Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Indian Su-30 fighters depart for Red Flag exercise
Flight International ^ | 11/07/08 | Radhakrishna Rao

Posted on 07/11/2008 4:28:54 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Indian Su-30 fighters depart for Red Flag exercise

By Radhakrishna Rao

An Indian air force contingent with eight Sukhoi Su-30MKI combat aircraft, two Ilyushin Il-78 air-to-air refuellers and one Il-76 transport has left India to participate in the 9-23 August multinational exercise Red Flag '08 at the US Air Force's Nellis AFB in Nevada.

It will be the first time that the Russian-made Su-30MKI will participate in multinational manoeuvres involving US and other NATO fighters. India expects to spend around Rp1 billion ($23 million) on its participation in the air combat exercise.

Sources in India's state-owned Defence Research and Development Organisation meanwhile say that preparations are in full swing for the first full test firing of the nation's home-grown Astra beyond-visual-range air-to-air missile from an Su-30.

DRDO sources say the weapon will interrupt targets at speeds of Mach 1.2 to M1.4, but have not revealed the missile's range. The Astra - intended to arm aircraft such as the Dassault Mirage 2000 and RSK MiG-29 in air force service - has already undergone ground tests to check its avionics, electronics and other subsystems. The DRDO has also hinted at its intention to develop hypersonic weapon systems.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: aerospace; armstrade; geopolitics; india; redflag; su30
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-95 next last
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

1 posted on 07/11/2008 4:28:54 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

If the F-22 is there (and it will be) they’ll get their clocks cleaned just like everyone else.

And if the F-22s run out of missiles, they’ll just sneak up behind them and get a gun kill, just like they did at Elmendorf in an exercise a year or so ago. Talk about humiliation...


2 posted on 07/11/2008 4:39:26 AM PDT by zipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zipper

I figured the F-22 put the SU-30 to shame, but how does the SU-30 stack up against our other fighters? Anyone know?


3 posted on 07/11/2008 5:07:44 AM PDT by libs_kma (The land of the free, because of the brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: libs_kma
but how does the SU-30 stack up against our other fighters?

The SU-30 is a very good aircraft, and the Indian pilots are also. In reports I've read the last time they were up against our F-15's in exercises they surprised a lot of cocky USAF Eagle drivers and fed them all a piece of humble pie.

F-22's however are a different breed...

4 posted on 07/11/2008 5:37:30 AM PDT by kAcknor ("A pistol! Are you expecting trouble sir?" "No ma'am, were I expecting trouble I'd have a rifle.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: zipper

You people are amazing. Do you realize India is our friend? They are a hell of a lot more trustworthy that Pakistan for freak sake.

Lay off the video games for a while.


5 posted on 07/11/2008 5:58:07 AM PDT by SQUID
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

In the Su-30mki you have an aircraft that in most aspects meets or exceeds the F-15C. In Indian pilots you probably have the best drivers of that aircraft type. It’ll be a learning experience for both sides if a shooting war should start. That is why these exercises are held after all.


6 posted on 07/11/2008 6:19:20 AM PDT by Tallguy (Tagline is offline till something better comes along...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SQUID

Exactly.
India is becoming a solid US ally and is beginning to consider American equipment over Eastern block alternatives. It was the US that pushed India towards Russia with our alignment with Pakistan in the 1970s.

India is known for top-notch pilots and their equipment isn’t shabby either.

BOTH sides will learn from this exercise.
This is criticaly, because 193 F-22s (th-th-that’s all, floks) won’t cover much airspace.


7 posted on 07/11/2008 6:21:32 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

They should really televise these as sporting events. :) PPV would make a killing.


8 posted on 07/11/2008 6:44:20 AM PDT by papasmurf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE
Of course. We need to seriously strengthen our relations with India over Kerplakistan.
9 posted on 07/11/2008 6:48:49 AM PDT by SQUID
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SQUID

Do we need to hold hands and start singing Kumbaya too?


10 posted on 07/11/2008 6:55:24 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Barack Hussein Obama=Jimmy Carter Part Deux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: zipper

This is great training for all involved, and should prompt some very badly needed upgrades on our F-15s.


11 posted on 07/11/2008 6:58:47 AM PDT by SampleMan (We are a free and industrious people, socialist nannies do not become us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE

This is a recent development and a good one. India has been in the Soviet orbit too long...


12 posted on 07/11/2008 7:00:54 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

They guy I work with, and Indian immigrant, was born on a Soviet naval base. His father was an officer in the Indian navy many years ago.

And, he recently obtained his US citizenship.
I thanked him with a bottle of US small-batch bourbon.

We’re getting the best and the brightest from that country.


13 posted on 07/11/2008 7:06:35 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

‘I’d piss on a spark plug if I thought it would help.”

ONE BILLION allies ain’t chump change, friend.


14 posted on 07/11/2008 7:07:53 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Beautiful aircraft.


15 posted on 07/11/2008 7:15:54 AM PDT by DemforBush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE
Ditto Eastern Europe.
My dad was in the China-Burma-India Campaign and was always peeved that the Indian leadership had turned so far anti-Western after they gained their independence.
16 posted on 07/11/2008 7:25:05 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

India was part of the “non-aligned” movement started by PM Nehru (sp?), but Nixon’s alignment with Pakistan sorta forced their hand.


17 posted on 07/11/2008 7:42:23 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks; SJSAMPLE

India had close relations with Britain all through. I wouldn’t call it anti-Western, really.

The relationship with the Soviets was vital for India’s interests, during that time, especially vis-a-vis China; just as Pakistan was necessary for America, vis-a-vis the USSR.

Remember, not a single square-inch of Indian territory was provided to the Soviets, as a military base, ever.


18 posted on 07/11/2008 8:20:13 AM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

They’re gonna have fun in Vegas, too!


19 posted on 07/11/2008 10:42:51 AM PDT by swarthyguy (Osama Freedom Day: 2500 or so since September 11 2001! That's SIX +years, Dubya.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE

Nehru was an idiot Commie. Most Indians today oppose him and love America. They blame him for all that is wrong with India including poverty. Note that they even have a term for his economic policies. That term is Nehruvian-Stalinism.

However, like in most countries, seasoned politicians have a grip on the political offices and common folk do not know how to get into power. So India continues to have the Nehru family in power despite its unpopularity. The Nehru family’s main source of votes is the Islamofascist lobby to which it gives massive doles. With 15% of India’s population consisting of Muslims, this is a huge chunk. The family is also allied with Communists in India.

I once read an article by an Indian bashing Nehru and the Non-Aligned Movement. According to him, the Non-Aligned Movement legitimized dictatorships and Islamofascist theocracies.


20 posted on 07/11/2008 12:27:19 PM PDT by JimWayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

My Indian friends have all told me that the pro-Soviet policies of India were due to the Nehru family and that no Indian ever migrated to USSR. Even during cold war days, the common Indians rooted for USA and had disdain for Communists. I guess the Nehru family is the scourge of India?


21 posted on 07/11/2008 12:29:36 PM PDT by JimWayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

I don’t think our guys are allowed to show all of their tactics to foreign countries. I think that is why the Indians had the advantage over the F-15C’s.


22 posted on 07/11/2008 12:33:26 PM PDT by saminfl (,/i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Your dad had a reason to be peeved, but the fact of the matter is that when Britain quit India, they carefully chose a Communist leaning person called Nehru and handed over power to him. So blame Mountbatten for it.

BTW, Mountbatten was a homosexual and so was Nehru. They were very close family friends and there was a public love affair between Nehru and Mountbatten’s wife Edwina. I have a serious question for you — considering the fact that a historian has documented Nehru’s homosexuality and Mountbatten was a famous homosexual, would you really believe that Nehru’s affair was with Edwina? Anyway, Mountbatten handed over power to his “family friend,” Nehru, when Britain quit India.


23 posted on 07/11/2008 12:34:48 PM PDT by JimWayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne

>>Nehru was an idiot Commie

I do love an intellectually handsome framed comment.

Nehru, FYI, among his faults and virtues, was instrumental in setting up the Indian Institutes of Technology, and working with Eisenhower to allow Indian students to study at places like MIT, Stanford, etc, in Nuclear Technology.
He also understood the value of industrializing and modernizing Indian industry.

Not perfect, but certainly not an idiot and not a commie.

He was Kashmiri, and knew and understood Islamic fundies rather well, at a time in the 50’s and 60’s when the USA was using the Muslim Brotherhood as a foil against Nasser.

So you can save the simplistic analysis you offer.


24 posted on 07/11/2008 12:34:50 PM PDT by swarthyguy (Osama Freedom Day: 2500 or so since September 11 2001! That's SIX +years, Dubya.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne
Nehru was what historians call a Fabian Socialist.

"The Fabian Society is a British intellectual socialist movement, whose purpose is to advance the principles of Social democracy via gradualist and reformist, rather than revolutionary means. It is best known for its initial ground-breaking work beginning late in the nineteenth century and continuing up to World War I. The society laid many of the foundations of the Labour Party and subsequently affected the policies of states emerging from the decolonisation of the British Empire, especially India.

The society is still in existence today and forms a vanguard "think tank" of the centre-left New Labour movement. It is one of fifteen socialist societies affiliated to the Labour Party. Similar societies exist in Australia (the Australian Fabian Society), Canada (the Douglas-Coldwell Foundation and in past the League for Social Reconstruction) and New Zealand."

Link.

India's reliance on the Soviets was largely and mostly for cheap weaponry whose need was acute at the time, considering the state of India's immediate post-independence economy, and the rapid rise of China as a major threat.

As for things to do with people, Europe (especially England and France) and America were the only places that mattered. There are barely any Indians, apart from people working for the government, who've had anything to do with the USSR.

25 posted on 07/11/2008 12:38:17 PM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: saminfl
I don’t think our guys are allowed to show all of their tactics to foreign countries. I think that is why the Indians had the advantage over the F-15C’s.

I think its because the USAF delayed the upgrades to the F-15C because they wanted to make the need for the F-22 seem greater (probably not a bad tactic given Congress). The SU-30 is an extremely capable aircraft capable of many things that the standard F-15C cannot do.

26 posted on 07/11/2008 12:40:30 PM PDT by SampleMan (We are a free and industrious people, socialist nannies do not become us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy; JimWayne

Nehru’s policies weren’t great in hindsight,but he can hardly be called a commie.Fact is that his policies were not very different from those beipng implemented in western European countries at the same time. Another fact is that the communists themselves disliked Nehru and called him an agent of the west.Besides, Nehru did his utmost to stall the growth of communist political parties, including removing a democratically elected communist government in the state of Kerala.

So which fact should one believe??-Commie or no Commie.


27 posted on 07/11/2008 12:41:09 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: saminfl
I don’t think our guys are allowed to show all of their tactics to foreign countries. I think that is why the Indians had the advantage over the F-15C’s.

The same applied to the Indian MKI's as well.

There was an article right here on FR, about this very fact. Something to do with the radars that were switched off to prevent 'signature farming' or so. I'll try and run a search.

28 posted on 07/11/2008 12:43:19 PM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne

Whether we like it or not, Nehru was the most popular leader in India at the time of independence. The only ones who could come close to him were an aging Sardar Patel (who died in 1950) and Subhash Chandra Bose, if he didn’t die in WW-2. So no point in blaming Mountbatten for it.


29 posted on 07/11/2008 12:44:46 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne

>>historian has documented Nehru’s homosexuality

HAHAHAHAH! When you first “argument” is questioned, you resort to slimy, sleazy, sexual innuendo.

So blame the sainted Britishers.

Way to go, Jimbo!


30 posted on 07/11/2008 12:45:34 PM PDT by swarthyguy (Osama Freedom Day: 2500 or so since September 11 2001! That's SIX +years, Dubya.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Are they bringing teepee’s with them?


31 posted on 07/11/2008 12:48:09 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: saminfl; SampleMan
Found!

To protect Sukhoi secrets, IAF will switch off radars during exercise

http://www.idrw.org/2007/12/27/to_protect_sukhoi_secrets_iaf_will_switch_off_radars_during_exercise.html

India’s defence ties with the US may be reaching new heights, but the Air Force is keen to protect the secrets of its latest fighting machine, the Su 30MKI, from probing eyes during the high profile ‘Red Flag’ exercise scheduled to take place at the Nellis airbase in US in August next year.

The Air Force is sending six Su 30s for the prestigious exercise — the first time the latest fighter from the Russian stable will visit North America — but has decided to keep the aircraft’s classified NO11M BARS radar switched off during the entire war game.

While alternative arrangements are being made to ensure that the performance of the fighters at the “world’s toughest aerial combat training exercise” does not get compromised, the IAF top brass is clear that the secret frequencies used by the BARS radar to track enemy targets and launch offensive weapons should not be exposed.

“The radar frequencies are top secret as they can be used to block vital functions of the fighter. While we have a good equation with the US, we have to be careful about the future,” a senior IAF officer said.

Perhaps, the IAF has not yet recovered from its experience at the Indra Dhanush exercise in UK earlier this year, where US and UK spy planes tried to snoop on the Su 30 MKI’s radar.

According to some reports, a US Air Force RC-135U electronic spy plane and a UK Air Force BAC 111 test plane equipped with radar detecting gear were snooping around the Waddington airbase during the two-week war game. However, the BARS radar was switched off during that exercise too.

Also, Russia is keen to protect the frequencies of its radar as it has just started getting global orders for the Su 30. “There are IPR related issues too as Russia would not want its radar frequencies to be revealed,” the IAF officer said.

The US is specially interested in the BARS radar as the Su 30s are becoming the mainstay fighter of the Chinese Air Force too.


32 posted on 07/11/2008 12:48:14 PM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

>>Commie

Facts are so passe. We’re Americans, we’re into feelings.


33 posted on 07/11/2008 12:53:45 PM PDT by swarthyguy (Osama Freedom Day: 2500 or so since September 11 2001! That's SIX +years, Dubya.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
The blame is not on the British but on commies/socialists. They don't have borders. I have heard that Nehru was a Communist. I do not distinguish between British Communists or Indian Communists or the Shining Path or FARC. They are all the same to me. I don't think I am blaming the British for anything.

Regarding the slimy claim, see the quote from http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbninquiry.asp?pwb=1&ean=9780195100730

Synopsis

Strips India's greatest political leader of his public mask to expose a multi-faceted man whose early homosexual influences . . .


Cheers.
34 posted on 07/11/2008 1:04:58 PM PDT by JimWayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

> Whether we like it or not, Nehru was the most popular

Correct me if I am wrong, wasn’t Gandhy the most popular leader when it came to attracting masses and having name recognition?


35 posted on 07/11/2008 1:07:00 PM PDT by JimWayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki; swarthyguy

I don’t think it is fair to compare India with West Europe. If there is one area that I can claim expertise in, it is Economics. India had a planned economy complete with Planning Commission and Five-Year Plans and food distribution through government controlled ration shops and most of the major industries being controlled by the government. No West European country had a Soviet style Planning Commission to plan out the economy.


36 posted on 07/11/2008 1:09:36 PM PDT by JimWayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne

Gandhy(sp) was shot dead in 1947.

Nehru was closely identified with Gandhi and was his confidant. There was no one else at the time who had the love and confidence of the people like Nehru.

Granted, not a perfect man by any means.

Gandhi had no interest in formal political office.

Nehru did in fact dispatch a medical battalion to Korea. To fight with the UN forces. Not exactly the actions of a communist.


37 posted on 07/11/2008 1:11:47 PM PDT by swarthyguy (Osama Freedom Day: 2500 or so since September 11 2001! That's SIX +years, Dubya.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne

Gandhi stepped back from holding public office long before the likes of Nehru and Patel came to the front-he promoted them to be the political face. IOW, he was not a candidate for leadership, which is what we are talking about.


38 posted on 07/11/2008 1:12:14 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne

Yes, but India never outlawed small commerce like the commies. Shopkeepers and markets were never outlawed.

Big Industry was nationalized, correct, but at that time, similar actions were underway in both Britain and France.


39 posted on 07/11/2008 1:13:53 PM PDT by swarthyguy (Osama Freedom Day: 2500 or so since September 11 2001! That's SIX +years, Dubya.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne

Are you telling me that active government controls were absent in post-war Europe??? The kind of Soviet planning you refer to went into full swing after Nehru.


40 posted on 07/11/2008 1:14:31 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne

Alright, for the sake of argument, he was bisexual.

So what?

>>They are all the same to me

And this huge blinder, the inability to differentiate, is what causes a lot of trouble.

I refer you to a book called Spies in the Himalayas by Retd Mil types named Kohli and Conboy detailing the joint operations conducted by India and the US against China in Tibet.


41 posted on 07/11/2008 1:17:35 PM PDT by swarthyguy (Osama Freedom Day: 2500 or so since September 11 2001! That's SIX +years, Dubya.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne
India had a planned economy complete with Planning Commission and Five-Year Plans and food distribution through government controlled ration shops and most of the major industries being controlled by the government.

Britain had something on these lines for their post-WW2 recovery. Other countries ran schemes for food stamps, agricultural subsidies, employment exchanges and the like. Same thing, different names.

As for the planning commissions and five-year plans, private industry was not quashed, like in Russia or the other Communist countries, and interestingly, that was the same time the Indian government established the major business schools across the country.

42 posted on 07/11/2008 1:18:41 PM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick
Britain had something on these lines for their post-WW2 recovery. Other countries ran schemes for food stamps, agricultural subsidies, employment exchanges and the like. Same thing, different names.

Other countries you mention did not quash private industries.

As for the planning commissions and five-year plans, private industry was not quashed, like in Russia or the other Communist countries, and interestingly, that was the

You are dead wrong on this. Private industry was all but banned and licenses were granted to a select few. This was consistent with Leninist ideology. It was Lenin who said that the "commanding heights" of the economy must be controlled by the State and they could allow "petty businesses" to operate. So Nehru was merely following the Leninist diktat.

Please Sir, it is important not to delude oneself and believe that the Indian economy was great before 1991 when it started becoming a market-oriented economy. The reason that it was in the doldrums is socialism.

same time the Indian government established the major business schools across the country.

I am not in favor of state-controlled enterprises whether universities or public sectors. India had some good private sector universities built by the Tata family and Birla family even before India became Independent. Examples are the Indian Institute of Science and Birla Engineering College (I think they later changed the name of this).
43 posted on 07/11/2008 1:26:17 PM PDT by JimWayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
Yes, but India never outlawed small commerce like the commies. Shopkeepers and markets were never outlawed.

What you describe about India is exactly what Lenin called for. That was the big difference between Stalin and Lenin. This is not the difference between Communists and non-Communists. Lenin called for the "commanding heights of the economy" to be controlled by the state and allow the "petty businesses" to operate.

Nehru himself was a very close friend of Stalin and an admirer of Lenin. He visited Soviet Union in the 1920s and was impressed by the Societ economy and has written about it.
44 posted on 07/11/2008 1:30:30 PM PDT by JimWayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: saminfl
The Rules of Engagement were changed to give the Indians a better chance (and, IMHO, the USAF a better reason to order more F-22s). I think they made rules against Beyond Visual Range attacks by AMRAAMs - the USAF had to visually ID the targets first - meaning they were well into missile range by the time they could start shooting.
45 posted on 07/11/2008 1:37:53 PM PDT by Little Ray (I'm a Conservative. But I can vote for John McCain. If I have to. I guess.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
Alright, for the sake of argument, he was bisexual.

So what?

Your method of arguing is not a logical method. You have already arrived at a conclusion and you seem to be in awe of Nehruvian-Stalinism and Nehru's Non-Aligned Movement and everything that has the Nehru stamp on it.

If you were objective, you would admit that I gave you a good academic reference. To answer your question, so it becomes a conflict of interest here. Mountbatten handed over power to an unpopular leader who did not win any election and this "leader" had a physical relationship with either Mountbatten or his wife.
And this huge blinder, the inability to differentiate, is what causes a lot of trouble.

In fact, the problem is not my categorization of all Communists as having bad effects on the economy. The problem is your sympathy for some Communists and your claims that some Communists are like Western Europeans! If you disagree, please enlighten me on why FARC, Shining Path or Communist Party of India are not bad.

Based on your response, I can safely say that you did not know the difference between Leninism and Stalinism and that India imitated the Soviet economy and became a satellite of USSR.

46 posted on 07/11/2008 1:38:37 PM PDT by JimWayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne

>>a satellite of USSR.

OK, India was like Poland, or Bulgaria.

Ignorance such as yours is fairly impervious to facts.

You’re obsessed with Nehru’s sexuality and your own conclusions about India’s economy and the “ Stalinism” of Nehru.

Fine.


47 posted on 07/11/2008 1:42:33 PM PDT by swarthyguy (Osama Freedom Day: 2500 or so since September 11 2001! That's SIX +years, Dubya.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne
You are dead wrong on this. Private industry was all but banned and licenses were granted to a select few.

LOL, my dad ran a small shop making proximity sensors, from the garage of his rented home, about 40 years ago. In such endeavours, he was certainly not alone, nor especially privileged to do so. In the thick of License Raj. Some of the big companies in India today were small startups in the sixties and seventies. What changed with liberalisation most significantly was the ability to import and export goods far easily. The rest is basically as it always was.

The government's amount of interference all along, hasn't been any different. It'd take the same amount of pushing papers in 1960, to start a business, as it does now. In fact, it has increased for these days.

48 posted on 07/11/2008 1:46:24 PM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne

Buddy, I have no problem with your view about Nehru,but why blame Mountbatten for handing over power??Mountbatten handed over power to the Congress, with Gandhi essentially splitting responsibilities between Nehru and Patel. If Patel had lived a few years longer, he would have continued to balance out Nehru.

About the government opening universities, bodies like the IITs and IIMs were autonomous in nature, not run by the government.

Your painting anyone not agreeing with you as being sympathetic to communists only reduce the weight of your arguments.


49 posted on 07/11/2008 1:47:14 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: kAcknor
The SU-30 is a very good aircraft, and the Indian pilots are also. In reports I've read the last time they were up against our F-15's in exercises they surprised a lot of cocky USAF Eagle drivers and fed them all a piece of humble pie. F-22's however are a different breed...

At the time I read the reports, they were coupled with arguments that this showed the need to get lots of F-22's so we could keep up.

I wondered if the F-15's were trying their best, or whether they were told that demonstrating a lack of need for the F-22 would be a career-ending move

50 posted on 07/11/2008 1:49:27 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson