Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Consequences of Rejecting Hillary
weeklystandard.com ^ | 09/10/2008

Posted on 09/11/2008 1:44:48 AM PDT by tomymind

IT'S WIDELY ACCEPTED now that Barack Obama would be better off if he'd picked Hillary Clinton as his vice presidential running mate instead of Joe Biden. Obama had his reasons, particularly his discomfort with her as his actual vice president if he's elected. Still, Obama sacrificed a stronger ticket by rejecting Clinton.

Absent Hillary, the contest between Obama-Biden and the Republican ticket of John McCain and Sarah Palin is throwing the Democrats into disarray. The consequences of Obama's veep decision appear mostly to favor McCain. And if Obama had picked Hillary? Here are a few of the differences.

No Palin. Okay, McCain might have picked her anyway. He was looking for a running mate who would help him shake up the campaign. And Palin has delivered spectacularly on that. But choosing her would have seemed far less of a game-changer had Obama picked Clinton. Palin would have been merely the second female running mate in 2008. And her appeal to those who had voted for Clinton in the primaries would have been reduced if not nullified altogether. As a result, the prospects of the other potential game-changers McCain was considering--Democratic senator Joe Lieberman and pro-choice ex-Pennsylvania governor Tom Ridge--would surely have risen. And while it's unknowable whether McCain would have picked Palin if Obama had gone with Clinton, selecting Palin would have been a lot less likely.

(...)

(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; biden; clinton; elections; hillary; hitlery; mccain; mccainpalin; obama; palin; vp; writtenbyfredbarnes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-55 next last
Is (unfit) Gov. Granholm ready to rumble for Biden?
1 posted on 09/11/2008 1:44:49 AM PDT by tomymind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tomymind

“As a result, the prospects of the other potential game-changers McCain was considering—Democratic senator Joe Lieberman and pro-choice ex-Pennsylvania governor Tom Ridge—would surely have risen.”

yeah the snooze team. zzzzzzzz
If Obama picked Hillary, the race would be over no matter what McCain did. He’d pick a VP who had nothing to lose.


2 posted on 09/11/2008 1:54:23 AM PDT by ari-freedom (We never hide from history. We make history!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomymind
Don't be surprised if Biden exits and Hillary takes over.

With Palin there, Hillary has almost no chance of a 2012 win for President.
So maybe VP now or for sure nothing ever.

3 posted on 09/11/2008 1:56:59 AM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomymind

I still think Hillary would have turned down the VP spot even if offered. She wants to be the top dog, and that would only delay it. Plus, if she thinks Obama is a loser, getting tied to him could be grim.

Having said that, it’s hilarious to watch Obama get zinged for it. Even Biden’s admits he’s the wrong guy. LOL!


4 posted on 09/11/2008 1:57:11 AM PDT by shteebo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shteebo

I agree.


5 posted on 09/11/2008 1:58:04 AM PDT by tomymind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tomymind
And the dirtiest way for Hillary to enter would be AFTER the VP debates.

Palin would have taken all she had to, Biden would be gone and nobody would get to ask anything of Hillary in a debate.

Perfect and quite typical Democrat party stuff IMO.

6 posted on 09/11/2008 1:58:21 AM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomymind

another point: if Hillary was on the ticket, Obama could then lay claim to the Bill Clinton years of balanced budgets and a strong dollar. Now he risks being tied to Carter and Europe


7 posted on 09/11/2008 1:58:43 AM PDT by ari-freedom (We never hide from history. We make history!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

you don’t seem to understand. Obama supporters hate Hillary. It’s not just about Barack and his wife.


8 posted on 09/11/2008 2:00:46 AM PDT by ari-freedom (We never hide from history. We make history!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Don't be surprised if Biden exits and Hillary takes over.

That would lead to a clinton presidency. Obama would be a puppet while hillary and bill ran the show. They would demand nothing less for their support.You all saw what the got away with at the convention, Obama would fold like a pack of cards - again.

9 posted on 09/11/2008 2:02:44 AM PDT by Wil H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: shteebo

I feel the same exact way. People often assume Hillary would take the VP position if offered. If I was her, I’d say no. For all the reasons you stated.


10 posted on 09/11/2008 2:03:51 AM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tomymind

It’s not Plugs that’s the problem for the donkeys, it’s Barry “Can’ts say the middle name” Obama.


11 posted on 09/11/2008 2:04:43 AM PDT by JohnLongIsland (jackmartins08.com NY 4th Congressional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
Worse! B. Hussein Obama is a former madrassa student, lying in wait for his opportunity to destroy our country from the office of president. His possible win would be a TRAGEDY!

https://secure.johnmccain.com/Secure/Signup.aspx

12 posted on 09/11/2008 2:04:51 AM PDT by tomymind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GOP Poet

Plus she’d insist on having the 20 million debt of her campaign paid off, and Obama right now doesn’t have that kind of money to throw around.

Hillary as VP as this point is simply not going to happen.


13 posted on 09/11/2008 2:11:55 AM PDT by Truthsearcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Wil H
no way...Pelosi wants to be the Queen Bee.

14 posted on 09/11/2008 2:13:57 AM PDT by ari-freedom (We never hide from history. We make history!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
"Don't be surprised if Biden exits and Hillary takes over."

Otherwise why is Biden saying that Hillary would have been a better choice and that she may be more qualified, and why this mysterious meeting between Obama and Bill Clinton in NYC tomorrow?

Something is up. If it does happen, I wonder if we'll hear a lot of talk from the media about "Hail Mary passes"?

Obama may be a leftist, but he's not stupid. He knows he screwed up.

15 posted on 09/11/2008 2:14:24 AM PDT by Batrachian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tomymind
The Consequences of Rejecting Hillary - Obama dies in bed of old age?
16 posted on 09/11/2008 2:15:36 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Batrachian

because Biden is a dork. he always says stupid things.


17 posted on 09/11/2008 2:15:43 AM PDT by ari-freedom (We never hide from history. We make history!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tomymind

Had Obama tapped Hillary Clinton I would not have been lining up to sell him life insurance, that’s for certain.


18 posted on 09/11/2008 2:32:10 AM PDT by The Duke (I have met the enemy, and he is named 'Apathy'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

Would of...could of...should of.


19 posted on 09/11/2008 2:32:19 AM PDT by screaming eagle2 (No matter what you call it,a pre-owned vehicle is still a USED CAR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Batrachian

This is the USA, not New Jersey. A switcheroo at this point would backfire in a big way, and a feigned “health problem” by Biden would not be believed either.


20 posted on 09/11/2008 2:33:06 AM PDT by Chet 99 (http://www.mccainpalinvictory2008.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
And the dirtiest way for Hillary to enter would be AFTER the VP debates.

Don't know if they could wait that long. Thirty states have some kind of early voting and I doubt they could change the ticket once voting started. The whole country isn't New Jersey, if they really want to dump Biden (which I strongly doubt would happen) they need to act soon.

21 posted on 09/11/2008 2:33:19 AM PDT by jalisco555 ("My 80% friend is not my 20% enemy" - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

Michelle wouldnt allow a hillary Veep


22 posted on 09/11/2008 2:34:24 AM PDT by TheRedSoxWinThePennant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Don't be surprised if Biden exits and Hillary takes over.

I agree. As one FReeper put it yesterday; "There's your October Surprise".

And ditto what you said about the timing.

Say...less than two weeks before the election and after the debates. There'd be no time to really respond.

Then again, Hillary isn't exactly popular outside of the PUMA supporters, but it wouldn't stop that group from voting for the ticket.

23 posted on 09/11/2008 2:41:57 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: shteebo
I still think Hillary would have turned down the VP spot even if offered

OK, let's assume for a second that you're correct in your thoughts. How would this revelation play out in public perception? Especially now, after Biden's own little revelation, essentially that he's less qualified than Hillary to be on the ticket? The meme has been planted, Obama's judgment is being questioned (not just by us but by the left), a more qualified woman is being percieved as having been passed over ... I see little downside to this. Should Biden actually be thrown under the bus for Hillary, then there's a whole 'nother set of thorns for Obama to contend with. His own most ardent supporters are misogynist. He will be overshadowed by his own VP. The longer we can keep them chasing their collective (and I do mean collective) tails over this, the longer they remain in complete disarray.

24 posted on 09/11/2008 2:42:10 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tomymind
I think this point is entirely nonsense. I think that Hillary Clinton would be more than happy to accept the VP slot under other conditions.

But remember what Gov Bill "Judas" Richardson (D, New Mexico) said Hillary told him after he decided to endorse Obama. "He cannot win, Bill. He cannot win."

I think she realizes exactly what happened. Obama's Hopey McChange routine won him the nomination, and was on track to run out of steam. There's a lot of Wright sermons, Ayers links. Hillary knows what the last 2 months of the election will do to a sham candidate.

Sadly, Obama never got a chance to run out of steam on his own. Sarah Palin turned the coronation into the Hindenburg disaster. Obama is already disintegrating, weeks before the election. And McCain hasn't even really started hitting him. Just playful jabs this far, and they're hitting like sledgehammers. What's Obama going to do against ads showing him smiling in the audience while Wright thunders "God damn America"?

Hillary saw it all coming. "He cannot win, Bill. He cannot win." No way on Earth she'd go near his candidacy. You may as well hope for Santa Claus to join the ticket.

25 posted on 09/11/2008 2:46:19 AM PDT by Steel Wolf (The diamonds in Sarah Palin's earrings were crushed with her own hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomymind

In Obama’s first big test of Presidential Authority, he fumbled the ball. Big Time.

He could have put this race away in August by swallowing his pride and selecting Hillary Clinton for the ticket. It was a move so obvious, with a pay-off so huge, that a third-grader could have gotten it right. Pick Hillary and win, or pick somebody else and risk losing. In that situation, prospective President Barack Obama picked Joe Biden, and made losing a very real possibility.

The Biden pick revealed deep insecurity and weakness. It showed insecurity because Obama accepted the criticism that he is a policy lightweight who needs others to add heft to his campaign. It showed weakness because he allowed himself to be cowed by others who hate Hillary and by Hillary herself.

In his first test of Presidential decision making, Obama revealed himself to be an insecure and weak deal-maker, who looks for the easy way out, even if that way clearly leads to disaster.

And the Donks have the nerve to criticize the Republican choice for VEEP.


26 posted on 09/11/2008 2:46:59 AM PDT by gridlock (HIX IN STIX DIG MCCAIN CHICK PICK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Yes, but in a way it would be a blessing that Palin was debating Biden. He is going to have to be much more careful than Clinton would have to be.

There is so much dirt on Clinton, volumes could be whipped up in a New York minute.

27 posted on 09/11/2008 2:48:27 AM PDT by singfreedom (Obama's solution to the energy crisis: check the air in your tires! Why didn't we think of that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf

and that ain’t happening (Santa Claus joining) because the North Pole is in Alaska and Santa is a strong Sarah Palin supporter :-D.


28 posted on 09/11/2008 2:57:25 AM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
another point: if Hillary was on the ticket, Obama could then lay claim to the Bill Clinton years of balanced budgets and a strong dollar.

On the other hand if he would have picked Hillary he probably would not have lived to give his first State of the Union Address.
29 posted on 09/11/2008 3:00:26 AM PDT by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
" You don’t seem to understand. Obama supporters hate Hillary. It’s not just about Barack and his wife. "

So the likelihood of Obama dropping Biden and have Hillary on the ticket is very low ? .. let's hope you are right.
30 posted on 09/11/2008 3:01:35 AM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM .53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart, there is no GOD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TheRedSoxWinThePennant
Let's be real: Obama made his selection based on Media advice and Michelle. He scrapped Hillary as VP. He had her black base and THOUGHT he had her woman's "loyal dem" vote.

McCain saw something in Palin that "WE, THE PEOPLE" have been asking the Republicans for, over and over....A CONSERVATIVE. It was listening to, "the people", not politics and the media as usual, that helped him in his decision.

There's a lot of irony in all this.

Our forefathers anticipated "socialism". They set up the Senate and the Electoral College to combat it. Unfortunately, the Senate has not lived up to its' responsibilities.

We need a change IN CONGRESS and THE SUPREME COURT to get back to what was intended by our forefathers.

31 posted on 09/11/2008 3:02:52 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (I'm planting corn...Have to feed my car...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Truthsearcher

Just the image in people’s mind of Obama dropping Biden and putting Hillary on the ticket would look bad ? right ? the campaign dollars would drop off dramatically when they ( donors ) see that the ticket is losing or is in trouble by the fact that Obama has to CHANGE his VP in mid stride in this last stretch to the election.


32 posted on 09/11/2008 3:06:25 AM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM .53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart, there is no GOD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness
So the likelihood of Obama dropping Biden and have Hillary on the ticket is very low ? .. let's hope you are right

It's not just low. It's nonexistant. Look, pretend you are a Democratic voter, and you'd be perfectly happy with Clinton or Obama.

Ask yourself this. "What will I and all of my Democrat friends say the day after McCain wins?"

(Aside from, "No fair, I think they only counted three of my votes.")

They're going to say, "Damn. We should have gone with Hillary."

She's doing the exact right thing. She ran a good race, she was magnanimous at the convention, now she's fading away into the background to nurse her wounds. When the Democratic party needs a champion, she'll be back. And the Democratic voters will say, "We should have gone with Hillary LAST time."

Too easy. Why muddle things up by jumping on the ticket now, just as that ticket is taking a mach 5 nosedive into the pavement?

33 posted on 09/11/2008 3:12:55 AM PDT by Steel Wolf (The diamonds in Sarah Palin's earrings were crushed with her own hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: shteebo

If Hillary had run as VP with Kerry, they would have won and she MIGHT be running as Kerry’s successor. Sometimes, No. 2 is the right step to take. Egomania is a shortcoming.


34 posted on 09/11/2008 3:15:59 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (I'm planting corn...Have to feed my car...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

The BDS has crippled the lefts thought process and they missed a golden oppertunity with the biden pick.And they damn well know it.


35 posted on 09/11/2008 3:20:19 AM PDT by imahawk (Defeat liberalism, its the right thing to do for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

we’ve needed 2 things: a conservative and someone who can connect with people, like Reagan.


36 posted on 09/11/2008 3:20:38 AM PDT by ari-freedom (We never hide from history. We make history!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: singfreedom

“There is so much dirt on Clinton, volumes could be whipped up in a New York minute.”

well the obama people realized that the clinton’s were exactly what we’ve been saying all along. I don’t think the reason why Hillary wasn’t vetted was because of spite...


37 posted on 09/11/2008 3:24:38 AM PDT by ari-freedom (We never hide from history. We make history!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf

Hillary probably didn’t expect Palin to be a future contender. She probably thought mccain would pick some very conservative guy or some boring guy and she’d run against him.


38 posted on 09/11/2008 3:28:42 AM PDT by ari-freedom (We never hide from history. We make history!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: tomymind

Rusgh’s Operation Chaos is still working!!!!!!!!!!1


39 posted on 09/11/2008 3:43:54 AM PDT by Gumdrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomymind

Am I missing something here? Aren’t Hillary’s negatives still above 50%? What would replacing one liar with another really gain Barry? Does Hillary really want to be compared to Sarah?


40 posted on 09/11/2008 3:44:18 AM PDT by anoldafvet (Barack Obama, the "Platte River Politician", a mile wide and an inch deep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

“Unfortunately, the Senate has not lived up to its’ responsibilities....”

hmmm...mash here...

http://www.articlev.com/repeal_the_17th_amendment.htm


41 posted on 09/11/2008 3:46:37 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

“Our forefathers anticipated “socialism”.

That’s a provocative thought. Collectivism existed in various forms throughout human history. I believe the Founders clearly understood totalitarianism, a product of socialism, and despised the practice and wrote of the stench of dictatorship in our Declaration of Independence. They just didn’t have the word “socialism” available for use or they might have penned something like “Socialism Sucks!” but in a much more eloquent way.

As I said, your statement is provocative but I don’t want to think too hard this early in the morning.

:-) (I think the coffee is ready!)


42 posted on 09/11/2008 3:48:40 AM PDT by sergeantdave (We are entering the Age of the Idiot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: tomymind

I should think that if the proposed scenario that is chugging about slightly under the radar about Hillary to replace an “ailing biden” soon, that she would become a female “also ran”.

Seems to me that Palin has stormed the scene sufficiently to put “female no matter who” in such a position.

Hillary would take a number of votes from McCain/Palin, but insufficiently to warrant her joining up with loser “O”. People celebrate a winner, not a loser, and “O” is showing us what a loser he is recently.

It seems to me that it would be charitable of Clinton to join with the loser “O” at this time in the run. Not going to happen IMO, for the Clinton’s charity starts at home.


43 posted on 09/11/2008 4:36:37 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, Call 'em what you will, they ALL have Fairies livin' in their Trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Our forefathers anticipated “socialism”. They set up the Senate and the Electoral College to combat it.

They set up the constitution to not allow it.

The constitution had to be changed to allow the income tax, the original constitution did not allow the income tax.

"When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic." -- Benjamin Franklin.

44 posted on 09/11/2008 4:36:44 AM PDT by FreedomProtector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf

You are spot on. Obama is stuck with Slow Joe.


45 posted on 09/11/2008 4:37:00 AM PDT by jalisco555 ("My 80% friend is not my 20% enemy" - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: tomymind
I think the two dislike each other despite appearances and would have made for a terrible ticket. There's no real synergy between Obama and Hillary. They just can't stand each other and personality as much as politics is why she wasn't picked for Obama's running mate. And Hillary didn't want to play second fiddle again. She's done that all her life.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

46 posted on 09/11/2008 5:06:37 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shteebo
Exactly! And Hillary would NEVER have picked Obama. What does he bring to the table the Democrats don't already have? Nothing!

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

47 posted on 09/11/2008 5:08:36 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tomymind

Obama has to BIG of an ego... There is now way he will take Hillary as VP.. He has no respect for women, and will never admit a woman helped him into the White House...


48 posted on 09/11/2008 5:10:28 AM PDT by just me (Liberals do not like children, and children are one of the reasons I like Sarah Palin.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf
Yep. Hillary wants to teach her party a lesson in turning its back on her. I don't think Hillary will win in 2012. The stars this year were all aligned this year and you seldom get those kinds of favorable headwinds the Democrats had this year. If she never gets to be President, she at least has the satisfaction of getting to see the party that betrayed her take it up the chin.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

49 posted on 09/11/2008 5:13:06 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
Michelle vetoed Hillary. She is the one who wears the pants in the Obama family. What the wife says goes. And there's too the fact Obama would have to watch his back for the rest of life with Hillary a heartbeat away from the presidency. There was no love lost between them.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

50 posted on 09/11/2008 5:16:04 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson