Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne

The article actualy distinguishes between ObamaCANS (Republicans for Obama) and ObamaCONS (conservatives for Obama).

It states that it started with Obamacans, but now it spread to Obamacons.


35 posted on 07/06/2008 9:48:47 PM PDT by FocusNexus ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: FocusNexus

I’ll admit, I didn’t dig deep in this one. I don’t see how an honest to goodness Republican or Conservative could vote for him. Especially a Conservative...


91 posted on 07/07/2008 6:40:18 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Annapolis, flight school, Congress, Senate, MIAs, Keating 5, Soros, Kerry... tried & found wanting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: FocusNexus
The article actualy distinguishes between ObamaCANS (Republicans for Obama) and ObamaCONS (conservatives for Obama).

It states that it started with Obamacans, but now it spread to Obamacons.

The word "Obamican" -- Republican for Obama -- showed up in February, and it looks like it's morphed through "Obamacan" to "Obamacon" (after the model of neocon and paleocon) once somebody showed up claiming to be a conservative for Obama.

I don't think there's very much in this. This is a small group of people and other conservatives who are tempted will find out that Obama isn't any sort of conservative.

It's more the Republicans and conservatives who aren't going to bother to vote that McCain has to worry about, since it's easier not to vote at all than to convince oneself that Obama is worth supporting.

118 posted on 07/07/2008 2:02:21 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson