Skip to comments.
USA: Texas execution violates international law
Amnesty.ORG ^
| 08 August 2008
| Amnesty.ORG
Posted on 08/10/2008 8:13:47 PM PDT by davidosborne
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 141-142 next last
To: davidosborne
Amnesty International—helping political prisoners, unless they’re still in utero.
61
posted on
08/10/2008 8:56:04 PM PDT
by
Antoninus
(McCain/Palin in 2008!)
To: davidosborne
Congress can, of course, write legislation that would implement terms of the the treaty, but it has not. The ICJ cannot authorize the President to by-pass Congress.
62
posted on
08/10/2008 8:56:09 PM PDT
by
RobbyS
(Ecce homo)
To: davidosborne
Headline?
Daughters of World Court member beaten, raped, tortured, mutilated, murdered
Court reverses stand on death penalty
When it happens to the "little people" it just a statistic and some noble ideal to debate.
63
posted on
08/10/2008 9:01:37 PM PDT
by
WilliamofCarmichael
(If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
Comment #64 Removed by Moderator
To: davidosborne
#1 - the International Court has NO jurisdiction here.
#2 - when are we not violating some international law of some type?
65
posted on
08/10/2008 9:12:28 PM PDT
by
Tzimisce
(How Would Mohammed Vote? Obama for President!)
To: davidosborne
Dear Amnesty International:
Screw you.
Oh, and have a nice day.
To: davidosborne
The one thing I don’t understand is these groups also insist that US police forces are not allowed to ask criminals their nationality when picked up. How are the police supposed to know that someone is an illegal alien unless the suspect speaks up? This piece of s... was in America for 15 years and spoke decent English, how were the police supposed to know to contact the consulate?
67
posted on
08/10/2008 9:30:59 PM PDT
by
sharkhawk
(Here come the Hawks)
To: South40
"It undermines the authority of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) which had ruled in favour of a stay of execution."And?
68
posted on
08/10/2008 9:35:26 PM PDT
by
cardinal4
(Drill Now, Vote Nobama, and Oust the Third Word Democrat Congress)
To: davidosborne
69
posted on
08/10/2008 9:37:30 PM PDT
by
lonestar
To: cardinal4
70
posted on
08/10/2008 9:39:23 PM PDT
by
South40
To: FlingWingFlyer
And just who enforces “international law?” A bunch of metrosexual girlymen from Amnesty Int’l? The U.N.? ROTFL! Sorry boys. America is still a sovereign nation Let the democrats back in the WH or more in congress/senate and the U.S. WILL be under International Law and the rule of e UN.
71
posted on
08/10/2008 9:41:36 PM PDT
by
maine-iac7
(No trees were killed in sending this message but a large number of electrons were terribly agitated)
To: davidosborne
ICJ has no authority whatever.
72
posted on
08/10/2008 9:42:59 PM PDT
by
Tax Government
(Vote for McCain, not McBambi.)
To: FlingWingFlyer
And just who enforces “international law?” A bunch of metrosexual girlymen from Amnesty Int’l? The U.N.? ROTFL! Sorry boys. America is still a sovereign nation Let the democrats back in the WH or more in congress/senate and the U.S. WILL be under International Law and the rule of e UN.
73
posted on
08/10/2008 9:45:41 PM PDT
by
maine-iac7
(No trees were killed in sending this message but a large number of electrons were terribly agitated)
To: davidosborne
Just out of curiosity what would have happened if the SC had ruled against Texas and Texas showed some balls and told them the IC has no jurisdiction over Texas and to take its ruling and shove it and executed the son of a bitch anyway?
74
posted on
08/10/2008 9:50:36 PM PDT
by
Bookie1066
(What part of illegal don't you understand?)
To: davidosborne
TO AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL:
TOUGH SHIT!
Where were you when this bastard killed his victims?
To: davidosborne
I say we all boycott the International Court of Pancakes....wait a min.....do I have something mixed up here?
Leni
76
posted on
08/10/2008 9:52:10 PM PDT
by
MinuteGal
(Stay Home in Nov & Vote for Obama-ization, More Regulation, Taxation, Litigation and Ginsburgization)
To: davidosborne
We are not aparty to the International Court and By our own laws NOT subject to its rulings.
77
posted on
08/10/2008 10:02:58 PM PDT
by
screaming eagle2
(No matter what you call it,a pre-owned vehicle is still a USED CAR!)
To: davidosborne
We are not aparty to the International Court and By our own laws NOT subject to its rulings.
78
posted on
08/10/2008 10:03:02 PM PDT
by
screaming eagle2
(No matter what you call it,a pre-owned vehicle is still a USED CAR!)
To: PGalt
Now why waste a perfectly good curse word
79
posted on
08/10/2008 10:04:04 PM PDT
by
screaming eagle2
(No matter what you call it,a pre-owned vehicle is still a USED CAR!)
To: PGalt
Now,why waste a perfectly good curse word
80
posted on
08/10/2008 10:04:59 PM PDT
by
screaming eagle2
(No matter what you call it,a pre-owned vehicle is still a USED CAR!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 141-142 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson