Posted on 06/04/2008 6:12:59 PM PDT by elkfersupper
Heather Squires was the designated driver. Never exactly a fun thing, but a college buddy of her husband's was driving up from Tucson to celebrate his acceptance into law school. So when her husband, Jason, asked, Heather said yes.
It's not safe to be the designated driver these days, either.
At Chuy's in Tempe, Heather's brother and her husband and the soon-to-be-law-school student knocked off four pitchers of beer. Everybody was having a great time.
Around 9:30 p.m., they decided to head home. So they piled into Jason Squires' new pickup truck. As planned, Heather drove.
They didn't get very far.
A motorcycle cop spotted the truck as Heather drove through the intersection of Baseline Road and Mesa Drive. Not familiar with the truck, she'd failed to flip on her lights. Soon the cop was flipping on his — and they were flashing.
Heather was ordered out of the vehicle and almost immediately handcuffed. She was taken to the Mesa Police Department and charged with both driving under the influence and driving with a blood alcohol content over the legal limit. The truck was searched, then impounded.
Party's over.
Heather Squires was no different from any of the thousands of people who've been charged with DUI this year in Arizona. They drank, they got busted, and now — thanks to the toughest DUI laws in the nation — they can expect jail time, big fines, and an ignition interlock.
Except for one thing.
Heather Squires' blood alcohol content that night was 0.00. The records prove, beyond the shadow of a doubt, that she was an exemplary designated driver.
She hadn't had a drop to drink.
Heather Squires is a 29-year-old legal assistant, but with long blond hair and wholesome good looks, she resembles nothing so much as a fresh-scrubbed high school student.
So it doesn't surprise me that the Mesa policeman's first question was, "How old are you?" On a dark night, it would be easy to assume she was underage and out past curfew.
The problem is, she wasn't. Wasn't underage, wasn't past curfew, wasn't drunk. Wasn't even drinking. The arrest should never have happened. And though Mesa police quietly dismissed the charges against her a month later, I think her case still raises serious questions.
Let's face it. The DUI situation in Arizona is out of control. As I reported earlier this year, drivers are getting popped after just one or two drinks, with blood alcohol contents far below the legal limit.
But Heather's case is the only one I've seen in which the driver drank nothing. It certainly makes me wonder whether her treatment was related to the fact that her husband, Jason, is a DUI attorney based in Mesa.
A few months before Heather's arrest, in fact, he helped a client beat the rap for extreme DUI at a jury trial, even though records suggest the guy was guilty.
The officer who arrested the guy? Bond Gonzalez — the same cop who would arrest Heather Squires.
I would call that a remarkable coincidence, except I'm not so sure it is a coincidence. The truck, after all, was registered to Jason Squires. And when Gonzalez began questioning Heather, Jason immediately identified himself from the back seat, as Gonzalez's report confirms.
Gonzalez wrote in the report that he did not recognize Squires for quite some time. In fact, when Squires showed his bar card to verify that he's an attorney, Gonzalez wrote that Squires was attempting to claim he worked for the county attorney.
I find the officer's report a little disingenuous.
The Squireses agree that, upon his pulling them over, Gonzalez was almost immediately hostile. Rather than ask Heather Squires whether she'd had anything to drink, he ordered her out of the truck. Then he immediately ordered her to do a field sobriety test.
Sensing trouble, Jason Squires advised her to refuse.
"I didn't like the way this was happening," he explains. "At that point, I'm not going to trust him to be fair." It didn't help that the area where they were standing was covered in thick gravel and Heather Squires was wearing strappy heels. As any DUI lawyer knows, that's setting a driver up for failure.
Now, the law is clear. If you refuse a blood test, the police confiscate your license right away and suspend it for a year. By refusing, you're admitting guilt.
But that is not true for field sobriety tests. They are supposed to be optional.
That's not how Gonzalez handled it. When Heather Squires refused the field tests, Gonzalez said he had no choice: "If you're not going to do these, I'm putting you under arrest."
"What for?" Jason Squires asked, incredulous. He knew his wife hadn't been drinking.
Within minutes, she was in cuffs anyway.
The Mesa police are equipped with portable Breathalyzers — a test that would have shown immediately that Squires was not intoxicated. But Gonzalez never administered one.
And though Gonzalez's supervisor showed up, he never administered a breath test, either.
In total, five cops reported to the scene. (Nice use of Mesa's tax dollars, eh?) And not one of them did anything to stop the madness. Not one of them noticed that the woman they were arresting was as sober as an undertaker.
The next day, Jason Squires filed an Internal Affairs complaint, alleging retaliation. He and Heather say there will be a lawsuit.
The Mesa police see things a bit differently. Detective Steve Berry, a spokesman for the department, tells me that by refusing the field test, Heather Squires "forced" Gonzalez's hand.
"He had to look at the totality of the situation," Berry says. "You have a car where the other two individuals are clearly drinking. He smells alcohol. And then you have someone driving without their headlights, not willing to do field sobriety tests — he's left with few options at that point."
Berry adds that Gonzalez likely had no idea whom he was pulling over. Yes, police typically run license plates before making a traffic stop, but they're mostly checking to make sure a vehicle isn't stolen. He's skeptical that Gonzalez actually recognized Squires' name.
But as scary as it is to think that the police harassed the wife of a DUI lawyer, I think the other option is almost scarier.
And that's this: In this time of anti-DUI zeal, are police so eager to make arrests that everyone on the road at night is presumed to be a drunk driver?
It's interesting to read the affidavit that Officer Gonzalez wrote that night about Heather Squires, intending to ask the Motor Vehicles Division of ADOT to yank her license. (He never mailed it — possibly because of the blood-test results.)
It describes "bloodshot and watery eyes."
"Flushed face."
"Strong odor of an alcoholic beverage emitting from breath."
All this on a woman who was sober.
Anyone at that scene should have noticed that Heather Squires didn't smell of alcohol, that her eyes weren't bloodshot, that her face wasn't flushed. She wasn't, after all, drunk.
But that's not what they wanted to see.
There's no one who understands that better than Jason Squires.
Two months ago, when Squires questioned Officer Gonzalez in court for that extreme DUI arrest he'd made, Gonzalez admitted that he'd pull people over at night for things he'd never bust them for during the day. And when a juror asked if he had a quota, Gonzalez replied that he liked to arrest three people per night.
So what if some of them are sober, right?
One month after her arrest, Heather Squires is still nervous behind the wheel.
"Particularly when I'm in Mesa," she admits. "Like, I would not want to call them in an emergency — the people you think are there to help you and assist you are not." Even knowing that she was sober, she says, she agonized over whether the charges would be dismissed.
Keep in mind, this is coming from a woman whose husband handles DUI cases for a living. Most of us would have been on our own.
Honestly, I don't want to believe that Officer Gonzalez sought out the lawyer who beat him in court — and then penalized his wife when she'd done nothing wrong.
But a rogue cop is almost preferable to a system that's stacked against motorists who want nothing more than to get home at night. Those people might not be as sober as Heather Squires proved to be, but after one or two drinks, I'm willing to bet that they don't have bloodshot eyes or reek of booze. You're still going to read that in the police report.
That's how the system works these days.
"We have to fight this," Jason Squires tell me, "for all the people out there who can't."
It's going to be a lonely fight in this teetotaler's paradise. But if nothing else, I bet he's got the Mesa PD's attention.
Drive carefully, Jason.
Look forward to our new utopia.
LOL—Cop with a grudge meets lawyer with an attitude.
Happy I don’t reside in Arizona. ;-)
Well, she was pulled over at 9:30 PM for driving without her lights on ...
If these are the facts, it would appear that she has a case against the Officer for tortious false arrest and false imprisonment, and also against the town of Mesa.
BTTT
Actually, now that I think about it—the symmetry is perfect: cop with an attitude meets lawyer with a grudge.
There was a time when going out for a drink or two with friends was okay so long as no one was driving around drunk.
But nowadays, I wouldn't want to be on any street in America after midnight.
"Gonzalez was almost immediately hostile."
Many cops are violently hostile nowadays because of their testosterone levels being 10 times higher than normal.
The reason?
Cops on steroids are severely altering their brain chemistry, and subsequently "the juice" makes them so aggressive that even sober college chicks need to be harassed and arrested.
I am not saying that Gonzalez was on steroids because only a test can verify that.
However, anyone who is instantly "hostile" during a simple traffic stop will raise my eyebrow.
One reason I hate those DRL's and the automatic headlight switches on GM and other vehicles.
I want to pull or twist the knob.
> "... the people you think are there to help you and assist you are not..."
Well, that's an erroneous assumption.
With all respect to the many great cops out there, and my friends who serve behind the badge, the policeman is not there to "help and assist you". The policeman is there to enforce the law. Helping and assisting happen if there's nobody breaking the law at that moment.
At the beginning, that cop had every reason to believe he was dealing with a drunk (or otherwise impaired) driver. She was arrested for refusing a field sobriety test, while driving at night without headlights, with a car-full of drunks.
"Help and assist" was not on the menu.
Nevertheless -- they should have straightened it out immediately.
Don’t, for a moment, believe that it is different where you live.
Outrageous story. Officer Gonzalez needs to be busted to crossing guard duty. Or maybe he should be the officer who teaches kids bicycle safety. But he sure needs to be off the street where he appears to be a bully and a turd to sober people.
Too many psychologically disturbed people getting police badges these days.
Sheesh.
Let's corrupt the cops and throw the constitution out the window...after all, it's Bush's fault and it's for the kids.
Where's the boot lickers with the 'ya shouldn't drink and drive' blah blah blah to excuse whatever happened? This woman hadn't had any. BTW, I very rarely drink so I'm always the designated driver.
If I were the local judge or magistrate, I would contact the chief and tell him that he might save time and not have Gonzalez bother to apply for any search warrants. He out and out lied on the affidavit. The courts can prevent this nonsense by a simple call. And the chief can like it or not.
Gad, I miss "Peace Officers".
What the heck is going on in law enforcement when statements like that are made?
Gone are the days of Andy Griffith, that's for sure.
Man, sometimes I drive around during the day and forget to turn on my lights too.
Heh. The other night, I flashed my headlights at a SUV that didn't have its lights on. He turned them on just before he passed me, at which point I could see that it was a deputy sheriff's vehicle. Maybe I should've spun around and executed a citizen's arreyust.
If you have a few pops be sure to flip on yr headlights. Police on DUI stakeout look for this. It’s a give away. This was Heather’s first mistake
It’s a good policy to all night time running lights in working order. Being pulled over for broken rear license plate light is a golden oldie. Same for non-functional rear brake light that escapes notice during daytime but not when bars empty out
A guy I met in traffic class has the similar thing happen to him. I don’t recall the details, but he was fighting to keep his license. He told his story, and the cop running the class said it was a case where he got all the wrong breaks. SCARY.
IMHO, sounds like the cop’s the one with a subsatnce abuse problem...
IMHO, sounds like the cop’s the one with a substance abuse problem...
I have a true story about how a friend of mine got some payback for these types of police tactics...
My friend is the postmaster a nearby town post office. The local police started harassing him and his employees because they were going to work at early hours. After being pulled over twice and given field sobriety tests on his way to work by one particularly aggressive cop, he decided it was time for a little payback. Let's just say that cops bills, paychecks and other important documents started getting "lost in the mail" some even got "mistakenly" rerouted to China he also ended up on every junk mail list in the country... After a few months he must have got the message because he hasn't harassed a postal employee since then.
Why should free men have to do all that?
Too bad we all don’t have that kind of power.
Ahh, the Newman strategy. Nice!
Welcome to the Brave new World of facist Nazi Cops of Mesa
This is the direct result of MADD
We let these Idiot Mothers run Amuck, and Pass Draconian
legislation, then leftist Morons let it Grow into the Monster it is Today.
Ruined lives because of some bitter Mothers who cant get over the deaths of their Children
and want to punish anyone who has a drink.
Screw MADD and the Idiots who Helped them.
Good way to attract an "Interfering With a Police Officer" or "Failure to Obey" arrest.
Either way, it's handcuffs and a trip to the local lockup.
Hardly any of them are "mothers" or even genetically or physically capable of becoming "mothers'.
Dark Blue, Light Blue feud.
Are the postal employees and cops in that area of different ethnicities, like the NYPD & NYFD?
They still have drive-in liquor stores in Arizona that are open until midnight ?
And the cop defender contingency checks in.
Although I haven't been to Arizona in decades, I can say probably not.
The State Legislature confiscated all the drive-up windows around here a decade ago.
“Well, she was pulled over at 9:30 PM for driving without her lights on ... “
And I have seen plenty of times driving in the city that the street lights are so bright that you can’t tell if your headlights are on or not
I want to pull or twist the knob.
YES!
I do the same thing in my 98 pickup all the time. Those damn DRl's are on, and if it's still light enough to see the gauges, I don't even think of turning on the lights.
DRL's suck, I hate em.
Fair enough. But just the same, there is this mentality for arresting DUI's and a general presumption of guilt.
On th way to the airport to catch a 6AM flight, it's 4AM and I drift over the fog line while lighting up a cigarette. Imagine, it's 4AM freshly showered, shaved, and wearing a business suit. I get pulled over and the first words out of the deputy's mouth are "have you been drinking"? I politely but firmly told him that he needed to have his eyes checked, and that maybe a CT scan was in order since his sense of smell was gone.
I blame MADD for all this. They are the worst of the totalitarian statist organizations.
If the officer was being a little less than truthful, I’m sure the tape has been misplaced. The DUI attorney would have known about it, if the Mesa police have the dash cameras.
Free men? We haven't been free for a long time : ( Our masters simply try to give us the illusion of freedom.
There's an 18 minute gap in the tape.
I have no great love of lawyers, and I try to respect the job cops do. But cops are getting more and more militarized these days, and have a far greater superiority/power lust than in years past.
“Berry adds that Gonzalez likely had no idea whom he was pulling over. Yes, police typically run license plates before making a traffic stop, but they’re mostly checking to make sure a vehicle isn’t stolen. He’s skeptical that Gonzalez actually recognized Squires’ name. “
Not the way my cop friends say they do it. They definitely look at the name on the registration when they run the plates.
Then they check to see if the name/address of the driver matches. Otherwise they then want to know why you’re driving a vehicle you don’t own.
I agree.
It was a sad day when I realized that I fear the cops more than the criminals.
I am totally with you.
As a certain radio personality says, “follow the money.” These days of speed traps and excessive DUI arrests tell anyone that the primary motivation on all this stuff is revenue.
They can talk all they want about how it costs money to prosecute so they don’t really make anything, but they all want it flowing in. “Protect and serve” has become “Arrest and soak.”
You don't think this happens in every state?
We need to nip this in the bud Andy, nip it in the bud!
I disagree.
I think the primary motivation is control (some people just can't stand the freedom embodied in a privately-owned and operated automobile).
The secondary motivation is revenue.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.