Posted on 06/29/2008 5:27:34 PM PDT by leonard33
Readers at the New York Times have already spoken about the most overrated books of all time and the winners (or rather, the losers) are J.D. Salinger's "The Catcher in the Rye" and God's "The Bible." I read all about it in the Times' Paper Cuts blog ("Plaster Saints?") and arrived at the conclusion that the least favorable works were usually those that failed to adhere to political correctness. (New York Times readers LOVED Obama's "Audacity of Hope.")
Hence, Books That Could Never Get Published Today
The Hebrew Bible: Too Jewish.
Confessions of St. Augustine: Too Christian.
Moby Dick -- Dear Mr. Melville: A quite similar book has already been done by Jonah and it is still in print. We'd reconsider if you could produce a more sensitive Capt. Ahab. You do go on about whaling. Also, your opening line does not work for us. Can you come up with something better than "Call me Ishmael?" (Our first readers, by the way, were rooting for the whale.)
The Old Man and the Sea -- Dear Mr. Hemingway: We no longer use the term "old man." (Our first readers, by the way, were rooting for the fish.)
Leaves of Grass -- Dear Mr. Whitman. Good for you. We are glad that you celebrate America. We don't. Also, we are larger than you and contain more multitudes.
Ivanhoe -- Dear Sir Walter Scott: Glorifies chivalry. Women can take care of themselves and don't need men except to take out the garbage. Or haven't you heard?
Exodus -- Dear Mr. Uris: We could give this further thought if you would delete all references to Israel. Can you find some other country?
Diary -- Dear Miss Frank: We might consider this work if you would delete all references to the genocide known today as the Holocaust, also to your reminding people that you are Jewish. Can't you make yourself more "universal" for a broader readership? We enjoyed your tone of voice and some of our editors suggest that you place your predicament somewhere in Los Angeles, you know, growing up as a mixed-race foster child on the mean streets of south-central LA. We have already had great success with such a memoir, though later proven to be fraudulent. In your hands, however, this could work.
The Adventures of Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn -- Thank you for both submissions, Mr. Clemens. You have captured the times we live in so perfectly. You have presented our culture admirably. Your dialogue is pitch-perfect. You have not shied from using language that is offensive, insulting and derogatory. This is the mark of a great novelist - the boldness to tell life as it really is. Future generations have a right to know how it really was in America, warts and all. These two works - entirely authentic! What courage! For all those reasons, we pass. Good luck elsewhere.
Women -- Dear Mr. Bukowski: You must be kidding. Are you aware how insulting this is to women? Give it up and stick to your job at the Post Office.
Dear Mr. Whitman: We understand that, since you could find no traditional publisher, including ourselves, you went ahead and SELF-PUBLISHED Leaves of Grass. As we told you, our editors are the finest in the land and if we passed on it, it means that your book is unworthy. Going the self-publishing route is a guarantee that Leaves of Grass will never succeed. We regret that you had to take that step. Good luck finding another line of work.
The Metamorphosis -- Dear Mr. Kafka: We fail to get the symbolism. The man wakes up to find himself turned into a monster insect? We've been tossing this around from editor to editor and can't see the metaphor. Perhaps, however, you intend this to be a political novel, your political statement, in which a Democrat wakes up to find himself a Republican (in other words, monster insect) and thus raises havoc and horror among family, neighbors and friends. If that is the case, be more specific and we'll have another look.
Dear Moses: All right already! Thunder, lightning, hail, fire and brimstone were over the top and quite unnecessary. How do we get rid of all these frogs?
About the author: Jack Engelhard's latest novel, "The Bathsheba Deadline," now available in paperback, places journalism at the center of our war on terror and has been hailed (by author Robert Spencer) as "a rousing thriller about clashing civilizations." Engelhard wrote the international bestselling novel "Indecent Proposal" that was translated into more than 22 languages and turned into a Paramount motion picture starring Robert Redford and Demi Moore.
No way in hell could GONE WITH THE WIND be published today. Even if the protagonist was a strong, independent woman.
I read numerous antique ‘chemistry’ books as a teenager that were filled with all sorts of potential mayhem. There were many extremely useful concepts in there as well. So much knowledge forced out of general existence. It’s a shame.
I was surprised when I read Gone with the Wind that Mitchell is gifted at character portrayal. It is a well written book, despite its apologia of slavery and the attempt by the South to reestablish the aristocracy and serf system of old Europe.
You could publish “Charlotte’s Web”, “Peter Pan” and “The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh”, but their endings would have to be changed to allow for further adventures and serial publishing.
Huckleberry Finn
I have never read “Leaves of Grass” but I suspect it could easily be published today. The reason: Bill and Hillary love it. I am certain I have read that somewhere.
Me neither ... but I practically have "A Child's Garden Of Grass" memorized ... Firesign Theater ... '68 or '69 .. (can't remember .... for obvious reason(s) .. )
i never understood why “catcher in the rye”
was so popular.
i found it boring.
Cheers!
My Daughter who has a Masters in Literature and is a teacher, thinks it is great.
May I suggest...
Peter Pansexual (with a foreword by Michael Jackson)
Cheers!
Already done. Google "Pooh Goes Apesh*t" and prepare for extreme vulgarity and violence. It's obviously the Quentin Tarentino version of Pooh.
Cheers!
Yeah, Bill likes it, Monica gave him a copy when they were a “thing”. Im not kidding either.
I loved reading that.

I wonder if some schools are still dropping it?
We read Lord of the Flies, then Catcher in the Rye in school. They are fascinating to compare and contrast. Are we savages even as children, or can children be “protected” from becoming savages by being caught before they fall off the rye cliff? Personally I agree with LOTF. I think children can do very evil things to each other.
Excellent read!
i like your reply
it sounds like
fake poetry
Never have I wanted to punch a single literary character in the face more than I wanted to punch Holden Caufield in the face. (It also occurred to me that I read "Rye" as a teenager, so that explains a lot).
Almost. Bill gave a copy to Monica, and Hillary had the fits when she found out about it because Bill had given a copy to her when they first met.
I believe Bill had a case of the books that he picked up at Dollar General. Made him seem sensative and caring and all that.
Leon Uris wrote about heroes who believed in their causes - definitely not P.C.
I am not at all surprised to see “Catcher in the Rye” on a list of over-rated novels. It is some comfort to know that other readers have disliked it as much I did.
We had to read it in high school. I detested the main chacter. I failed to take any interest in his problems.
THIS I BELIEVE
by Robert A. Heinlein
i’m glad
you enjoyed it!
Thankya Drummie. A great reread, indeed. :o)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.