[neodad]

My wife and I watched the one from last week with “Hillary”. I thought it was hysterical. They poked just as much fun at Hillary as they did Sarah.

[FreeReign]

My wife and I watched the one from last week with “Hillary”. I thought it was hysterical. They poked just as much fun at Hillary as they did Sarah

Good comedy has a kernel of truth to it. This NY Times thing is funny because NY Times reporters in real life come off as being Manhattan elitists and the NY Times in real life comes off as trying to slime Sarah Palin

What was the kernel of truth last week about Sarah Palin that made it funny? Seems to me the humor was based on politically motivated leftwing elitist, lies.

[krb]

Since Hillary isn’t running for anything, that’s easy for them.

You should be wondering where the Obama jokes are.

[urroner]

As I started to watch the skit, I was upset initially, but quickly I realized that this was a hit job on the NYT and then I started to enjoy it. What the NYT truly needs is more cowbell and less bullshit. The NYT lives in a world of ivory towers and plastic flowers.

I especially like the end where the reporter won a Pulitzer for not proving anything.

BTW, Youtube just removed it due to copyright infringement. I’m glad I caught it before that happened.

[AnotherUnixGeek]

They poked just as much fun at Hillary as they did Sarah.

The thing is, Hillary is out of the race. Obama is still in - and SNL will not touch him. Obama, like God, is not mocked.