Posted on 08/19/2008 8:43:22 AM PDT by pjsbro
My comment from an earlier Barr thread about her opinion of Jolie :
“Aren’t you supposed to , oink!, be somewhat enlightened, or do you, oink!,not know that the, oink!, African daughter you hold in, oink!, every picture had parents who suffered and, oink!, died because of the Republican party’s worldwide oinkonomic assault on Africa over the last, oink!, few decades since Reagan? Oink! Oink!” Barr wrote. “Oink!”
Bitterness with an Aluminum Foil Deflector Beanie!
Feral hogs cannot type uppercase letters because their cloven hooves cannot operate the shift key properly.
Porcine?
Tom Arnold’s been saying it for years
and he should know. ;)
Well I guess she can't be called a racist then.....
Barr is just trying to articulate, in her own inimitable way, what the entire Democratic party is now starting to painfully realize: Obama is not The One.
This is interesting. How would she know this? Is it true?
Wait a minute, she says she is going to vote for What’s her face, but in another post on her web site she chews out Angelina Jolie for not supporting Obama. So who is she really for, Obama, Hillary or Cynthia? The fat lady of the century thinks Republicans consume to much, I guess eating enough to keep 5 people alive doesn’t amount to consumption.
I’ve had people blast me before when I complained that a posted article was not news-worthy, or boring. People have told me “Well, you took the time to click on the thread, you must have cared enough to do that...”, so- I’ll save you some time, I’ll blast myself. WHY, why, why did I read the rantings of this complete moron? Why am I taking the time to even respond to words said by someone who should have been under mental evaluation years ago? Roseanne Barr- remind me when it’s 1990 again, so I can take your words as someone who’s actually relevant in society. What’s next- the guy who played the part of the brother of the neighbor on “Kate And Allie” telling us their views on the election?
You’re killin’ me. ;-)
Republicans are responsible for Katrina? People can criticize Bush and the local politicians for errors after Katrina, but the only thing the congressional republicans did was give away crazy amounts of money in the aftermath of that disaster.
I am of the strong suspicion that Obama was never intended to win, just to be the only candidate who could defeat Hillary.
To start with, there are powerful and wealthy parts of the Democrat party who bitterly hate the Clintons. Their leader is Al Gore, who was essentially given hundreds of millions of dollars in stock IPOs from his high tech base to defeat Hillary.
They went to the experienced Chicago Daley machine, also anti-Hillary, to get a candidate who had to be black, and had to be far to the left of Hillary, since the DNC delegates are far more leftist than Democrats as a whole, a candidate who had to be totally under the control of the machine, with no “control handle” from anyone else. Obama’s voting record is even to the left of the Socialist senator.
Obama was just the man for this purpose. And he remains so until he is nominated. At which point, more than anything else, he will be kept under heavy armed guard to prevent his being harmed prior to the election.
But the goal is singular. To stop Hillary. They do not really care if he is defeated in the election, and there will be no great effort to get him elected—just to keep him alive. There is a good chance that he could be in a McGovern blowout.
There will be a huge fight at the convention. Both sides are itching for it. If necessary, both sides may even be willing to split the party.
Hillary’s faction, which if it became dominant, would try to purge out the extreme left and those not loyal to Hillary, and claim the mantle of the party, turning it into the Clinton party.
Obama’s faction, would be to further radicalize the party, but at the same time to prevent Hillary from every getting power in the party again.
In either case, their fear and hatred of each other will push them both into a fight, which may spill outdoors. Obama’s supporters will want the mob to act, Hillary’s for the police to brutally suppress them, and thus embarrass Obama.
The critical factor will be if Obama does not win with the first ballot. If so, all delegates will be freed up to vote as they see fit.
The Hillary supporters will demand a roll call vote of every State delegation. This will take many hours and run the schedule into the early morning hours. This is so that if the first ballot fails, the attempt to steal the nomination will be out of prime time.
If they have counted the numbers, intense lobbying will be under way to bribe and threaten the delegates on subsequent ballots, to deny some of the delegates their votes, to change the party rules, and to otherwise jam the works in a way to get their desired outcome.
If Hillary has a chance, at the last minute Al Gore may throw his hat in as a dark horse, to suck away enough of her support to deprive her of the nomination.
“Ugly deeds and dark doings in smoke filled chambers.” This was how things used to be done before television coverage of the conventions.
I think Rosanne is confusing two things in that sentence--aborted babies that are born alive and partial birth abortion.
What is she talking about anyway? People that vote Dem don't care about babies and abortion. Everyone knows they are the pro baby killing party. This comes as a shock to who?
From the sounds of her incoherent blog, it sounds like Rosanne has had a few of her brains sucked out.
OUCH! That’s gonna leave a mark.
"Rosanne,... Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life..."
Barak Obama has prevented Hillary Clinton from being President for at least four years. In that sense, he is an American hero.
ROSIE!!!! There is a baby whale out in the ocean looking for its momma. You should swim back out there and take care of your baby.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.