Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State's nuclear oversight could face new challenge
Times Argus ^ | August 11, 2008 | Dave Gram

Posted on 08/11/2008 1:07:25 PM PDT by Pontiac

When Vermont lawmakers debate whether the Vermont Yankee nuclear plant should be allowed to extend its license beyond 2012, they might want to avoid the S-word.

Snip

The worst-case scenario would be for the Legislature to pass a resolution saying "because of our safety concerns at VY," it was declining to approve the license extension. "Of course they're not going to do this," Hofmann said of lawmakers. "But that would be the worst of all worlds. That kind of courts a pre-emption claim."

Snip

Michael Marriotte, executive director of the Nuclear Information and Resource Service, a group based near Washington that is critical of nuclear power, said he, too, believes the state would be on safe ground turning down the license extension over issues of reliability or economics.

He noted several states, including California, have passed laws — California's was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court — saying they'll allow no more reactors until the problem of what to do with nuclear waste is solved.

But he called the notion that lawmakers should remain mum on safety issues "pretty Orwellian. They have the right to question the safety of the plant and not fear that the federal government is going to make them keep it because they fear it's unsafe."

(Excerpt) Read more at timesargus.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Vermont
KEYWORDS: climatechange; energy; environment; nuclearpower
How can responsible state legislatures suggest that a power plant that has safely, efficiently and cheaply generated power for forty years should be prematurely shut down. Vermont Yankee generates power far more cheaply than any replacement power ever could.

Capital cost of Vermont Yankee was paid off many years ago so electric produced by the plant is very cheap.

The Liberals of Vermont are crying Global Warming and they want to shut down a power producer that produces ZERO pounds of green house gases per Kilowatt.

1 posted on 08/11/2008 1:07:26 PM PDT by Pontiac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pontiac
The Liberals of Vermont are crying Global Warming and they want to shut down a power producer that produces ZERO pounds of green house gases per Kilowatt.

Let them freeze in the dark.

2 posted on 08/11/2008 1:28:02 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Drill Here. Drill Now. Pay Less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

Just tell them the radiation is good for pedophiles and other homosexuals and they will renew the license faster than a truckload of q....

Well, lets just say they will renew it fast.


3 posted on 08/11/2008 1:30:12 PM PDT by Iron Munro (Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac
Two words: Breeder Reactors.
4 posted on 08/11/2008 1:34:47 PM PDT by TChris (Vote John McCain: Democrat Lite -- 3% less liberal than a regular Democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TChris
Two words: Breeder Reactors.

Good idea.

Maybe president Obama will start work on them after he cancels construction of the Yucca Mountain spent fuel burial sight.

5 posted on 08/11/2008 1:40:45 PM PDT by Pontiac (Your message here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson