Skip to comments.
Iran says any attack on its nuclear sites means war
Google | AFP ^
| 7/4/08
Posted on 07/04/2008 8:28:23 PM PDT by LibWhacker
TEHRAN (AFP) — The head of Iran's elite Revolutionary Guards has warned that any Israeli or US attack on its nuclear sites would mean the outbreak of war, the official IRNA news agency reported on Friday.
"Any action against Iran will be interpreted as the start of a war," General Mohammad Ali Jafari was quoted as saying late on Thursday. "Iran's response to any military action will make the aggressors regret their decision."
The United States has never ruled out an eventual resort to force against Iran over its contested nuclear programme, which the West fears is cover for a drive to build an atomic weapon.
(Excerpt) Read more at afp.google.com ...
TOPICS: Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: attack; bombiran; energy; geopolitics; iaf; iran; iraniannukes; middleeast; nuclear; proliferation; sites
To: LibWhacker
Wow, that is a brilliant deduction.
2
posted on
07/04/2008 8:29:17 PM PDT
by
yldstrk
(My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
To: LibWhacker
Is there a mullah version of Captain Obvious?
3
posted on
07/04/2008 8:31:40 PM PDT
by
F15Eagle
(1 John 5:4-5, 4:15, John 11:25, 14:6, 1 Tim 2:5, John 3:17-18, John 20:31, 1 John 5:13, John 6:69)
To: LibWhacker
ooooh fear fear tremble tremble.
4
posted on
07/04/2008 8:37:17 PM PDT
by
bikerman
(_ _ . /_ _ _ /_ . . / / . . . . / . / . _ . . / . _ _ . / / . . _ / . . . //)
To: LibWhacker
Iran says any attack on its nuclear sites means war Iran may be too smart for us.
5
posted on
07/04/2008 8:37:21 PM PDT
by
lowbridge
("I have never learned to fight for my freedom. I was only good at enjoying it" - Van Den Boogaard)
To: LibWhacker
Prelude to a self-attack to provoke war, allowing i-am-a-nut-job and the mullahs to retain power?
6
posted on
07/04/2008 8:39:16 PM PDT
by
PeaceBeWithYou
(De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afganistan and Iraq))
To: LibWhacker
>>>>>any Israeli or US attack on its nuclear sites would mean the outbreak of war,
Duh..... well, yeah, that’s what it means all right.
7
posted on
07/04/2008 8:44:35 PM PDT
by
angkor
(Conservatism is not now and never has been a religious movement.)
To: PeaceBeWithYou
Prelude to a self-attack to provoke war, allowing i-am-a-nut-job and the mullahs to retain power? They must have learned this trick from BJ Klinton during his Lewinski scandal.
8
posted on
07/04/2008 8:47:12 PM PDT
by
OldCorps
To: LibWhacker
So what?
Iran is actively at war with us in Iraq.
I’ve been at war with Iran since Nov. 1979.
It’s about time we get on with business—the mullahs have to go, or an American city will.
Let’s roll, Mr. President.
9
posted on
07/04/2008 8:48:54 PM PDT
by
exit82
(Are the environmentalists gonna pay my heating bill this winter?)
To: LibWhacker
""Any action against Iran will be interpreted as the start of a war," General Mohammad Ali Jafari was quoted as saying late on Thursday. "Iran's response to any military action will make the aggressors regret their decision."
10
posted on
07/04/2008 8:50:07 PM PDT
by
musicman
To: LibWhacker
any Israeli or US attack on its nuclear sites would mean the outbreak of warAs opposed to a nuclear armed Iran with a wacky President?
I think I'll choose door #1 and take my chances thank you...
11
posted on
07/04/2008 8:56:26 PM PDT
by
John123
(Obambi said that he has been in 57 states. I will now light myself on fire...)
To: yldstrk
b-2 check, delta force check, bunker buster check, tactical nukes .... probably not but I can dream right?
To: LibWhacker
I don’t know about the rest of you, but I want to know what cool new weapons we have.
Bring it on!
To: John123
any Israeli or US attack on its nuclear sites would mean the outbreak of war
As opposed to a nuclear armed Iran with a wacky President?
I think I’ll choose door #1 and take my chances thank you...
All the major (and minor ones, too!) power countries had better wake up and join the US and Israel - Iran wouldn’t try to stand up against a majority world opposition. If the right countries would join forces, we could literally break their economy and country without firing a shot. otherwise, it’s dicey - between their choking oil stronghold and the straits of hormuz, closing of which would have unreal world consequences.
14
posted on
07/04/2008 9:18:21 PM PDT
by
llandres
(I'd rather be alive and bankrupt than dead and solvent)
To: Born to Conserve
I don’t know about the rest of you, but I want to know what cool new weapons we have.Me too! We need realistic field testing.
15
posted on
07/04/2008 9:42:16 PM PDT
by
Cobra64
(www.BulletBras.net)
To: LibWhacker
General Mohammad Ali Jafari...We will cut your feet off as well, so that they add weight to your boots, when we beat your face in with them.
>B-(
16
posted on
07/04/2008 9:47:56 PM PDT
by
DGHoodini
(Nor shall my sword sleep in my hand)
To: LibWhacker
That's a coincidence, this evening I finished Vince Flynn's “Protect and Defend” which is exactly about this.
17
posted on
07/04/2008 11:52:08 PM PDT
by
vets son
To: LibWhacker
"
Any action against Iran having already started a War against America
will be interpreted as the start of a war a normal response," General Mohammad Ali Jafari ... Fixed it.
18
posted on
07/05/2008 4:47:17 AM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
To: LibWhacker
Iran says any attack on its nuclear sites means war Ummmmm...
OK.
Now where was I, sorting the brown socks or the blue ones...?
19
posted on
07/06/2008 1:18:35 PM PDT
by
Publius6961
(You're Government, it's not your money, and you never have to show a profit.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
