Posted on 07/08/2008 7:00:00 PM PDT by rob777
Sen. John McCain gave two economics speeches in the last 48 hours. They were very strong, pro-growth, and pro-energy production. McCain also is finally slamming Obama on taxes and energy. Yesterday in Denver, the senator said, “If you believe you should pay more taxes, I am the wrong candidate for you. Sen. Obama is your man. The choice in this election is stark and simple. Sen. Obama will raise your taxes. I won’t.”
This is good. Strong. I hope it’s the beginning of a Big Mac resurgence under the new management of Steve Schmidt, who is effectively running the campaign as of this past weekend.
McCain also slammed Obama on energy, essentially labeling him Doctor No. In the Denver speech McCain said, “My opponent’s answer is no to more drilling; no to more nuclear power; no to research prizes that help solve the problem of affordable electric cars. For a guy whose ‘official seal’ carried the motto, ‘Yes, We Can,’ Sen. Obama’s agenda sure has a whole lot of ‘No, We Can’t.’” This also is good.
Increasingly McCain is shifting his positions towards the supply-side: across-the-board tax cuts, keeping the Bush tax rates on investment, slashing the corporate tax rate, doubling the child deduction for family dependents, cutting pork-barrel spending, and producing more energy.
On the drill, drill, drill energy front, McCain argued in favor of producing more oil and gas, and he said this would send a message to the market that would result in lower prices. He argued for nuclear power, clean coal, and oil shale. And he noted for the first time that expanded energy production would be a strong job-creator. This is so important in terms of an economic fix.
And here are a couple things missing from McCain’s speech: There was no mention of “obscene profits”; no mention of cap-and-trade; and no mention of reckless traders. We will see if these ideas continue to be absent from the senator’s formal speeches. I hope so. Voters want more drilling and they do not want cap-and-trade, which is really tax-and-raise-gas-pump-prices and ultimately cap-and-kill-the-economy.
By the way, in his second economics speech today in Washington, D.C., Sen. McCain strongly defended free trade, saying it would create more and better jobs, increase wages, keep inflation under control, and make goods more affordable for low- and middle-income consumers.
He also supported more competition for schools and empowering parents with choice. I have not heard him argue for school choice before. He then argued for comprehensive immigration legislation that would include border security first, apprehending illegal felons who commit crimes, recognition of the important economic contributions of immigrants, and finally humanitarian treatment. I still believe the best way to stop illegal immigration is to promote more legal immigration — namely by raising the entry limits to meet U.S. job demands. But McCain is combining this with a tough border-security message, and I think that’s good.
In general, the senator is developing a good supply-side message for economic growth, with a big focus on tax cuts and new energy production. Obama is for tax hikes and opposed to energy production. These are important contrasts. Now it’s up to the Republican standard bearer to keep hammering these key points on the campaign trail. More energy. Lower taxes. A pro-growth economic recovery plan. Perhaps he will even add King Dollar to his repertoire. I might add that increasing the value of the dollar is part of McCain’s 15-page policy blueprint. Right now he is definitely on the right track.
Wow, didn’t he get that no we can’t line from FR? Just sayin.
Who knows. Maybe some of his campaign staffers are lurkers.
“...recognition of the important economic contributions of immigrants, and finally humanitarian treatment...”
Both code words for Z Visas. McCain hasn’t changed. The tough “border security” is a ruse of the “trigger” variety, put into the last bill to distract people from everything else.
His energy emphasis is good.
His speeches are moving to the Right. I doubt he is capable of doing so.
When handed the speech, McCain said, “Sure, I can read this. But what are these taxes things? Do they have something to do with the government?”
This is encouraging. I was REALLY PO’d a couple weeks ago when a McCain ad ran on Bay Area TV stations. He was in favor of alternative energy, solving global warming, “holding CEOs accountable” and other myriad liberal causes. I hurled right in the living room after watching that crap.
Fixed it for you.
Another slam McCain needs to use, “If Obama had been president instead of John Kennedy, he would have said, ‘We can’t go to the moon, that would take almost 10 years.’”
Such are the wages to the conservatives for their performance in the primaries.
i got a kick out of mccain’s “balanced budget by 2013”.
no one believes it, including john.
"Wait, uh... Doh!"
RINOs have such a good track record with election year veracity.
No doubt, McCain would be better than Obama. GHW Bush was undoubtedly better than Dukakis. I believed Bush's election year rhetoric, but am less naive today. Fiscally, McCain will be little more than a Democrat at a 10% discount.
Not that I disagree with these positions, but when any candidate starts moving his positions in a campaign, I am skeptical.
Why the sudden change of heart? IMO, what a candidate has said and done in the years PRIOR to the campaign are probably more accurate markers of his thinking and beliefs.
I’m not singling out McCain on this. But when criminals get religion after they are caught, I doubt their sincerity.
Cut taxes and balance the budget by 2013. Ain't going to happen with the majority of the budget going to the locked-in so-called "entitlements." How's he going to do it with the 'Rats in control of Congress? Zero out all non military/non-entitlement spending?
Fair Tax.
The way I understand Kneecap-and-Trade: It’s like getting your usual bill from the I.R.S., with the addition of a notification of how much you are allowed to earn NEXT YEAR.
Maybe, but timing is everything. The folks here know what they want to hear, the Arby’s or Jack in the Box crew is a few months away. :^)
And of course, if he doesn't mention his previously stated priority programs, he must have changed his mind. /s
Steve Schmidt sold Schwarzenegger to California as a "conservative" with a whole host of lies. I guess he is dusting off the playbook and replacing the name Schwarzenegger with McCain.
One of the most on-target posts I’ve read on FR!
Gramm is a moron. This is the Schmitt effect
Gramm helped make the Wall St mess we have with Bear Sterns, Citi and Merrill meltdowns and write downs
cap-and-trade = crap and treason
On the tax side, yes. But on the spending side, he has consistently been a budget hawk.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.