Skip to comments.
Top Dem Estrich: 30% of Clinton Backers Could Vote for McCain/Palin
BreitBart/Fox News ^
| September 3
| Staff
Posted on 09/03/2008 10:33:35 AM PDT by PghBaldy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 last
To: PghBaldy
To: listenhillary
I think some of those liberaltarian cookies might have a bit of herbage in them.
LLS
62
posted on
09/03/2008 12:31:10 PM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
( REAGANISM not communism)
To: sportutegrl
The MSM will find a way to criticize no matter what choice is made so the hell with them.
If McCain passed Palin over he would have been blasted for it by the so-called feminists.
To: PghBaldy
One of the libs’ strengths is the solidarity of their disparate parts. The crusading “minorities” have the backs of the other power groups, because if anyone peels away, the true enemy wins.
If logic ever enters the picture, they have a problem. This is a dangerous moment for leftist women, who are ultimately the shills for men like Biden.
What has happened to the Palin family is one of the most abusive, disgusting episodes in American political history. If she were a Democrat, the gushing would be endless. There is no more to it than that.
64
posted on
09/03/2008 12:43:01 PM PDT
by
Luke21
To: MissyMa
My best to you. I understand. I voted for Jimmy Carter in 1976.
65
posted on
09/03/2008 12:50:10 PM PDT
by
Luke21
To: tobyhill
What’s the Sherlock Holmes story, 10% solution. Well if she takes 10% of hillary’s voters, that’s a 4 million vote swing. That’s huge. On our side the GOP will get 95% plus of the republican vote, largely due to Palin. Add in Reagan democrats, some hillary supporters, the 60% plus of the independent vote, McCain wins easy.
To: kempo
The ultra left are so stupid they don't realize they are driving many toward McCain/Palin with their attempt at degrading Palin with Palin’s personal life.Shhhh! Don't tell 'em!
67
posted on
09/03/2008 1:12:04 PM PDT
by
uglybiker
(I do not suffer from mental illness. I quite enjoy it, actually.)
To: Petronski
Actually, that would be “anagram”, not “palindrome”.
Palindromes read the same forward and backwards.
Madam, I’m Adam.
Eve.
A man, a plan, a canal, Panama.
68
posted on
09/03/2008 3:14:39 PM PDT
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: DuncanWaring
69
posted on
09/03/2008 3:15:50 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(The Vice Presidency is below Sarah Palin's paygrade.)
To: Petronski
But, as an anagram, it’s correct.
Thankfully.
And delightfully.
70
posted on
09/03/2008 3:17:30 PM PDT
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: comebacknewt
92% of the GOP...? how much of the GOP voted for Bush?
71
posted on
09/04/2008 1:01:46 AM PDT
by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
To: Steve Van Doorn
In 2004, Bush received:
93% GOP
11% RAT
48% Indie
We need more RATs this time because there are now more self-identified RATs in the general populace than there were in '04.
To: comebacknewt
18% is a lot. we maybe in trouble then.
We shouldn’t expect the PUMA's to be on our side.
73
posted on
09/04/2008 12:54:52 PM PDT
by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson