Posted on 07/24/2008 2:40:33 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
Seven years after Chandra Levy's remains were found in a Washington, D.C., park, a year-long investigation by the Washington Post offers evidence the congressional intern was murdered by an illegal alien.
As suspicion mounted that Levy's boss, Rep. Gary Condit, D-Calif., might be involved in her disappearance, the case became front-page news in the summer of 2001. But with the Sept. 11 attacks, law enforcement personnel in the capital quickly turned their attention to the the nation's security, and Levy's case became a distant memory for the public.
But the Post says that as authorities searched for Levy in Rock Creek Park they overlooked the July 2 confession of an illegal alien who had attacked two other women in the park.
~~snip~~
An informant comes forward
On Oct. 19, 2001, authorities questioned the informant claiming Guandique admitted to the murder. The informant told police the Salvadoran was depressed and confided in him one day in the jail yard. According to the informant, Guandique said he murdered a woman named Chandra Levy in the park – and that Condit paid him $25,000 to kill her.
The unidentified man said Guandique first got drunk and high on drugs, and then he found Levy jogging on a path in the place Condit told him to go. According to the story, the illegal alien hid, jumped out and stabbed her in her neck and abdomen. Levy stumbled to the ground, and Guandique buried her body in the woods, leaving the knife inside her body. The $25,000 was then sent to the man's relatives in El Salvador...
(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com:80 ...
Musta been campaign cash, a congress critter would never pay that much out of their own pocket... especially when the guy would probably have done it for $1000.
This is very old news. Not sure what to make of it.
bkmark for later. thx
If this pans out, then Condit needs to visit old Sparky.
that creep only got 10 years?
Thanks Jim, have a great evening!
btt
“Condidit”
HAR!!!
It makes me doubt that he was the guy who killed Levy.
Oh, my. I don’t remember this.
It would all depend on what kind of details the informant had that were correct and not released to the public.Like, did the public know the knife was left in the body or where the stab wounds were and in what order they were delivered.
As I recall from back then, that guy was definitely a suspect after the body was found. However, I am skeptical about the Condit part of the story.
Get Mark Fuhrman to investigate.
This may be “old news” but you can count on 2 things:
1) justice needs to be served, whether old or not
and
2) if Condit was a Republican, the MSM and Dem Congress Critters would exploit it to show “Republican corruption”.
And it would work, as opportunistic as that may be.
Very true.
I haven’t heard this before. But it certainly links up with what I’ve thought all along; that Condit paid for a hit.
Hey thanks Jim for the article.
Ping to keep an eye on it.....
Hey Jim...glad to see you!
God bless you and yours!!!
I have heard rumors about several scenarios all of which are disgusting and sickening. This one makes as much sense as the others and is equally disgusting and sickening.
I will be surprised if this goes beyond WND.
It just doesn’t seem to get the media excited to jail a Democrat.
Hmmm. Well, two things are for sure - the young woman is dead, and the perpetrator has not yet been arrested.
This suspect is as likely as another. But without a credible tie-in to the congresscritter it won’t go very far.
What might be relevant here is that Kasich and Condit were supposed to be so tight back in what I think might have been Kasich’s bachelor years. If so, if McCain were to consider or name Kasich as his running mate, those partying days might be recalled.
I don't remember that they ever found a knife. Or were they keeping that as a big secret.
.....Just doing the jobs Americans won’t do.
If this is true, he had 25 thousand reasons to kill Chandra Levy and probably none for the other two victims.
It may be “old news” to you you but not to her family.
Unsolved murders do not go away especially to those that
are sworn to solve them.
That's part of the problem with polygraphs...they can't winnow out partial or incomplete truths...for example, if the informant might be implicated or associated with an otherwise truthful answer, it may still display indicators of deception. For example, "Guandique" may have told him about the $25,000 for other reasons, with the Levy story merely as a peripheral issue: i.e., promising to split it with him for a favor, etc.
If I remember, it was also pretty evident that someone she knew had something to do with it. (Stuff left in the apartment and computer traces, etc.)
He gives some specific details that could be (have been?) checked out. How many transfers of approximately $25,000 from that area to El Salvador were there on about that date? Does his family say they received $25,000? Of the bones recovered, did any have knife marks? Was a knife found near the scene?
Soooo I wonder if Condidit will file a lawsuit against the Washington Post and/or World Net Daily?
He’s been a busy litigant over the past little while, but his legal batting average hasn’t been so great.
Great to see you Jim, prayers and blessings to you and yours!
MKJ :)
Of all the polygraphers I've met, they all say the instrument is not 100% accurate, but to a man, they all claim THEY are 100% accurate. Go figure.
And having taken those exams a time or two in my life, I am not impressed with the instrument at all.
Hmmm.
Well, we got rid of the bum anyway and now we’re stuck with Nancy’s Lapdog, Dennis
Maybe this criminal murdered Chandra and then saw the story on TV and started to fantasize about it. Or, maybe it’s just a total fantasy.
The likelihood of Condit finding an illegal alien who likes to attack women... The story doesn’t hold water.
And, the stupidity of a polygraph test in English when he doesn’t speak English is beyond comment.
Criminal defendants are convicted on the basis of jailhouse snitches all the time. Pretty tough to pin this on Condit, though, without more evidence.Police can trace money, calendars, phone records, computer hard drives etc, but it’s now seven years later. I always believed that Condit got rid of this naive young woman. But,there has to be actual evidence linking him to the crime.
What is the response of the Dept. of Justice?
[sound of crickets] Proving once again that all Democrats [each and every one] can murder, hire others to murder,
plunder assets, steal (even hundreds and hundreds of FBI files),
drive drunk and hit police cars, get caught cheating on their wives, even commit treason.
but THEY ARE ALL ABOVE THE LAW.
Nothing to see here. Move along.
Yes,that's true.But in a case of this magnitude the "snitch" in question has an even stronger than usual motive to lie.Actually,maybe a couple of motives (fame and a deal from the prosecutor).Sure,investigators would be smart to try to confirm...or shoot down...his claim.If they can confirm it then obviously this proof is presented in court.
Please make that just one you!
The rumor I heard was that Condit had a male lover and that he (Condit) couldn’t have satisfying sex with a woman unless there was a man in the rear. (Can I say this on FR?) I heard that Chandra was going to spill the beans about his disgusting fetishes and he had her bumped off.
I also heard that since Condit was on a committee that dealt with terrorism and intelligence that he had contacts from outside the country to help get rid of Chandra.
Condit and his wife have been pretty successful in shutting people up because they successfully sued a few. But things have been pretty quiet lately. What a creep!
Not earth shattering by any means, but wonder if Condit had told Chandra that when they were finally able to be together-haha-that along with the picket fence house, that he and Chandra would have their own BR shoppe and live happily ever...
I did not mean to imply that it wasn’t important. The question is why this was not fully investigated.
Wonder if the Levy’s hired their own investigator at any point. Very strange that the body wasn’t found for so long.
Nothing about this case made a bit of sense and it still doesn’t.
Even if Condit paid to have her killed, nothing will come of it.
I no longer believe anyone on the left side of the aisle ever has justice meted out to them.
Makes me wonder why not? I don’t believe I would like the answer.
Everytime I see that picture I want to dust those bastards with an M249.
I remember freeping on this 9/9/01; the story was top interest for weeks.
You just know Condit was involved. Three things stand out.
1) Chandra had confided in a phone message to her aunt the day before, saying that she had “great news!” The aunt was her only known confidante about the affair with the married Congressman whom she hoped to marry.
2) Chandra went out that day to the park, after looking up the directions online, without any I.D., the way she was told to always by Condit when she was meeting him.
3) Condit was called at home in California by Chandra’s parents, when they had not heard from her in days, and they begged him to inquire about her. He made no call for a long time, seemingly knowing that there was nothing he could do to “find” Chandra. He had already left some messages on Chandra’s machine earlier.
Not to mention all of his suspicious behavior during the searches.
Thanks for posting this, Jim.
I pray some day Chandra’s parents get closure along with justice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.