Skip to comments.
"Four retired commanders say gays should be allowed to serve openly in the military. Should they?"
AOL ^
| July 8, 2008
| Ed Morrissey
Posted on 07/08/2008 9:58:15 PM PDT by TheEaglehasLanded
The lefties have hit this hard.
58% remove ban entirely 22% keep don't ask don't tell 20% gays shouldn't be in at all
TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; homosexuals; military; openly; serve
To: TheEaglehasLanded
No info on who the 4 military commanders were, I’m guessing 1 was at the Republican debate earlier this year.
To: TheEaglehasLanded
Load them up with rubber bullets and send them on a forward offensive. An all gay rifles division called The Pink Patsy’s.
To: TheEaglehasLanded
“Four retired commanders say gays should be allowed to serve openly in the military. Should they?”
OPENLY? That would be better than not. At least one would know what one is dealing with, but actually in response to the question of “should they be allowed to serve” the answer is NO. A resounding NO.
We had two gays in our unit overseas back in the 60’s.
Everybody became a baritone when either of them were around, and most took on posture similar to “Incredible Hulk” as well. Nobody was comfortable with them around.
4
posted on
07/08/2008 10:09:30 PM PDT
by
rockinqsranch
(Dems, Libs, Socialists...call 'em what you will...They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
To: TheEaglehasLanded
The lefties have hit this hard. Bad turn of phrase.
To: TheEaglehasLanded
6
posted on
07/08/2008 10:11:21 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
(DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
To: TheEaglehasLanded
All hands on the poop deck.
7
posted on
07/08/2008 10:14:16 PM PDT
by
Ratblaster
( Obama's house, Rezko's yard)
To: TheEaglehasLanded
NEVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
8
posted on
07/08/2008 10:18:18 PM PDT
by
vpintheak
(Like a muddied spring or a polluted well is a righteous man who gives way to the wicked. Prov. 25:26)
To: Ratblaster
They can keep each others guns clean!
9
posted on
07/08/2008 10:21:50 PM PDT
by
smoketree
(the insanity, the lunacy these days)
To: TheEaglehasLanded
Just voted, and the percentage hasn’t changed.
10
posted on
07/08/2008 10:29:09 PM PDT
by
Tired of Taxes
(Dad, I will always think of you.)
To: TheEaglehasLanded
A safe bet would be that Weasel Clark was one of these perfumed pinked panty poster boys:

Clark is probably very close to the other 4 for gays.
Clark is shown below enjoying a gay happy moment, with no socks while being very light in his loafers!
11
posted on
07/08/2008 10:34:44 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(America's Mugabe, the Obamination.will bring Mugabe Change to America!)
To: TheEaglehasLanded
Just voted:
58% Yes
22% No, keep “Don’t ask,Don’t tell
20% No Gays
12
posted on
07/08/2008 10:47:47 PM PDT
by
Peacekeeper357
(God provided food for every bird but he didn't put it in their nest.)
To: TheEaglehasLanded
The military should be all gay.
Draft them all right away.
13
posted on
07/08/2008 10:52:17 PM PDT
by
onedoug
To: onedoug
Supply should issue each soldier a gay.
14
posted on
07/08/2008 10:58:15 PM PDT
by
Hillarys Gate Cult
(The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
To: TheEaglehasLanded
Just voted...Should not be in at all...percentages are the same...
Checked some states- NY and Calif are right up there on removing the ban entirely..Place with the highest score was DC...Vt and MA were also high on removing the ban...Even the Southern States scored higher than one would expect- like in the 40-49% range.....
15
posted on
07/08/2008 11:02:57 PM PDT
by
billmor
(The American Voter--the Sleeping Tiger. Kicked in the back end.)
To: TheEaglehasLanded
You don't have to be straight to be in the military; you just have to be able to shoot straight. Barry Goldwater
16
posted on
07/08/2008 11:29:52 PM PDT
by
trumandogz
("He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and it worries me." Sen Cochran on McCain)
To: TheEaglehasLanded
Very clever of them splitting the vote like that.
The truth is that 42% don’t want the ban removed.
17
posted on
07/08/2008 11:32:01 PM PDT
by
Fichori
(Primitive goat herder, Among those who kneel before a man; Standing.)
To: TheEaglehasLanded
Greetings TheEaglehasLanded:
Well what do you know... In this poll 100% of nearly retired E-9’s say “retired commanders” supporting homosexual presence in the military should forfeit their pension.
Cheers,
OLA
18
posted on
07/08/2008 11:37:16 PM PDT
by
OneLoyalAmerican
(Truth was the first casualty in the MSM's war on President Bush.)
To: TheEaglehasLanded
At least half of that 58% is female votes. They could care less about gay men and whether or not they’re in the military.
Openly gay men cut their hair regularly, so why not let them serve?
Because it makes straight soldiers uncomfortable? Sorry, that’s their problem.
19
posted on
07/09/2008 1:49:29 AM PDT
by
Randy Papadoo
(Nothing can stop the Duke of Earl.)
To: TheEaglehasLanded
I have the strangest feeling that the poll numbers are bogus.
20
posted on
07/09/2008 1:51:56 AM PDT
by
Randy Papadoo
(Nothing can stop the Duke of Earl.)
To: TheEaglehasLanded
Personally, I would prefer having no “GAY soldiers”.
The same way I don’t want “GAY policemen”.
Or “GAY bartenders”. Or “GAY astronomers”.
What’s wrong with just having soldiers, or policemen, or bartenders, or astronomers?
I’ll tell ya. The fascination with emphasizing that “I’m a GAY magician” or whatever the crap is, seems to me to be a deep down admission that something is seriously wrong.
I go into a store and order a coffee. The person makes the coffee, hands it to me, I pay them and say thanks, and they say “Have a nice day.”
I go into a store and order a coffee. The person makes the coffee, hands it to me, then broadcasts loudly “I’m a GAY coffee maker, and can do it as good as anyone else!!”
I pay for the coffee, leave it on the counter, and walk away.
I really don’t give a chit about his (or her) fantasies, I just want somebody to make me a cup of coffee.
It’s getting sickening.
21
posted on
07/09/2008 2:10:48 AM PDT
by
djf
(I don't believe in perpetual motion. Perpetual mutton, that's another thing entirely!)
To: Fichori
Someone who is more interested in being a “GAY soldier” is more interested in being “GAY” than he is interested in being a “soldier”.
Enuff already.
22
posted on
07/09/2008 2:13:17 AM PDT
by
djf
(I don't believe in perpetual motion. Perpetual mutton, that's another thing entirely!)
To: TheEaglehasLanded
Yes!
They should all be issued Baby Blue helmets and be put into the service of the Euro-twit-third-worlders at the UN.
(In lieu of any further monetary contributions to that organization.)
23
posted on
07/09/2008 2:16:12 AM PDT
by
shibumi
(".....panta en pasin....." - Origen)
To: TheEaglehasLanded
The military is not the proper medium for failed social experimentation.
24
posted on
07/09/2008 2:16:57 AM PDT
by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: Caipirabob
"The military is not the proper medium for failed social-(ist) experimentation."
25
posted on
07/09/2008 3:09:42 AM PDT
by
Leisler
To: Randy Papadoo
How much less could they care?
To: Randy Papadoo
Quote:
______________________________________________________________________
Openly gay men cut their hair regularly, so why not let them serve?
Because it makes straight soldiers uncomfortable? Sorry, thats their problem.
______________________________________________________________________
/Quote
It is hard enough trying to be soldier without having to watch to see if your buddy is slipping mickies into your canteen so that he can have a good time while in the field.
27
posted on
07/09/2008 4:33:54 AM PDT
by
LuxMaker
(The Constitution is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, Thomas J 1819)
To: Fichori
43% in Alabama want the ban removed? 51% in Florida? 46% in Georgia? Somehow I can’t buy into that.
28
posted on
07/09/2008 5:07:27 AM PDT
by
Russ
(Repeal the 17th amendment)
To: Russ
When you put your own interests about that of the unit, people die.
29
posted on
07/10/2008 2:05:40 PM PDT
by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson