Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

George McGovern Says McCain's War Experience Not a Qualification for the White House
The Boston Globe ^ | July 8, 2008 | Susan Milligan

Posted on 07/08/2008 6:54:41 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

He was a fighter pilot in World War II, bombing targets in Europe to stop Hitler. But former Senator and 1972 Democratic presidential nominee George McGovern says that didn't qualify him to run the country--and the same goes for GOP presumptive nominee John McCain.

``I don't have any regrets about that,'' the antiwar Democratic stalwart said in a brief interview yesterday on Capitol Hill. ``While bombing is a terrible thing, we smashed Hitler's oil refineries all over Europe.''

``But I don't recall ever saying that experience as a bomber pilot equipped me to be very strong on how to run a war, how to command the armed forces,'' said McGovern, who will turn 86 on July 18.

Retired General Wesley Clark, a onetime candidate for president himself, raised ire when he said recently that McCain's experience in Vietnam--while laudable--did not qualify him to be commander-in-chief. While noting that he honored McCain's service -- including his years as a prisoner-of-war--Clark said late last month that McCain has not held ``executive responsibility,'' and added, ``I don't think riding in a fighter plane and getting shot down is a qualification to be president.''

The remarks on CBS's ``Face the Nation'' were immediately derided by McCain's supporters. But McGovern said Clark had it right.

``I think General Clark was misunderstood,'' McGovern said Tuesday evening as he visited the House chamber where he once served. ``He wasn't belittling [McCain] at all.''

McGovern, who remains a fervent anti-hunger_activist, was in town to present an award to Representative Jim McGovern [no relation to the former senator] for the Worcester Democrat's own contributions to fighting hunger. The_younger McGovern last year lived a week on $3 worth of food_a_day--approximately the amount allowed to individuals receiving food stamps -- to underscore the struggle hungry Americans face daily.

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2008; blahblahblah; election; electionpresident; elections; georgemcgovern; mccain; obama; weasleyclark; weleyclark; whocares; yawn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-57 next last
The reporter doesn't know the difference between a fighter aircraft and a bomber (see first sentence) but somehow SHE is qualified to write news articles in a major metropolitan newspaper. Have they no editors? We can expect every democrat that ever wore a military uniform to pile on and agree with General Wesley Clark in the next few weeks, which confirms for me that Team Obama put him up to his statement. IMO, they've miscalculated and this will hurt them amongst "bitter clingers", Reagan democrats and the GOP base. How do you see it?
1 posted on 07/08/2008 6:54:42 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Absolutely nothing qualifies George McGovern to ever be President...


2 posted on 07/08/2008 6:57:17 PM PDT by geo40xyz (BE PREPARED: Rotate the ammo, food supplies, water, gas etc. Update the list:-() No new debt..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I thought McGovern was dead? Who the hell is channeling this guy anyway?


3 posted on 07/08/2008 6:59:53 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Hey Nancy and Harry! Are we going in the "right direction" yet? I'm getting dizzy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Go easy on him, after all he won 1 state.

Pray for W and Our Troops


4 posted on 07/08/2008 7:01:40 PM PDT by bray (Drill Congress!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

McGovern cannot stand the FACT that his candidate is a total loser when it comes to the military, national defense, foreign policy, or the ability to MAKE ANY HARD QUALIFIED DECISIONS about the use of our military, how it works, or ANYTHING about it.

Choke on it McGovern. Support your pathetic commie nobody of a candidate.


5 posted on 07/08/2008 7:01:43 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Nothing qualifies nobama.


6 posted on 07/08/2008 7:02:35 PM PDT by monkeycard (There's no such thing as too much ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Have they no editors?

Doesn’t matter, as long as she is pushing the party line.

7 posted on 07/08/2008 7:02:49 PM PDT by doc1019 (I was taught to respect my elders, but it's getting harder to find one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“The reporter doesn’t know the difference between a fighter aircraft and a bomber (see first sentence)”

Lots of fighter planes bombed tactical targets in WWII and later, but McG was a bomber pilot of a B-17


8 posted on 07/08/2008 7:02:58 PM PDT by texson66 ("Tyranny is yielding to the lust of the governing." - Lord Moulton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

People who are in favor of McCain winning in November should welcome this seemingly unending attack on his war and military record. If McCain is perceived as a heroic military figure (rather than as the pandering politician he has often been) he is likely to get a lot of the “undecideds” who vote on emotion rather than reason or even thought-out self-interest. I don’t understand why the Rats keep reminding everyone of McCain’s heroic service. Self-defeating personality disorder must run rampant among the unhinged.


9 posted on 07/08/2008 7:03:06 PM PDT by PaleoBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkeycard

McGovern DID prove that being a combat pilot was NOT a sure ticket to the White House.


10 posted on 07/08/2008 7:04:43 PM PDT by xrmusn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
How do you see it?

McCain isn't basing his run for the presidency solely on the fact that he flew attack planes and survived the Hanoi Hilton. He's basing it on his idea of service, and while some of that service post-military ticks me off, I think this line of attack by Obama will not help and is more likely to hurt him.

11 posted on 07/08/2008 7:05:17 PM PDT by Bahbah (Typical white person)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Refesh our memories,Georgie....was it 14 electoral votes back in ‘72?
12 posted on 07/08/2008 7:05:43 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (The problem with the rat race is,even if you win you're still a rat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

McGovern is still alive? I thought that he crossed the Stygian waters long ago.


13 posted on 07/08/2008 7:08:29 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Wassa matter? You never saw B-17’s dogfighting before?


14 posted on 07/08/2008 7:08:51 PM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkeycard
“Nothing qualifies nobama.”

To Libs, speaking (i.e. BS flinging) is what qualifies one to be President. That's reason # 34 why they hate Bush -— since he can't talk properly in their eyes.

Yep, to elitist Libs, speaking high brow BS is the key to everything!

15 posted on 07/08/2008 7:09:19 PM PDT by TRY ONE (NUKE the unborn gay whales!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Did he say the same about the haughty John Kerry “reporting for duty” at the Dim convention?


16 posted on 07/08/2008 7:09:32 PM PDT by tips up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texson66

That’s what I meant: I know that fighter-bombers had a big part in the war, but a B-17 Flying Fortress isn’t a fighter-bomber.


17 posted on 07/08/2008 7:09:38 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (McCain could never convince me to vote for him. Only the Marxist Obama can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

He did, but no one has bothered to tell him. ;-)


18 posted on 07/08/2008 7:10:47 PM PDT by doc1019 (I was taught to respect my elders, but it's getting harder to find one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Well all I can say is we should remember what these dems are saying trashing McCain’s military service. They are saying that service does not qualify him for political office. Because we know that in future years the dems will run Iraq/Afghanistan War vets so we can thank Harkin, Clark, Rangel and McGovern for informing us that being in the military is absolutely no qualification at all for public office.


19 posted on 07/08/2008 7:11:59 PM PDT by fkabuckeyesrule
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
George McGovern?

I read somewhere he had been turned into a zombie.

20 posted on 07/08/2008 7:12:22 PM PDT by don-o (Have you donated to FR? If not, why not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
It's a simple calculation for Obama. He doesn't have one thing that anyone can say qualifies him to seek the Presidency. This is why they are claiming McCain has no qualifications, they think if they say that McCain isn't qualified enough times then their most glaring weakness won't be noticed.

Very Clintonian.

21 posted on 07/08/2008 7:14:00 PM PDT by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkeycard
Community Organizer is the new litmus test for the left.
22 posted on 07/08/2008 7:14:27 PM PDT by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
George McGovern Says McCain's War Experience Not a Qualification for the White House

Begs a few questions ...

1) What credibility could George "Worst Defeat in Presidential History" McGovern possibly have regarding fitness for the Chief Executive?

2) If McCain's EXPERIENCE does not qualify him for the presidency, how does Nobama's INEXPERIENCE qualify HIM?

3) How does serving honorably in the armed forces and making extreme sacrifices for one's country NOT serve as an indication of patriotism and integrity, which, while not recommendations for the White House per se, certainly bespeak a high moral integrity?

23 posted on 07/08/2008 7:18:44 PM PDT by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tips up
"Did he say the same about the haughty John Kerry “reporting for duty” at the Dim convention?"

No. Serving in the military as a requirement for higher office depends on which party's nominee has done so. 1988-GHWB's service not an issue. Dukakis "speaking five languages" makes him qualified. 1992-GHWB's service not an issue. Clinton's non-service and anti-military loathing not an issue. 1996-Dole's service not an issue, plus he's "too old" 2000-Gore being in Vietnam as a reporter makes him a war hero. GWB-"avoided service" while in TANG 2004-Kerry's shooting a 14 year old VC in the back makes him a war hero, therefore qualified. GWB- AWOL while in TANG per the Killian forgeries. 2008-McCain serving honorably and 5 years in the Hanoi Hilton, with 25 years in congress= not qualified. B.Hussein 3 months in the US Senate before deciding to run for president= presidential material.

24 posted on 07/08/2008 7:20:42 PM PDT by boop (Democracy is the theory that the people get the government they deserve, good and hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: xrmusn
"McGovern DID prove that being a combat pilot was NOT a sure ticket to the White House."

The difference in 1972 was that President Nixon was also a wartime veteran (Lieutenant Commander, U.S. Navy 1942-45) so the veteran issue didn't differentiate between the two men, only their policies did.

25 posted on 07/08/2008 7:24:08 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (McCain could never convince me to vote for him. Only the Marxist Obama can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

McGovern flew a B24 Liberator. His bomber was named "Dakota Queen", something one probably wouldn't name a bomber today.

I respect his service, but McGovern lost his marbles years ago.

26 posted on 07/08/2008 7:24:42 PM PDT by Sooth2222 ("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Strictly speaking, being a fighter pilot isn’t automatic qualification. Most people realize this.

However, one must be a US military officer to be a pilot, requiring leadership and service to country, which is a damn good start.


27 posted on 07/08/2008 7:25:24 PM PDT by zencat (Because Obama isn't an option: (www.McCain-Magnets.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

American voters thought McGovern wasn’t qualified to be President. Case closed.


28 posted on 07/08/2008 7:25:41 PM PDT by Retired Chemist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
McGovern's service is his to be proud of and for all of us to be thankful for. That said, he is showing more signs of losing more of his faculties every time he makes a statement like this. I was a B-52 pilot and, although I did not fly any combat missions, I was qualified to command an airplane whether it be on a training mission, an airborne alert mission, or on a mission of nuclear war. Thankfully the latter did not happen or you would have read about it. John McCain flew a single seat, single engine fighter in combat. He “hung his a$$ out”, risked his life, was captured and showed more character during captivity than Wesley Clark has ever shown or Barack Hussein Obama will ever show in their lifetimes. “Team Obama” is barking up the wrong tree if they think that this tactic will be successful. I submit that flying an airplane is more qualifying for ANYTHING than organizing a community program!
29 posted on 07/08/2008 7:31:10 PM PDT by BatGuano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Retired Chemist

I don’t care what the polls say, Americans simply do not trust Democrats on national security. Mc Govern, of all people, should understand this, since his 1972 landslide defeat marked the official beginning of that era.


30 posted on 07/08/2008 7:34:24 PM PDT by Jaguarmike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Was McGovern a real warrior, or a phony warrior like Kerry? It’s hard to believe any liberals actually have the warrior gene.


31 posted on 07/08/2008 7:37:27 PM PDT by FFranco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Excuse me Mr. Loser McG but didn’t your DemRat party in 2004 nominate JF’n Kerry because of his “military experience’.... ‘reporting for duty’ canard he spoke at the DNC convention? So now McCain (a true war hero) is not qualified by military experience? Which twisted side of the Lib mind will it be then?


32 posted on 07/08/2008 7:37:43 PM PDT by tflabo (Truth or tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sooth2222
SOme a-hole Democrat was slamming McCain because he "dropped bombs from high altitude and didn't see who they hit".

Dipstick Dems don't realize that is an accurate description for McGovern. B-24 were "precison high altitude daylight bombers". Only they weren't as precise as McCain's A-4 Skyjawk and McCain went in at much lower altitude.

Ignorance and arrogance, the twin hallmarks of a liberal Democrat.

33 posted on 07/08/2008 7:40:52 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (Fire the CIA and hire the Free Clinic, someone who knows how to stop leaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: boop
How true, how true. After active duty, I flew F-84s for the Ohio ANG. The media (Dan Blather) made a big deal about GW Bush missing drills etc. which was really a non issue for those who have been involved in Guard duty. One can miss drills as long as they are made up at a later date and all the squares are filled for training and annual flying requirements are met. The Democrat/liberals hate the military so much that they cannot open their eyes or ears to see or listen to basic facts of how we operate. I usually say “Screw Em, they are not worth the bother”, but so many people, who are not aware or informed, take the media's and left-winger’s crap for gospel and we must change that!

I almost threw up when I heard about the “Reporting for Duty” line at the DEM convention. Sure did backfire on him.

34 posted on 07/08/2008 7:46:32 PM PDT by BatGuano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: boop

Well said!


35 posted on 07/08/2008 7:49:25 PM PDT by tips up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: texson66

He flew B-24s


36 posted on 07/08/2008 7:53:21 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The reporter doesn't know the difference between a fighter aircraft and a bomber (see first sentence) but somehow SHE is qualified to write news articles in a major metropolitan newspaper

That immediately jumped out at me too, idiot eastcoast slut.

My father was a 50 mission B-17 pilot over Germany and he wouldn't have bothered to stop to spit on George McGovern.

37 posted on 07/08/2008 7:57:41 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

the wesley clark attack failed,

so the democrat operatives

decided to have mcgovern present the same message again.

both messages hide al obama’s no experience. none. nada.


38 posted on 07/08/2008 7:57:55 PM PDT by ken21 ( people die + you never hear from them again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
he was a fighter pilot in World War II, bombing targets in Europe to stop Hitler.

Well someone who flew the P-47 was a fighter pilot who also dropped bombs in the ground attack role. So that sentence could be true for the P-47. Problem is, George McGovern flew the B-24 which is strictly a bomber so the reporter is full of crap.
39 posted on 07/08/2008 8:04:34 PM PDT by Locomotive Breath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texson66
McG was a bomber pilot of a B-17

He was actually a B-24 Pilot.

40 posted on 07/08/2008 8:05:22 PM PDT by GunnyB (Once a Marine, Always a Marine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bray
Go easy on him, after all he won 1 state.

Good point. The senile dork is clearly an expert on the qualifications to be president.

41 posted on 07/08/2008 8:05:28 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“I’m Barack Obama and I approve this message....until I don’t.”


42 posted on 07/08/2008 8:06:08 PM PDT by keepitreal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
If Weasley simply said, "Being a fighter pilot or being in the military is not a qualification to be president," no one would have said very much about it. However, he said, "I don't think riding in a fighter plane and getting shot down is a qualification to be president." That's nasty and insulting.
43 posted on 07/08/2008 8:10:29 PM PDT by Dahoser (America's great untapped alternative energy source: The Founding Fathers spinning in their graves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
``But I don't recall ever saying that experience as a bomber pilot equipped me to be very strong on how to run a war, how to command the armed forces,'' said McGovern

Has McCain said his experience as a bomber pilot equiped him to be president?

44 posted on 07/08/2008 8:13:53 PM PDT by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: geo40xyz

Another babbling obammy shill.


45 posted on 07/08/2008 8:14:20 PM PDT by Fudd Fan (Obama: black & white, and RED all over. NObama-- KEEP THE CHANGE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The automatic reply should be: “And what experience does Obama have?”


46 posted on 07/08/2008 8:22:48 PM PDT by Interesting Times (Swiftboating, you say? Check out ToSetTheRecordStraight.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Bringing out the deadwood. I gotta believe they gave him his talking points to which he replied...”Hey I never got these when I was employed in Washington”.


47 posted on 07/08/2008 8:26:44 PM PDT by oust the louse (Terrorists are salivating over an Obama White House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Well, military experience was certainly important when the perfumed prince weasley was running though, wasn’t it?


48 posted on 07/08/2008 8:34:56 PM PDT by Let's Roll (As usual, following a shooting spree, libs want to take guns away from those who DIDN'T do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

who cares?


49 posted on 07/08/2008 8:44:05 PM PDT by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Clark said late last month that McCain has not held ``executive responsibility,

As opposed to Obama's vast experience.

50 posted on 07/08/2008 8:53:54 PM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson