Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Here Since Childhood, Alamance Co. Librarian Now Faces Deportation
My Fox Boston ^ | July 17, 2008 | Caron Myers

Posted on 07/19/2008 10:11:13 AM PDT by MissouriConservative

An Alamance County librarian who has been in the U.S. illegally since she was 3 years old was arrested at her job by federal agents earlier this week.

*****

Martinez's husband, Marcos Miranda, said the two attended Cummings High School together. They married two years ago and have a 15-month-old son.

"I don't know ... maybe we do something wrong, but we only have to have a future for my son," Miranda said.

The criminal complaint filed against Martinez in U.S. District Court indicates the librarian was using a deceased person's Social Security number and was paying taxes on her vehicles

*****

A spokesperson for ICE said the agents are simply doing their jobs, which include enforcing the immigration laws that are on the books.

"We are not anti-immigration in this county whatsoever," said Jones. "But we're going to continue to be anti-criminal. I don't back away from that, I don't think any of us here do."

(Excerpt) Read more at myfoxwghp.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: aliens; deportation; illegalimmigration; immigrantlist; immigration

1 posted on 07/19/2008 10:11:14 AM PDT by MissouriConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative

Most libraries keep piling up late charges on overdue books. Buh-bye.


2 posted on 07/19/2008 10:12:28 AM PDT by Manfred the Wonder Dawg (Test ALL things, hold to that which is True.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Manfred the Wonder Dawg

cry me a river - adios!!


3 posted on 07/19/2008 10:13:33 AM PDT by mouse1 ("whitey")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative
"I don't know ... maybe we do something wrong"

Yeah, SEVERAL things wrong....

4 posted on 07/19/2008 10:13:42 AM PDT by NRA1995 (It should be called "Cosa Nostra", not "Congress")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative
using a deceased person's Social Security number and was paying taxes on her vehicles

Yes, maybe you did something wrong.

5 posted on 07/19/2008 10:16:33 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (Only a Kennedy between us and tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative

There are a lot of similar stories out there but a little known clause can help some of folks like her...return to your country..file thru the US embassy to the proper channels and she may get residence in 6 months if everything is on the up and up.

Other than that I say throw em out!


6 posted on 07/19/2008 10:18:09 AM PDT by rrrod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Manfred the Wonder Dawg

Boo frikin’ hoo.


7 posted on 07/19/2008 10:19:59 AM PDT by altura (Freepers have become like dementors ... they suck the joy out of everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative
She had enough time.
She had access to the law.
She used fraud.
Such corruption would only be tolerated by one evil group.


8 posted on 07/19/2008 10:21:01 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative

Sorry lady, you might have been 3 when you showed up, but you were an adult when you stole someone else’s identity. That’s against the law here....you know, the RULE OF LAW, which you ignored all your life.

Buh-bye now.


9 posted on 07/19/2008 10:22:20 AM PDT by AuntB (Vote Obama! ..........Because ya can't blame 'the man' when you are the 'man'.... Wanda Sikes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative
The criminal complaint filed against Martinez in U.S. District Court indicates the librarian was using a deceased person's Social Security number

Now we get to the bottom of it. Fraud and possible identity theft.
10 posted on 07/19/2008 10:22:24 AM PDT by JamesP81 (George Orwell's 1984 was a warning, not a suggestion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative
was using a deceased person's Social Security number

I wonder if she was aware of this or if this is something her parents stole for her when she was young and not aware of. If she knew it was stolen, we may need to slap a few fraud and identity theft charges on her before we send her out.

11 posted on 07/19/2008 10:22:28 AM PDT by mnehrling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative

If she is a librarian this means she has at least a bachelor’s degree. Bet SHE didn’t pay for her education!


12 posted on 07/19/2008 10:23:12 AM PDT by proudofthesouth (Homosexuality IS a choice! There isn't any biological reason for it. They CHOOSE to be that way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative

She’s using someone else’s ID and she doesn’t know if she did something wrong! And here since 3 months old and still speaks broken English!


13 posted on 07/19/2008 10:23:44 AM PDT by BunnySlippers (Made on a Mac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative

She’s educated, employed and married before having a child. She’s done many things right, and I don’t blame her for not self-deporting if she was brought here at three.

So why on earth did she blow it by fraudulently using a dead person’s SS card?


14 posted on 07/19/2008 10:24:34 AM PDT by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative

This is in Alamance county, North Carolina, not Massachusetts.


15 posted on 07/19/2008 10:24:46 AM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative

this is the answer to the question often asked ‘there are 20 million of them - how are you going to deal with that?’

one at a time

goodbye mrs. martinez - don’t let the door hit you in the...


16 posted on 07/19/2008 10:25:15 AM PDT by sloop (pfc in the quiet civil war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

“She’s using someone else’s ID and she doesn’t know if she did something wrong! And here since 3 months old and still speaks broken English!”

And works for the government! Another job no American will do....???


17 posted on 07/19/2008 10:26:03 AM PDT by AuntB (Vote Obama! ..........Because ya can't blame 'the man' when you are the 'man'.... Wanda Sikes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative

I wonder if she was really a librarian or a paraprofessional? Professional librarians in this country have a masters degree. Did she go all the way thru college and grad school on this deceased person’s SSN? If so, I wonder if she also got federal aid to do so?

I’m all for deporting her ass back to Mexico, but maybe first we should be looking to see if she owes the feds any money.


18 posted on 07/19/2008 10:26:08 AM PDT by radiohead (Donate to the flooded libraries in Iowa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

I think it’s the husband who speaks broken English - ICE should be looking at him, too!


19 posted on 07/19/2008 10:26:39 AM PDT by Andy'smom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative

Stealing an SSAN? Two years in the Federal pen....then deportation.


20 posted on 07/19/2008 10:28:48 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (The problem with the rat race is,even if you win you're still a rat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative

I don’t understand one thing. What’s wrong with Mexico? Why can’t she, her husband and kid go live in Mexico? Considering the U.S.is such a mess- recession, poverty and global warming, wouldn’t she and her family be better off there? Deport her and, if Obama wins the election, she can apply to come back when he makes everything all right again.


21 posted on 07/19/2008 10:30:26 AM PDT by Krankor (N)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative

And MLS graduates wonder why they can’t find any jobs...


22 posted on 07/19/2008 10:42:14 AM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee (const Tag &referenceToConstTag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative

Adios,Muchacha!


23 posted on 07/19/2008 10:44:14 AM PDT by Don Corleone (Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Krankor
What’s wrong with Mexico?

Indeed! The liberals act like sending someone back to Mexico is the most cruel punishment imaginable. But when the illegals come here and want to turn the US into the very place that it's cruel to send people back to...why, then we're told that the US turning into Mexico is a wonderful thing, and that they're only enriching us with their diversity!

24 posted on 07/19/2008 10:46:11 AM PDT by Nea Wood (I'm not a bad Christian because I refuse to join you in giving other people's stuff away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative

I wonder if she will be charged the $250,000.00 fine for Social Security fraud?


25 posted on 07/19/2008 10:48:20 AM PDT by Disturbin (Liberals: buying votes with your tax dollars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rrrod

It’s called the “path to citizenship”.


26 posted on 07/19/2008 11:03:16 AM PDT by Checkers (McCain: "Hillary Clinton would make a good President.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nea Wood

You’re right, liberals do make sending people back to Mexico sound horrible but, interesting enough, they never tell you why it’s such a bad place. No politician, liberal or conservative, will ever say Mexico is a rat hole filled with crime, corruption and gross incompetence. In Mexico city, they actually have separate commuter train cars for the sexes during rush hour because the men harass the women so much.


27 posted on 07/19/2008 11:04:32 AM PDT by Krankor (N)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Krankor

“In Mexico city, they actually have separate commuter train cars for the sexes during rush hour because the men harass the women so much.”

Lol, I think I owe you an apology for doubting you. Decided to Google. You’re right, no US politician’s talking about that out in public (if they even know):

“We’ve already covered numerous examples of women-only taxi services over the last year or so, and now the idea appears to be spreading to public transportation as well. In Mexico City, where millions of women bus riders have long endured groping and verbal abuse en route every day, a new, women-only bus service aims to create a safer and more comfortable ride.”

This one is about buses:

http://www.springwise.com/transportation/womenonly_bus_service/


28 posted on 07/19/2008 11:21:12 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

It doesn’t matter. She should be charged with fraud, penalized and when having paid her debt to society, put on the first transportation to her native country.


29 posted on 07/19/2008 11:33:49 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative
The criminal complaint filed against Martinez in U.S. District Court indicates the librarian was using a deceased person's Social Security number and was paying taxes on her vehicles

This country has looked the other way at the identity theft part of illegal immigration for quite some time. The problem with that is- even if you think it is ok for a librarian to have bad documents; you have to know if illegals are allowed to get by with bad paper then what will keep terrorists from using the same system to get bad paper to be here to commit terrorist acts? I am sure they already have used the same network to get ID and are here in larger numbers than we want to know. That is why the illegal issue is always tied to national security issues, whether our politicians and pro open border people want to admit it or not.

If illegals can cross the border at will and get documents, there is nothing to stop terrorists from doing the same.

Illegal immigration is wrong on so many levels, but this part of illegal immigration is flat out dangerous for our entire country.

30 posted on 07/19/2008 11:41:29 AM PDT by Tammy8 (Please Support and pray for our Troops, as they serve us every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

It actually does matter a lot in terms of how many taxpayer dollars we want to invest in going after her for the SSN fraud versus just going through the deportation process. If the SSN was stolen by her parents and provided to her when she was a child, all her life she didn’t realize it was stolen and believed it was her own, then there wasn’t criminal intent, therefore, the tens of thousands of additional dollars it would take to prosecute with this, on top of deporting her may be a waste.

If however, she was fully aware it was stolen, then it is worth going after her, even if the ‘victim’ of the theft is dead and suffered no personal loss. Identity theft is the unspoken crime in the illegal immigration debate. If this part comes to light more, I feel the tide will turn in how the average public feels.


31 posted on 07/19/2008 11:58:08 AM PDT by mnehrling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Clarification on first paragraph, the cost of deporting isn’t a waste, the cost of prosecution for SSN Fraud may be if there was no awareness or criminal intent.


32 posted on 07/19/2008 11:59:31 AM PDT by mnehrling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

I don’t care about intent, whether she knew, any of that. The fact is that this kind a fraud is rampant and largely unprosecuted. She broke the law and she needs to be made an example. If it’s cheaper to ship her back than judge and incarcerate her, then okay. However, there are absolutely no sympathies residing here with ANY illegal or their plights.


33 posted on 07/19/2008 12:02:58 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative

This story is a good illustration of why amnesty is a bad idea. The Amnesty Act of 1986 applied to illegal immigrants who entered the US before January 1, 1982. It seems Ms. Martinez and her family entered the US about the time the act was passed, possibly believing that if the US granted amnesty once, we would do it again.

Amnesty for illegal immigrants does nothing to discourage illegal entry.


34 posted on 07/19/2008 12:05:16 PM PDT by DesertDreamer ("I don't believe in a government that protects us from ourselves." - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

All I can say is take a trip down to your local SS office and see them and the hundreds of them filing for this and that. It will open your eyes.....


35 posted on 07/19/2008 12:05:31 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
The problem with this is you can create a bottleneck in the system on a crime she is bound to be acquitted on. Tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars can be spent, and years of going through the system, tying up prosecutors and judges. All the time, she is still in the US, living on the taxpayer's dime. It is a matter of balancing resources. Go after the ones that you can win in court so you can process and deport them as quickly as possible. If she was not aware it was stolen, thus no criminal intent, I can pretty much guarantee most juries will acquit, if it even makes it past a grand jury. Why not use the resources to go after the ones we know we can take down and deport the rest? There are about nine thousand federal prosecutors in the United States and twenty million illegals. If any sort of actual dent is going to be made in solving this, we have to be smart and efficient and not tie up our prosecutors on non-win cases when the person could have just been deported.
36 posted on 07/19/2008 12:08:13 PM PDT by mnehrling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
9,000 Prosecutors / 20,000,000 illegals / 5 years (for example, with no vacations or holidays) means each prosecutor would have to completely process each illegal, from processing, to jury selection, to trial every 8th of a day. This is if no other crimes are prosecuted and the prosecutors work 24 hour days.

This is why we should deport as many through the quickest means necessary and save the fraud prosecution for the cases we know we can win and will make the greatest impact.

Now, reverse the math. Right now, from the day a prosecutor gets a case until it goes through the system and a verdict is brought to trial takes, on an average, 1.5 years. How long would it take to process all illegals through the system if we tried to take every fraud case to court?

37 posted on 07/19/2008 12:15:37 PM PDT by mnehrling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: heartwood

These SS numbers that the illegals are using aren’t the cards the original owner used. When an illegal needs a SS#, he or she pays someone to furnish it. They pull a number out of the air, print it on a card that looks much like a valid SS card and away they go. The owner of that illegal card has no idea whether the number belongs to someone else or even if the number is valid. Whatever monies are withheld from their salaries are simply left in the treasury since they never apply for a refund. Whether we want to admit it or not, the U.S. makes at least part of their total outlay for supporting these illegals back in the form of unrefunded taxes.


38 posted on 07/19/2008 12:22:18 PM PDT by oldfart (The most dangerous man is the one who has nothing left to lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
The criminal complaint filed against Martinez in U.S. District Court indicates the librarian was using a deceased person's Social Security number and was paying taxes on her vehicles.

Paying taxes on the deceases persons vehicles? She had to know it was a fake.

39 posted on 07/19/2008 1:09:43 PM PDT by muggs (No matter who wins, America loses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
Math is math and your numbers are indeed frightening. All I am saying is that for every case that makes it to the MSM propaganda pages, look at prosecuting them and putting them in jail if they broke the law. I'm not advocating wholesale prosecution for principle's sake, but I am advocating that we fight back and make some examples and to let the publicized cases be made known we're not farting around. I want these people gone, and the quickest way is to make it very unpleasant for the most notable of these case public. Otherwise we are faced with rounding them all up - we need to make them feel uncomfortable and very unwanted.
40 posted on 07/19/2008 3:11:08 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: oldfart
You can bet your a$$ that the SSA KNOWS exactly how many and which SSANs are being fraudulently used. They choose not to make a big deal because it is extra money in their coffer for which no defined benefits are due to the fraud perpetrators.

It is very easy to separate which payments against which number come from where and to compare against historical records. If anyone thinks SSA doesn't know this and tacitly overlooks he/she is smoking some pretty strong ganja IMO.

41 posted on 07/19/2008 3:15:23 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
I wonder if she was aware of this or if this is something her parents stole for her when she was young and not aware of.

She HAD to know; she was paying the taxes on her (the deceased's) vehicles.

42 posted on 07/19/2008 3:19:41 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (The Great Obamanation of Desolation, attempting to sit in the Oval Office, where he ought not..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ApplegateRanch
I originally read that as she was caught paying taxes on her vehicles using the deceased person's ssn (how she was caught). If the way you said it is true, then in addition to SSN Fraud, Identity theft, tax fraud, we can add auto theft to the list. If that is the case, she wishes we would just deport her to Mexico, the federal pen can't be any nicer.
43 posted on 07/19/2008 3:26:18 PM PDT by mnehrling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
Your way of reading it could e right. It was clumsily written.

I just took it in a way that seemed grammatically logical from the sentence.

44 posted on 07/19/2008 5:04:59 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (The Great Obamanation of Desolation, attempting to sit in the Oval Office, where he ought not..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ApplegateRanch

I thought that originally, but then I thought if she was going to go through all the trouble of stealing identity etc, why would she pay taxes on the vehicle. That’s why I read it the other way.


45 posted on 07/19/2008 6:52:13 PM PDT by mnehrling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson