Posted on 06/13/2008 6:50:19 AM PDT by Eurale
Since literally the founding of the American Communist Party in 1919, the extreme left -- specifically, the communists -- have relied upon genuine liberals to be dupes, or suckers, to help further their cause. Here's how it typically worked: the communists would engage in some sort of work or agenda, very focused, and which they would be prepared to publicly deny. Anyone who has done any work with or on communists, from New York City to Moscow, can speak at length about how they operated with deceit. As Vladimir Lenin had said, in a favorite quote cited often by Ronald Reagan, the only morality that communists recognized was that which furthered their interests.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
The only problem here is that most liberals overtly agree with the principles of Communism. They are not being deceived in any way at all.
I agree with your assessment , most liberals here are fully in agreement with Communist teachings,, I see them as “unawakened” ,, running on feelings and such...basically fat dumb and happy.. if they ever honestly think through their positions they will become Conservatives overnight.
Conservatives have been educating their kids in socialist run re-education camps for fifty years.. And THEY wonder what happened to all the conservatives.. WELL DUUUUGH..
By the way, **schools** are the communists’ **most** important weapon. They have thoroughly and completely infiltrated every level of the educational process. They are hard at work indoctrinating the next generation of voters.
Also...It irritates me that Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Bill OReilly fail to call liberals what they are. Geeze! They could at least take a minute or two each day to point out the communist philosophy that underlies everything a liberal says and does.
**ALL** liberals, leftists, progressives, and socialists are either communists or useful idiots ( without exception!). It is time to call the enemy what and who he is: Communism and communist!
Communism is our nation's **MOST** serious threat! Schools are their **MOST** important weapon!
We on Free Republic “get it”! We are far ahead of the talking pumpkins on talk radio. ( Rush, Hannity, OReilly).
| Code Pink - "Al Qaeda Not A Threat To U.S., WWII Not Justified, Nothing Wrong With Communism" ^ |
||
|
06/12/2008 12:59:28 PM PDT · by My Favorite Headache · 23 replies Code Pink ^ | 6-11-2008Check out Liberalism at its best. We get to hear the scum of Code Pink tell a U.S. Marine that he is a war criminal, that there is nothing wrong with communism, that Al Qaeda is not a threat to the U.S., that the war on terror is not real, WW2 was not justified, and my favorite line...OUT OF HAWAII NOW! What are we doing there anyway? http://www.youtube.com |
||
|
|
||
| Code Pink co-founder is Obama bundler ^ |
||
|
06/12/2008 2:21:46 AM PDT · by markomalley · 7 replies · 258+ views Politico ^ | 6/11/2008 | Jonathan MartinA co-founder of the anti-war group Code Pink, which has made a name for itself by interrupting hearings on Capitol Hill, is a fundraising bundler for Barack Obama. Jodie Evans has pledged to raise at least $50,000 for Obama, according the Democrat's campaign site. According to research being circulated by GOP sources, Evans has a record of inflammatory statements such as saying that women were better off in Iraq under Saddam Hussein, "Men are dying in their Hummers in Iraq so you can drive around in yours" and, my favorite, that the invasion of Iraq amounted to "global testosterone poisoning."... |
||
|
|
||
| Obama - Code Pink Scandal Breaking ^ |
||
|
06/11/2008 7:51:09 PM PDT · by kristinn · 85 replies · 2,676+ views Wednesday, June 11, 2008 | KristinnThe mainstream media and Republican operatives are finally starting to notice the connections between presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Sen. Barack Obama (IL) and the terrorist supporting group, Code Pink.The Politico reporter Jonathan Martin has an article this evening on the scandal:A co-founder of the anti-war group Code Pink, which has made a name for itself by interrupting hearings on Capitol Hill, is a fundraising bundler for Barack Obama. Jodie Evans has pledged to raise at least $50,000 for Obama, according the Democrat's campaign site. According to research being circulated by GOP sources, Evans has a record of inflammatory statements such... |
||
|
|
||
| (Code Pink)Obama Bundler Jodie Evans: Osama Had A Valid Reason to Attack the United States ^ |
||
|
06/10/2008 5:06:13 PM PDT · by 2ndDivisionVet · 13 replies · 381+ views No Quarter ^ | June 10, 2008 | Charles LemosOn June 3, 2008, Jodie Evans, the founder of Code Pink and an Obama Bundler went on the Conscience of Kansas Radio Show with Paul Ibbetson. During the interview, Jody Evans noted that Osama bin-Laden had a valid reason for attacking the United States on 9/11. From the interview: Jodie Evans: We were attacked because we were in Saudi Arabia, that was the message of Osama, was that because we had our bases in the Middle East, he attacked the United States. Paul A. Ibbetson: Do you think thats a valid argument? Evans: Sure. Why do we have bases in the... |
||
|
|
||
| Time to Curb "Code Pink" ^ |
||
|
06/05/2008 3:39:37 PM PDT · by trooprally · 32 replies · 611+ views NRO ^ | Wednesday, May 21, 2008 | Elaine Donnelly"Finally, a member of Congress has announced a laudable plan to do something about the abusive behavior of demonstrators of the anti-war left. Rep. Todd Akin (R-Mo.), a member of the House Armed Services Committee, has introduced legislation to deal with what he has described as a growing number of our fellow citizens [who] are abusing their right of free expression through vandalism and violent protest aimed at military recruiters and those who wish to serve." Finally someone talking serious about Code Pink's anarchical activities. There are a lot more examples of Code Pink's crimes then noted in the article.... |
||
|
|
||
The Communist have always had successful disinformation programs, they are the most accompolished liars in history...the willing dupes have infested the institutions to a level where they can only be countered by a large concerted counter-disinformation program or armed revolt. We will face this choice in the near future.
I see the battle between freedom (conservatism) and communism as the never ending battle between good and evil. I am afraid it will never end.
Without Big Journalism behind them, "liberals" would lose a good ten points in any election, IMHO. The question which has always plagued conservatives has been how to blunt the (unadmitted) support of journalists for their opponents, without opposing free speech and freedom of the press.The actual problem is the tendency of Big Journalism to claim - and for the public to be unable to reject the fallacy of - Big Journalism's defining of the public interest. Certainly the attitude that journalism defines the public interest is embedded in the McCain-Feingold law, and the fact that John McCain actually accepts that premise is what defines him as a RINO. But the reality is that the rules of journalism - such as "'If it Bleeds, it leads," "Man Bites Dog' is a good headline but 'Dog Bites Man' isn't news" and "There's nothing more worthless than yesterday's newspaper" - are entertainment rules. They are rules for making the paper interesting to the public - and that is a different matter entirely that being "in the public interest."
An evenly matched struggle between a cop and a robber - still more so the victory of a robber over a cop - is interesting (if in a morbid way), but the certain victory of the cop over the robber is what is in the public interest. The signal success of the "surge" in Iraq is in the public interest, but the chaos that preceded the surge was what made "good copy." The effective functioning of the capitalist free market system has produced gradual miracles in the US over the generations - so much so that an American secretary of today might be ill-served to trade her circumstances for those which Queen Victoria enjoyed in her (1819-1901) day. Yet claims of "market failure" and "greedy capitalists" and "overpaid CEOs" make much better copy. Corruption and failure on the part of people and institutions upon whom/which the public must depend are highly interesting to the public - and dramatically adverse to the public interest. The story line which, for commercial reasons, appeals to Big Journalism - which Big Journalism wants to believe and to propagate - defines what interests the public, and is essentially the very opposite of what is in the public interest.
For those reasons Big journalism inherently tends to oppose the public interest. Big Journalism is selling something, and that thing is not what the public should buy, but what is promoted by a century and a half of unremitting propaganda as being good for it. And that is why we have so much difficulty disposing of the impostures of the socialist delusion - which is actually nothing more than the idea that Theodore Roosevelt was wrong in saying that it is not the critic but "the man who is actually in the arena" who counts. Socialism is all about censoring the credit which properly accrues to those who accomplish things like providing our fuel, medicine, food, and other goods. Socialism is about suppressing that credit in favor of the second guesser and the critic, and the imposture of those who, precisely on the basis that they have no experience in confronting the actual constraints of business, affect to be able to do those jobs better than those who actually take responsibility for doing so.
BTTT
bttt
The Communist’s greatest trick is to convince people that they don’t really exist.
A Plan:
Conservatives should remove their children from government schools immediately. Encourage others to do the same.
Join with neighbors, friends and family to elect officials that will close down government schools. Permanently.
Organize private voucher foundations that would award private vouchers to students attending private **conservative** schools. The foundations could certify the schools and teachers, and administer testing to the students.
Abandon the brick and mortar, Prussian-style school! It is expensive. Also, with today's technology a student can receive a self-paced education that is far more efficient an thorough.
Send armies of youth onto our nation's college campuses who are well prepared to stare down their Marxist professors and to defend their faith and conservative principles.
Can this be done! You bet! A 5 Trillion dollar endowment at 5% interest could provide every school child in the nation ( approximate 50 million children) with a $5,000 private voucher. Please remember that Harvard alone has a $35 Billion dollar endowment, and colleges across the nation have endowments in the BILLIONS and multi-multi-millions. Five Trillion is less than 4 Harvards.
Finally, we should encourage our talk show Pumpkin Heads ( Rush, Hannity, and OReilly) to start calling the enemy who and what it is: Communist and communism.
If we start now, my children's blood will not need to water the Tree of Liberty.
BTTT!
Thanks for the ping and your posts/links, c_I_c. OUSTANDING article by Paul Kengor. Informative. Educational. Thanks for posting. Deceit is a pillar of the anti-life criminal/collective. It is often the 1st weapon used in their arsenal.
Great thread. Thanks to all contributors. BUMP-TO-THE-TRUTH!
You got some great ideas on how to start taking back education from the Collective of Mis-education, the COM.
Let’s get busy.
There are organizations, such as Exodus Mandate run by Bruce Shortt, that encourage Baptist churches to open private schools. In my opinion this is the wrong approach.
Churches are **not** going to rescue our children. Why? Answer: Because there are too many government employees sitting in the church pews. Few ministers will bite the hand the puts money in the collection plate. In many counties the government schools are the single biggest employer.
Conservatives ( Christian and non-Christian) will need to start a grassroots effort to organize the political action against the government schools and start the voucher foundations.
btt
No,Communism is socialism on steroids.Ans=d there is a reason it doesn’t work.Only the liberals,”intellectuals”,and elitists haven’t figured it out yet.Thankfully,my elders made sure I knew what was what despite my socialist teachers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.