Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bathroom Wars
Breakpoint ^ | June 6, 2008 | Chuck Colson

Posted on 06/11/2008 10:54:22 AM PDT by Fichori

Bathroom Wars

By Chuck Colson
6/6/2008
Related Audio/Video Downloads
Real Media
Windows Media
MP3 Media

Potty Politics

Three months ago, I told you about a new law in Montgomery County, Maryland, that demands co-ed locker rooms and restrooms in all public accommodations. The law was intended to accommodate “transgendered people”—that is, men who say they perceive themselves to be women, and women who claim they consider themselves men. I said, at the time, that we would see extremists in other jurisdictions attempting to pass similar laws. And that is exactly what is happening.

Last week, Colorado’s legislature passed—and Gov. Bill Ritter signed—a law that will open all public accommodations, including public restrooms, to anyone who wants to use them. That means men may use a women’s restroom, and women may enter men’s rooms. The rationale for Senate Bill 200 is that transgenders should be able to use the restroom they feel most comfortable using. Apparently, it is not important if others feel uncomfortable having their privacy violated every time they use public facilities.

The lack of privacy is not the only problem. Nobody is going to ask a man if he is trangendered before allowing him into the ladies’ room. This means any man—including a child molester—could simply follow a little girl into the privacy of a public restroom. And, if a man decided to expose himself to a young girl there, who is she going to complain to? After all, restrooms, by definition, are places where one exposes the private parts of one’s body.

Men will have even less privacy, because they often do not use stalls.

Appalling as this law is, it gets worse. Tom Minnery of Focus on the Family points out, in the Denver Post, that the law also threatens religious liberty: Colorado’s “public accommodations” law includes not only hotels and restaurants, but also any small or home-based business that offers “goods or services” to the public.

And, as we have seen before, radicals go out of their way to target Christian businesses. As Minnery notes, in Albuquerque, a Christian couple who operate a photography studio politely declined, on religious grounds, to photograph a lesbian “commitment ceremony.” For this exercise of their First Amendment rights, the couple were forced to appear before New Mexico’s human rights commission and fined more than $6,600. Now, if you dare to deny a transgendered “man” access to the women’s room, you can be prosecuted under criminal laws and spend up to a year in jail. It is an outrage.

The American people are not asking for new bathroom laws. The truth is, this is an effort—by a small but radical minority—to use the force of law to punish anyone backward enough to believe there are only two sexes: male and female. The true goal behind the law is the radical remaking of our society—one in which faithful Christians, Muslims, and Jews will be punished for their beliefs.

Are you disgusted enough? Good. If you live in Colorado, get to work putting an initiative on the November ballot. That is what citizens of Montgomery County, Maryland, did. And the rest of us better stay on our guard, keeping an eye on our own lawmakers.

In a free country, nobody has the right to tell us what to believe—or to punish us for putting our First Amendment rights into practice. And, yes, there are men and women who deserve privacy, no matter who tells us there are no differences between the sexes.

Today's BreakPoint Offer

BreakPoint WorldView magazine is now available for FREE online. Sign up today!

For Further Reading and Information

Tom Minnery, “Proposed Anti-Bias Law would open a Pandora’s Box,” Denver Post, 23 May 2008.

BreakPoint Commentary No. 080305, “Not My Shower: Breaking Biological Barriers.”

Bob Unruh, “Pass the Towels! Plans for Coed Locker Rooms,” Worldnetdaily.com, 2 November 2007.

Bob Unruh, “Coed Locker Rooms given Green Light,” Worldnetdaily.com, 14 November 2007.

Bob Unruh, “ ‘Coed Locker Rooms’ Spark Citizen Backlash,” Worldnetdaily.com, 11 December 2007.

Anne Morse, “Social Chastity Belts,” The Point, 9 April 2008.

John Ingold, “Ritter Signs Controversial Anti-Discrimination Bill,” Denver Post, 29 May 2008.

Ross Kaminsky, “Colorado Gov. Bill Ritter Signs Transgender Bill,” Human Events, 3 June 2008.

Urge Colorado governor to veto Senate Bill 200: “Take Action on Colorado Senate Bill 200.”



TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Colorado; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: billritter; celebrateperversity; colson; culturewar; heshes; homosexualagenda; montgomerycounty; unisex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: Jim 0216

Don’t worry. In ‘The last days’, the rebel will have outrageous things like this well under control. As we abandon the freedom and liberties that Christianity has provided along with sensible societal morality, what’s rushing in to fill that vacuum will have those examples of perverse behavior hanging from cranes every few blocks to remind the public that behavior will no longer be tolerated. (like Iran does now)


21 posted on 06/11/2008 11:29:10 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Polybius

A bloke who likes wearing tights and pretty frocks probably isn’t likely to be interested in your wife. He’s more likely to be interested in you....


22 posted on 06/11/2008 11:30:04 AM PDT by thundrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Polybius

I got the impression that the law just made existing facilities available to ‘anyone who wants to use them’.

So even if there was a coed restroom, if a man wanted to ‘use’ the ladies room, he could.


23 posted on 06/11/2008 11:30:39 AM PDT by Fichori (I'm always getting spam advertising drugs and replica watches; Who do they think I am, a gangster?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Fichori
I got the impression that the law just made existing facilities available to ‘anyone who wants to use them’.

Oh, ..... hmmmm ....., that's diffrent.

(Flashbacks to the coed head of that Navy BOQ.)

24 posted on 06/11/2008 11:38:20 AM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Fichori
Its just disgusting. And not the way I was raised.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

25 posted on 06/11/2008 11:38:20 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
"Its just disgusting."
Understatement.

Its also not the way I was raised either.
26 posted on 06/11/2008 11:43:44 AM PDT by Fichori (I'm always getting spam advertising drugs and replica watches; Who do they think I am, a gangster?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: lazypadawan

It should be called the ‘Predator Accommodation Law’


27 posted on 06/11/2008 11:46:21 AM PDT by Fichori (I'm always getting spam advertising drugs and replica watches; Who do they think I am, a gangster?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

ROFLMAO!


28 posted on 06/11/2008 11:52:46 AM PDT by devistate one four (Nam 67-68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Fichori
Yes, you are quite wrong.

ML/NJ

29 posted on 06/11/2008 12:28:03 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy
When a woman has got to go, she will barge into the Men’s Room and she’ll tell you to get out.

This wasn't the case at all at Belmont. The ladies just strode past the urinals and made their way to the commodes. I remarked to someone, that it reminded me of being in Paris.

ML/NJ

30 posted on 06/11/2008 12:31:49 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Russ

“For God’s wrath is being revealed from heaven against all the ungodliness and wickedness of those who in their wickedness suppress the truth. For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God himself has made it plain to them.

For since the creation of the world God’s invisible attributes—his eternal power and divine nature—have been understood and observed by what he made, so that people are without excuse. For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him.

Instead, their thoughts turned to worthless things, and their senseless hearts were darkened. Though claiming to be wise, they became fools and ex­changed the glory of the immortal God for images that looked like mortal human beings, birds, four-footed animals, and reptiles.

For this reason, God delivered them to sexual impurity as they followed the lusts of their hearts and dishonored their bodies with one another. They exchanged God’s truth for a lie and worshipped and served the creation rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.


31 posted on 06/11/2008 12:32:33 PM PDT by Obadiah (I remember when the climate never changed, then Bush stole the election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

The reason for my assumption was that I expected anyone who has a daughter would be in disagreement with a law that permits predators/perverts to enter the womans bathroom unquestioned.

Your comment about the clubhouse at Belmont appeared to convey apathy towards the consequences of the new law.


32 posted on 06/11/2008 12:43:44 PM PDT by Fichori (I'm always getting spam advertising drugs and replica watches; Who do they think I am, a gangster?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Fichori
Actually, I was commenting on women using the men's room. My guess is that it the situation were reversed, we mostly wouldn't have cared. I don't think the women would have had as casual an attitude about men utilizing their facilities.

ML/NJ

33 posted on 06/11/2008 2:24:58 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

No one can express it as well as the Holy Scripture. Thank you...


34 posted on 06/11/2008 2:59:56 PM PDT by Russ (Repeal the 17th amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ljco

It all went downhill after women started wearing pants. I remember when I was in school, girls HAD to wear dresses unless the temperature was below 32 degrees.


35 posted on 06/11/2008 3:00:31 PM PDT by Burkean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Fichori
The way you were raised is simply wrong, shallow, bigoted, and hate-filled. At least that is what the “enlightened” leftists would tell you.
36 posted on 06/11/2008 3:55:07 PM PDT by fwdude (If marriage can mean anything, then marriage means nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

I pity those who are, or should be, consigned to a mental institution.

May God draw them to himself that they might find salvation and deliverance.


37 posted on 06/11/2008 4:27:14 PM PDT by Fichori (I'm always getting spam advertising drugs and replica watches; Who do they think I am, a gangster?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Fichori

Rape waiting to happen.


38 posted on 06/11/2008 4:46:53 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (TAZ:Untamed, Unpredictable, Uninhibited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TASMANIANRED

Everybody who is able to carry a gun SHOULD carry a gun.

Especially women.

But having birdbrained politicians passing these kinds of laws is still unacceptable.


39 posted on 06/11/2008 5:02:40 PM PDT by Fichori (I'm always getting spam advertising drugs and replica watches; Who do they think I am, a gangster?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Fichori

No argument here.

As much as I loathe the french, they did have one good idea....way back when.


40 posted on 06/11/2008 5:15:02 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (TAZ:Untamed, Unpredictable, Uninhibited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson