Commentary: The Battle for True Marriage is Underway

The unrelenting efforts of an activist wing of the homosexual community have succeeded in reframing the issues of the debate and now aim to enforce nothing short of a Cultural Revolution.

They have been joined by eager collaborators in the Judiciary and elected officials who believe they are some kind of new “liberators”.

No longer are there any news reports using the word marriage for what it ontologically is, the lifelong union between one man and one woman ordered toward love, the conception and rearing of children, and the formation of family, which is the foundation of society because it is its first vital cell.

Rather, the verbal engineers who are the architects of this Revolution have strategically changed the language and convinced even the unwary to use their new revolutionary vocabulary.

First, from the proponents of this “brave new world” where marriage is no longer what it is but a redefined word, came the distinction between so called “traditional’ Marriage and all other “marriages”. That was the most decisively fatal volley in this early verbal skirmish....

Homosexuality is spelled out in Scripture as a sin, and if you really think carefully about it, sodomy is contrary to the natural order. In a created world there is a plan. We have life cycles, weather cycles, seasons, etc. In the human life cycle family is clearly the basic unit for the orderly growth and maintenance of society. Sodomy is a destructive lifestyle for the person and society. And, as you may know, that as much money and effort devoted to find a scientific proof that it is biological and natural, none has been found. We all know some folk who are homosexual, most seem to be good people, but that doesn’t change the fact.

I think the best way to fight this is by enlisting the “first wives club” members.

If gay marriage is okay, then polygamy (which has been around alot longer and accepted in alot more cultures) is okay.

We just need to remind the “first wives club” members (most of whom will be lib feminists) that collecting child support from 3-4 FIRST WIVES will be even more fun than they are having now.

;^)

The illusion that the homosexual lifestyle is a normal way of living has been successfully propagated by promoting a “victim” image for homosexual persons, and by the pseudo-science alleging a ‘gay” gene.

Of the reports alleging, or promising soon down the road, a “gay” gene, not a single one has survived scientific peer review. There is no “gay” gene.

On the other hand, the evidence does show that homosexual persons are indeed victims — but overwhelmingly of their own behavior, not that of others.

Typical homosexual behavior includes regular contact with fecal matter from oneself and from sexual partners, tragically reversing several centuries of learning about cleanliness, and thus several centuries of growing lifespan. Homosexual behavior makes no more sense than playing in the toilet.

All available evidence indicates that the lifespan of practicing homosexual persons is drastically shortened by their behavior. No reliable study indicates otherwise. The lifespan topic is taboo among homosexual advocates because the evidence is so damaging to their case.

Dude, forget the religious angle - it's a dead loser in terms of restricting marriage. As many have learned to their chagrin, granting legal recognition to "domestic partner" arrangements inevitably leads to a conclusion of 'separate but legal' ie de facto discrimination.

It is now time to be upfront & explicit about the important social policy advantages provided by marriage to the extent of repealing domestic partner laws. Discrimination is perfectly legal in many, many cases as long as there are very specific & justified social benefits.

Here's a short list off the top of my head: 18 age of majority (contracts, criminal law, etc), 16 yo drivers, under 16 marriage, females barred from front-line combat, 21 yo alcohol, 18 yo cigarette, etc. The list goes on; in each case, there is explicit discrimination codified by law.

Marriage is the foundation of all societies throughout history & the world - from the most high-tech 1st world countries to the deepest, darkest primitive jungles. If we cannot articulate why this is such a critical institution as to bar all other pseudo forms, then we only have ourselves to blame.

Kind of in the same vein as this recent homosexual wave, there was an obscure movie made in the late 1960's called Wild in the Streets in which disaffected, counterculture youth built up enough critical mass in the American society to push through the legislature, first, an amendment to lower the eligible age for the office of President to something like 18. A carismatic, drug-culture rock star idol was able to be elected President and then the blocks started falling in rapid secession. The shocking conclusion was "olders" (over 30, conservative citizens) being deported to camps and required to down LSD to force mind expansion. Initially, the newfound Presidential favorite found support and favor with the more "progressive" but still-traditional members of congress, but even they were sent to re-education camps just to be sure.

The prophetic message of this movie haunted me and stayed etched in my mind even until today. Surely nothing like this could possibly happen in the US. But I look with horror at a similar progression of developments over the past few year in the U.S. and around the world. I now see hundreds of Homosexuals flocking to California to force others not involved with their relationship to give credence to, and actively participate in, all the implications it involves. These activists will bring a cascade of lawsuits, IN EVERY STATE (mark my words, a slew of homoactivist groups like HRC have made sure there are couples representing each state to do this with full legal and financial backing from the Homo-lobby) demanding that their "marriage" be honored in each State, effectively contesting DOMA as unconstitutional. I can't honestly see every district federal appellate court sustaining state marriage policy, and one will eventually make it to the US Supreme Court. It's anyone's guess what decision will follow, but considering the Court's past decisions, such as Lawrence and Garner vs. Texas, the outcome is questionable. If the USSC reverses, Homo "marriage" immediately becomes law of the land in all 50 states.

The homo-activist know this, will tell you frankly that this is what will happen, and they will tell you that this is their goal.

A Federal Marriage Amendment must be passed sooner than later, when the invaders are already in the house.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.