inflationary spiral?


37 posted on 10/03/2008 9:30:51 AM PDT by OB1kNOb (The Late Great Nation USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

I have heard that claim. “Banks are hoarding money” if true how long can they keep that up? Banks make the bulk of their money by lending out money not keeping it in the bank.


38 posted on 10/03/2008 9:33:44 AM PDT by nomorelurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC

nobody wants to make any transactions because they are afraid they’d be taken down
Brian Wesbury wrote:
http://www.ftportfolios.com/Commentary/EconomicResearch/2008/10/1/how_to_start_the_healing_now
Mark-to-market accounting causes so much mayhem because it forces financial firms to treat all potential
losses as if they were cash losses. Even if the firm does not sell at the excessively low price, and even if the net present value of current cash flows of these assets is above the market price, the firm must run the loss through its capital account. If the loss is large enough, then the firm can find itself in violation of capital requirements. This, in turn, makes it vulnerable to closure, nationalization or forced sale.

Because the government has been so aggressive with the use of these capital regulations, private capital has been scared away. Just about the only transactions taking place in the subprime marketplace have been sales to private equity firms that do not have to mark assets to market prices. Their investors agree to commit capital for the long haul, and because they are able to bend the current holders of these assets over the knee of the accounting rules they get prices that virtually guarantee a huge profit.


39 posted on 10/03/2008 9:36:48 AM PDT by ari-freedom (Betcha they're good. Why shouldn't they be? Their one mistake was giving up me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: OB1kNOb

It is a potential risk.

How about this hair-brained metaphor: we could be hit by a runaway boulder—this IS a slide area—but first let’s get the hell out of the way of the on-rushing train.


40 posted on 10/03/2008 9:36:59 AM PDT by Petronski (Please pray for the success of McCain and Palin. Every day, whenever you pray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
The claim is that the extra cash in the market is not being used to issue loans, it’s just sitting there.

The real issue with the "bailout".

There are no guarantees that a similar situation won't occur, despite the purchase of "illiquid assets".

See Japan, 1991-1999, for what happens when government efforts to stimulate an economy are thwarted by money hoarding.

41 posted on 10/03/2008 9:39:26 AM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

I just don’t want to dodge an oncoming train just to get hit by a landslide boulder. ;-)


42 posted on 10/03/2008 9:42:27 AM PDT by OB1kNOb (The Late Great Nation USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

“There are hundreds of businesses and corporations that depend on short term debt and commercial paper for their working capital.”

If they don’t have the capitol to make their material purchases and payroll they should be put out of business.

We ran a business for 57 years and never borrowed money to run it.

Very simply, we never bid a project that we didn’t have at least 4 months capitol in the bank for material and payroll.


43 posted on 10/03/2008 9:44:19 AM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Santiago de la Vega
The Fed is trying to alleviate the problems faced by the banking system.

Well duh.

44 posted on 10/03/2008 9:44:52 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Let me apologize to begin with, let me apologize for what I'm about to say....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

We could look at the YOY number instead of projecting a shorter time frame. But that's less scary. I guess the Fed should do less during a crisis?

45 posted on 10/03/2008 9:53:19 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Let me apologize to begin with, let me apologize for what I'm about to say....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dalereed
We ran a business for 57 years and never borrowed money to run it.

So what?

46 posted on 10/03/2008 9:53:51 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Let me apologize to begin with, let me apologize for what I'm about to say....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

No business or person for that matter should operate on borrowed money.


47 posted on 10/03/2008 9:58:14 AM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
not when gold is $847 an ounce

Gold almost 20% below the July high must be proof that inflation is out of control.

48 posted on 10/03/2008 9:58:29 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Let me apologize to begin with, let me apologize for what I'm about to say....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: dalereed
No business or person for that matter should operate on borrowed money.

Because it makes Allah angry?

49 posted on 10/03/2008 9:59:15 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Let me apologize to begin with, let me apologize for what I'm about to say....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

“Because it makes Allah angry?”

What has some goat screwing rag head got to do with anything?


50 posted on 10/03/2008 10:02:01 AM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson