Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Su-35, a younger son of Su-27
Ria Novosti,Russia ^ | 09/ 07/ 2008 | Ilya Kramnik

Posted on 07/10/2008 9:04:58 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Su-35, a younger son of Su-27

18:21 | 09/ 07/ 2008

MOSCOW. (RIA Novosti military commentator Ilya Kramnik) -The first demonstration fight of the Su-35 on July 7, 2008 attracted much attention to this aircraft, which has been undergoing tests since February. The latest addition to the large T-10 (Su-27) family is to become the interim fighter for the Russian Air Force before fifth-generation aircraft are launched into mass production.

The Su-35, more precisely the Su-35BM, is the second model of the T-10 family to carry that designation. The first Su-35 was manufactured 20 years ago, taking to the skies in 1988 under the designation Su-27M.

In 1991, it was decided to launch the Su-27M into mass production under the designation Su-35. The first serial aircraft took off in April 1992, though this model was never produced in large numbers. Due to the lack of funding between 1992 and 1995, only 12 Su-35's were delivered to the Air Force. These aircraft have been used for tests and demonstration flights.

Soon the Su-37 was developed on the basis of the Su-35. Often confused with the experimental C.37/Su-47 aircraft, the Su-37 was equipped with thrust-vectoring engines, which was the main difference between this model and the Su-35. The No. 711 Su-37 prototype impressed specialists greatly by its outstanding maneuverability, but remained one-of-a-kind.

In the late 1990's the Su-35 was given a new lease of life, as the issue of rejuvenating the Russian Air Force was raised again. To avoid excessive growth of designation numbers, the new aircraft was given the designation Su-35BM ("Big Modernization").

In 2008, the 117C engine was developed, enabling the designers to start the flight tests of the new aircraft, scheduled to be finished by 2010. The state armament program for 2006-2015, adopted in 2006, envisages mass production of the Su-35BM for the Russian Air Force, and the Defense Ministry is expected to purchase 182 of these aircraft. In addition, technology developed within the Su-35 project will be used to upgrade the Su-27s to the Su-27CM2 standard.

The creation of the Su-35 is an important step for the Air Force and the aircraft industry. Taking into account that a fifth generation fighter would not be in mass production in Russia before 2015, the Su-35BM will help to close the gap, replacing the older Su-27s, which will be decommissioned starting from the next decade.

The technical characteristics of the Su-35 are high enough to fulfill this task, outmatching all the modern American, French and EU generation 4+ fighter designs, including the Super Hornet, Rafale and Typhoon. The Su-35 is even able to withstand the world's only fifth-generation fighter now in production, the F-22, though it is much cheaper than the American fighter - its cost is around $40 million dollars compared with $300 million for F-22.

Regarding the Defense Ministry's plans, the question emerges whether the Russian industry would be capable of launching production in the required numbers within the scheduled period. The answer is more likely to be positive: the industrial capacities are beyond doubt, as the production of numerous modifications of Su-27s and Su-30s for export is on the rise. What the program requires is uninterrupted state funding.

With the Su-35 launched into mass production in 2011, the 182 aircraft ordered by the Defense Ministry would be delivered by 2020. By that time the Russian Air Force would have between 120 and 140 upgraded Su-27s and 30-40 fifth-generation fighters, enabling the Air Force to maintain its combat potential in the next 2-3 decades.

There have been many successful designs in the history of aviation, but only a few could match rising combat requirements for a number of years, like the famous Messerschmitt Bf-109 and P-51 Mustang fighters, the Tu-95 and B-52 strategic bombers, and the Su-27. The T-10 prototype made its maiden flight in 1977, and another flight in 1981 after major improvements.

The fighter went into mass production as late as 1984, and it still has the combat potential sufficient to remain one of the world's best aircraft. The Su-35BM, taking to the skies in 2008, showed even higher performance, an unprecedented improvement on a design developed 30 years ago.

It's not easy to forecast what lies ahead for the Su-35, but no doubt it will live through a few decades of service with gradual renewal of armament and avionics, until the moment when this fighter, along with more sophisticated aircraft, will be replaced by aerial vehicles based on new physical principles.

The opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily represent those of RIA Novosti.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: aerospace; armstrade; miltech; russia; su27; su35
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

1 posted on 07/10/2008 9:04:58 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

From the title I was guessing artificial insemination from frozen sperm.


2 posted on 07/10/2008 9:07:43 PM PDT by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
"...The Su-35 is even able to withstand the world's only fifth-generation fighter now in production, the F-22..."

Heh, I am sure they just forgot to post all the head-to-head flight and weapons testing statistics...:)

Nice looking hardware!

3 posted on 07/10/2008 9:09:20 PM PDT by rlmorel (Clinging bitterly to Guns and God in Massachusetts...:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Beautiful. Thanks for posting.

...until the moment when this fighter, along with more sophisticated aircraft, will be replaced by aerial vehicles based on new physical principles.

Dang it. The Russkis have flying saucers too... ;-)

4 posted on 07/10/2008 9:10:55 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

Poor translation I think.

They’re talking about UCAVs and forward-swept wing fighters.


5 posted on 07/10/2008 9:34:15 PM PDT by AntiKev ("The Earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena." - Carl Sagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

LOL!


6 posted on 07/10/2008 9:47:26 PM PDT by shadowcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
The Su-35 is even able to withstand the world's only fifth-generation fighter now in production, the F-22, though it is much cheaper than the American fighter - its cost is around $40 million dollars compared with $300 million for F-22.

O rly????

I'm not usually the gambling type, but I'd take a bet on the F-22 in half a heartbeat.

7 posted on 07/10/2008 9:48:28 PM PDT by Ronin (Is there some rule that says that when an evil man gets sick, we must pretend he was saint?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
To avoid excessive growth of designation numbers, the new aircraft was given the designation Su-35BM

Well, at least the Russians are getting more honest with their designations.

8 posted on 07/10/2008 10:06:24 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Barack Hussein Obama=Jimmy Carter Part Deux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

There are now two types of modern fighter aircraft: F-22 Raptors and targets.


9 posted on 07/10/2008 10:07:55 PM PDT by 43north (The democrats are the party of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I think their biggest development was to get their planes to stop crashing at air shows, a step that helps sales.


10 posted on 07/10/2008 10:11:03 PM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult

We’ve had our share. Don’t think we can skate on this one.


11 posted on 07/10/2008 10:17:25 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I wonder if the Soviets have not already found the chink in the F22 stealth armor.


12 posted on 07/10/2008 10:34:20 PM PDT by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
In the late 1990's the Su-35 was given a new lease of life, as the issue of rejuvenating the Russian Air Force was raised again. To avoid excessive growth of designation numbers, the new aircraft was given the designation Su-35BM ("Big Modernization").

No, "BM" represents what the pilots will do when F-22's missles start destroying a whole squadron of them.

13 posted on 07/10/2008 10:41:47 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Drill Here. Drill Now. Pay Less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
"...The Su-35 is even able to withstand the world's only fifth-generation fighter now in production, the F-22..."

There is enough slabs of metal on that aircraft that it would light up like a neon sign on a Las Vegas casino. The F22 can see it, but the SU-35 will only know the F22 is there when he is shot down.

14 posted on 07/10/2008 10:48:49 PM PDT by cpdiii (roughneck, oilfield trash and proud of it, geologist, pilot, pharmacist, iconoclast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
This reads like a muscle-building supplement ad from Men's Fitness.

The Pravda-inspired writer alluded to a handful of aircraft that succeeded over time. Ivan neglected to mention the aircraft which dominated the planet for 3 decades - the F-15 Eagle.

15 posted on 07/10/2008 11:40:01 PM PDT by jblair (Air Force Brat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Wow thats a lot of airplane for $40 Mil.

I still say that the Aussies should have looked at the The SU-32MF/-34 “Fullback” fighter-bomber to replace their F111’s


16 posted on 07/11/2008 12:16:20 AM PDT by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: valkyry1

40 mn price tag is hot air(like most of the article). The current SU-30 variants cost approx 50-60 mn a piece and the SU-35 is supposed to be more advanced.


17 posted on 07/11/2008 12:48:16 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

BM. As in, “the last thing the pilot of the Su-35 will do when it realizes the F-22 has acquired it on its radar”.


18 posted on 07/11/2008 12:52:30 AM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 43north
Quit drinking zoomie kool-aid.


19 posted on 07/11/2008 3:57:47 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
I'm not usually the gambling type, but I'd take a bet on the F-22 in half a heartbeat.

Let's do bit of back-of-envelope calculations:

*Training of one pilot: $1M (around)
*7 units of Su-35: $270M

If Su-35BM modernizations can squeeze the odds ratio below 7:1, the exchange ratio will become worthwhile. Little rough on pilots, but these countries are not hypersensitive to military casualties like USA.

Put a 7-plane squadron of Su-35:s against one raptor (or a 35-plane flight against 5-raptor squadron) and the bet becomes far less certain...
20 posted on 07/11/2008 10:12:51 AM PDT by MirrorField (Just an opinion from atheist, minarchist and small-l libertarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MirrorField

Normally I would agree with you, but when it comes to the F-22, as much as it pains this old salt to say it, that baby is beyond awesome.

Send a squadron of Su-35s up against a Raptor and it would be a total turkey shoot. It would be like clubbing baby seals.


21 posted on 07/11/2008 6:36:02 PM PDT by Ronin (Is there some rule that says that when an evil man gets sick, we must pretend he was saint?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii
There is enough slabs of metal on that aircraft that it would light up like a neon sign on a Las Vegas casino. The F22 can see it, but the SU-35 will only know the F22 is there when he is shot down.

Are you sure SU-35 won't have a low-frequency radar?

22 posted on 07/16/2008 4:23:32 AM PDT by MHalblaub ("Easy my friends, when it comes to the point it is only a drawing made by a non believing Dane...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

The F-22 can beat everything out there, even when it can be seen.


23 posted on 07/18/2008 3:10:59 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MirrorField

The Russians may have technology to find the F-22 hundreds of miles away. Still, the F-22 has the advantage in technology, speed, and maneuverability. In my opinion, if the F-22 can be tracked normally by radar, 10 SU-37s to one Raptor.


24 posted on 07/18/2008 3:14:46 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

25 posted on 07/20/2009 2:18:49 AM PDT by myknowledge (F-22 Raptor: World's Largest Distributor of Sukhoi parts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 43north

The Russians are big fans of plasma stealth, which works on the principles of using ionized gases around the aircraft to deflect radar signatures.


26 posted on 07/20/2009 6:30:17 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson