Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UN'STABLE' RANGEL (FACES LOSING LOW-RENT APTS)
NY Post ^ | 9/21/08 | ISABEL VINCENT

Posted on 09/21/2008 5:21:03 AM PDT by jimbo123

Rep. Charles Rangel's tax disclosures not only are an embarrassment for the Democratic congressman - they put him far over the limit to qualify for his rent-stabilized Harlem apartments.

While the powerful Ways and Means chairman previously disclosed income at or slightly above the $175,000-a-year stabilization ceiling on previous congressional documents, new revelations could put his earnings at more than $200,000 a year.

The disclosure could put pressure on Rangel to give up his New York housing perks, critics say.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 110th; congress; corruptdems; corruption; nyc; rangel
$3,894 a month in rent + $175k+ income for 2 plus years = landlord can petition for deregulation and they can double Chuck's rent.
1 posted on 09/21/2008 5:21:03 AM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
I guess rangel must be disabled.

2 posted on 09/21/2008 5:25:13 AM PDT by ari-freedom (We never hide from history. We make history!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
Democrat Rangel didn't have to pay any PENALTIES on his TAX EVASION???? TWO AMERICAS!!!!

4 RENT-CONTROLLED APTS????TWO AMERICAS!!

3 posted on 09/21/2008 5:29:43 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion.....The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

So what was Chuck using these apartments for? Midday getaways with his hos?


4 posted on 09/21/2008 5:30:42 AM PDT by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

I wasn’t sure from the article whether the $3,894/month is for all four units he rents, or for each of the four. If this is the total for four units that is incredibly cheap for NYC. If it’s for just one unit, then I wonder how he can afford to pay close to $12,000/month.


5 posted on 09/21/2008 5:31:42 AM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

They are NOT an “embarrasment”.; Charlie is part of the something for nothing crowd and will take full advantage of every opportunity he gets because he knows that his stature in the party will not diminish and that he will not be jailed because that would be “racist” of amyone that tried.


6 posted on 09/21/2008 5:32:06 AM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
Once again the greatest thing about the drity dems is that left to their own devices they almost always self destruct,I love it.
7 posted on 09/21/2008 5:33:43 AM PDT by rodguy911 (HOME OF THE FREE BECAUSE OF THE BRAVE--GO SARAHCUDA !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

RANGEL IS JUST ONE PART OF THE PROBLEM! Theres more where he came from.


8 posted on 09/21/2008 5:35:04 AM PDT by ronnie raygun (IF YOU ARE NOT CONSERVATIVE BY 35 YOU HAVE NO BRAIN. W CHURCHILL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

It won’t happen. He will find a friend to transfer enough paper losses in the stock or commodities market to bring him back below the ceiling and probably get a refund on his taxes too.


9 posted on 09/21/2008 5:36:22 AM PDT by fatrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun

This is an absolute travesty. Pelosi should be hung for failing to call Rangel to task on this! Rangel should be removed from office. This is beyond a joke and the Democrats have no morals whatsoever. Culture of corruption, indeed!


10 posted on 09/21/2008 5:37:39 AM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

What is the TAX OWED on the IMPUTED INCOME from having 3 ILLEGALLY subsudized/rent controlled properties in NYC?


11 posted on 09/21/2008 5:38:30 AM PDT by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

WHY ISN’T THIS CROOK IN JAIL??????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


12 posted on 09/21/2008 5:42:12 AM PDT by FES0844 (FES0844)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dinodino

AGREED..& SHE WAS GOING TO DRAIN THE SWAMP...
SHE’S A DISGRACE TOO.


13 posted on 09/21/2008 5:43:20 AM PDT by FES0844 (FES0844)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FES0844

He is not in jail because he is a democrat. Had this be a Tom Delay, George Bush or Dick Cheney they would have not only been in jail, they would have bee ripped apart by the media.


14 posted on 09/21/2008 5:46:22 AM PDT by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: FES0844

“WHY ISN’T THIS CROOK IN JAIL??????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”

1) He is a dim
2) He is black
3) He is a ranking dim that is black
4) He is a dim
5) He is a dim
6) He is a dim

LLS


15 posted on 09/21/2008 5:49:39 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (GOD, Country, Family... except when it comes to dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dinodino
Pelosi should be hung for failing to call Rangel to task on this!

I would imagine if Pelosi hung Rangel out to dry....He'd dump everything he knows about her.

They are so dirty and intertwined that nothing will ever come of this.

16 posted on 09/21/2008 5:49:51 AM PDT by Kakaze (Exterminate Islamofacism and apologize for nothing.....except not doing it sooner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
Photobucket "CHARLIE THE TUNA" RANGLE: "I just picked this $10,000 bill out of that pile and paid my taxes"
17 posted on 09/21/2008 6:01:25 AM PDT by RetSignman (DEMSM: "If you tell a big enough lie, frequently enough, it becomes the truth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pieceofthepuzzle
"If it’s for just one unit, then I wonder how he can afford to pay close to $12,000/month."

One was being used as a campaign office, which probably means he was using campaign funds to pay for it.

18 posted on 09/21/2008 6:02:39 AM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FES0844
WHY ISN’T THIS CROOK IN JAIL??????

'Cuz he's a Democrat. This is a resume enhancer!

19 posted on 09/21/2008 6:03:39 AM PDT by Thermalseeker (Silence is not always a Sign of Wisdom, but Babbling is ever a Mark of Folly. - B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: FES0844
Because he is another of those magic negros.


Sounds racist, doesn't it?

In fact, it's the damn truth!

20 posted on 09/21/2008 6:05:51 AM PDT by G.Mason (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RetSignman

Sorry Charlie!”


21 posted on 09/21/2008 6:14:43 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.

George Orwell

22 posted on 09/21/2008 6:16:42 AM PDT by mewzilla (In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pieceofthepuzzle; mass55th
I wasn’t sure from the article whether the $3,894/month is for all four units he rents, or for each of the four.

Previous reports have made it clear the $3894 is the combined rent for all four apartments...or $974 a month average per unit.

Yes, one unit was used as his office, paid for by US, the taxpayers. It hasn't been explored (to my knowledge), but how much you wanna bet he was OVERcharging the government for his "office" unit, thus offsetting his personal expense for the other 3 units?

Nothing this bum did would surprise me.

23 posted on 09/21/2008 6:31:44 AM PDT by Timeout (The Brits have their royal family. We have our privileged "public servant" class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Timeout
But the CBC has Goodtime Charlie's back, and Pelosi won't dare pi$$ off the CBC, no matter how much damage sticking with Charlie'll do the to 'Rats as a party.

They all deserve each other.

24 posted on 09/21/2008 6:36:39 AM PDT by mewzilla (In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

Yup these slime balls get into office and use it as a career of power/corruption rather than a short term obligation to serve our Country. I’m all for purging the bunch for fresh, concerned Country loving blood.


25 posted on 09/21/2008 6:48:33 AM PDT by mcshot (Bitterly Loving God, Family, and Guns more then ever. And greatly missing President Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

What Charlie should be facing is a stiff jail sentence.

Hey Charlie. ¿Cómo se “prison” en Español?


26 posted on 09/21/2008 6:54:03 AM PDT by LRS (NO DRILLING; NO PEACE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

Rangel appears to be senile. Pelosi, of course, sees no reason why he should give up the ways and means chair.


27 posted on 09/21/2008 7:46:11 AM PDT by y6162 (uot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
whether waddling down the halls of congress, or passed out on his untaxed beach... Rangel is UNSAFE at Any SPEED!!!
28 posted on 09/21/2008 8:05:38 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - McCain/Palin'08 = http://www.johnmccain.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
Note to RNC...

This is the "Foley" of this years election cycle..

Unfortunately, you have to go to Hillary's lock box and get you manhood back before you make the commericals....

29 posted on 09/21/2008 8:13:45 AM PDT by taildragger (The Answer is Fred Thompson, I do not care what the question is.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

All asset’s should be seized immediately, then LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE. or Hanging, let Rangel choose.


30 posted on 09/21/2008 8:24:40 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson