Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rabscuttle385

Judges are a hugely overrated reason to vote for McCain:

1. The most likely retirees are liberal, and there is no way Leahy, Kennedy, etc., would allow a conservative McCain nominee to replace a liberal. And, Obama would make no difference in the court replacing a liberal.

2. Kennedy and Leahy will not allow committee approval of any true conservative. McCain would have to sit down with Ted and Pat and agree upon someone in advance. And, we all know how great McCain is at reaching across the aisle. And they won’t agree on the conservative opposite of Ginsburg and Breyer. They won’t roll over on SCOTUS nominees as the Republicans did during the Clinton years.

3. Who believes McCain when he says he’d appoint conservatives in the first place?


19 posted on 07/17/2008 10:44:06 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Will88
Will88 said: "Judges are a hugely overrated reason to vote for McCain:"

Why don't you tell us, then, who you will vote for, why you will vote for them, and who you suspect will win in November?

62 posted on 07/17/2008 11:52:02 AM PDT by William Tell (RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Will88
Kennedy and Leahy will not allow committee approval of any true conservative.

So that pretty much means we can forget about a Chief Justice Roberts or a Justice Alito as long as Leahy and Kennedy are around? Oh wait. Leahy and Kennedy were around and we do have Justices Roberts and Alito.

Kennedy and Leahy will not allow committee approval of any true conservative.

Ibid. Op cit.

75 posted on 07/17/2008 12:14:32 PM PDT by Eroteme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Will88

Bingo, the idea that a vote for McCain will result in a Scalia, Roberts or Alito is laughable.

Ain’t going to happen. Besides, Juan isn’t done praising Obama yet. Why think of stuff like this?


86 posted on 07/17/2008 12:36:20 PM PDT by dforest (I had almost forgotten that McCain is the nominee. Too bad I was reminded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Will88
1. The most likely retirees are liberal, and there is no way Leahy, Kennedy, etc., would allow a conservative McCain nominee to replace a liberal. And, Obama would make no difference in the court replacing a liberal.

That's an assumption. Kennedy and Scalia are also in their 70's. Considering the number of politicians re-elected, if Obama wins two terms, they will be pushing 80 if they are still on the court in 2016. Also, Obama will replace the leftists with clones 20-30 years younger. If we get a buffer, when a leftist is elected, we might not lose the entire court for 40 years like we did with the Warren and Burger courts.

2. Kennedy and Leahy will not allow committee approval of any true conservative. McCain would have to sit down with Ted and Pat and agree upon someone in advance. And, we all know how great McCain is at reaching across the aisle. And they won’t agree on the conservative opposite of Ginsburg and Breyer. They won’t roll over on SCOTUS nominees as the Republicans did during the Clinton years.

Those same senators will let a clown like Erwin Chermerensky sail through. I'll take a Kennedy clone over Cermerensky, Stephen Reinhardt, or another Breyer.

3. Who believes McCain when he says he’d appoint conservatives in the first place?

I'll take a MIGHT appoint a conservative and voted for conservatives over someone who VOTED AGAINST conservatives like Roberts and Alito.

127 posted on 07/17/2008 9:43:57 PM PDT by Darren McCarty (Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in - Michael Corleone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson