Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jet fuel alternative on standby
AP via Boston.com ^ | August 16, 2008 | Unknown

Posted on 08/18/2008 1:32:59 PM PDT by Abathar

PHOENIX - With the price of oil holding above $110 a barrel, everything from wood chips to chicken fat is being scrutinized as an alternative to traditional fuel. But when it comes to airplanes, finding the right mix poses a special challenge.

"When you're in an airplane, you don't want your fuel to start solidifying," said Robert Dunn, a Department of Agriculture chemical engineer who is studying biodiesel jet fuel.

The airline industry is aggressively pushing for homegrown alternatives to petroleum-based jet fuel, while leaning on customers with a variety of new travel charges to help control a projected $61 billion industrywide fuel expense this year. A number of alternatives to standard jet fuel have been studied for years, though aircraft manufacturers say the challenge is to find ideas that will work now.

Jet engines can be retrofitted to run on hydrogen, for example. But hydrogen does not pack the same punch as traditional jet fuel - kerosene - and would require airlines to buy planes designed with massive tanks. That is a tough choice for cash-strapped carriers, said Billy Glover, managing director of environmental strategy at Boeing Commercial Airplanes.

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: avaition; energy; jetfuel; oil; transportation
Hydrogen for airplane fuel?

My would that make a good BOOM during an accident.

1 posted on 08/18/2008 1:33:00 PM PDT by Abathar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Abathar
My would that make a good BOOM during an accident.

Democrats would simply say, "buy the brand of hydrogen that doesn't go boom in an accident."

Problem solved...

2 posted on 08/18/2008 1:39:12 PM PDT by Night Hides Not (John McCain is Lucy, McCainiacs are Charlie Brown, and the football is a secure border.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

Yeah, I guess the Hindenburg is so long ago that many have lost or forgotten the lesson.


3 posted on 08/18/2008 1:39:19 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

How about ultra-clean synthetic fuel converted from coal, natural gas, or municipal solid waste, etc...

http://www.rentechinc.com/

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/pr?s=RTK


4 posted on 08/18/2008 1:39:47 PM PDT by petercooper (IQ tests for all voters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petercooper

I had heard about that company on TV. Sounds interesting.


5 posted on 08/18/2008 1:43:41 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

6 posted on 08/18/2008 1:46:38 PM PDT by steveo (Hi mom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not

That would be the wet kind, already combined with the oxygen.

It doesn’t burn very well. But it is much more readily available than the “boom” kind.


7 posted on 08/18/2008 1:46:53 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Though to be technically honest, the wet/oxygen kind can also go boom given the right containment and temperature.

[wink]


8 posted on 08/18/2008 1:48:49 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
"When you're in an airplane, you don't want your fuel to start solidifying,"

Yeah, it could ruin your whole day...........

9 posted on 08/18/2008 1:49:39 PM PDT by Red Badger (All that carbon in all that oil and coal was once in the atmosphere. We're just putting it back.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
That would be the wet kind, already combined with the oxygen.

That stuff is MUCH more dangerous when inhaled!

Darn! Looks like we're back to square one, i.e. JP4.

10 posted on 08/18/2008 1:51:04 PM PDT by Night Hides Not (John McCain is Lucy, McCainiacs are Charlie Brown, and the football is a secure border.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: petercooper

I believe the B-1, B-52 have been signed off on Synfuel already.


11 posted on 08/18/2008 1:59:19 PM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

From what I’ve read that jet bio-fuel thing was some sort of hoax .... that only 10% of the fuel driving that one engine was bio .....


12 posted on 08/18/2008 2:10:34 PM PDT by SkyDancer ("What Our Enemies Couldn't Do To Us Our Liberal Democrat Politicians Will")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

Actually, the Hindenburg fire was primarily a problem with the highly flammable aluminum coating used on the fabric covering. The hydrogen itself burned away in a relatively harmless manner, from what I understand.


13 posted on 08/18/2008 2:23:13 PM PDT by Arkansas Toothpick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer; BurbankKarl
For your info:

Snagged from WikiPedia.

Now what is the total cost difference in creating Synfuel against JP-8?

14 posted on 08/18/2008 2:27:26 PM PDT by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: brityank

The B-1 went vertical and broke the sound barrier....the pilot said the fuel was smoother than JP-8.

The Wall Street Journal said it broke out to $4/gallon, but that the company that made the test batches wouldnt be doing anything further without a huge contract....


15 posted on 08/18/2008 3:06:48 PM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

According to Obama and Schwarzeneggar, all the airlines need to do is check the inflation of the landing gear tires. Energy problem solved.


16 posted on 08/18/2008 3:15:16 PM PDT by PC99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brityank
Forgive me if I am naive, but, wouldn't they test this bio-fuel in labs under different temperatures and pressures to make sure it would not solidify in a actual flight test ?
17 posted on 08/18/2008 3:20:33 PM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM .53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart, there is no GOD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
everything from wood chips to chicken fat is being scrutinized as an alternative to traditional fuel.

everything from wood chips to chicken fat is being scrutinized as an alternative to traditional fuel excuses for not drilling. There, had to fix that.

18 posted on 08/18/2008 3:51:39 PM PDT by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness

I would hope so; but as we should all know, what is tested in labs doesn’t always work in reality.


19 posted on 08/18/2008 4:09:07 PM PDT by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
Hydrogen for airplane fuel?
My would that make a good BOOM during an accident.

No more than you would get a BOOM of our gasoline or jet fuel. More like a high-level whoosh: Photobucket

20 posted on 08/18/2008 5:47:24 PM PDT by sionnsar (Impeach Obama |Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PC99
According to Obama and Schwarzeneggar, all the airlines need to do is check the inflation of

Bill Clinton had some suggestions regarding inflation also, but they could not be printed in a family venue...

21 posted on 08/18/2008 5:50:26 PM PDT by Clint Williams (Read Roto-Reuters -- we're the spinmeisters | Impeach Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson