Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain skin biopsy negative for cancer: clinic
Rooters ^ | July 29, 2008

Posted on 07/29/2008 7:32:55 PM PDT by xjcsa

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A biopsy conducted on skin taken from the face of U.S. Republican presidential candidate John McCain showed no skin cancer, medical authorities said on Tuesday.

McCain, who has suffered from skin cancer in the past, had a spot removed from his face during a routine checkup in Scottsdale, Arizona, on Monday and had it checked to ensure it was not cancerous.

"The biopsy that was performed did not show any evidence of skin cancer," said Michael Yardley, a spokesman for the Mayo Clinic. "No further treatment is necessary."

The spot, visible on the Arizona senator's face and not covered by a bandage, appeared to be about the size of a small coin.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; cancer; mccain

1 posted on 07/29/2008 7:32:55 PM PDT by xjcsa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: xjcsa

Even if it was cancer basal cell carcinoma of the skin has something like a 99%+ cure rate and only those with a compromised immune system would be at risk of it spreading, which would take many many years of ignoring warning signs.


2 posted on 07/29/2008 7:44:53 PM PDT by LukeL (Yasser Arafat: "I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LukeL

There are some people here on FR that are really disappointed. They were hoping it would be cancer, so that they could try to kick him off the ticket.

I guess they haven’t thought far enough as to whom to replace him, so we could possibly get Ron Paul or the Huckster and lose 49 states and the District of Columbia.


3 posted on 07/29/2008 7:50:15 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LukeL

McCain has had multiple melanomas removed over the years; he’s at enhanced risk for recurrence. I’m glad he’s healthy, but I’d sure love to see him decide to withdraw from the race to make sure :)


4 posted on 07/29/2008 8:38:37 PM PDT by xjcsa (Has anyone seen my cornballer?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
I guess they haven’t thought far enough as to whom to replace him, so we could possibly get Ron Paul or the Huckster and lose 49 states and the District of Columbia.

It wouldn't be Paul. Might be the Huckster, which would be too bad. I think Romney or someone else would be more likely though.

I'm not disappointed, by the way - I'm glad he's healthy. But as I mentioned, I'd love to see him drop out just to make sure.

5 posted on 07/29/2008 8:39:57 PM PDT by xjcsa (Has anyone seen my cornballer?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Paul, no chance.

Huckasuckapee, unlikely.


6 posted on 07/29/2008 11:13:29 PM PDT by Impy (Spellcheck hates Obama, you should too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson