Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

He's Bob Barr, and he's running for president (says Bush is worse than Bill Clinton)
Los Angeles Times ^ | July 22, 2008 | Faye Fiore

Posted on 07/23/2008 9:46:18 AM PDT by FocusNexus

In fact, as much as he despised Clinton, Barr thinks President Bush is worse. "What George W. Bush has done to the fabric of our constitutional government, to separation of powers, to a government of limited powers is absolutely unforgivable," he said.

That prospect is greatest in Barr's home state of Georgia. Obama is already running ads targeting an untapped pool of African Americans and younger voters. State polls suggest Barr's single-digit following pulls mostly from McCain.

"If Barr can win 5 or 6 points of the total vote -- it's an if but it's conceivable -- then Obama could win Georgia," said Merle Black, who teaches political science at Emory University in Atlanta.

His vote to authorize the war? A mistake. The Patriot Act? Ditto. It was an excuse for unreasonable government spying. He has disowned the Defense of Marriage Act he championed, not because Jeri Barr is his third wife but because Libertarians don't believe in government telling people who to marry. (He says that is up to each state.)

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: 2008; aclu; barr; bobbarr; bozo; clown; conservatives; elections; libertarian; libertarianparty; libertarians; mccain; patriotact; professionalspoilers; propagandawingofdnc; sideshowbob; thirdparty; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-53 next last

1 posted on 07/23/2008 9:46:19 AM PDT by FocusNexus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus

Way to go, Bob. Because getting Osama Obama elected is really going to help the Libertarian cause, right?

}:-)4


2 posted on 07/23/2008 9:50:23 AM PDT by Moose4 (http://moosedroppings.wordpress.com -- Because 20 million self-important blogs just aren't enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus
LLS says that barr is worse than catah ever was!

LLS

3 posted on 07/23/2008 9:51:11 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (REAGANISM... not communism!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moose4

Barr is no Libertarian.

He is fully on board with the Mega-Government, socialist Global Warming scam.


4 posted on 07/23/2008 9:52:27 AM PDT by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Moose4

No, but it would surely help the ACLU.


5 posted on 07/23/2008 9:54:13 AM PDT by willgolfforfood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EyeGuy
Does Bob Barr have the hip-hop activist veep?

My mistake that's Cynthia Mckinney.

In my view, Bob Barr and Cythia Mckinney are two peas of the same pod.

6 posted on 07/23/2008 9:54:13 AM PDT by libs_kma (NOBAMA. Keep the change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus
If Barr feels this way, why did he vote for the "patriot" act?

If this is the best the libertarians can do, it's write-in time.
7 posted on 07/23/2008 9:54:13 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus

Barr’s single-digit IQ


8 posted on 07/23/2008 9:54:45 AM PDT by tbpiper (NObama '08 - Unfit in any color)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus

Boob Bar is running for president. No thanks.


9 posted on 07/23/2008 9:55:14 AM PDT by A. Morgan (VOTE FOR A LIBERAL N' WE'LL BE UP TO OUR NECKS IN ILLEGALS and OUTA' GAS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moose4

Actually, fools like Neal Boortz (famous radio mouth, high priest of libertarianism) believe it will! Boortz told his listeners to not vote for republicans in 2006, to teach the pubbies a lesson.


10 posted on 07/23/2008 9:56:37 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus

Libertarian BDS is particularly debilitating.


11 posted on 07/23/2008 9:57:29 AM PDT by Post Toasties (It's not a smear if it's true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus

All he will succeed at is getting votes that would have gone to McCain thus electing B. Hussein. (hey that rhymes!)


12 posted on 07/23/2008 9:57:44 AM PDT by stanz (Those who don't believe in evolution should go jump off the flat edge of the Earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moose4

GOP leader disses Barr

http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/07/23/gop-leader-disses-barr/

Reason magazine’s David Wiegel was having lunch with House Minority Leader John Boehner (R - Ohio) and around 50 conservative bloggers, reporters, and think-tankers. Then he got his question in: Might the Barr candidacy force the GOP to reform itself?

Boehner’s response:

“A vote for Bob Barr - you might as well vote for Barack Obama. If you want to throw your vote away, that’s fine. But that’s what it would be.”


13 posted on 07/23/2008 9:58:15 AM PDT by FocusNexus ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus
He's Bob Barr and he backs AlGore on Global Warming
14 posted on 07/23/2008 9:58:54 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus
In fact, as much as he despised Clinton, Barr thinks President Bush is worse.

That sound you hear a formerly conservative Congressman reaching his level of mental incompetence.

15 posted on 07/23/2008 9:59:04 AM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus

He’s also in favor of amnesty.


16 posted on 07/23/2008 9:59:35 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus

The nearly extinct L A Times doing a puff piece on Bob Barr is an operative argument for the irrelevance of the MSM.


17 posted on 07/23/2008 10:03:44 AM PDT by Biblebelter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
He’s also in favor of amnesty.

Worse, he actually fought to prevent State and local law enforcement from going after illegals saying it was a 'federal only' responsibility.

18 posted on 07/23/2008 10:05:40 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: All

The Libertarian party is completely clueless on foreign policy. Libertarians, including Bob Barr seem to think that you can “negotiate” with Iran, and “want to understand” Ahmadinejad. What are they going to do, WHEN Iran finished their nuclear missile development?

Libertarian Party says ‘Iran should not be the new Iraq’

http://www.frostillustrated.com/full.php?sid=3894

“Iran should not be the new Iraq,” said Libertarian Party spokesperson Andrew Davis. “An attack on Iran would be like opening the Pandora’s box of foreign policy. All the evils we’ve spent the last five years in Iraq trying to put back in the box would be unleashed all over again, and I fear this time the lid will never be able to be closed. Attacking Iran would be game over for our economy, our military readiness and the entire stability of the Middle East.”

The Libertarian Party’s position is that the U.S. should abandon its attempts to act as policeman for the world and avoid entangling alliances with other nations by eliminating economic and military aid. The party believes that free trade and diplomacy are the best tools for ensuring an America that is at peace with the world.

Defusing the confrontation with Iran will not be easy, Barr recently said, “but any nonproliferation strategy must begin with diplomacy and include a willingness to address the other side.”


19 posted on 07/23/2008 10:07:54 AM PDT by FocusNexus ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus
“A vote for Bob Barr - you might as well vote for Barack Obama. If you want to throw your vote away, that’s fine. But that’s what it would be.”

Boehner is exactly right.

20 posted on 07/23/2008 10:08:18 AM PDT by demkicker (In the minority or majority, I'll never stop 'kicking' dems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus

Bob Barr is worse than bad breath.

This guy was a laughing stock when he was in the House.


21 posted on 07/23/2008 10:09:02 AM PDT by RexBeach ("Americans never quit!" Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus
Bob Barr is not going to get more than 1% of the total vote which is the typical percentage of a third party candidate. He is not going to cause McCain to lose a single state where McCain is favored to win.
22 posted on 07/23/2008 10:11:51 AM PDT by jveritas (God Bless President Bush and our brave troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamuraiScot

Bob Barr has reached the point of “diminished capacity”. He may have had some idea of what was going on, years ago, but he now needs to say something outrageous to just get attention. I think that he started to lose it during the impeachment of Clinton...He remembers the name “Bill Clinton” and just threw it up to compare President Bush to BC in a negative way. Next stop, DEMENTIA. It is really sad to see one end up this way. Wake up Libertarians, he is a loser who will only spoil the result of what should be a McCain victory in November.


23 posted on 07/23/2008 10:12:27 AM PDT by BatGuano (We're not playing Tidally Winks here!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus

>> As much as he despised Clinton, Barr thinks President Bush is worse. “What George W. Bush has done to the fabric of our constitutional government, to separation of powers, to a government of limited powers is absolutely unforgivable,” he said.

I don’t figure he’ll be getting much conservative support with that kind of nonsensical diatribe. Barr’s gone off the deep end.

I’m not a McCain fan — but I see no reasonable alternative. Barr’s position on the WOT and the Patriot Act is a dealbreaker. The Constitution Party guy is a catastrophe. Who’s left? Obama — nut job. Cynthia McKinney — nut job. Ralph Nader — nut job.

These people make John McCain look like a genius.

H


24 posted on 07/23/2008 10:12:50 AM PDT by SnakeDoctor (Keep Austin Quarantined ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus
The Libertarian party is completely clueless on foreign policy.

Have you read "Libertarianism: The Perversion of Liberty" by Peter Schwartz? It really does outline how the Libertarian party has very little in common with people who have libertarian ideals. In this he says "If it were ever successful, it would destroy the remnants of freedom that still exist in this country far faster than of the more explicit enemies of liberty."

25 posted on 07/23/2008 10:18:45 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus
What George W. Bush has done to the fabric of our constitutional government, to separation of powers, to a government of limited powers is absolutely unforgivable,"

Unforgivable? Everyone forgave FDR and he did far worse.

26 posted on 07/23/2008 10:19:12 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus

The statement about President Bush alone will keep me voting for Bob Barr. It’s a lie and Bob knows it.


27 posted on 07/23/2008 10:35:24 AM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10

Bob Barr’s transformation to a “moron” is now complete.


28 posted on 07/23/2008 10:38:38 AM PDT by DarthVader (Liberal Democrats are the party of EVIL whose time of judgement has come.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus

I think Barr would be more of a problem if he had charisma.


29 posted on 07/23/2008 10:38:47 AM PDT by freespirited (Never vote for a man who gets his nails done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Post Toasties

That Barr is an idiot goes without saying; however, I find it strange how so many FReeps were praising this guy when he railed against McCain but now ridicule him when he correctly points out how incompetently the president has managed his term in office and how it has so negatively harmed the Republican Party.


30 posted on 07/23/2008 10:39:53 AM PDT by meandog (please pray for future President McCain, day minus 158 and counting)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus

Bob Barr couldn’t get re-elected to the House and has been a sore loser since then. He jumped aboard the ACLU scam and has been sinking into the morass that he made since then.


31 posted on 07/23/2008 10:42:10 AM PDT by hgro (Jerry Riversd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hgro

Well, its official
We all know who Barr wants to be POTUS and its not Barr
These whores will do anything for the promise of a position in the next presidency

I keep saying Obama is a well funded puppet
Whoever is pulling his strings has lots of money & power


32 posted on 07/23/2008 10:53:41 AM PDT by mouse1 (a vote for mccain is a vote against obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Moose4

“Way to go, Bob. Because getting Osama Obama elected is really going to help the Libertarian cause, right?”

And electing McCain will?


33 posted on 07/23/2008 10:59:13 AM PDT by Daveinyork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus

Barr has gone waaaay over the edge...McCain is extremely unpopular with the conservative base...on several issues. The trust issue among base voters is a big question with McCain. I as well as most here see it or hear it all the time.

McCain doesnt look like he even wants to beat Obama but he sure goes after “his” people if they speak up.

I cannot believe we are in this mess...maybe after a few yrs of Obama we can get back on track.


34 posted on 07/23/2008 11:12:20 AM PDT by rrrod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus

I had a little bit of respect left for Bob Barr until now, I really did.

He’s full of crap. Bush is a great man compared to the great Sink Staining Liar, Impeached42.


35 posted on 07/23/2008 11:20:22 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (Just say NObama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rrrod

I think there may not be much of a republic left to defend if Hussein occupies the Oval Office. McCain goes off the conservative reservation more than I’d like, but Hussein is on another planet.


36 posted on 07/23/2008 11:21:57 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (Just say NObama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus

This is what happens when the Repubs are willing to throw people under the bus rather than supporting them from RAT Attacks. FRATricide.


37 posted on 07/23/2008 11:25:04 AM PDT by Hacklehead (Crush the liberals, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentation of the hippies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus
I would like to have a viable candidate who puts America and American citizens first.


38 posted on 07/23/2008 11:26:40 AM PDT by Iron Munro (Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus

How the mighty have gone bat-shit CRAZY!


39 posted on 07/23/2008 11:30:38 AM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EyeGuy
Barr is no Libertarian. He is fully on board with the Mega-Government, socialist Global Warming scam

Dang! Sounds just like John McCain!

40 posted on 07/23/2008 1:36:39 PM PDT by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

“Dang! Sounds just like John McCain!”

Yes. On this issue, Barr agrees with both the moderate Democrat John McCain, and the Marxist radical Obama.


41 posted on 07/23/2008 1:49:08 PM PDT by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Aren’t *all* the candidates pro-amnesty?? It’s shoddy to have no real choice; I hope I’m wrong, but I know I’m not.


42 posted on 07/23/2008 2:45:07 PM PDT by gopherbot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus

I suspect that former Border Patrol officers Ramos and Compean would agree with Barr on this point.


43 posted on 07/23/2008 2:46:06 PM PDT by Theodore R. (Cowardice is forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gopherbot

As I’ve said many times before, they all suck.


44 posted on 07/23/2008 2:47:02 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Hacklehead

This too sounds like Ramos and Compean, who truly learned that “compassionate conservatism” is something of a GWB oxymoron.


45 posted on 07/23/2008 2:47:44 PM PDT by Theodore R. (Cowardice is forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Actually, fools like Neal Boortz (famous radio mouth, high priest of libertarianism) believe it will! Boortz told his listeners to not vote for republicans in 2006, to teach the pubbies a lesson.

Well it worked. It did teach Republicans a lesson. It taught them to nomimate a RINO.

Right wingers fail to understand. When they go off to third parties they move the political center to the left. To win Republicans have to replace them with more voters from the left of the old center. That is how the center gets moved to the left. The Republican party when Punished by the right must move to the left in order to have a chance to win.

Can you imagine what would happen if a third party candidate ever did get elected president. NO party can win control of the Senate in one election. And the odds of putting up candidates to win a majority of house seats are very slim.

That would live the house and senate in control of Democrats and Republicans. Who only agree on one thing. They would have to destroy the third party and to do that they would have to destroy the third party president and vice president. I would bet they could find, with the help of the media, enough grounds to impeach him and his VP in less than two years.

This nation is a two Party system. If you don't like either party get active in one of them and change it. A third party is always counter productive to its own goals.

46 posted on 07/23/2008 5:57:06 PM PDT by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator

“This nation is a two Party system. If you don’t like either party get active in one of them and change it. A third party is always counter productive to its own goals.” Wise words, well and truly stated.


47 posted on 07/23/2008 5:59:43 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

I believe Mr. Barr is trying to be pragmatic about this - you cant reason with the global warming crowd, and if you tell them they are idiots for believing in junk science they plug their ears and wont listen to another thing you say - However to achieve energy independence we need these people to work with us, and I believe this is what Mr. Barr was trying to accomplish. This statement of his - “I am, however, also aware that scientists differ on its causes, impact and remedies. I remain
firmly committed to free market solutions and innovations to address this issue; not tax-driven policies.” (remember McCain supports cap and trade) he said this when he was at the Al Gore event - Someone on the global warming hysteria bandwagon would not speak such hypocrisy - which is why I feel confident in continuing to support Mr. Barr


48 posted on 07/24/2008 6:56:41 AM PDT by ZakCarter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus

Where is the Republican Party that stood for limited government, personal responsibility, a strong national defense, and against being the world’s policeman? As recently as the 90’s Republicans railed against a foreign policy of “making the world safe for democracy”, (which is historically the Democrats foreign policy, ala Woodrow Wilson) when Bill Clinton was President and he took us to war in Bosnia and Kosovo, without U.N. approval I might add. Which reminds me, the United Nations is something the GOP used to believe we needed to get out of. - From its inception, the Republican Party advocated a humble foreign policy in line with our founding fathers recommendations, now, with John McCain as the leader and voice of the GOP, we are told to get behind his idea for a “League of Democracies” which sounds terrifyingly similar to Wilson and his Progressive Democrats “League of Nations” almost 100 years ago.


49 posted on 07/24/2008 6:56:42 AM PDT by ZakCarter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

I would remind you that before Lincoln, the Republican party was a minor 3rd party - the Democrats and the Whigs ran the show. The Libertarian party has more integrity than the Republicans right now - the dirty laudry they have given us is stinking up the nation. That being said - I pray the GOP gets its act together.


50 posted on 07/24/2008 6:56:44 AM PDT by ZakCarter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson