Skip to comments.
Leftists Fight “Gundamentalism”
Cross Action News ^
| 7-7-08
| Mark D. Tooley
Posted on 07/07/2008 6:08:24 AM PDT by Victory111
The God Not Guns coalition is predictably upset about the U.S. Supreme Courts overturning the Washington, D.C., handgun ban.
It will embolden adherents of GUNdamentalism in their belief in the inerrancy of the 2nd Amendment, intoned the Rev. Nancy Smith, coalition founder and chief. Gundamentalism is a religious movement without spiritual grounding. Rather, it is rooted in the sale and promotion of violence.
(Excerpt) Read more at crossactionnews.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: advocacy; banglist; democratparty; democrats; elections; godgap; godnotguns; gundamentalism; heller; liberals; nancysmith; obamanation; religiousleft; shallnotbeinfringed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-59 next last
To: Victory111
So apparently according to Rev. Nancy Smith, a defenseless woman raped and beaten is somehow less violent than a dead rapist and a smoking gun in a woman’s hand?
2
posted on
07/07/2008 6:11:06 AM PDT
by
mvpel
(Michael Pelletier)
"Not a blacksmith could be found in the whole land of Israel, because the Philistines had said, "Otherwise the Hebrews will make swords or spears!" - 1 Samuel 13:19
3
posted on
07/07/2008 6:13:29 AM PDT
by
mvpel
(Michael Pelletier)
To: Victory111
People who value the religious freedom described by the First Amendment ought to have equivalent respect for the freedom described in the Second Amendment.
4
posted on
07/07/2008 6:14:01 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(Et si omnes ego non)
To: Victory111
It will embolden adherents of GUNdamentalism in their belief in the inerrancy of the 2nd Amendment,
Let's give her credit, she acknowledges what the Second Amendment is, but disagrees with it. She is welcome to try to get a Constitutional Amendment passed to realize her vision of a better order.
5
posted on
07/07/2008 6:14:22 AM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics)
To: Victory111
Useful idiots for the Brady bunch.
6
posted on
07/07/2008 6:16:08 AM PDT
by
xDGx
To: Dr. Sivana
Leftists are never honest enough to play within the rules to achieve their goals.
They’d rather not have to go through the messiness of a constitutional amendment when you can so much more easily sway 5 people to your side of the argument.
7
posted on
07/07/2008 6:16:24 AM PDT
by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: Victory111
This thread has just added to the
FreeRepublic "bang list" (firearms interest list) by adding the keyword "banglist".
Any time a firearms-related thread is created on FreeRepublic, please be sure to add the "banglist" keyword to it so that interested FReepers don't miss it. Just a suggestion.
Let Freedom Ring,
Click the pic to go to the Gun Facts v5.0 download page!
8
posted on
07/07/2008 6:16:57 AM PDT
by
Joe Brower
(Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
To: Victory111
The God Not Guns coalition is predictably upset about the U.S. Supreme Courts overturning the Washington, D.C., handgun ban. Oh Lord....what next...rape me, shoot me, stab me, kill me....but I did not have a firearm, therefor I get to go to heaven? WTF?
9
posted on
07/07/2008 6:17:46 AM PDT
by
cbkaty
(I may not always post...but I am always here......)
To: Victory111
guns don’t kill,
people do.
it’s called behavior, bitch.
either you’re responsible or not.
libs don’t want to hold people responsible for bad behavior.
10
posted on
07/07/2008 6:18:06 AM PDT
by
ken21
( people die + you never hear from them again.)
To: mvpel
Let’s see...........so now I’m a Typical White Gundamentalist............
I good with it.
11
posted on
07/07/2008 6:22:25 AM PDT
by
cowboyway
("The beauty of the Second Amendment is you won't need it until they try to take it away"--Jefferson)
To: Victory111
I see the National Council of Churches is active here...typical for a Marxist Organization.
12
posted on
07/07/2008 6:27:53 AM PDT
by
Redleg Duke
("All gave some, and some gave all!")
To: Victory111
Gundamentalism is a religious movement without spiritual grounding. Rather, it is rooted in the sale and promotion of violence. She's got the 2nd Amendment confused with Islam
13
posted on
07/07/2008 6:27:59 AM PDT
by
SauronOfMordor
(When injustice becomes law, rebellion becomes duty)
To: Victory111
Saw the headline and thought they were going after teddy bears now.
14
posted on
07/07/2008 6:28:45 AM PDT
by
william clark
(Ecclesiastes 10:2)
To: Victory111
How do we bring about Gods Kingdom - with an open heart or with a gun in hand? If we even could "bring about God's Kingdom," my guess is that it would require both.
To: ken21
The root tenet of liberalism is that
the responsible should be forced to pay for the behaviorial decisions of the irresponsible.
This extends to the policy of “someone poops their pants and we ALL have to wear diapers”.
16
posted on
07/07/2008 6:30:20 AM PDT
by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: mvpel
"Not a blacksmith could be found in the whole land of Israel, because the Philistines had said, "Otherwise the Hebrews will make swords or spears!" Dang Skippy right we will make `em! That and a few things ya have not heard of yet...
17
posted on
07/07/2008 6:38:17 AM PDT
by
TLI
( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
To: SauronOfMordor
18
posted on
07/07/2008 6:38:49 AM PDT
by
xDGx
To: Victory111
"It offers power, freedom, self-determination and protection all in the metal casing of a gun. With the gun as its icon, the 2nd Amendment as its creed, gundamentalism proclaims that nothing is as sacred as the right to own a gun.
Preach on sister!!! I will say that I believe all of the bill of rights (and I include the 14th amendment in that) to be sacred.
To: Victory111
I wouldn’t trust these people to speak for me personally. I certainly don’t trust them to speak for my God.
20
posted on
07/07/2008 6:48:08 AM PDT
by
DesScorp
To: Dr. Sivana
"Let's give her credit, she acknowledges what the Second Amendment is, but disagrees with it. She is welcome to try to get a Constitutional Amendment passed to realize her vision of a better order."
This would still not give her the desired outcome. People that believe (like Johnathon Turley and Alan Dershowitz) the 2A is an individual right, but would like to see the Amendment overturned still do not get the 2A or the bill of rights. It is impossible to get rid of the 2A because our current government does not grant these rights, but merely recognizes pre-existing (to the government) rights. As Patrick Henry would say, the natural rights of man.
To: Victory111
She doesn’t explain why the Apostles carried swords...
22
posted on
07/07/2008 6:50:13 AM PDT
by
WayneS
(The Mask that Evil Wears May Change, but the Face of Evil Remains Constant.)
To: Victory111
“Gundamentalist.”
I like it!
To: Victory111
Cars and guns are tools. The main difference between them is that cars are inherently more violent by far. Hmmmm. Which one to ban? Hmmmm, let me think...
24
posted on
07/07/2008 6:54:07 AM PDT
by
Migraine
(Diversity is great (until it happens to YOU)...)
To: Victory111
Then Jesus asked them, “When I sent you without purse, bag or sandals, did you lack anything?” “Nothing,” they answered. He said to them, “But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one. It is written: `And he was numbered with the transgressors’ ; and I tell you that this must be fulfilled in me. Yes, what is written about me is reaching its fulfillment.” The disciples said, “See, Lord, here are two swords.” “That is enough,” he replied. (Luke 22:35-38, NIV)
To: Old Teufel Hunden
It is impossible to get rid of the 2A because our current government does not grant these rights, but merely recognizes pre-existing (to the government) rights. As Patrick Henry would say, the natural rights of man.
You are of course, right. Enough of the Founders anticipated that these rights would not be recognized long-term if not spelled out that they decided to spell them out and provide the Tenth Amendment as a catha-all for the rest. Patrick Henry, if I recall,was the most prominent of the Anti-Federalists and thought that spelling them out would be a bad idea.
A right that is not protected by the government isn't too practical, and when the atmosphere is filled with legal positivism, internal consistenecy is pretty much the most you can hope for from your opponents. Fifty million victims of abortion are not well-consoled that no one had the rigth to do what the Court said could be done.
26
posted on
07/07/2008 7:13:06 AM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics)
To: WayneS
She doesnt explain why the Apostles carried swords...
They are just dandy for gutting fish and opening scrolls.
27
posted on
07/07/2008 7:14:26 AM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics)
To: Victory111
Gundamentalism is a religious movement without spiritual grounding. Rather, it is rooted in the sale and promotion of violence. You're sadly mistaken. It's actually rooted in peace.
28
posted on
07/07/2008 7:15:33 AM PDT
by
Donald Rumsfeld Fan
("Sincerity is everything. If you can fake that, youÂ’ve got it made." Groucho Marx)
To: Victory111
I thought Obama was fighting BOTH demographics, those who cling to God (on issues like abortion and homosexuality) and Guns (on the 2nd amendment).
These were not meant to be interpreted as a single bloc of voters, it was Obama’s comment to typify “single issue” voters who each have a DIFFERENT issue they won’t bend on.
29
posted on
07/07/2008 7:20:16 AM PDT
by
weegee
(CHANGE? A more truthful slogan would be to proclaim Obama the candidate of FLIP FLOP.)
To: william clark
You can have my giant robot when you pry it from my cold dead hands... < /s >

Gundamentalists is probably what Gundam fanatics should be called.
30
posted on
07/07/2008 7:24:17 AM PDT
by
weegee
(CHANGE? A more truthful slogan would be to proclaim Obama the candidate of FLIP FLOP.)
To: Dr. Sivana
That’s a lie. The neo-left veganatics have told me that Jesus was a vegetarian. You must be mistaken about them slaughtering innocent fish. < /s >
31
posted on
07/07/2008 7:25:21 AM PDT
by
weegee
(CHANGE? A more truthful slogan would be to proclaim Obama the candidate of FLIP FLOP.)
To: DesScorp
Read up on the religious Left. Read up on the God Gap.
(both are active keywords with some background of the liberals’ 2004/2006/2008 election strategy to co-opt religion to tell people how to vote)
They don’t come to their views through religious study, they study religion to sway the masses to the viewpoint they already held.
32
posted on
07/07/2008 7:28:09 AM PDT
by
weegee
(CHANGE? A more truthful slogan would be to proclaim Obama the candidate of FLIP FLOP.)
To: weegee
Gundamentalists: Green-haired girls with big eyes, big hooters, and big guns.
I like it! ;-)
33
posted on
07/07/2008 7:29:26 AM PDT
by
Jonah Hex
("Never underestimate the hungover side of the Force.")
To: Dr. Sivana
"Patrick Henry, if I recall,was the most prominent of the Anti-Federalists and thought that spelling them out would be a bad idea."
Actually, people like Patrick Henry, Thomas Jefferson, George Mason and the rest of the Anti-Federalists were for the BOR. They felt in general that our natural rights needed to be spelled out somewhere in the constitution so that they are guaranteed. Some of the Anti Federalists were against the Constitution because it did not speel out our natural rights. People like Federalist Alexander Hamilton were against the BOR because they said that these rights were so basic as to be commonly understood by everyone that citizens retained these rights. Alexander spelled out his opposition in Federalist paper 87. Keep in mind that the BOR was written by an Anti-Federalist (James Madison).
"Fifty million victims of abortion are not well-consoled that no one had the rigth to do what the Court said could be done."
This is the sad irony of Roe vs. Wade. Somehow Supreme Court justices found a penumbra in the 14th amendment (which is ridiculous) that a woman has the right to kill her unborn baby. Yet these same liberal justices/scholars cannot see the plain reading of the 2A. They also cannot read the plain penumbra of the 4th amendment to our right of private property. (See Kelo).
To: Victory111
Another Cultural Marxist in churh. This is why women should not have leadership in the church.
35
posted on
07/07/2008 7:34:17 AM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(If God wanted us to be Socialist, Karl Marx would have been born in America.)
To: Victory111
Looks like the Left no longer believes in “armed resistance.”
36
posted on
07/07/2008 7:36:13 AM PDT
by
Zionist Conspirator
(Vayiftach HaShem 'et-pi ha'aton vato'mer leVil`am meh-`asiti lekha ki hikkitani zeh shalosh regalim?)
To: bmwcyle
In the Church, as in the family, men ARE the leaders, by definition...
just whether they do a good job of it or not - that’s the question.
37
posted on
07/07/2008 7:36:19 AM PDT
by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: Victory111
Rev. Nancy Smith - a Liberal asking for the ultimate ZOT.
Perhaps, given the ALmighty’s alleged dislike of deliberate deception, she should curtail her summertime outdoor activities?
38
posted on
07/07/2008 7:39:08 AM PDT
by
GladesGuru
(In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principles,)
To: Victory111
As a matter of theological accuracy, the Commandment originally forbid “murder”.
Liberation theology types like to claim the Commandment forbid “killing”.
They are, in so claiming, violating the commandment forbidding “bearing false witness”.
If I may be forgiven for paraphrasing a famous Watergate line, “Is this here ‘bearing false witness’ what we, back home, call plain old ‘lyin’”?
39
posted on
07/07/2008 7:46:47 AM PDT
by
GladesGuru
(In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principles,)
To: Zionist Conspirator
Anything to create a nation of peaceful sheep, all prepared for the eventual coming of the leftist ministers of salvation. Or in plain english, create a defenseless public so the Marxists can take over as easy as pie! Yeah..I’m sure that’s part of Gods plan.
40
posted on
07/07/2008 7:51:42 AM PDT
by
Oldpuppymax
(AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
To: GladesGuru
“Rev. Nancy Smith”
1 Corinthians 14:33-35 (English Standard Version)
33 For God is not a God of confusion but of peace. As in all the churches of the saints, 34 the women should keep silent in the churches. For they are not permitted to speak, but should be in submission, as the Law also says. 35 If there is anything they desire to learn, let them ask their husbands at home. For it is shameful for a woman to speak in church.
To: Oldpuppymax
Anything to create a nation of peaceful sheep, all prepared for the eventual coming of the leftist ministers of salvation. Or in plain english, create a defenseless public so the Marxists can take over as easy as pie! Yeah..Im sure thats part of Gods plan.I understand that, but my point is that the Left used to scream for "armed revolution." The fact that the American Left advocates that only the government can legally own firearms certainly gives a certain degree of believability to the theory that the Left is actually run by the American Establishment.
42
posted on
07/07/2008 8:06:26 AM PDT
by
Zionist Conspirator
(Vayiftach HaShem 'et-pi ha'aton vato'mer leVil`am meh-`asiti lekha ki hikkitani zeh shalosh regalim?)
To: Victory111

They are a NEWTYPE of conservative!
43
posted on
07/07/2008 8:14:32 AM PDT
by
struggle
((The struggle continues))
To: Victory111
On his last night, in the garden, Jesus told his disciples they needed swords for self defense.
Swords were the pistols of Jesus’ day.
44
posted on
07/07/2008 8:37:11 AM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
To: Victory111
Havamal 38
A wayfarer should not walk unarmed,
But have his weapons to hand:
He knows not when he may need a spear,
Or what menace meet on the road.
45
posted on
07/07/2008 8:37:34 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(What would a free man do?)
To: cbkaty
intoned the Rev. Nancy Smith, coalition founder and chiefShe's a Reverand AND a Chief? So, she can bless the masses & do a rain dance at the same time?
46
posted on
07/07/2008 8:38:15 AM PDT
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: mvpel
To: Victory111
No hiding the fact now that the anti-civil rights crowd is religious like in their faith. No pretending there is any rational basis to their beliefs now.
To: Victory111
Luke 22:36
“He said to them, “But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.”
Today, He would most likely instruct His people to buy a firearm.
And the next Manson, Dahmer or Bundy that turns up — send him to live with some of these folks.
To: Old Teufel Hunden
Yet these same liberal justices/scholars cannot see the plain reading of the 2A. Sure they can. They completely & thoroughly understand the plain meaning, but as Souter noted, the minority believe the Constitution can be amended by 5/9. It elevates Scotus as final arbiters over public policy matters.
It is this type of thinking that is most dangerous, and needs to be combated via an impeachment process.
50
posted on
07/07/2008 8:53:30 AM PDT
by
semantic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson