Skip to comments.
Jet fuel alternative on standby
AP via Boston.com ^
| August 16, 2008
| Unknown
Posted on 08/18/2008 1:32:59 PM PDT by Abathar
PHOENIX - With the price of oil holding above $110 a barrel, everything from wood chips to chicken fat is being scrutinized as an alternative to traditional fuel. But when it comes to airplanes, finding the right mix poses a special challenge.
"When you're in an airplane, you don't want your fuel to start solidifying," said Robert Dunn, a Department of Agriculture chemical engineer who is studying biodiesel jet fuel.
The airline industry is aggressively pushing for homegrown alternatives to petroleum-based jet fuel, while leaning on customers with a variety of new travel charges to help control a projected $61 billion industrywide fuel expense this year. A number of alternatives to standard jet fuel have been studied for years, though aircraft manufacturers say the challenge is to find ideas that will work now.
Jet engines can be retrofitted to run on hydrogen, for example. But hydrogen does not pack the same punch as traditional jet fuel - kerosene - and would require airlines to buy planes designed with massive tanks. That is a tough choice for cash-strapped carriers, said Billy Glover, managing director of environmental strategy at Boeing Commercial Airplanes.
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: avaition; energy; jetfuel; oil; transportation
Hydrogen for airplane fuel?
My would that make a good BOOM during an accident.
1
posted on
08/18/2008 1:33:00 PM PDT
by
Abathar
To: Abathar
My would that make a good BOOM during an accident.Democrats would simply say, "buy the brand of hydrogen that doesn't go boom in an accident."
Problem solved...
2
posted on
08/18/2008 1:39:12 PM PDT
by
Night Hides Not
(John McCain is Lucy, McCainiacs are Charlie Brown, and the football is a secure border.)
To: Abathar
Yeah, I guess the Hindenburg is so long ago that many have lost or forgotten the lesson.
To: Abathar
4
posted on
08/18/2008 1:39:47 PM PDT
by
petercooper
(IQ tests for all voters!)
To: petercooper
I had heard about that company on TV. Sounds interesting.
5
posted on
08/18/2008 1:43:41 PM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: Abathar
6
posted on
08/18/2008 1:46:38 PM PDT
by
steveo
(Hi mom!)
To: Night Hides Not
That would be the wet kind, already combined with the oxygen.
It doesn’t burn very well. But it is much more readily available than the “boom” kind.
7
posted on
08/18/2008 1:46:53 PM PDT
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: thackney
Though to be technically honest, the wet/oxygen kind can also go boom given the right containment and temperature.
[wink]
To: Abathar
"When you're in an airplane, you don't want your fuel to start solidifying," Yeah, it could ruin your whole day...........
9
posted on
08/18/2008 1:49:39 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
(All that carbon in all that oil and coal was once in the atmosphere. We're just putting it back.....)
To: thackney
That would be the wet kind, already combined with the oxygen.That stuff is MUCH more dangerous when inhaled!
Darn! Looks like we're back to square one, i.e. JP4.
10
posted on
08/18/2008 1:51:04 PM PDT
by
Night Hides Not
(John McCain is Lucy, McCainiacs are Charlie Brown, and the football is a secure border.)
To: petercooper
I believe the B-1, B-52 have been signed off on Synfuel already.
To: Abathar
From what I’ve read that jet bio-fuel thing was some sort of hoax .... that only 10% of the fuel driving that one engine was bio .....
12
posted on
08/18/2008 2:10:34 PM PDT
by
SkyDancer
("What Our Enemies Couldn't Do To Us Our Liberal Democrat Politicians Will")
To: taxcontrol
Actually, the Hindenburg fire was primarily a problem with the highly flammable aluminum coating used on the fabric covering. The hydrogen itself burned away in a relatively harmless manner, from what I understand.
To: SkyDancer; BurbankKarl
For your info:
Fuel research platform
In September 2006, the B-52 became one of the first US military aircraft to fly using 'alternative' fuel. Syntroleum Corporation, a leader in Fischer-Tropsch process (FT) technology, announced that its Ultra-Clean jet fuel had been successfully tested in a B-52. It took off from Edwards Air Force Base with a 50/50 blend of FT and traditional JP-8 jet fuel which was burned in two of the eight engines on the aircraft. This marked the first time that FT jet fuel was tested in a military flight demo, and is the first of several planned test flights.[64]
On 15 December 2006, tail number 61-0034, Wise Guy took off from Edwards with the synthetic fuel blend powering all eight engines, the first time an Air Force aircraft was completely powered by the mixture. The test flight was captained by Major General Curtis Bedke, commander of the Edwards Flight Test Center, the first time in 36 years that the installation's commander performed a first flight in a flight test program. The flight lasted seven hours, reached an altitude of 48,000 feet, and was considered a success.[64]
On 8 August 2007, Air Force Secretary Michael Wynne certified the B-52H as fully approved to use the FT blend, marking the formal conclusion of the test program.[65]
This program is part of the Department of Defense Assured Fuel Initiative, an effort to develop secure domestic sources for the military energy needs. The Pentagon hopes to reduce its use of crude oil from foreign producers and obtain about half of its aviation fuel from alternative sources by 2016.[64] With the B-52 now approved to use the FT blend, the USAF will use the test protocols developed during the program to certify the C-17 Globemaster III and then the B-1B to use the fuel (the first B-1 test flight took place in March, 2008). The Air Force intends to test and certify every airframe in its inventory to use the fuel by 2011.[65]
Snagged from WikiPedia.
Now what is the total cost difference in creating Synfuel against JP-8?
14
posted on
08/18/2008 2:27:26 PM PDT
by
brityank
(The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
To: brityank
The B-1 went vertical and broke the sound barrier....the pilot said the fuel was smoother than JP-8.
The Wall Street Journal said it broke out to $4/gallon, but that the company that made the test batches wouldnt be doing anything further without a huge contract....
To: Abathar
According to Obama and Schwarzeneggar, all the airlines need to do is check the inflation of the landing gear tires. Energy problem solved.
16
posted on
08/18/2008 3:15:16 PM PDT
by
PC99
To: brityank
Forgive me if I am naive, but, wouldn't they test this bio-fuel in labs under different temperatures and pressures to make sure it would not solidify in a actual flight test ?
To: Abathar
everything from wood chips to chicken fat is being scrutinized as an alternative to traditional fuel. everything from wood chips to chicken fat is being scrutinized as an alternative to traditional fuel excuses for not drilling. There, had to fix that.
18
posted on
08/18/2008 3:51:39 PM PDT
by
BerryDingle
(I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
To: Prophet in the wilderness
I would hope so; but as we should all know, what is tested in labs doesn’t always work in reality.
19
posted on
08/18/2008 4:09:07 PM PDT
by
brityank
(The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
To: Abathar
Hydrogen for airplane fuel?
My would that make a good BOOM during an accident. No more than you would get a BOOM of our gasoline or jet fuel. More like a high-level whoosh:
20
posted on
08/18/2008 5:47:24 PM PDT
by
sionnsar
(Impeach Obama |Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: PC99
According to Obama and Schwarzeneggar, all the airlines need to do is check the inflation of Bill Clinton had some suggestions regarding inflation also, but they could not be printed in a family venue...
21
posted on
08/18/2008 5:50:26 PM PDT
by
Clint Williams
(Read Roto-Reuters -- we're the spinmeisters | Impeach Obama!)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson