Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mkjessup
Fast forward 63 years to this far more sophisticated and more powerful experiment...

Does this really involve more power than a nuclear bomb?

30 posted on 09/06/2008 1:36:47 PM PDT by Arguendo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Arguendo
Does this really involve more power than a nuclear bomb?

I think in terms of explosive power, probably not as the Hadron Collider is not an explosive device. But compared with a nuclear explosion, the Collider probably IS more powerful if only due to the fact that it is a carefully controlled release of energy which takes place over a longer period of time than one would see with a nuclear detonation.

The typical nuclear weapon is intended to blow things up with little regard for anything else.

The Hadron Collider is intended to rip things apart by generating massive controlled amounts of energy on a scale I don't believe we've seen as yet.

It's going to be interesting.
76 posted on 09/06/2008 3:50:58 PM PDT by mkjessup (If Ronald Reagan were with us today, he'd say "Vote McCain/Palin, & Win One More for the Gipper!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson