Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rep. Mark Udall says Rangel should step down
The Hill ^ | 09/28/08 | Aaron Blake

Posted on 09/28/2008 5:54:40 PM PDT by george76

Rep. Mark Udall (D-Colo.) said Sunday that House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.) should step down from his chairmanship while an ethics investigation takes place.

Questioned by host Tom Brokaw on NBC’s ‘Meet the Press’, Udall initially cited the ethics process and demurred.

When pressed, though, he said that it would be “helpful” if Rangel stepped down.

“I think it would be helpful if Charles Rangel stepped down,” Udall said.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections; US: Colorado; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 110th; charlesrangel; corruptdems; democrats; election; electioncongress; elections; electionussenate; markudall; rangel; ratcrime; udall

1 posted on 09/28/2008 5:54:41 PM PDT by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: george76

Hooray for Mr. Udall!! Rangel is a HUGE CROOK and TAX CHEAT!!!!!!


2 posted on 09/28/2008 5:56:53 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion.....The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Yep Rangel will surely comply with this giving up all his power and corruption money.

Yep, lets all hold our breath.


3 posted on 09/28/2008 5:58:52 PM PDT by driftdiver (No More Obama - The corruption has not changed despite all our hopes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
Udall used these words, but he did not in any way call on Rangel to step down. He was full of praise for Rangel and said that it's up to Rangel whether he stepped down or not. Then he noted that it would be helpful in Rangel stepped down.

Pretty mild statement.

4 posted on 09/28/2008 6:09:04 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Michelle, spare me your phony outrage, you know as well as I do that dress makes your butt look big)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
How about INDICTING Bawney Fwank?

That would be a lot more fun.

5 posted on 09/28/2008 6:09:19 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Public policy should never become the captive of a scientific-technological elite. -- Ike Eisenhower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

bttt


6 posted on 09/28/2008 6:13:25 PM PDT by ConservativeMan55 (Obama is the Democrats guy. They bought the ticket, now they must take the ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: george76
Oh BS. When push came to shove he voted to keep Rangel in his seat (and he's received $10K in campaign contributions from Rangel):.

"In the September 19 Rocky Mountain News comes word Mr. Udall accepted campaign donations from New York representative Charles Rangel, the Democratic chair of the House Ways and Means committee. If you you're not aware of the trouble this disgrace of a congressman is in lately, look it up, but to put it plainly, he's the taxman caught " allegedly" (in some cases admittedly) cheating on taxes.From the RMN: [Rocky Mountain News]

" Udall, an Eldorado Springs Democrat, received $10,000 of campaign contributions from Rangel's leadership political action committee this year and $2,000 in 2000. He, like most other members of his party, voted against ordering Rangel to give up his seat."

http://www.examiner.com/r-2349368~More_Dirty_Udall_Money.html

It's easy to say Rangel should resign, but Udall did nothing about it when he had the chance. Now he thinks he'll sound like a moderate to Colorado voters when he's actually just another liberal dem party hack.

7 posted on 09/28/2008 6:37:11 PM PDT by keepitreal ("I'm Barack Obama and I approve this message. . . until I don't.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

He’s got a (D) behind his name, he’s not accountable for anything he does wrong.

Charlie Rangel is a boil on the behind of the US government


8 posted on 09/28/2008 6:58:08 PM PDT by Leofl (I'm from Texas, we don't dial 9-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
Which party did Rostenkowski represent???

Maybe Rostie can give Charlie some tips on proper show etiquette...

9 posted on 09/28/2008 7:20:13 PM PDT by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

I thought Rangel should step down too, but he does seem an appropriate leader for the crooks who are stealing $700 billion. Nothing will come of it as nothing ever does to those who know how to work the system in DC.


10 posted on 09/28/2008 8:54:54 PM PDT by nclaurel (I think therefore I vote Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Udall didn’t say he SHOULD step down. He just said it would be HELPFUL if he stepped down. That’s not the same thing. The media is helping Udall.


11 posted on 09/28/2008 9:36:10 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson