Posted on 07/26/2008 9:00:37 PM PDT by robertvance
Personally, I do have some mixed feelings about the Dalai Lama. While I do not buy into all of the conspiracy theories about links between him and the CIA or his involvement in the recent Tibet uprisings, I am not convinced that his organization is as clean as the driven snow as so many would like to suggest. I realize that he won a Nobel Peace Prize some years ago, but after it was bestowed upon Al Gore last year, I lost faith in the value of that distinction. No matter how peaceful of a man he is able to present himself as to the world, I am sure that there are some darker aspects of his work that would surprise many of his supporters.
However, I do admire the Dalai Lama for one simple reason. Forget about Tibet for a moment. It is part of China and that is not going to change. Even the Dalai Lama has said that he is not calling for independence. In my estimation, the Dalai Lamas contribution to peace and harmony has little to do specifically with Tibet. The fact is, the Dalai Lama stands for much more than just autonomy in Tibet. He stands for human rights in China; he is a constant reminder to world leaders and policy makers that the human rights situation in China cannot be ignored.
(Excerpt) Read more at teachabroadchina.com ...
To the faithful of Tibet the DL is their leader until he dies and the monks find his reincarnated soul in another—who then becomes the next DL.
When the current DL croaks,look for the ChiComs to find the next one themselves and to murder any monk who dissents.
Then and only then,will the ChiComs own Tibet.
Wait for the DL to die (and it must be of “natural” causes) or slaughter and imprison every Buddhist in Tibet?
The second option hasn’t worked well so far so the ChiComs are left with the first.
He needs to go Yoda and urge violence against Chinese occupiers.
Agents Provocateur? ["Tibetan supporter" who attacked torch bearer may be Chinese agent]
China salaries overseas Chinese for anti-Tibetan protests (rent-a-mob: $350 per head)
Beijing orchestrating Tibet riots
Attack on an American volunteer by anti-Carrefour mob in Zhuzhou, Hunan
"The cab driver was shouting at him to get out. Then they started hitting the car.
The crowd was shouting "kill him! kill the Frenchman."" (he was actually an American but small difference to a government hired mob)
But history was made billions of years before our lifetimes, and will doubtlessly be made billions of years after our lifetimes. My feeling is that it will take a tiny fraction of that amount of time. When the Japanese annexed Korea and Taiwan in 1895, they probably saw these territories as remaining Japanese in perpetuity. When the Chinese overran Vietnam over a thousand years ago, they undoubtedly saw Vietnam as permanent Chinese territory. We now know different.
I understand your Chinese students aren't too thrilled that some barbarian (i.e. non-Chinese in general, but here, specifically Western) nations remain steadfastly unwilling to prostrate themselves before the Chinese state. But that's the whole Western philosophy. It's the same exact reason that in antiquity, Oriental ambassadors had no problem prostrating themselves before the Chinese emperor, whereas European ambassadors limited themselves to a kind of curtsey. Westerners do not believe in god emperors.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.